This is Our World and we know it best!


Free speech is considered to be a very important topic in mainstream political discourse, in fact it is considered to be one of the fundamental values of the world as we know it, that helps separate people into the “good” and “bad” guys. Good guys support free speech, bad guys are against it. However, the reality is that free speech in its current narrative is mostly an overblown balloon of hot air, all but ready to burst – recent events are pushing at its limits, before the facade will finally fall away.

The modern narrative about free speech can be easily destroyed in but one sentence: today National Socialists, the quintessential and universally designated “bad guys”, Nazi Thugs… are for freedom of speech. The mold is immediately broken and one has to ask “well how can that be?” The more realistic people, though they still hold the delusion of freedom of speech being an “intrinsic value”, comment that the Nazis only support freedom of speech for now, to spread their message so as to take power – once that is achieved they will suppress freedom of speech, thus they are ultimately against it, and so the narrative is preserved… except that these same people then turn around and say that to defend free speech they have to limit our access to it, which likewise destroys the entire narrative.

At the same time, one of the most common, and likewise one of the most ridiculous arguments that we are used to when dealing with our opponents, is one that goes a little something like this: “you nazi scum, only reason you are able to say the kind of things you say is because of the freedom of speech THIS society provides for you!” The idiocy of this statement should be clear to anyone with half a brain: why would a National Socialist state that we fight for NOT allow us to speak freely the dogma of National Socialism while also condemning its enemies? There is an old Cold War era soviet anecdote that works as a perfect rebuttal to this “argument”:

An american and a soviet citizen are arguing. The american declares At least MY society has freedom! I can walk up to the White House and shout ‘Reagan is a fucking idiot!!’ The soviet citizen just chuckles and says So what? I can walk up to the Kremlin and shout ‘Reagan is a fucking idiot’ too.

People at large can easily succumb to the delusion of free speech being some intrinsic value or right due to their nature as lemmings – the majority of the population is always supportive of the status quo just by virtue of it being the status quo. Unconscious conformity makes one believe that they are free, and since they play by the rules of the status quo they get all the benefits and punishments that it upholds as part of its rules.

Yet this creates the question: if free speech can be utilized in the way described prior at all, then surely it no longer has the properties of an absolute value, but that of a weapon. Much like a sword or a gun can be used to both commit and fight against injustice, same can be said of free speech and of its suppression. Thus it becomes a question of who wields free speech and the tools to suppress it, and for what ends, meaning that it can be used for good and ill by anyone, there is no fundamental value to it whatsoever, no more than a sword or a gun in of itself has fundamental value.

What has already been said above is really enough to  end the whole discussion on the nature of free speech, but we all know that people will build further rationalizations to support their delusions, unless we look under the hood and point out every single flaw in their primary argument and possible followup counter-arguments. So let us have a detailed and realistic look into the issue of free speech, and prove it to be the weapon that it is, and likewise look at the weapons deployed to suppress speech, how this completely erodes the mainstream conception of it as an intrinsic value, and what is the general Fascist/NS attitude towards free speech.


In order to make our point we must explore the context in which free speech is unmistakable for the weapon that it is, and answer if that context takes primacy over any other. To do this we will look to IMPERIUM by Francis Parker Yockey (all underscores in quoted segments of IMPERIUM in this article are my own, quoted texts in the same box are not necessarily presented in the same order as they appear in the book), namely the chapters of “The 20th Century Political Outlook” segment.

We will begin with the fundamental basics of the world of true politics (stripped of any other veneers, facades and window dressings, what one would be inclined to call the Machiavellian understanding of politics), which we can name “Power Politics”. Here Yockey provides us with the following crucial definition: Politics is activity in relation to power”. The inevitably necessary followup definition is that of power itself: “Power is a relation of control between two similar organisms.”

The world of Power Politics is made up of  political units. The simplest way to sum up everything that will be said about the nature of political units, is that they, for all intents and purposes follow the same fundamental principles as living organisms: “[…] the State can only be comprehended organically”. For example, these units are subject to what Yockey calls the Laws of Totality and Sovereignty. These laws, simply put, mean that the political unit, as any living organism, must be in full control of itself, least its very existence be threatened:

Totality refers both to issues within the organism and to persons within the organism. Any issue within the organism is subject to political determination, because every issue is potentially political. Any person in the organism is existentially embraced in the organism. Sovereignty places the decision in every important juncture with the organism. Both of these laws are existential, like all organic conditions: either the organism is true to them, or it is faced with sickness and death.


The Law of Sovereignty is the inner necessity of organic existence which places the decision in every important juncture with the organism, as opposed to allowing any group within to make the decision. An important juncture is any one which affects the organism as a whole, it’s steering in the world, its choice of allies and enemies, the decision of war and peace, its inner peace, its unchallenged inner right to decide controversies. If any of these can be called into question, it is a sign that the organism is sick. In the healthy organism, this sovereignty is absolutely undisputed, and may continue so for centuries.

If the political unit does not maintain its totality, it becomes divided, meaning that there are, in fact, several political units present, and what used to be whole becomes fractured and there exists a potential for conflict between the fractured parts (the topic of conflict will be discussed in the following segment of this article). If the fate of the political unit is being decided by one of its component parts, or a force that resides outside this particular political unit (ergo by a foreign political unit), then the laws of totality and sovereignty have been broken and the political unit ceases to exist in point of fact – it is now no more than an extension of another political unit.

The first crucial lesson to take away, one directly relevant to our primary topic of discussion, is that free speech is one of the issues that can, and inevitably does become political, thereby also becoming subject to the world of Power Politics and everything that entails. In the context of this purely political outlook, where all activity exists in relation to power, free speech is likewise a form of activity that can only be evaluated in terms of its relation to power. In true politics there are two simultaneous consequences of any action, including free speech and the suppression of speech: every action serves to increase power in one political unit and decrease it in another. Yockey covers this by talking about the Laws of Constancy of Inter- and Intra- Organismic Power:

Law of Constancy of Inter-Organismic Power: “In any age, the amount of power in a State-system is constant, and if one organic unit is diminished in power, another unit, or other units are increased in power by the same amount.

Law of Constancy of Intra-Organismic Power: “The power within an organism is constant, and if individuals, groups, or ideas within the organism are diminished in power, some other individuals, groups, or ideas are increased in power by that amount.

We will discuss how this turns free speech into a weapon in greater detail in the segment on conflict.

The second crucial lesson that can be learned from what has been explained thus far, is that any political unit is “totalitarian” – if it were not, it would cease to exist by virtue of all the laws we had discussed so far. We are all well aware of the modern narrative when it comes to this word and the kind of whining, whaling and cautionary tales that it evokes. However these are all futile, for even the most freedom loving groups that engage in true politics – Power Politics (and engage in them they must if they truly want to pursue and enact their beliefs in reality rather than just pay lip-service to them) – are subject to these laws.

All political units are “totalitarian”, regardless if they are liberal, democratic, communist (and it pains me to once again point out how the real stated goal of communism is a stateless, classless society, rather than any form of an all-powerful nanny state, hence it likewise seeks some form of freedom)  or anything else. However, as we will discuss in the segment on liberalism, these lovers of freedom operate under a delusion of not pursuing a totalitarian goal by virtue of consciously operating in a different, non-political context. Nevertheless, in point of fact they are unconsciously operating according to all the rules of Power Politics. One may think they oppose “totalitarianism” in favor of “freedom” per the context of their outlook and its stated narratives, however, if they wish to enact real social change, then by necessity they must engage in Power Politics and the only way to win in that field is if they follow all the laws, principles and tactics thereof. That is how their cognitive dissonance is born. Again, more on this later.


If it is not yet clear, in the world of Power Politics everything revolves around the acquisition and retention of power. As a result, everything within the scope of the world of politics becomes divided in any given situation into two sides: friend and enemy. This is ALWAYS the case, whenever someone attempts to introduce a different way of division, that means that they are regarding the situation from a NON-POLITICAL viewpoint. As Yockey remarks, Morality distinguishes between good and evil; aesthetics between beautiful and ugly; economics, in its initial phase, between utile and inutile, and in its later and purely trading phase these become identical with profitable and unprofitable. The distinct division between Power Politics and these other viewpoints is that only the former deals with assuring the existence of one’s respective political unit:

“The enemy can be good, he can be beautiful, he may be economically utile, business with him may be profitable – but if his power activity converges on mine, he is my enemy. He is that one with whom existential conflicts are possible. But esthetics, economics, morality are not concerned with existence, but only with norms of activity and thinking within an assured existence.”

This is where we define the primacy of Power Politics over all other outlooks: it is only by virtue of Power Politics and its respective laws that the very existence of a political unit, like the State and the society it governs, is assured, hence demanding one to follow the laws of the political outlook. Only after existence is assured is there room for other considerations. The only way one can truly change a society is if they engage the ruling State as a political unit at war with the political unit of the State, and freedom of speech becomes one of the weapons in that war. If the changes one seeks to enact can be accommodated by the State, then in point of fact they are not vast enough to threaten its existence as a political unit, they take on an entirely secondary characteristic, and are most likely just a variation on the norms of activity and thinking already embraced by the State.

The State as a political unit can be founded on certain principles and a certain outlook, however when conflict arises, internal or external, as it inevitably does, the State will by necessity have to engage in its natural mode of action as a political unit, regardless of its professed principles and foundations, for if it does not it will inevitably perish. The same is true for whomever wants to change society according to their outlook and the values of that outlook.

A truly Organic State, which is the goal of National Socialists and Fascists, seeks to put all things in their proper place and make sure that they follow their inherent nature. Therefore, our understanding of the State follows its natural Power Politics dynamics at all times in perfect harmony, as opposed to what occurs in Liberal politics – more on both later in their respective segments.

For the purposes of our discussion of free speech we need only to focus on the internal conflict of a political unit, for if one political unit could affect the utilization of speech in another, foreign political unit, then in point of fact the latter unit’s Totality and Sovereignty have been broken and it ceases to exist as a true political unit in its original form. So let us consider the dynamics of an internal conflict.

If a religious difference, an economic contrast, an ideological disjunction, were to reach the degree of intensity of feeling at which it would range men against one another as enemies, it would thereby become political, and such units as formed would be political units and would be guided by a political way of maneuvering, thinking, and valuing, and not by a religious, economic or other way of thinking.

The seed of internal conflict most always resides in some outlook that is not accommodated by the existing status quo, established by the political unit of the State, because this outlook is contradictory to the one professed by those in power, and thus this competing outlook is regarded as a potential threat to the existence of the political unit.

There are, of course, scenarios where two or more groups within the same State may reach a level of opposition between themselves that may lead to armed conflict and civil war, in which case the Laws of Totality and Sovereignty are likewise broken and several political entities come to exist instead of the one. However, for the sake of our discussion on free speech we are only focusing on the opposition between a single internal group and the State.

The conflict between them can take on only two distinct forms. The first is where the political unit of the State is sick and thus cannot mount real resistance to the competing political entity, thereby its slow loss of power results in the rise of its enemy’s power. This is often the case, when the ruling Power refuses to act according to the laws of Power Politics because it refuses to accept the political outlook on the situation, in place of its own (whatever it may be). When the State, as a political unit, does not act according to its nature as such, it is in effect sick and gives up its power without a fight.

An organism either follows its own law, or it becomes ill. This is organic logic and governs all organisms, plant, animal, man, High Culture. They are either themselves, or they sicken and die. Not for them is the rational and logical view which says that whatever can be cogently written down into a system can be foisted on to an organism.

One can easily see examples of this in the history of our own struggle, where the political units of the German and Italian states had willingly given up their power to our predecessors, whereupon those political units ceased to exist, only to be replaced by the Italian Fascist State and the Third Reich. They had done this because they either outright refused to fight (Victor Emmanuel the IIIrd conceded to Mussolini’s demands after the March on Rome), or because they maintained loyalty to a non-political outlook that created a conflict between their upheld values and the action that was necessary to maintain their power (Weimar Republic unable to contain Hitler’s ascent to power by democratic means, not that they had, by then, any chance to contain him by forceful means of Power Politics either), resulting in the ultimate defeat of their values. Something similar is likewise described by Savitri Devi in her book “Lightning and the Sun”, when she speaks of the Egyptian Pharaoh Akhnaton.

The second form is the one, where the political unit of the State does offer resistance to the enemy that seeks to take the power for itself. In this situation it is the State that acts out in defense of its existence, and in doing so provokes an open conflict that may escalate to war: “[…] it is the victim who makes the war.” 

The State can decide to either carry out preemptive, non-violent means of containing and neutralizing potential threats before they have the power to truly converge against it, or it can wait until such a point in time when it will have no other resolve but to use force against a fully realized enemy, a rival political entity that challenges its own existence.

If however a disjunction occurs in the population of a State which is so deep and strong that it divides them into friends and enemies, it shows that the State, at least temporarily, does not exist in fact.


If the State has to resort to force, this in itself shows that there are two political units, in other words, two States instead of the one originally there.


The essence of the State is that within its realm it excludes the possibility of a friend-enemy grouping. Thus conflicts occurring within a State are by their nature limited, whereas the truly political conflict is unlimited.

From what has been said so far the goal of utilizing preemptive countermeasures to the growth of any group into a real political enemy should be self evident, as these means prevent, or rather delay, an unlimited, political conflict – war.

[…] war is an armed struggle between organized political units.


[…] the State never permits subjects to make war. If a group of subjects assume this power, a new State has arisen.


War is the highest possible expression of the friend-enemy disjunction.  It confers the practical meaning on the word enemy. The enemy is he upon whom one is preparing to make or upon whom one is making war. If there is no question of war he is not an enemy. He may be a mere opponent in a contest for a prize, he may be a mere heathen, a mere ideological opponent, a competitor, a hateful thing for reasons of antipathy. The minute he becomes an enemy, the possibility or actuality of armed struggle war, enters.


War does not have however a motivation of its own – this is supplied by politics. As is the intensity of the political struggle, i.e., of the enmity, so is the war.


Motives other than strictly political ones can indeed actuate a war – but the war takes them up into itself, and they vanish into it.


The phrase political soldier is only ad hoc, to designate anyone fighting from conviction, rather than from profession.

To sum up what has been said in regards to a State that is willing to fight for its existence against a threat of a single group: the State may use various means of preventing (or only delaying) the formation of an internal grouping that may become a perspective threat in the first place; if such a group does come about the State may attempt to deploy means that would prevent (delay) the growth of this group into a a true political enemy; and if it fails at that it will switch over to means of unlimited warfare against a fully developed enemy. Thus revolutions are born.

Such groups may arise out of motives rooted in conviction and dedication to a certain outlook, however, as we have already established by now, if a group wants to enact the values of their outlook in reality, they must submit to the rules of Power Politics.

Let us now introduce free speech into a conflict within the world of Power Politics:

To ensure their own existence AS the status quo, the powers that be (the Rulers) provide sanctions and punishments for those who would take up views that are contrary to the views on which the power of the Rulers resides (the Opposition). Thus the conflict of freedom of speech is born: where the Rulers do provide some scope of free speech, but only so long as this speech does not defy the status quo upon which their power resides; and where the Opposition take up the weapon of free speech as a means of overcoming the Rulers.

The Rulers represent an entity that holds the power, and when it feels its power threatened it becomes an existential conflict, within which no other distinction than friend and enemy may exist. This is what defines the scope of permitted free speech in a given society: so long as your speech does NOT threaten the existence of the status quo that maintains the Rulers in power (in other words the Totality and Sovereignty of the political unit of the State) you are not regarded as an enemy and your speech is not a threat. As a result you are relegated to a different, secondary viewpoint from which you may be regarded, one of morality, economics or whatever else.

The Opposition, if it is real, is by necessity an entity that holds views that definitively threaten the existence of the status quo (the Totality and Sovereignty of the political unit), and the Rulers that rely on it. They are regarded as an enemy, they exist outside the scope of that which is permitted, hence their speech must be limited and the necessary weapons of suppressing it are employed, while the Opposition may employ the weapon of free speech to destroy the existing status quo, the rival political unit, and substitute it with its own.

Were that to occur, the roles become reversed, and the former Rulers become the Opposition, and thus their methods, tactics and weapons become those of the Opposition – likewise the former opposition become Rulers with everything that entails, all of this, of course, strictly existing within the realm of Power Politics.

This is the naked truth of Power Politics, one that takes primacy over any and all other considerations and viewpoints if the political unit wishes to assure its existence. Let us now proceed towards examining the modern, liberal outlook on politics, which is the source of the delusions and cognitive dissonance on what has been posited herein so far.


As we established, in order for a political unit to assure its existence it must follow its own nature as such and submit to the laws and workings of the world of Power Politics. If it does not, then, as a political unit subject to these laws, it is sick and dying, its existence is now under threat.

Therefore, the inevitable conclusion is this: if a political unit puts primacy into an outlook that is anything but political, that pertains to anything outside the world of Power Politics, and this outlook does not coincide with the necessities of Power Politics, the political unit is doomed. If the political outlook demands one thing, while the outlook of the status quo demands another, either the political unit will sacrifice itself for the sake of the non-political outlook (which in of itself is a non-political decision, signaling the primacy of that outlook), or it will sacrifice the outlook inasmuch as it has to in order to survive (which makes it a bad representative of that outlook).

To put it bluntly: if the non-political outlook is not one that is harmonious with the political outlook, the political unit will inevitably either cease to exist or betray its values. Extinction or hypocrisy are the only outcomes in this scenario. Simplest example of this would an outlook that prizes pacifism and neutrality:

For a country to become neutral as a form of existence would be to cease to exist as a political unit. It might continue to exist economically, socially, culturally, but politically it could not exist if it were neutral.


Politics and neutrality exclude one another, as do neutrality and continued existence.


To renounce politics – which is what total neutrality means – is to renounce existence as a unit. 

Any political unit that declares its neutrality in effect simply ceases to exist as a political unit within the world of Power Politics and instead becomes a game piece and resource for political units that do exist – remember the Law of Constancy of Inter-Organismic Power.

Here we finally come to the world of Modern Politics, namely Liberal “Politics”, the quotation marks signifying a drastic departure of the Liberal narrative from the laws of real politics – Power Politics. The entire foundation of Liberalism has always been one that purposely sought to leave behind all realities of Power Politics, declaring them to be a “thing of the past” in the face of a brave new world, where there would be no more wars and other such nonsense. It was always the express goal of Liberalism to depart from this fundamental reality in favor of its own made up formulas, as it does with all things. Classical liberalism screams that it wants nothing to do with the real world, the world of Power Politics, as it declared the State to have no more function than to be the “guard dog” of Society, one that defends it from external threats via the military and maintains internal order via the police.

Liberalism is in essence nonpolitical; it is outside of politics. It would like to have politics serve as the handmaid of economics and society.

Laws of Totality and Sovereignty are immediately sacrificed to liberal whims with that proclamation, thus the notion of a political unit upholding liberal values inevitably faces that very choice we have isolated prior: extinction or hypocrisy.

Let us further dive into the nature of Liberalism:

The touchstone of any political theory whatever is its attitude to the fundamental ethical quality of human nature.


Every Rationalistic political or State theory regards man as “good” by nature.


All Liberalism predicates a sensualistic, materialistic philosophy. Such philosophies are rationalistic in tendency, and Liberalism is simply one variety of politically applied rationalism. 


Liberalism is Rationalism in politics.


Liberalism, however, with its compromising, vague attitude, incapable of precise formulation, incapable also of rousing precise feelings ,either affirmative or negative, is not an idea of political force […] it was not a political idea, but only an idea about politics. Its followers had to be for or against other ideas as a means of expressing their liberalism.

Having completely denied the political outlook, Liberalism instead sought to elevate the outlooks of economics and ethics to primacy over all else, subjugating the State and politics to this outlook, giving them an entirely different meaning, one that is foreign to their inherent nature.

Here Liberalism found its two poles of thought: economics and ethics. They correspond to individual and humanity. The ethics of course is purely social, materialistic; if older ethics is retained, its former metaphysical foundation is forgotten, and it is promulgated as a social, and not a religious, imperative. Ethics is necessary to maintain the order necessary as a framework for economic activity. Within that framework however, “the individual” must be “free”. This is the great cry of Liberalism, “freedom.” Man is only himself, and is not tied to anything except by choice. Thus “society” is the “free” association of men and groups. The State, however, is unfreedom, compulsion, violence. The Church is spiritual unfreedom.

All things in the political domain were transvalued by Liberalism. War was transformed into either competition, seen from the economic pole, or ideological difference, seen from the ethical pole. […] The State becomes society or humanity on the ethical side, a production and trade system on the economic side. The will to accomplish a political aim is transformed into making of a program of “social ideas” on the ethical side, of calculation on the economic side. Power becomes propaganda, ethically speaking, and regulation, economically speaking.

Hence, liberalism goes further still against the Laws of Totality and Sovereignty: first with the diminishing of the State’s natural domain of power, second with the purposeful division of society into a fractured multitude of individuals and groups. Liberalism then seeks to establish a “balance” between these fractured pieces and employs Democracy as its tool of choice for this purpose, which only creates further, devastating contradictions, leading Liberalism down the path of its own demise:

Another important by-product of Rationalism is Democracy.


[…] to Rationalism, not quality but quantity determines, so the mass became the nation.


Democracy is not a retreat from Reality, from war, History and Politics, like Liberalism. It remains within politics, but seeks to make politics a thing of mass. It seeks to make everyone subject to politics, and to make everyone into a politician.

[…] it forced everyone to have an opinion on matters of government, it forced him then to express the opinion in plebiscites and elections. If he had no independent opinion – and more than 99% of men do not – it forced an opinion on him, and told him it was his.

Liberalism employed Democracy to serve its outlook of ethics and economics: the former is where the contradiction lies, as Liberalism thought Democracy would create the necessary compromise and balance of powers within society fractured into individuals and groups. Never mind that this organization of society into free groups and free individuals once again goes against the nature of the State as a political unit, hence placing it in danger of extinction along with its Liberal values:

All the organizations would have their claim on the individual, who would be bound to a “plurality of obligations and loyalties.” The organization would have relations and mutual interests but no subjection to the State, which would be merely an organization among organizations, not even primes inter pares.

Such a pluralistic State is of course not a political organism. If an external danger were to threaten such a State, it would either succumb at once, or else fight, in which case it would become at once a political organism, and the “pluralism” would vanish.


In reality there is no such thing as a “political association” or a “political society” – there can only be a political unit, a political organism.

The bigger issue is that in reality, democracy only facilitates a struggle for power that is fully in line with the political outlook that Liberalism sought to escape. By forcing politics onto every single individual and group, it created a potentiality of every individual and group becoming the seed of a political unit, and where the masses lack comprehension of the theoretical, they make up for with raw instinct, hence they all inevitably, unconsciously submit to the laws of Power Politics. Thus every potential political unit became a potential enemy.

Democracy seeks no compromise, no “balancing”, no destruction of authority – it seeks power.

And yet the liberals are somehow actually surprised that their fostered system of opposing views leads to an internal conflict that follows the laws of Power Politics, and are appalled by the idea that the conflict is meant to reach its natural conclusion of someone winning and the rest losing, hence destroying their entire desired balance and pluralism of opposing thought. Any competition by its very nature must have a winner, and in the world of Power Politics that competition is war, and the prize is power. Meanwhile Liberalism wants to do away with this reality in favor of some mythical state of a perpetual balancing act, where everyone competes only within certain limits.

There certainly can be that kind of competition, but only for so long – the very moment an outlook takes root anywhere within this balancing act, that is fundamentally opposed to the entire Liberal status quo, a potential enemy in the political sense has appeared, and his victory signals the dissolution of the balancing act and of the entire Liberal structure, if it keeps true to its values, as it did in Weimar Republic. Liberalism fosters the seeds of its own inevitable destruction, and so it again faces the choice: extinction or hypocrisy.

When it comes to economics, on the other hand, Democracy was successfully utilized by Liberalism in its battle against Authority.

A moment’s reflection shows that Liberalism is entirely negative. It is not a formative force, but always and only a disintegrating force. It wishes to depose the twin authorities of Church and State, substituting for them economic freedom and social ethics.


Liberalism can only be defined negatively. It is a mere critique, not a living idea. Its great word “freedom” is a negative it means in fact, freedom from authority, i.e., disintegration of the organism. In its last stages it produces social atomism, in which not only the authority of the State is combated, but even the authority of society and the family.


Liberalism was never entirely successful in its fight against the State, despite the fact that it engaged in political activity throughout the 19th century in alliance with every other type of State-disintegrating force. Thus there were National-Liberals, Social-Liberals, Free-Conservatives, Liberal-Catholics. They allied themselves with democracy, which is not Liberal, but irresistibly authoritarian in success.


The idea of “balance of power,” a technic of weakening the State, is Liberal throughout. By this means the State is to be rendered subject to economics. It cannot be called a State theory, for it is a mere negative.

One may be so inclined to stop us and say at this junction that we have just argued against our point with one of the quotes above, that states democracy to be “irresistibly authoritarian in success”. The crucial part of this quote, however, is “in success”, because in success democracy ceased to be itself:

One characteristic of Democracy was that it rejected the aristocratic principle which equated social significance with political significance. It wished to turn this around and make social dependent on political. This of course was merely the foundation of a new aristocracy, and in very fact democracy was self-destructive: when it attained power, it turned into aristocracy.


For, in everything, Democracy must fail, even in success.

If Democracy is to remain true to its principles then once an undemocratic political force takes over by democratic means it will abolish Democracy, and if Democracy attempts to resist this advance, it will cease to be democratic – extinction or hypocrisy.

In modern Liberal politics there likewise exists a new kind of aristocracy in the form of the existing political and media classes. The real power, however, lies in the anonymous business class, which democracy had served to empower for Liberalism.

Thus Democracy in fact was throughout most of its history a servant of Economics in its battle against Authority.


[…] this followed inevitably from the idea of independence of economics and law from political authority. There is nothing higher, no State, it is only individuals against one another. It is but natural that the economically more astute individuals accumulate most of the mobile wealth into their hands. They do not however, if they are true Liberals, want authority with this wealth, for authority has two aspects: power, and responsibility. Individualism, psychologically speaking, is egoism. “Happiness” = selfishness.


[…] it was solely the financier whose interest was served by the constitutionalized anarchy called Democracy. The word democracy thus passed into the possession of Money. 


But Democracy perishes with Rationalism. The idea of basing political power on the masses of the population was a technic at best. Either it proceeded to authoritarian rule like that of Napoleon or Mussolini, or else it was a mere cover for unhampered looting by the financier.


Having leveled all the political and social powers, Rationalism can now look upon the monster of its own creation, the absolute power of Money. This new power is unformulated, anonymous, irresponsible. The most powerful money-magnates are not well-known to the masses, nor do they wish to be. Fame, responsibility, and sanctions go together. The Master of Money desires no limelight, no risk of life, but only money and ever more money. Party politicians exist only to protect him and his operations. The courts are there to enforce his usury. The remnants of the State are there to do him service. Armies march when his trade system is challenged. He is subject to nothing, he is the new Sovereign. He is above nations, and his banking operations transcend national laws.

How vividly familiar that last quote sounds, “almost” like we are living it right now.

By now it should be clear that Liberalism has purposely created a precarious house of cards doomed for failure by ignoring the fundamental realities of Power Politics, sacrificing them in favor of their theories and values that only create further instability and the ever encroaching inevitable choice between extinction and hypocrisy.

Modern day realities are mounting evidence of hypocrisy gaining favor with the Liberal states of today, and any person can easily think of several examples off the top of their head. This article was foremost prompted by the recent events in the aftermath of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, so we will focus on the example of the United States to make our case.

USA is clearly heading into the direction of choosing hypocrisy in order to maintain its existence, proving that all of its fundamental rhetoric and values will only remain such until push comes to shove. It does, however, as any political unit will, everything it can to prevent the formation of a true political enemy by various means, some of which do not yet expose the encroaching hypocrisy, while others do.

This organic right to determine the inner enemy is not always exercised in the same manner. It may be open: arrest, sudden attack, shooting down at home, butchery in the streets. It may be concealed: drawing up of punitive laws general in their terms but applying in fact only to one group. It may be purely formless, but nonetheless real: the ruler may attack verbally the individual or group in question. Such a declaration may be used only to intimidate, or it may be a method of bringing about assassination. It may be economic pressure – such a tactic is naturally the favorite of Liberals. A “blacklist” or boycott may destroy the group or individual.

It goes without saying that the exercise of such a right has no connection whatever with any written “constitution” which purports verbally to distribute the public power in a political unit. Such a “constitution” may forbid such a declaration of inner enemy, but units with such a constitution have never hesitated in need, and have often invoked such procedure independently of need.

Suppression of free speech is one of the tactics that can be employed by the State to prevent the formation of a true enemy, or to combat one when it forms. However the methods of suppression can differ, from “hard” censorship, to “soft” and indirect censorship. Most people can only imagine censorship as being hard, the way it was described in “1984”. Orwell’s primary sin with his novel is that he made people all the more blind to the more subtle approaches of speech suppression (for all intents and purposes all he did was point out the obvious until such a point, when people couldn’t see anything but the obvious), that in their nature seem to only uphold free speech further, rather than suppress it. The prime example of this type of “soft” censorship is oversaturation of the channels of expression with “white noise” – useless information, the sheer quantity of which will be enough to bury out of sight, and thus suppress, other forms of speech.

The Liberal state and its primary benefactors, anonymous money-magnates, have superior resources to produce such noise at a constant pace and will gladly give a helping hand to independent noise makers, by placing them front and center, suppressing the speech of undesirable actors by simple omission. The next logical step to this approach would be to separate undesirable speech into a specially designated area, which is still kept out of sight of the public.

It doesn’t matter what platform of medium of speech one uses, all the same methods apply across the board, because the real subject is not the medium, but speech itself, thus the Internet offers no real breakthrough. In fact, the anonymous power of money actually holds even more sway online, as the nonstop hounding of the DailyStormer proves. The ongoing situation with YouTube serves as an example of the white noise method and the subsequent isolation of undesirable speech, and even supposed platforms of free speech like have shown themselves to be no different, as it likewise favors only certain kind of speech, and discriminates which users can, in effect, utilize one of its fundamental features –  “boosting content”. White noise and permitted speech can be boosted to make a wider audience pay notice to it, undesirable speech is rejected from utilizing this function, and is thus buried beneath the nonstop flow of the former.

The last step in this progression is the “hard” censorship everyone expects: to outright forbid and remove and undesirable speech altogether. While the anonymous power of money can do this rampantly online, where companies can outline the terms of service of their platforms as they see fit, this is not as simple to do in reality if the Liberal status quo wishes to maintain its facade. The United States, however, attempts to, and ultimately has to do just that, as free speech ranks #1 on the Bill of Rights. To hide the inescapable fact that USA has already chosen hypocrisy over extinction it must find ways of direct speech suppression that go around its stated values.

Hence, the status quo commits to indirect censorship as it takes into its employ “independent” actors (and perhaps these actors don’t know who is really pulling their strings) to do the dirty work for it. In a liberal society of balancing acts there are plenty of sides to choose from that exist in tension or open conflict with one another, making the choice of a pawn with a common enemy to the status quo easy. Enter the Antifa and SJW crowds, who act as censors where the State cannot, and moreover, much of the ideas these groups promote are readily enacted by the State into law, so long as these ideas don’t overstep certain boundaries and likewise don’t go against the facade of the State. Such is the case with the constant SJW demand to denounce “Hate Speech”, as doing so would indeed dismantle the facade being so desperately preserved. This, of course, points to either these groups being an extension of the State, or, more likely, both the State and these groups exist as an extension of the anonymous power of money, and the name of George Soros serves a prime example of this kind of power influencing both, though he is certainly not the only one engaged in such machinations that Liberalism made possible.

Soon as any kind of undesirable speech makes its way into reality in the form of a public engagement, such as a speech at a university, or a public gathering, the State will allow the opponents of the message being promoted to show up and cause trouble, as this gives the officials responsible for hosting the event an innocent reason to shut it down on grounds of concern over safety and security (and if the event is staged solely by the Antifa itself, it provides the justification the State needs to shut it down all on its own). Meanwhile Charlottesville has already proven that the State will gladly allow and even facilitate physical confrontations to occur in the first place with the specific intent of shutting down an event they deem undesirable, thus maintaining the Liberal facade while engaged in Power Politics. The event also served to provide the necessary excuse for radically increased censorship of undesirable speech online by private companies, which is all, likewise, in line with the ultimate goal of suppressing speech of the potential enemies.

In short: if you are a potential threat, a potential enemy to the Liberal state, and this state has chosen to secure its own existence at the expense of its liberal values, all the while desperately trying to maintain the facade of upholding them, it will:

  • Drown your speech out with noise,
  • Cordon it off in a proverbial speech-ghetto,
  • Manipulate an unwitting pawn to forcefully censor you for it.

And all of this will be facilitated by the anonymous power of money. The facade will fall only when these measures are exhausted and the State faces an immediate threat of war and extinction on its hand, when the opposition has successfully grown into a political unit and an enemy of the status quo. When one considers our modern day circumstances they will inevitably have to admit two things: that the Liberal state has already made its choice in favor of hypocrisy, rather than extinction; and that free speech and the suppression thereof are weapons in a conflict of Power Politics.

The only people who will hold out against this conclusion are the self-professed classical, rational liberals (a good amount of whom one is most likely familiar with today via their YouTube channels), who are in effect Liberal idealists with no political power what-so-ever. Having no real political power in their hands they do not have to consider the world of Power Politics and the choices it presents at all, in fact they don’t have to comprehend anything outside the Liberal outlook, because that is the predominant outlook that exists today. Only thing that differentiates them from lemmings, is that they are actual, true believers of the liberal outlook, rather than passive conformists to whatever status quo exists.

Since these types have no engagement in real Power Politics but only theoretical Liberal “politics” they don’t have to face the dilemma of extinction or hypocrisy, instead they enjoy the luxury of dealing exclusively in the liberal ideals, hence their constant baffled reaction to most all of the realities we have outlined this far. Since they don’t have to acknowledge or face the dilemma presented by the undeniable primacy of Power Politics, they are free to pay lip-service to their ideals and scold everyone else for not playing by the rules, which is the only real defense liberalism can mount: pacifying its enemies into accepting its rules and to play by them, rendering them likewise non-political. In other words, they demand that one disengage from Power Politics and engage solely in Liberal Politics, thereby crowning Liberalism the default winner.

The fighting proletariat of the Communists became in such a pluralistic State also a politically neutral trade-union or party.

They likely don’t themselves comprehend that this is what they are in effect doing, and recognize even less how this can never, in effect, restrain Power Politics from taking over. Liberal politics do nothing for their participants, regardless of their creed, as all are meant to be pacified for the sake of Liberalism. Say a party or candidate professing certain views and policies take power – they can only enact those policies within certain limitations established by this system, which prevents them from changing the System drastically (and if it did allow this, it would cease to exist then and there, as we have repeatedly established prior); opposing parties are often permitted to get in the way of these policies being enacted; sometimes the leader of the state does not belong to the ruling party and thus continue to nullify each other’s policies; limitation of successive terms prevent a popular leader or party from continued realization of their policies, and suffer constant setbacks when the opposing side is elected into office and dismantles their work; and, of course, the anonymous power of money rules from behind the scenes and can easily manipulate all parties and leaders involved towards its own benefit. In the end the entire practice of party politics is an extension of fracturing and division, all of which exists in clear contradiction to Power Politics, thus everyone involved in the practice lie not only to their electorate, but to themselves as well.

[…] party-politicans deal in lies from inner compulsion, for their activity itself is an organic lie.


One can retain non-political ideas privately, but if they become public they vanish into the political. The result is politics dressed in moral clothing.


Thus morality in politics makes bad politics if taken seriously, and if used cynically, it dishonors him who uses it.

All this does is perpetuate Liberal Politics without ever enacting any real change or achieving any substantial goal, other than preserving the power of money. This, of course, is what Sir Oswald Mosley had talked about in his own time, and what he sought to rectify with his proposals, the full context of which may now appear clearer, if one keeps in mind what we have established in this article.

We have no real democracy at the present time, because again and again since the war the country has voted for great changes and for decisive action, yet again and again their will has been thwarted by obstruction in the talking shop at Westminster. True democracy only begins, when the will of people is carried out.

“Democracy is authoritarain in success”. In true democracy, once a side wins, it gains the power to unrestrained political action. Liberalism introduces these restraints because it has sought to destroy authority but maintain the state as a means of serving its economic and social outlook. And what if it is the will of the people to END democracy? As was the case in Weimar Germany, considering how Adolf Hitler had expressly promised as part of his campaign to put an end to chaos of innumerable political parties, and so he did.

This situation of constant pacification will inevitably lead to unrest of those true believers of their outlook, who refuse to be pacified, and can identify how Liberal Politics present not a path to power so that they may enact their sought after societal change, but rather a trap to prevent them from ever achieving their goals. The entire nefarious setup can be depicted as a mouse in a running wheel, desperately pursuing a morsel of cheese suspended out of reach. Thus Liberal Politics are cast aside and Power Politics inevitably take their place, creating the potential formation of a real enemy to the Liberal status quo, forcing onto Liberalism the dilemma of extinction or hypocrisy, and free speech becomes the offensive weapon of the competing outlook, while its suppression becomes the defensive weapon of the status quo. As we have stated earlier, the division and competition promoted by Liberalism serves as its own undoing.

The self-professed classical, rational liberals that we have mentioned prior are the only side in the topic of free speech who operate from a purely non-political outlook, since even their own Liberal state has now opted for hypocrisy in order to assure its own existence, a fact that these true believers cannot appreciate. They insist on maintaining free speech as an absolute value, because they believe that everyone will operate under the rules of Liberal Politics, hence the “bad messages” can be heard out loud and dismissed. Reality, however, is much different for those who have engaged in Power Politics, where having your message heard is not the definitive tool for victory, but an auxiliary one. Free speech assists revolutions, but the actual revolution is the work of revolutionary hands, those who had stepped outside Liberal Politics into the world of Power Politics.

Liberalism, thus, can offer no defense of itself within its own rules against a political force acting according to the laws of Power Politics. Liberalism, as the negative and critical phenomenon that it is, is most effective and true to itself only on the offensive as a force of dissolution, much like its relatives Anarchism and Communism, although the latter of the two has been effectively dead for decades, with its remnants having been absorbed into the so-called “regressives”, a.k.a Social Justice Warriors/Neoliberals/Cultural Marxists. Frankly, any one of these labels is far more accurate than “regressives”, which is used by classical liberals to distance themselves from their own spawn. Indeed, “regressives” are merely a younger breed of liberalism, one that still has criticism to offer where classical liberalism does not, thus the former is still an active force, while the latter is a static force. Quite paradoxically this proves that Liberalism can only continue to fight for its existence successfully, within the framework of its own outlook so as to maintain its idealistic integrity, only if it begins to consume itself.

When it comes to Anarchism and Communism, we’ll provide the following Yockey quotes:

The assumption of the goodness of human nature developed two main branches of theory. Anarchism is the result of radical acceptance of this assumption. Liberalism uses the assumption merely to weaken the State and make it subservient to “society”.


Thus Liberalism has no objection to individuals being more powerful than the State, being above the law. What Liberalism dislikes is authority. The  State, as the grandest symbol of authority, is hated.


Rationalism became more extreme with each decade. Its most intransigent product is Communism.


Communism is the symbol of the transference of the democratic struggle to the sphere of economics.

Liberalism feeds the goal of Anarchism on its way to dismantling the State altogether, as well as validates Communism in its economic struggle. Where these things differ, however, is that Communism and Anarchism are actual ideas of political force, unlike Liberalism, which we have already identified to be as nonpolitical, or even anti-political by nature.

Anarchism, the radical denial of the State, and of all organization whatever, is an idea of genuine political force.


Anarchism was able to rouse men to sacrifice of life, not so Liberalism. It is one thing to die to wipe out all order, all State; it is quite another to die in order to bring about a decentralization of State power.


It would be cruel and insane to ask men to die in order that the remainder would have an unimpaired, or higher standard of economic life.


But Communism was political, unlike Liberalism, and named an enemy who must be annihilated – the bourgeoisie.

What this in effect means, is that at this stage Anarchism and Communism (not so much, due to it extinction) still have something to fight for, they have either a fundamental goal or a fundamental enemy against which to rouse their adherents as a real political unit. All Liberalism can offer is for men to fight and die for consumerist goods and economic well being, for pure hedonism with no greater value attached even as a nominal rationalization for sacrifice. Atomistic individualism = egoism. Happiness = selfishness. One who values their own well being and pleasure above all else cannot be motivated to give up their life, and to demand that they do so in order that others may carry on doing that while he cannot is absurd. And at the end of the day, nobody, liberal or otherwise, will sacrifice their life for a toaster.

Reason is quantitative, not qualitative, and thus makes the average man into “Man.” “Man” is a thing of food, clothing, shelter, social and family life, and leisure. Politics sometimes demands sacrifice of life for invisible things. This is against “happiness,” and must not be.

Meanwhile the “regressives” simply fight against further vestiges of authority while trying to maintain the state as the servant of ethics and economics. They are the logical progression of liberal ideals and values, or rather of liberal criticism of any real ideals and values, going further still than merely denying the reality of Power Politics to deny basic reality that exists in hard facts of biology.

Regardless, all of these sides, except for the true believers of classical liberalism, are engaged in Power Politics, and thus utilize free speech and suppression thereof as a weapon, The competing sides other than the Liberal State promote their own speech as free speech, and demand the suppression of speech for their competition in the struggle for power. This goes against the liberal narrative of free speech as a fundamental right, but exists fully in line with the realities of Power Politics, where free speech is naught but a weapon, and limiting your enemy’s access to weapons is only natural, and to be expected.

In the end Liberalism will not prevail and will perish by virtue of its opposition to reality and Truth. And reality has come a-knocking.

Using inorganic logic to construct a program for actuality does not change the fact that an organism has its own structure, development, and tempo.


In a crisis, Liberalism as such was not to be found.


We have started out this article positing that in the current climate National Socialists are actually in favor of free speech. This is indeed the case, because in the current climate free speech serves us as a weapon in the fight against the status quo, which we wish to overturn and establish in its place the Organic State of Fascism/National Socialism. However one will be logically inclined to ask if free speech will be curtailed immediately thereafter.

We have likewise talked about how all political units are “totalitarian” by their nature because they retain in potentiality the power to influence and control any issue or person within their domain. Let us now clarify this further with an explanation on the polemical nature of political language.

Invariably the concepts, ideas, and vocabulary of a political group are polemical, propagandistic. This is true throughout all higher history. The words State, class, King, society – all have their polemical content, and they have an entirely different meaning to partisans from what they have to opponents. Dictatorship, government of laws, proletariat, bourgeoisie these words have no meaning other than their polemical one, and one does not know what they are intended to convey unless one knows also who is using them and against whom.


This use of the word “people” shows again the necessarily polemical nature of all words used politically. “People” was merely a negative; it merely wished to deny that the dynasty, or else the aristocracy, belonged to “the people.” It was thus an attempt to deny the monarch or aristocracy political existence; in other words, this word implicitly defined them as the enemy, in the true political sense.

Thus, the word totalitarian can be regarded in different ways. The polemical definition of “totalitarian” that dominates today is one promulgated by liberalism, it is one of an all powerful state that has direct power in the affairs of all people and has the final say on all issues. However in the world of Power Politics all of this is a concrete reality that exists in any political unit, in any state, including a liberal one, hence why it is capable of committing to the path of hypocrisy in the first place. That is how Communism could produce dictatorships, and the same is true for Liberalism (Napoleon). All states contain totalitarianism as a potentiality by virtue of their nature as a political unit, and as we have by now proven, when a state decides to secure its existence, it will utilize means of its totalitarian arsenal. Liberalism, freedom, democracy – all these things are in effect totalitarian if they wish to exist, because they demand dominance, as all ideas do, and only Power Politics can supply that  dominance. Should they wish to stay true to their ideals they will be swiftly done away with. This likewise applies to free speech.

Hence the accusation of “totalitarianism” is a mute one, for it exists as a universal potentiality in all political units. The difference is how much any given ideas chooses to enact that potentiality outside of a crisis, when the very existence of the unit is in question, and thus the full scope of totalitarian means becomes a necessity, which is where Liberalism throws its accusations of “trampling freedom” towards us, Fascists and National Socialists.

[…] every organism, by its very existence, has the characteristic that it assumes power over the determination of all issues. This does not mean that it plans the total life of the population – economic, social, religious, educational, legal, technical, recreational. It means merely that all of these things are subject to political determination.

The Worldview of Fascism and National Socialism is one that follows Truth in all things, as our regular readers should know, hence it seeks for all things to follow their proper nature. This likewise includes the realities of Power Politics and the nature of a State as a political unit. As a result we do not try to hide its totalitarian potential with polemical language that is foreign to reality of Power Politics, thus our presentation is by far more honest. However this still does not mean that we are looking to create “1984”.

Instead, what we seek is the Organic State, the name alone denoting how it coincides with the real nature of the State as a reality of Power Politics. It is a whole organism, not fractured, not divided, not at war with itself, but instead a gestalt – the whole that is greater than the sum of its parts. Here organisations, individuals and structures are not competitors but complimentary elements in the makeup of a bigger entity, like cells and organs within a living body, all acting independently within their respective domain, but fulfilling a singular purpose.

A State is organic when it has a center, and this center is an idea that shapes the various domains of life in an efficacious way; it is organic when it ignores the division and the autonomization of the particular and when, by virtue of a system of hierarchical participation, every part within its relative autonomy performs its own function and enjoys an intimate connection with the whole. In an organic State we can speak of a “whole” — namely, something integral and spiritually unitary that articulates and unfolds itself — rather than a sum of elements within an aggregate, characterized by a disorderly clash of interests.

-Julius Evola, “Men Among the Ruins”, Ch4

The center of our Organic State is the Truth, Cosmic Order, God – the laws by which all of life, physical and metaphysical, is organized. This State will exercise its totalitarian potentiality exactly inasmuch as is necessary in order to maintain and preserve the Truth in all things, but allows the necessary autonomy within the purview of its organs and cells. The human body is not all strictly controlled by the conscious mind (imagine having to consciously put in effort into every heartbeat, ever contraction, every action of every organ), the work of our internal organs is regulated by the vegetative nervous system, creating their autonomy from the conscious mind and vice versa.

Here, once again, Yockey provides a succinct explanation:

The State is the form of a nation for action.

The Organic State, presenting a singular organism, is the true manifestation of the spirit of its Race and Nation, this is what Mosley talked about regarding the will of the people being carried out, when real action is taken by the whole organism to assure its existence, and more importantly, actualize its inherent nature, its own Truth.

Then what of free speech in this Organic State? Frankly different Champions of our worldview offered different solutions to the matter, as it will inevitably happen again, since freedom of speech is not an absolute value or intrinsic right at all, but a weapon. Thus its implementation or limitation is a matter of individual policy, so long as that policy serves the Truth and opposes lies. George Lincoln Rockwell stood by the idealized attitude towards free speech, saying that everyone should be free to say whatever they want, however soon as that speech turns to action the action must be met with direct opposition. Meanwhile Sir Oswald Mosley had proposed introducing a court, where the State could sue the press for libel.

Whatever policy any given Fascist/NS state may adopt towards free speech, the true fundamental consideration that will have to be taken into account is the following: we uphold and defend the Truth. However the scope of the Truth is narrow and rigid, for the Truth is ever singular. The scope of lies, on the other hand, is infinite, and thereby lax, more is permissible, only Truth is not allowed. Lies present a threat of obscurification to Truth, all of them. Truth represents an existential threat to Lies, to all of them. Hence lies allow more debates and free speech and Truth allows less.

Opinions are born of ignorance. And in a world where Truth has triumphed free speech will be the exclusive weapon of lies. However, for the time being, in a world of lies, free speech is a weapon for anyone involved in Power Politics, who wishes to determine the future, provided that they have the WILL to take up other weapons as well.

And oh the “irony”, that the weapon of free speech gives us the tool to tell everyone what those other weapons are.


SIEGE, 7.3

The Years of Lead are coming back.



Subcomandante Marcos from the Zapatista Army of National Liberation

In the light of recent events, it has felt necessary to not only criticise the current  path by many self-professed “radicals”, but to show ways in which people can choose a more radical path rather than participating in the Elite’s game of political control, which ensures the entrapment of the radical. 

The following passage is divided into three parts:

  1. The Failure of Political Struggle
  2. The Path We Take
  3. The Strangling Grasp of the State
  4. Conclusion

For further reading, the following authors are a must:

  • Rene Guenon [Traditionalist]
  • Julius Evola [Traditionalist]
  • Savitri Devi [Esoteric Hitlerist]
  • Sergey Nechayev [Nihilist]
  • Corneliu Codreanu [Fascist]
  • James Mason [National Socialist]
  • Mikhail Bakunin [Anarchist]

1. The Failure of Political Struggle

Within the light of the events unfolding at Charlottesville, Virginia, in which the rally Unite the Right took place, one should be – if previously in support of ‘peaceful’ action – utterly demoralised: GOOD. Ever since 1945 the call to a political struggle, the one of the ballot box, the one of playing their own game, has utterly failed. It has never been achieved. Indeed, with the demographic shift – in which Europeans shall start becoming a minority in their own nations by the end of this century –  a democratic option will be even less of a ‘possible’ option.

When Mussolini marched on Rome, did he ask for the ballot box? When Hitler became Chancellor, was he voted there? No! In fact, upon his becoming of the Fuhrer, in the year 1933, the National Socialist German Workers Party received 17,277,180 votes, 43.91% of the vote, 288 seats, an increase of 92 seats. Why the gain? Failure of the state and the prowess of the Brownshirts on the streets, smashing through the communist hordes on the streets. The banning of the Communist Party after the Reichstag fire only cemented his power within the Reichstag to usher in total control – it was a legal loophole via Article 48 of the Weimar Republic’s constitution, not one of the ballot box! Did Codreanu rely on his elections? Nay, they continued in perpetual struggle against all odds, aiding the peasants and striving to pure excellence of the virtue of self-sacrifice.

The March on Rome, Mussolini and his Blackshirts, 28-29th of October 1922

The arguments used by modern Fascists for winning via the ballot box are absurd. They change their ways to accommodate more-so to the public. They liquidate their message and become more materialistic in nature, they become subdued to the demands of the masses.

Even the Anarchists, who hold the opposite of our worldview, which advocate  the domination of the Shudra caste and the destruction of  all hierarchy in the material and spiritual sense, still see the issues of the ballot box.

The National-Syndicalist thinker George Sorel In Reflections on Violence (1908),  stated that a revolution would come about through a general strike, a ‘revolution of empty hands’. The general strike was a political myth, a belief that has the capacity to provoke political action by virtue of its emotional power rather than through an appeal to reason. Through this appeal to the emotion of the people would a universal strike occur, causing the capitalist infrastructure to collapse. They believed that boycotting products, sabotaging machinery and organising mass strikes would help ushering in said collapse.

The Anarchist Mikhail Bakunin led a conspiratorial brotherhood named the Alliance for Social Democracy. Errico Malatesta in Italy, Russian Populists and Zapata’s revolutionaries in Mexico worked for a peasant revolution in the 19th and early 20th century. Some still placed emphasis on terrorism and violence. The late 19th century and the 1970s were peak periods of said action via clandestine violence through bombings and assassinations to create an atmosphere of terror or apprehension. Victims include Tsar Alexander II (1881), King Umberto of Italy (1900), Empress Elizabeth of Austria (1898) and Presidents Carnot (1894) of France and McKinley (1901). They justified this by stating that it mirrors the everyday violence of everyday society hence it is revolutionary justice. Russian populists portrayed violence as propaganda by the deed. The Russian Nihilist Sergey Nechayev ensured that the Narodnaya Volya – People’s Will – assassinated Tsar Alexander II, rather than using their resources to free him as was originally perpetuated by the group. In Catechism of a Revolutionary, Nechayev realised that the revolutionary is a doomed man. If his comrades succeed because of him taking a sacrifice then he had fulfilled his ‘duty’.

March 13th 1881: Alexander II assassinated by the People’s Will

But said revolutionary violence and direct action is not limited to them, indeed the Bolsheviks – a faction in the Social Democrats – took power via the October Revolution in 1917, using weapons given to them by the 2nd Minister-Chairman of the Russian Provisional Government Alexander Kerensky during the Kornilov Affair. The Bolsheviks made an alliance with the Kronstadt Sailors, and with their ship the Aurora they enclosed the city, taking over communications and key strategic positions, and storming the Winter Palace.

Indeed, further violence took place in many less-economically-developed-countries [LEDCs] using the idea of Lenin’s Revolutionary Vanguard. Said Vanguard was comprised of devoted revolutionaries, well versed in Marxist ideology, who would lead the working class towards class consciousness to help provoke revolt.

These groups have one key thing in common with us, the Traditionalists: they are radicals.

2. The Path We Take

Julius Evola

In Julius Evola’s Heathen Imperialism, Evola states that we have three possible paths to take as “the rhythm accelerates, [as] the circle of Western ‘civilisation’ threatens to close’ [Our European Symbol, Nietzsche Misunderstood]. He mentions that we can:

  • Withdraw, putting up barriers and leaving everyone else behind, the lemmings, and to break the bridges before the sons of Muspell think of it (a reference to Ragnarok when the sons of Muspell ride over Bifrost) and hence prevent them from reaching us
  • To accelerate the ongoing closing of the circle, provoking it, to give way to a new beginning
  • Or we unite to revolt, with a ‘destructive force on one hand, with a creative force on the other’

To summarise, we either flee to the hills and never return, accelerate the decline in any way possible, or we mass-revolt and plunge the West into chaotic violence.

To note, Heathen Imperialism was written in 1928  and then again in 1933. In 1928 the Italian Fascists were well situated, although he particularly notes in The Path of Cinnabar that:

“The Fascist ‘revolution’ in Italy had only affected certain political bodies: even from a political perspective, it had only been a half-hearted attempt at revolution, which never led to the development of a coherent, systematic and uncompromising doctrine of the State.”

As such, the Italian ‘revolution’ of the Fascists led by Mussolini was ultimately one of failure. It was materialistic, it did not change society in the manner Evola perpetuated.

As we well know, times have changed. No longer is WWI weaponry circulating our markets, no longer can we avoid the ever-growing eye of the state through their means of electronic over watch, no longer can we battle the state in the streets without superior technology flying over us, and no longer can we rally enough men to the streets to take action like the brave men of the Blackshirts, the Brownshirts, the Legionaries; nay, for our men lack the heroic courage such heroes held. We shy from violence, we shy from wanting bad public reputation, we shy from any concrete action!

Of course, the latter bullet point does not necessarily dictate a mass revolt, but a battalion, Nietzsche’s “last Battalion” of men who, unlike the other men of the period, will shape the destiny of the future of the West against all odds. For Savitri Devi, the fallen fighters of 1945 were “against Time”, as are their heirs, they are “the bridge to supermanhood”. We are the sword of the Last One, the avatar of Vishnu, Kalki, of which the Vedas foretold, who shall come striking down and create a world anew. With or without a wielder, the fight must continue.

“Out of the surface of her (Durga’s) forehead, fierce with frown, issued suddenly Kali of terrible countenance, armed with a sword and noose. Bearing the strange khatvanga (skull-topped staff ), decorated with a garland of skulls, clad in a tiger’s skin, very appalling owing to her emaciated flesh, with gaping mouth, fearful with her tongue lolling out, having deep reddish eyes, filling the regions of the sky with her roars, falling upon impetuously and slaughtering the great asuras in that army, she devoured those hordes of the foes of the devas.”   Hitlerian,

This overlaps with accelerationism. Indeed, with such times one must not give way to too much emphasis on violence, for the state shan’t be pleased. Accelerationism not only denotes violence (see the Years of Lead), but it also denotes the idea of breaking the System by any means possible. Actively take yourself out of the System. Go off-grid, do not feed the System! Be self reliant, not reliant on the state. Five, ten, one hundred, one thousand, one million – it does not matter how many do, it is still a punch to the System.  The socialist Charles Fourier made experiments in communal living, such as 1800 member phalansteries. Harmony in Indiana (1824-9) was set up by Robert Owen, modelling it on the Israeli kibbutz system which was a cooperative rural settlement system. Many other such communes were established by both socialists and anarchists, with the majority being incredibly self-reliant.

As for Evola’s first point, this does convey the idea of total withdrawal, being completely off the grid, completely self-sufficient, isolated and hence a total recluse… From the perversions of the modern world, of the Kali Yuga. A path can be forged in which the hero, the Solar Warrior, the Men Against Time, can prevail and aid the ushering in of the new age – the Golden Age.

But this is only possible not just through the damaging of the System, but through the pursuit of the path of the Warrior, the becoming of the Aristocrat of the soul. Men must become and fulfill their destiny, they have to embody Evola’s Solar Warrior, the Man with a higher cause than himself, a Man fighting not just for his blood, his soil, but for the very spiritual foundation the West lays upon. He must fight for Truth.

“The good fighter does ‘what has to be done’ and does not let himself be troubled by any scepticism’  – Evola 

He must not be stopped by petty materialistic desire, nor by himself, he must strip aside the petty I, the ego, the body – and conjoin his soul and spirit into one. He must manifest the being of a god, to become the overman.

“The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and the prayers of the faithful.” – Evola, Revolt Against the Modern World

It is not by words, but by deeds.

“Fascism is not Tory Reaction in a black shirt or a brown shirt, but the steel piston of realist revolution.” – William Brooke Joyce

3. The Strangling Grasp of the State

As such, the matter of being a radical is not simply committing to senseless acts of violence, but for a larger purpose. You are no longer invested in yourself but for a higher cause, a justification from the spirit. You must be radical in deed, not by thought – the pen does not change society. As we face an uncertain future, one must look away from conventional politics which have entrapped not only us – the Traditionalists – through the means of the ‘Alt Right’, but also the socialists through the Fabian Society which was founded in 1884 which took up the cause of parliamentary socialism in the UK, taking the name from the Roman General Fabius Maximus who was a patient and defensive tactician against Hannibal’s invading armies. They accept the use of the state as a neutral arbiter, rather than the Marxist belief of it being as an agent of class oppression. Eduard’s Bernstien’s Evolutionary Socialism (1898) developed ideas that paralleled the Fabian belief in gradualism, progress brought about via gradual improvement rather than dramatic upheaval and is thus achieved through legal and peaceful reform. The traditional working class, composed of manual labourers in established heavy industries have declined in size, giving rise to the idea of two-thirds, one-third societies, giving the socialist the belief that they can gradually shift society through the ballot box. Both ends, for the Traditionalist and for the Communist, are dead ends and dead weight. As such, the ruling Elite have entrapped the radicals which threatens them most via the appeasement of the proletariat (be it through utilitarianism or social welfare) to halt any uprisings.

Charlottesville and the fiasco of the Unite the Right Rally should hence serve as a primary example as to how the Elite can keep the ‘Right’ subdued. The false lead of change through protest, through ‘numbers’ (albeit not many considering the hype towards the event and the actual number of viewers/members for all the websites/groups combined for this event), and through legality has caused such membership to become eunuchs. Eunuchs of whom are not willing to go further, who are emasculated by the state through such false hopes. Even now in the aftermath, with the comments of President Donald Trump denouncing the so-called ‘Alt-Left’ gives such members a false hope. They made no impact whatsoever, indeed their actions – rather ironically – has caused the further destruction of Confederate statues, monuments and even possibly graves (as some leftist groups claim to be plotting), and hence their idea of defending Robert E. Lee’s statue through legal means, of winning over both the public and government authorities, did not work. And now members who attended this event are facing consequences via the release of their personal information on social media, and is being encouraged not just by the public but also by the media and officials. As such their potentiality of losing their stake in society through means of a career and social standing is high. And without a stake, these disgruntled young men will have no means of economic prowess.

The Conservative One Nation view on this matter would be thus; growing social inequality contains the seeds of revolution, and without members of society fulfilling an acceptance of duty and obligations, the individual would succumb to a rebellious attitude. To quell such rebellious attitude, the Conservative Party Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli implemented the Second Reform Act of 1867, giving the right to vote to the working class, and improving the housing conditions and general hygiene. An analogy can be made to our current situation, with the unemployed being given free housing and benefits, such as a monthly income. As such, the newly unemployed due to their actions at this rally have two choices: to either remain cushy with the state and maintaining their so-called ‘stake’ in society, or they can turn to more radical measures. Thus far we have established that: the radicals of the left took power through non-conventional means of revolutionary violence and direct action, the need for the individual to fulfill the role of the Solar Warrior for a higher cause than himself, and the fact that the state has ensured entrapment of the radicals through false-leading incentives. As such, the participants from Charlottesville should pursue a new path as dictated; one of accelerationism.

Accelerationism denotes different things to different people: a total withdrawal, terrorism, or random mob violence. A clear-cut definition of accelerationism is simple: to speed up the decline of the state. Such a method should be employed by all those who are certain that:

  •  The decline of the state is occurring and its collapse is inevitable
  • They have no obligations but to their cause
  • They are willing maximum sacrifice

The revolutionaries who fought and died for the Anarchist utopian dream were not held back by material luxury, they were not held back by pondering on ‘what if?’. They were dedicated, they were fixated, and they knew what they wanted. One cannot and should not expect to be able to employ similar tactics to the ones of old in the 1920s and 1930s, nor indeed during the late 19th century under the various Anarchists. Instead, we have to look to a newer, updated vision. Upon using the three options given by Evola in part two, we can conclude that the best path forward is a self-reliant, effective route: and such a route would be the initiation of not only self-withdrawal from society, becoming autonomous and self-reliant, but of a decentralised framework of radicals whom – not endangering the larger group as a whole [as is the danger with a centralised system being infiltrated] – operate on, largely, their own. Of course, to go into depth on the matter would ensure not only the author and potentially reader being put on the watchlist of the state, but to get a lovely knock on the door by authorities. As such, the matter of much more radical and devoted matters shall remain untouched, leaving it to the reader’s imagination. However, one can explore methods employed by groups already in effect in the modern world.

The tactic of fear shall always remain an effective choice. Whereas it does not accelerate the decline per say, it does ensure that: the enemy knows of your presence, and the attraction of radicals to your group. I point to groups such as Atomwaffen Division and Antipodean Resistance, with their posters not only explicitly stating their views and intentions, but give them attention and a spotlight – allowing the establishment to spread their message far and wide. The tactic of self-reliance has been dropped around this post rather frequently. Self-reliance and offgrid living come hand in hand; you do not rely on the state for your electricity, you do not rely on the corporations for your food; instead you supply your own energy, instead you grow your own crops. Such independence grants you autonomy, such independence grants you a cheaper, humbler way to live. Indeed, with soaring prices of both land and houses in the UK – for example in 1987 the house price to earnings ratio was 3.2 compared to in 2015 5.1  – and the same trend occurring across Europe due to the growth in housing demand, there is sensibility for not only buying land and living cheaper, but to group together for such a purchase. Such a group purchase is a risky move, for not only do you throw yourself completely into the group you will be sharing with, you make a financial commitment. You effectively throw all your wagers in. All or nothing. Codreanu, although not going so far with this, ensured that all members for example paid a membership fee – their stake was now in the group, in the ideology, rather than with society. The Anarchist communes previously mentioned had operated in a good manner, with people from varying economic backgrounds being able to participate in such group purchases.

Finally, the tactic of compassion. What is meant by this is not one of peace, love and happiness, but one of doing good in the world. Casapound for example put to use the idea of squatting, illegally taking buildings for their own and aiding the poor, those without a community. This doesn’t just infer squatting, but taking up the aid of your local community, too – helping with projects around say your village, your town, your city block – resurrecting the lost community spirit, which has been ultimately fractured by the atomisation of the individual and the concern of the I. Such tactics seem obvious, but they help breed and attract the radical. The masses aren’t going to come flocking to your banner, we have seen the failure time and time again. You don’t want moderates who aren’t wholly committed, who back out at the last moment and say “well, I’m not a racist!” or “I’m not a Nazi, I just want to protect history!”, or whom do not stand by their comrades and abandon them for their own safety. What we want is to forge a community, a community of radicals who become a family, and not atomised individuals. We must escape from the snare of the state, who wish to impede our efforts, and not feed it – after all, the Alt-Right only give way for the Elite to play at their own game.

4. Conclusion

Become the Man Against Time, become part of the sword which will begin a new Golden Age, and do not be swallowed into the false ideals of hope through comfortable, democratic means. The path forward is one of hardship and sacrifice. It is one where you take the plunge, removing yourself from that stake which pins you to the government, and using that stake, plunging it fully into the Truth. Your stake must not belong to the government, but the Truth. Your stake is not theirs to hold onto. Become radical in motive and you shall become the man who you were destined to be.



In the time that it took to write this article (from December 7th 2016 to January 9th 2017) and to finalize its editing (from January 9th to the date of the article’s release) a number of events had transpired that had only proven further the need for it, it’s clarifications and the conclusions it draws. In that period some mild, lukewarm turn towards positive developments did occur, however they have no bearing on the subject matter of this article, which represents in some ways the result of about a year’s worth of our exposure to what is called the Altright and its various persona’s and groups.

Certain things could have been avoided had there been more clarity, however, for reasons that we’ll go over in this article, it is apparent that this was never an option. Nevertheless, through those unavoidable engagements and following observations we had extrapolated a complete image of what the Altright represents, and this article is the totality of our conclusions. If nothing else, this will serve as the all-inclusive one-stop-shopping masterpost answer as to why we have issues with any given group and the Altright scene in general. Perhaps, then, we won’t be questioned as to why we “can’t all just get along”.

We’ve quite literally had enough of the Altright and everything associated with it, so we are set on moving on and leaving it behind for good, as we no longer wish to bother – this was our attitude for several months now, but let this article be our New Year’s resolution, as we issue a call to all our true Fascists and National Socialists comrades – a call for Zero Tolerance.

Zero Tolerance for anyone who isn’t a Fascist or National Socialist, for we march alone. This article is our final call for everyone to decide if they do share this vision, as it will be explained below, and realize that there is but one way towards its achievement. Alternatively, if they find that they have nothing in common with us, then let us part ways and hear no more talk of “alliances” and “punching right”.

This article is bound to ruffle some feathers, all the feathers in fact. However if you set out to read it then we urge you not to ragequit a quarter of the way in, for its best if you just ignore it entirely. The article is  divided into four primary parts with 3 segments discussed in the second part, dealing with the nature of the Altright. All in all this article, which was started back in December, has grown into a literal Wall of Text (or a short book, and we do plan to release this material in a PDF file format)and the Altright are going to pay for it.

1. Where We Stand
2. The Weapon of Criticism

  • Altright – Entryism tactic?
  • Altright – Hipster conservatism?
  • Altright – Racist liberals?

3. The Criticism of Weapons
4. Total Aryan Victory

One of the prime features in this article is the heavily prevalent usage of quotations from a number of notable Fascist and National Socialist Champions, as well as official NS documents. One of the primary reason for this, beyond providing substantial examples of how everything we say is in line with the hardline orthodoxy of our views, is to also preemptively nullify a very disingenuous  practice that we have by now come to expect from our detractors, namely in how they misrepresent our Champions in attempts to chide us with select quotations that do not, in fact, counter our own stance. For example we are often told that Hitler valued the mass movement approach to which we display our uncompromising opposition. In reality Hitler likewise never believed in mass movements or any other of the tactics practiced by the Altright, as will be made very clear in the course of this article.

The other reason for providing these quotations is to help us discern who does not respect our Worldview and its Champions in the slightest despite their calls for “alliances” and “not punching right,” all the while dismissing us on the basis of non-stop quoting people who have, in fact, helped shape and bring into focus the orthodoxy of our views. It would be as ridiculous to chide Christians for always quoting Bible passages, to chide us for referring to those who had carried the Swastika Banner before us, if we think ourselves to be worthy of carrying it forth ourselves.

So then, without further ado, please proceed with reading the article proper.

[ALTRIGHT TRIGGER WARNING: you will be triggered]


Where we Stand

We have repeatedly insisted on the Fascist Worldview being the Worldview of Truth, one that is rooted in seeking to know what the world is, rather than what we want it to be, rooted in a desire to know the eternal, unchanging laws by which the world is governed. We can refer to the totality of these laws, both physical and spiritual, by many names: Universal Truth, Cosmic Order (Natural Order or Laws of Nature referring to the physical side of the total Cosmic Order), God(s), The Absolute, The One, Providence, etc., however these are all one and the same.

“The moment the plan’s creator attempts to consider so-called “convenience” and “reality” instead of absolute truth, his work will no longer be a star seeking humanity and will become nothing more than an everyday procedure.”

“[Man] must understand the fundamental law of necessity rules in Nature’s domain, and realize how completely his existence is subject to these laws of eternal battle and the struggle for dominance.”

-Adolf Hitler

National Socialism serves eternal laws. This requires acceptance of the eternal laws to unselfishly serve the community and the welfare of the German nation and to live according to the eternal laws of our blood as they are expressed in the National Socialist Worldview. This is where the party member seeks and finds the purpose of his existence ultimately expressed.

-The Responsibilities of Party Members (Official NSDAP Document)

“I realized that this new and wonderful doctrine of scientific truth applied ruthlessly to man himself, as well as to Nature and inanimate matter, and that it was the only thing which could save man from his own degradation in luxury, self-seeking short-sightedness and racial degeneration.”

“You either believe in the scientific method and the truth, and you apply it to yourself without egotism, otherwise you don’t believe in the scientific method and you’re kidding yourself.”

“Anyone so conceited and foolish as to be determined to flaunt Nature’s Laws may do so but only for a limited period of time. He cannot go on doing so indefinitely.”

“National Socialism is nothing more or less than NATURAL ORDER.”

“National Socialism, as a PHILOSOPHY, embodies the eternal urge found in all living  things – indeed in all creation – toward a higher level of existence – toward perfection – toward God.

-George Lincoln Rockwell

Let’s realize that the Truth has a value in itself, and that dedication to the truth is a virtue in itself, more so in a world in which falsehood seems to rule.

-Dr. William Luther Pierce

“As opposed to today’s carefree relativism, where all ideas – in principle at least – are equally acceptable and valid, National Socialism represents the unremitting effort to find the absolute truth and to make this truth the foundation of human society.

“… National Socialism is based on common sense, and it seeks its arguments in the real world, where the difference between truth and lie and between good and evil is determined by facts and not by wishful thinking and theoretical reveries.”

“Unlike all these other philosophies, National Socialism has never been invented – it has been derived from the eternal Laws of Nature, which have existed as long as the universe and which have governed all life since the first primitive organism came into existence.”

“National Socialism was not invented by Adolf Hitler, but is the conscious expression of the fundamental Laws of Nature governing our lives.”

“As National Socialists we follow no other voice than the voice of Nature and no other ethic than the ethic of Nature, and we know only one mortal sin: to try to revolt against this ethic.”

“If the world does not accept National Socialism as its only hope of a future, man will be facing destruction. This will be a logical consequence of his continuous violations of the Laws of Nature.”

-Povl Heinrich Riis-Knudsen

“Whatever People’s perception of God, or Gods, or the motive Force of the Universe might be, they can hardly deny that Nature’s Law are the work of, and therefore the intent of, that Force.”

“Nature evidences the divine plan, for the natural world is the work of the force or the intelligence men call God.”

-David Lane

“In its essence, the National Socialist idea exceeds not only Germany and our time, but the Aryan race and mankind itself and any epoch; it ultimately expresses that mysterious and unfailing wisdom according to which Nature lives and creates: the impersonal wisdom of the primeval forest and of the ocean depths and of the spheres in the dark fields of space; and it is Adolf Hitler’s glory not merely to have gone back to that divine wisdom, but to have made it the practical regeneration policy of world-wide scope.”

“It is the acceptance of this more than human wisdom, it is this accord with the spirit of the Nature, which Hitlerism implies, or disintegration, ethnic chaos, the degeneration of man – separation from the Heart of the cosmos; damnation.”

-Savitri Devi

“Only man in his ignorance, pride and conceit, his off-base worldview with himself as the center of the universe and above Natural Law, has made possible the awful mess people are living in today.”

“National Socialism has been the closest thing yet to approach successfully the task of putting the Truth to work in reality.”

-James Mason

The truth is only one. Who believes in it has to defend it with his life. And whoever does not believe that he possesses the truth, absolute and sole, cannot be a Fascist, that is, cannot challenge death.

-Italo Balbo

If you believe in the existence of this objective, universal and absolute Truth in the world then it becomes your duty to uphold it. It’s very nature excludes any possibility of compromise – the Truth is what it is and it cannot be changed, it is non-negotiable. Integrity and loyalty to the values and principles of Truth are the fundamental aspects of those who follow it, and so they will never, under any circumstances, ever, agree to compromise on it, even “a little” – for what starts as a small angle of deviation invariably proceeds to grow larger the further you follow it’s course.

How could this happen to me, I made my mistakes, I’ve got no where to run!

It is far too easy to abandon our principles and values arguing pressure of circumstance. It takes strength of character, fortitude and resilience to resist the corrosive ideas of our enemies who bid us take the easy way.


We have only to compromise once and we are on the slippery slope that leads to betrayal.

-Derek Holland, “The Political Soldier”

Compromise is where the Truth goes to die, because if you are willing to compromise on one thing then how far are you willing to go, how much are you willing to compromise? How much of the Truth remains after all the compromises have been made? Who wins in the end? Certainly not the Truth.

The Truth is that 2+2 is 4, and we are intolerant of the liars who claim that 2+2 is 6, and we will never compromise with them by “agreeing to disagree” or “agreeing to meet them in the middle” on 2+2 being 5.

But natural law cannot be smashed any more than you can “smash” the fact that two plus two equals four.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch15

Indeed, anyone ostensibly “on the right” would claim that they agree with the above, and stand on the side of truth, as opposed to those “deluded leftists” who wallow in wishful thinking.

Yet we know that they all have a “limit,” beyond which they will flee from the truth, for fear of endangering their own personal safety and comfort. For the “cuckservatives,” this limit may lie at racial issues. For racialists, it may be the Jewish question. For others, it may be faggotry. But the defining difference between the fascist and all others is precisely this willingness to make any sacrifice in the upholding of truth.

Even those who may superficially promote the same positions as we do, could still be doing so with the reserve that their lifestyle should not be negatively affected. For example, they may criticize Jews, yet stubbornly advocate ineffective (but safe) methods to combat them. They may speak harshly of homosexuals, but without casting degenerate friends (or donors) out of their lives. They might accept the principle of hierarchy, yet still favor a political system in which they would be free from control by superiors.

So, what is our experience with the alt-right? Of course, many would assure us that they are, like us, selfless seekers of truth – and yet, we are chided by the compromisers for “purity spiraling,” as if it is an insult to uphold the purity of Truth. They think that by compromising they are being clever (as clever as saying that 2+2 is 5), and are annoyed when we attack them for it. They toss nonsense like the “Overton window” at us, saying that at least by promoting 2+2 as 5 they are moving the 2+2 is 6 liars closer to the truth of 2+2 equaling 4, when in reality all they have achieved was obscure the Truth with another lie. 5 is not a “better” answer than 6, because they are equally wrong. In the end it is them alone who made an “Overton window shift” closer to the liars and further away from the Truth, not the other way around.

The NSDAP must not be a follower of public opinion, but must become the master of public opinion. It must not be the masses’ servant, but their lord.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch6

The practice of mixing Truth with lies in an effort to formulate something that the sick masses might accept without much struggle has resulted in the Right having built for itself an insurmountable obstacle of self-imposed hang-ups and restrictions.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 9.6

Imagine if this sort of reasoning was applied in hard sciences, imagine if this mentality was in charge of constructing the building you are living in – how soon before that building would collapse on your head? In fact, would said building ever reach completion in the first place? Would you trust such “builders”?

Compromisers will likewise scream at us about “punching to the right”, calling for alliances and unity, for some loyalty rooted in us all supposedly being on the same side of a relative “spectrum”. The very nature of the “Left” and “Right” dichotomy is that it’s a relative scale. It lacks any conception of an Absolute reference point – it lacks the Truth. Should we view as allies anyone “to the right” of Marxism? Social Democracy? Liberalism? Where is the line drawn and based on what standard if not the Absolute one? Why should loyalty or alliances be forged on a relative premise?

Were we to take into account that Truth, the absolute anchor point, for reference, then any spectrum is shattered and all relativism is abolished – there is only the Truth and deviations from it, lies, regardless if they are “Left” or “Right”. Even if we were to give the “Right” a more solid value as something that exists in relation to the Truth, then the only relation it could possibly have is that of being a deterioration of it, effectively rendering it “to the Left” in regard to the Truth. We hold no allegiances to any spectrum or scales, only to the absolute Truth in its purity above all else, anything less than that, “Left” or “Right” is no ally of ours.

Back then Right wing catholic centrism had become the dominant force in the country, and soon enough, thanks to Palmiro Togliatti, and with some help from our pseudo-“fascist” leaders, the notion that “right wing” and “fascism” are the same thing took hold. Us, young fascists, despised and rejected this notion.

-Pier Luigi Concutelli

You can only punch Right if you are on the Left.

That is why Fascism/NS has no need of the Left/Right dichotomy at all, it only needs the eternal values of the Truth, and the only thing we need to judge who is our ally or not is to see if in what they do they actively strive to reach that Truth, in which case we see them as potential and hopeful allies who need guidance before they join our ranks as proud Fascists and National Socialists; or if they pursue any other goals which invariably come into conflict with that Truth, in which case they are at best irrelevant or an obstacle, and at worst potential, if not outright enemies.

This problem is epitomized very well in Plato’s allegory of the Cave: the liars and the compromisers are staring at the dancing shadows, enthralled with them, arguing and bickering with each other over their nature and value, never having seen the light of the Sun, of Truth. To them the world is a multitude of dancing shadows and shades, a spectrum with no Absolute. Those who had seen the Sun, however, can no longer distinguish between the shadows that well, thus to them there is only the dichotomy of the light of the Sun and Darkness, the Truth and Lies. Some would argue that one who has never seen the Sun is not a liar, but simply ignorant, however, his ignorance is the source of rootless opinions that serve to obscure the Truth, as they can never be correct, only wrong, therefore they ultimately amount to nothing more but lies. How is one, who had seen the Sun, supposed to compromise with someone who had never seen it, but argues that his shadow (and all the shadows “on the right side” of the Cave wall) is very much the same thing as the Truth of the Sun?


So why should we compromise? Why should we make allies out of the people who fight over shadows? Are the shadows beloved by the guy closest to the exit from the Cave truly any better than the shadows of the guy furthest from it? Is 5 better than 6 as the answer to 2+2? Should we prize modern “monarchists” as more righteous allies than conservatives? Should we count both as allies? Why?

We’ve already said that there can be those who are looking for the Truth, searching for the exit from the Cave, even if they don’t quite realize this themselves – their motives are True, and we would help them make it out of the Cave to gaze upon the Sun. However, are all our detractors and compromisers truly like that? Let us consider whom we are dealing with, these shadow gazers, and see what their motivations might be, as opposed to our own, how the vast difference between the two affects their reasoning towards actions, and how that shapes their criticism of us.

The motivation behind their criticism towards open and fanatical Fascists and National-Socialists can, obviously, either be earnest but misguided, provided that they are searching for that exit from the Cave; or subversiveconsciously so or not doesn’t matter, since in either case it reveals their goals being entirely different to our own. The essence of our Worldview is that the world operates according to specific, objective laws, and that we have no say in the matter, we can only choose to comply with or try to reject these laws. Living in harmony with the natural order of things, with the Truth, leads to happiness and prosperity. It’s rejection leads to degeneracy, death, decay and misery. It is our goal to create a society that complies to these laws (the Organic State), not necessarily for the prosperity and happiness this brings, but because we feel duty-bound to serve and uphold the Truth – everything else is simply a reward for that loyalty.

The Political Soldier is the man sustained by an Eternal Ideal who will act positively in any and all situations in the defense of what is Right, Good and True.

-Derek Holland, “The Political Soldier”

The power of ideas is in that they demand one to sacrifice himself for it without promise of raised wages.

-Ernst Junger, “Our Stance”

The path of faith is before each of us. Even if it is not the path of fame and honor, it is still the path of duty and of greatest happiness. To find it means to gain a part of the eternal strength that moves the worlds.

-Helmut Stellrecht, “Faith and Action”

Oh, you who exalt the fight without end, be it without hope, attach yourself to what is eternal!

-Savitri Devi, “The Religion of the Strong”


-James Mason, SIEGE, 4.6

Noble thoughts and ideals. Irrational as hell. But this provides us with our biggest advantage over our enemies; our legitimate reason for existing as individuals; our purpose in Life. Something bigger than ourselves, and certainly, as big as the universe itself. That is an experience these liberal types can never know and can never understand. Alone, it sustains us. COMBINED with the weaponry of cold thought process, it will lead us to victory over all odds.

SIEGE, 7.4

The motivations of our cause are selfless, they are not derived from personal or group interests. We wish to protect our Race and Nations not simply because they are our own, or because our individual interests are intrinsically tied with larger group interests, but because all of these things are manifestations of Truth.

We love our Family, Race, Nation. That is a great part of why we do what we do. But we likewise feel a powerful and irresistible compulsion to serve that Truth which governs the world and is present in all things – the Family, the Race, the Nation, and ourselves. This drive to serve something greater than ourselves will always lead us down the path of self-sacrifice for those things, or to simply do that which is necessary.

“The arguments of blood are not convincing, they are compulsory.”

We do not mule over benefit and practical gain, we have no need of comfort, we only require that which is necessary – that which fate desires.

-Ernst Junger, Forward to  F.G. Junger’s book“March of Nationalism”

“At once, a great weight lifted off my soul. I knew that I had found my way to the sun at last and the days of mental darkness, searching and endless frustration were over. But at the same time, an immensely heavy burden replaced it, but in a different, even satisfying way. I knew that I had to, I must do what I could, to spread the new and wonderful idea and secure its victory in the collapsing world – no matter what it cost me, or even if I were to become a ‘failure’ to be ‘fed to the lions’ in the ‘Colosseum’.”

-George Lincoln Rockwell, This Time the World, Ch7

Meanwhile, some people may only pay lip service to the idea of defending Family, Race and Nation as mere means to protect their own individual interests, and all interests are inherently contradictory to the Truth. One may be an absolutely selfish degenerate and throw in his lot with a group to which he can claim to belong to without honoring that connection, he is in it simply for the safety and strength of numbers. Faggots are throwing in their lot with our supposed “allies” “of the Right” for that very reason – they seek defense against the threat of Islam that would throw them off rooftops. Their motives are entirely selfish and they are using ideals of defending Family, Race and Nation as a vehicle for those selfish interests – they feel no true love for those values, and certainly feel no obligations – they simply make a calculated decision that provides them the most chances for a positive outcome.

Faggots are not the only ones who follow this logic and only pay lip service to these values, while in reality acting selfishly.  The only thing that compels this sort to act as they do is a desire to maximize their individual chances of survival whilst also seeking material comfort and pleasure (their tastes are simply not as “advanced” as those of faggots). Hence, they will never commit to any real struggle in defense of Family, Race and Nation, for to do so would put at risk their true motives. If your motives are selfish and egotistic they are invariably narcissistic and thus invariably hedonistic. This sort will avoid the fight at all costs – the dead can’t enjoy material comfort and pleasure.

That is why we do not automatically view people who claim to be fighting for Family, Race, Nation and etc. as being our allies – they may very well do things that on the surface may seem to serve that purpose but their ultimate goals are selfish, so their motivations will always lead away from the creation of the Organic State (the goal of our struggle) that upholds the Truth in favor of any mechanical system that will simply serve their petty wants and desires.

Any such system must always collapse back into the state of decay we bare witness to today (see our previous article on The Face of Decay), the decay that supposedly prompted these frauds to “join” our Struggle. Hence why we are not impressed by formulas like the “White Ethno-State”, as they are vague enough to encompass any mechanical system and any form of degeneracy, so long as all of its inhabitants are white. A “White Ethno-State” may very well be communist, libertarian, liberal, etc. It can be exactly the same as what already exists minus all the non-whites. That is not good enough.

This is where our supposed “allies” would reveal themselves as our enemies, for they will not like the Organic State we strive for any more than the Jews. If your motives are selfish, egotistic, narcissistic, hedonistic – no matter how much you pretend to the contrary, no matter how much lip service you pay – you will not benefit from the Organic State, if anything you will find yourself in great distress under it, for it’s fundamental core is one of loyalty, selfless service, sacrifice and duty to that which is greater than ourselves:

Fascism promises neither glory nor titles nor gain – only duty and struggle.

-Benito Mussolini

Modern nationalism does not wish to float in the airless space of theories, it does strive for “free thinking” but desires to gain strong ties, order, to grow roots in society, blood and soil. It does not wish for socialism of opportunities, it longs for socialism of duty, for that rigid stoic world that the individual man must sacrifice himself to.

-Ernst Junger, Forward to  F.G. Junger’s book“March of Nationalism”

Each has but one proper path. To follow it makes one happy to the highest degree, even if it is a path that brings only poverty and toil.

Any path that leads away from the meaning and purpose of life is death and sin. And even if the path seems ever so pleasant, you will sin every day of your life.

-Helmut Stellrecht, “Faith and Action”

Well-being – beyond the minimum that is necessary for each to fulfill his task – does not count. Only the task counts: the quest for the essential, the eternal, through life and through thought.

Attach yourself to the essential – to the eternal. And never worry about happiness – neither your own nor that of other men; but accomplish your task, and help the others achieve theirs, provided that it does not thwart your own.

-Savitri Devi, “The Religion of the Strong”

Indeed, it will be in the interest of people who are motivated by selfish interests to prevent the establishment of the Organic State at all costs. Our supposed “allies” will actively work against us. This is why we only readily accept as our allies other true Fascists and National-Socialists, for their open identification as such tells us that they understand the nature of the Struggle at hand and work towards the same ends as ourselves (or at the very least are close to finding the exit from the Cave), whereas the other “right-wing” “allies” can only be either potential Fascists and NS who will come to call themselves that in time… or underhanded rats trying to hold us back.

Us and our supposed “allies” are worlds apart. It becomes our task to figure out which of them are the potential comrades who will come to join our ranks, and which of them are the rats that must be exterminated if we are to achieve Victory. The primary tool in this process is criticism, both the criticism we dish out and the criticism we hear back, for if one is a true searcher of Truth, struggling to find the way out of the Cave, he will recognize our criticism and answers as the path that leads outside and into the light of the Sun. However, if one’s motives are anything else, that is to say if one is driven by selfish interests, wants and desires, then they will reject that criticism vehemently and will keep arguing about their shadows. Moreover, while our enemies like the SJW crowd sincerely believe in the shadows and think no such thing as the Sun exists, our supposed allies will reject the light of the Sun exactly because they understand what it is and what it implies for their interests.

Ask a selfish liar who professes his selflessness to go ahead and act selflessly (beyond any token gestures that he is ready to practice to give the illusion of being selfless as such gestures cost him nothing), and he will come up with all the excuses in the world not to. These “allies” will reject our criticisms and solutions, coming up with any number of excuses as to why they are “ineffective” or “wrong” not because they are so, but because they want to discredit that which would force them to act against their petty interests. A faggot will never fight in the ranks of the vanguard on the battlefield, his cummies are more precious to him than anything else. However, you will find plenty of them in rear, acting as the “intellectual” “vanguard”, the “planners” and speakers, actively working to rationalize their presence in this group and in this struggle as being something other than them seeking security, explaining away why there is no need for an actual battlefield, lest they be put in that front line vanguard. The assorted “allies” motivated by selfish interests will act in exactly the same manner.

That is the great divider that helps us establish who our true allies are and who are not, who has character and who is only in this for their safety, comfort and pleasure. Let us now examine “our ally’s” criticism of us and how we carry on in our Struggle, and examine it for the possible underhanded motivations to said criticism, which would distinguish the rats from the hopefuls. All the while we will reveal further and in more detail our own stance and why these criticisms are unacceptable to us, and where our own criticisms stem from.

The Weapon of Criticism

Let us summarize what has been elaborated on so far in a succinct manner: we cannot accept compromise because those who have differing views ultimately have a different objective which is not in accordance with the Truth – to compromise with them would be to reject the whole reason for our Struggle. Moreover, those who disagree with our methods and ways ultimately have a different understanding of reality and laws of nature, therefore they are not seeing the Truth, but a distorted image, a lie.

We’ve also already covered a few points of criticism thus far in this article, so we’ll return to them and flush them out some more as the starting point of our analysis.  Namely we talked about the criticisms of “Purity Spiraling” and “Not Punching Right,” as well as the call for unity and alliances. All of these are part of the same narrative of posing a united front against a common enemy. Of course, the very subject matter of this article deals with figuring out if the people who call for these alliances are in any way our actual allies or something else, perhaps something subversive. Nevertheless let us address the call itself – we do not approve of alliances.

Nowadays all Fascists and National Socialists around the world form a unified Struggle against a common enemy towards the exact same goals, thus one can only call it an alliance from a technical viewpoint in the sense that various nationalists come together, however they make up one cohesive group, as Aryans and as fellow Fascists/National Socialists. The only alliances that we can forge are with entities that exist outside the NS/Fascist sphere, with those who are not us.

Beyond what we have already highlighted, namely that others either do not follow or struggle to find their way towards the Truth (the Sun outside the Cave), one of the fundamental reasons not to engage in alliances was highlighted by one of the great Champions of our Struggle (who makes this observation with the presupposition that all the parties involved truly want the same thing):

Too many people believe that combining the strength used by the groups traveling down different roads into one unified journey would be more certain to bring success and bring it faster. But this is not the case. Nature herself, using pitiless logic, decides who succeeds by putting the various groups in competition with one another and forcing them to struggle for victory.


At this time, all those leaders who could not stand on their own feet united into these worker coalitions in the belief that eight lame men, arm in arm, would create one big gladiator. If there were one healthy man among the lame ones, he needed all his strength to keep the others on their feet and ended up paralyzed himself.


It must never be forgotten that nothing truly great in the world has ever been achieved by an alliance. It has always been through the triumph of the individual. The very origin of joint forces carries with it the germ of its own later decay. Great intellectual revolutions that shake up the world are only conceivable and only possible when they are monumental struggles by individuals and never when they are enterprises of coalitions.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf V2, Ch8

As long as the Movement remains part of the defense of something that it does not belong with then it will continue to share in the unremitting defeat of the past sixty years.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.1

To summarize: the chain is only as strong as its weakest link, to form an alliance is a handicap for the strongest elements in it as they have to spread themselves out to protect the weakest elements and make up for their handicap, which nullifies the strength of the strongest. As the title of that chapter of Mein Kampf goes: “The Strong Man is Mightiest when Alone”.

Thus, beyond our general distrust of other groups who do not openly profess to following the same Worldview as ourselves, there is a strategic argument for avoiding coalitions. The distrust, however, stems from another legitimate issue which gets criticized by would-be “allies” as Purity Spiraling – should we join a coalition then we do so based on some vague common denominator at the expense of all the more specific and exact aspects of our Worldview and what it is we Struggle for, in order to avoid “punching Right”. The group becomes something less than what it was on its own as a result, it’s ultimate goals obscured.

… we cannot afford any longer the stupid mistake of mixing and confusing our goals and priorities like so many Right Wing types have done in the past.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.5

In short: alliances come at a price of maintaining one’s own principles and goals as they are expected to simply button up and not bring up anything that would “rock the boat” of the vast variety of elements that make up the alliance. The demand of any alliance is for all involved groups to submit to a certain level of passivity and give up the freedom of action that they may deem fit to exercise when on their own. The social equivalent of this would be to host a Horror Movie fans club and then have it integrate into a larger Movie-Goers club and end up watching romantic comedies and other genres you don’t like more often than your preferred Horror genre, all the while keeping quiet and not complaining about it.

The only way we can maintain and pursue our own distinct and precise end goals, which are defined by our staunch adherence to the Truth, is to remain steadfast in our own path that stands alone from all the rest (in as much as the Truth stands alone from the countless lies), rejecting the idea of any coalitions and their inherent vagueness, that would handicap us in achieving the goals that nobody else in the coalition shares. Moreover, it becomes beneficial that we should criticize such coalitions and their vagueness in order to make our own path, with its distinct and coherent strict ideals, shine all the brighter for its clarity and consistency, as opposed to the muck that surrounds it on all sides and tries to encroach and absorb it.  The radiance this produces only attracts to us the exact type of people we should hope to have join us, those who search for the Truth and who do not have agendas which are actually contrary to our own.

If we are to assume malicious intent behind dragging NS/Fascists into coalitions then the obvious aim of that action is to make us reject our own ideals and bolster someone else’s numbers; or to manipulate us into “temporarily” subsiding our uncompromising fanaticism towards the promotion of our ideals and taking action that would lead to their realization. Coalitions hold no benefit for us even with benign intent behind them, and the subversive intent is realized by the very nature of coalitions with no other special effort or distinct trait by which the malicious nature of the proposed alliance can be identified, hence it becomes hard to tell if a given “ally” promoting a coalition does so out of naivety… or because he is an enemy seeking to anchor us down in the mud and make us submit to passivity. Either way: we will never accept any coalitions – we cannot afford to. There is only one front in this Struggle, NS/Fascists vs the rest.

We fight against everyone. That, is Fascism.

-Pierre Drieu la Rochelle, “Fascist Socialism”

This, of course, prompts another criticism from the would be allies, namely that of “why can’t you just leave us/them alone? Let everyone do their own thing, follow their own tactics/path to Victory, every bit helps, we’re all contributing and helping the same ends”. This argument is not new:

Many right-wingers are sincerely concerned, I know, about my battles with men such as Maguire, Snowden, Welch, Hargis, et al., and my revelations of what they really are. “They are doing good,” I am told, “why not let them go about their business their own way. They are helping. Don’t hurt them”.

I maintain they are only giving the appearance of helping-but are actually hurting.

Before a mass of people will rise up and do anything effective and forceful about a tyrannical situation, there must be built up a certain emotional pressure. A firecracker has not the force of a rifle bullet because it explodes harmlessly in all directions. But the gas from a rifle bullet cannot escape, except by forcing the bullet out at terrific speed, because it is confined, directed into useful channels.

As long as Welch and all the rest of his ilk, rich and poor, can give themselves the illusion of “fighting the Jews” by exploding the pressure inside of them verbally and harmlessly, in all directions, and without ever hurting a Jew traitor, they keep the pressure we need to get mad and fight from ever building up.

The Jews know this, and permit these hundreds and hundreds of harmless rightwing organizations to spout endlessly in silence behind the Jewish “paper curtain”. They don’t reach any significant number of people outside their own group. Even when they do, their approach is so feeble and so psychologically wrong that they win only a few rare types.

They never, never get out into the public, into the streets, and reach the masses with an inspiring and driving masculine movement, which alone can win the hearts of the masses! They pass literature and talk only to each other.

If just one tenth of the money which pours every year, year after year, into such “fire-cracker” movements were to be contained, directed, and used behind an ideological bullet forced out by fighting men, the Jews would stop at nothing to crush and destroy that deadly “bullet”. Even without that money, with only a few grains of “powder,” but confined and directed with force, we have already earned the all-out hate of the Jews, the only sure sign that we are not firing the eternal rightwing “gas” at them, but the deadly bullets which they know will eventually destroy their illegal, tyrannical power.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch12

George Lincoln Rockwell would sometimes copy over entire segments of his autobiography, “This Time the World” into his last work “White Power”, and it is there that we can pick up the further conclusions Rockwell drew from his experience with the American “right-wing”:

It is for political reasons, not personal animosity, that I consciously and calculatingly expose these political frauds. The doctor cannot cure as long as the patient is chasing after quacks and imagines himself ‘getting better’. The patient, our White Race, is dying! The situation is desperate, and it is viciously criminal to be a millionaire and then take the dimes and dollars of sincere little people in exchange for sugar syrup!

The right-wing cannot be wheedled together, but it can be driven together. This is our naked purpose. We intend to make it impossible for the fakes to keep up their medicine show, no matter how they pound their drums next to our office. Sooner or later, our mastery of the right-wing is assured. We have faced and beaten the worst the Jews have. We will have little trouble conquering and organizing the feeble right-wing. Exposing the simple truth about such men as Russell Maguire is part of that cruel but utterly necessary conquest. No matter how we are cursed and hated by the short-sighted, we will win all sincere Americans and White Men, when they see that we have done what they have so long prayed for: united the right-wing and driven steel into its backbone. The process is never easy or pleasant, but we mean to save Our Country and Our Race. The hurt feelings of a few millionaires, hobbyists and incompetent leaders will not deter us from our holy mission.

In addition to trifling with a deadly danger, as these people do, the phony and feeble leaders and tightwad millionaire ‘patriots’ also have a fearful effect on the real leaders who might otherwise lend their talents to the effort to save ourselves. DeWest Hooker is now working in Italy with a bottling company. He is disgusted and discouraged. His experiences with Maguire and the others, the same experiences which have made life so miserable for me and my family, have driven him back to the arms of the Jews and their money. We can’t afford this, Americans! Every day I am told breathlessly what an indispensable leader I am, and how the movement needs me, and how terrible it would be if anything happened to me. This is indeed true. To the devil with phony modesty! Without me, there would still be only babbling and whispering and sneaking and publishing and hoping in America, while the Jews counted their money, pushed the Blacks into your schools and homes and made token gestures of attack from time to time as such feeble ‘anti-Semites’.

Three years ago, I wrote the prediction that a spearhead ‘Nazi’ attack would revive the whole right-wing, by giving it courage — and it has! The Jews are revealing that we have given them the ‘heebie-jeebies’ by spewing forth more anti-Nazi lies and hoaxes than ever before!

But Hooker is one of the men who could have led fighting young men, as I am, in a fight to save America! The ‘nice’ people who back such ‘wake up America’ ‘patriots’ as Maguire drove a great White leader into the arms of the Jew money-masters! How many more Hookers there are is a tragic, unanswerable question.

No, America, it. is not wicked to expose and attack Maguire and his ilk. Such phonies have been wrecking the movement they are supposed to be creating for many, many years. Until these ‘patriots’ pitch in with their money, their brains, their guts and their blood, they are frauds, and I intend to drive them out of our way.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, This Time the World, Ch11

To summarize: we cannot accept the very existence of other groups that may be diverting the forces and energies of potential and hopeful, but so far unrealized, Fascists and National Socialists away from the path they are meant to follow, the path that puts them in our ranks, and into the arms of various quacks and frauds that for all intents and purposes puts them into a passive, catatonic state, if for no other reason than that they have to do so in order to play nice with others in the alliance of muck they had been dragged into. These strong men, whose might would be allowed to unfold fully within a Fascist/NS group, are instead subjected to the rule of the weak chains with whom they had linked up.

It is imperative to our Victory (and the best way we can honor Commander Rockwell’s legacy as one of the Great Champions to our Cause) that we must leave no more room for frauds and quacks, as such the “right-wing” spectrum is once again of no use for us as it exists exclusively as a premise and rallying cry for unity and alliances of these very frauds and quacks. There is only Fascism/NS and the rest, (invariably “to our Left”) and the part of the rest that exists solely as a cancerous tumor that diverts the lifeblood of our Struggle – the so-called “right-wing,” which exists simply as a last ditch “easy way out” that potential and hopeful Fascists/NS waste their time on; or as a playground for the worst kind of frauds – must be cut away.

Rockwell had personal experience with all of these same arguments and calls for unity that we hear today. The aptly named “50 years of Failure” chapter that we quote above from “White Power” refers not to the period from 1950s to 2000s but to the 50 years leading up to Rockwell setting course on an openly National Socialist activism in the late 50s. We already showcased how little has changed in the 50 years since Rockwell, amounting to over a 100 years of failure total now, yet our would-be “allies,” namely those carrying the mantle of the “Altright,” still insist on being something new and original, rather than walking down a beaten path to obscurity.

There is only two or three ways to really judge what the Altright is:

  • either it is a continuation of the Third Position and New Right trend of “being a nazi while avoiding being called a nazi” entryism tactic bullshit, which puts them into the earnest idiots category for us,
  • a continuation of American conservatism (read: liberalism) via a new brand that appeals to a younger demographic (conservatism for millenials),
  • or it is a bunch of liberals (i.e. American conservatives) who suddenly realized that they don’t like niggers and Jews, but have otherwise not given up on all their liberal values and just want more of the same, just minus the niggers, Jews, mexcian and muslim immigrants.

So let us go over each possibility and discuss them in some detail.

Altright – Entryism tactic?

If the Altright is the continuation of the Third Position and New Right trends, then we are dealing with the now 60 years old argument of “you can’t be an open Nazi!,” an argument that our “allies” will bring up even if this particular assessment of the Altright is invalid (and by all accounts this possibility is the least likely, though the Altright nevertheless obviously attracts the same old gang of Third Position, New Right idiots and other “sneaky nazis” into their ranks).

The notion that you can’t be an open Fascist/National Socialist has existed ever since the end of the Second World War. It owes itself to the perceived totality of our enemy’s victory, if for no other reason that we perceived the enemy to be a singular dominant force orchestrating everything, thus its totality would surely bring us down by force again should we ever label ourselves as Fascist/NS again. This is the “retribution from above” side to this argument, that the powers that be will attack us directly with full force.

We are likewise repeatedly told that we can’t openly proclaim ourselves to be Fascists/NS because of the “bad image” that entails with the general public who’d never support Fascism/NS as our victorious enemy gets to write us as the villains of history for the masses to accept as gospel through education and mass media. This is the “lack of support from below” side of this argument, that the masses will never aid us in our fight.

This argument was discredited and utterly destroyed by George Lincoln Rockwell, and if you have read GLR’s “This Time the World” and “White Power” then you should be well familiar with the incredible outrage and desperate, exasperated agony one feels when they discover that nothing has changed, that the same non-arguments have existed unchanged for decades. Moreover one feels a great sense of shame before the man who has done so much for the Struggle, a true Champion of our Cause, and yet we haven’t moved beyond the same old bullshit that his supposed “allies” threw at him.

“We can never win with open adherence to National Socialism and the Swastika,” these gentlemen explain feebly. “The Jews have taught people to hate them too much,” they add. “If we use the Swastika and praise Hitler too openly, they will throw us in prison or kill us!” And did they not throw ALL makers of revolutions, including the Jew makers of the Red revolution, in jail – and even kill some of them? Are we National Socialists to be more fearful and cowardly than a gang of Jews? The very persecution and bloodshed such irresolute characters seek to avoid is the *sine qua non* of our victory!

These are not empty words. I have personally proved their truth here in America, the power center of world Jewry, by being beaten, by going to jail and the insane asylum, losing my dear family, and living like an animal. Twelve days from today, as I write this, I face jail again. These things are unpleasant and even heartbreaking – but they MUST BE!

I have risen in two years to a commanding position in the worldwide fight for the White man, starting as a penniless, unknown and unaided single individual like millions upon millions of others – simply and solely because I have gratefully and lovingly used the precious names and symbols which have been bathed and soaked in such oceans of blood and tears – the Swastika and the name of the Leader, Adolf Hitler.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, “In Hoc Signo Vinces”

See more quotations from the same GLR article in this image.
For other relevant GLR quotes from “White Power” see this image.

The nature of this argument, if anything, was far more potent immediately after the war, when the majority of the people alive world wide had actually been contemporaries to that period of history, when the anti-nazi propaganda was part of their daily lives in a far more definitive and intimate way than it is today. Indeed, the “you’re a nazi!” accusation had been put into practice almost immediately after the war to make the “right-wing” toe the line the Jews wanted them to toe, it was a fear tactic that would leave the “right-wingers” rendered as helpless as a turtle on its back, cooking in the sun. It doesn’t matter if one truly is a Fascist/NS trying to conceal it, or if one is a lukewarm conservative who tentatively opposes Jewish plans, the accusation will be thrown out there regardless with the express intent of putting the accused on the defensive.

One of the best contemporary examples of this tactic and its outcome in practice, is that of Nick Griffin’s humiliation on Question Time, when he ended up stuttering and tried to say something about European Law, after being confronted by a strategically placed Judeling in the audience, as to his past statements on the validity of the Holohoax. Video below, timestamped.

“I cannot explain why I used to say those things […] because according to European Law” gets a rightful reaction of “are you fucking kidding me?” from the audience, and one doesn’t need a carefully vetted crowd of conformist lemmings, or an electric board flashing hints to the audience when they should laugh or gasp or boo, to get such a reaction to that reply. It was weak and pathetic, leaving Griffin to sweat on his back in the heat until he is thoroughly cooked.

To the conservatives and the rest of the “right-wing” who have to deal with the “you’re a Nazi!” accusation we can only say one thing: “tough shit”.

As Commander Rockwell said in the 1960’s, if you’re racialist and aware of the role of the Jews and are willing to discuss it, then they’re going to brand you a “Nazi” regardless of what you may call yourself or your group. You can even try cursing the Nazis and they’ll STILL call you a “Nazi”.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 6.19

Of course they will call you Nazis, moreover, you might as well be a Nazi to them if you don’t keep up with the ever shifting goalposts of “progress,” for such is the nature of that relative Right/Left spectrum that gets so much credit – if one were to look “to their Right” they would inevitably see down the line, at the very end, Fascism, where the constructors of this spectrum have put it. So if you move an inch “rightwards” you might as well go all the way – this is their equivalent of the slippery slope attitude: “if you don’t allow transrights today you’ll be gassing Jews and abolishing all freedom tomorrow!” 

However it does seem like the American “right wing” managed to come up with a counter to this by trying to redefine the spectrum, as well as Communism and Fascism all at once, placing them together on the “far Left” (defined as NO FREEDOM) end of the spectrum, with Anarchy on the “far right” (defined as TOO MUCH FREEDOM) and “good ol’ conservative US of A values” in the fucking middle (JUST THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF FREEDOM!). Never mind that American conservatism, i.e. classical liberalism, has more in common with Anarchism than Communism and Fascism have in common – this is simply a defensive strategy devised by American conservatives against the “you’re a nazi!” accusation, which in practice amounts to the following: “No, YOU’RE THE NAZI!”

The “NO U” defense – flawless victory!

Simply brilliant. Actually, in some ways it is, as it tries to usurp the accusation and use it against the accuser, trying to fight the enemy with his own major tool. Given the conditions the “right wingers” find themselves in this was probably the best they could have ever hoped for. Moreover, us actual Fascists and National Socialists didn’t have any big issue with this beyond the ridiculous claim that Fascism and Communism are the same, as in effect this still fed into one of our major principles, namely driving away unwanted elements (more on which later) as the “Left” and “Right” played hot potato with the Nazi label.

Going back to our primary point, Rockwell had proven the “you can’t be an open Nazi!” argument to be entirely false and he had proven it false back when the anti-Nazi sentiment was still far more intimate for the majority of people alive at the time.

I was determined, of course, to set up a program which was essentially National Socialist – Nazi – but for a long time I toyed with the idea of ‘disguising’ it, as do most other right-wingers, by using some other name and a slightly different symbol. At that time, an openly ‘Nazi’ party seemed too fantastic even to think about.

But then I began to reflect that the ultimate smear of the Jews was always, “You’re a Nazi!” And I wondered what it would be like to answer, “You’re damned right we’re Nazis, and we shall shortly stuff you Jew-traitors into the gas chamber! “

At once I had the answer! By being an open, arrogant, all-out Nazi, not a sneaky Nazi, but a Nazi with the Swastika, storm-troopers and open declarations of our intentions to gas the Jew-traitors (after investigations, trials and convictions), I would not only make an end of the filthy ‘silent treatment’ – for they could never ignore Nazis with Swastika armbands and talk of gas chambers – but I would also force the Jews to publish my propaganda in their press! Every time they would howl that I advocated ‘gas chambers’, people would be shocked, but they would also lose a tiny bit of their ‘fear of the Jews’ as the Bible calls the filthy terror inspired by these ‘apostles of tolerance’.

If millions of people kept reading in the Jew press about a man who was not only an ‘anti-Semite’, but an open Hitlerite, a Nazi – and survived as such – the myth of Jewish invincibility would be smashed. The timid little people all over the country who have been silently and fearfully reading all this material designed to ‘wake them up’ all these years would begin to creep out of their closets. While the Jews were desperately busy combating me, the little fellows would become bolder and would begin to act more like their American forefathers.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, This Time the World, Ch12

Commander Rockwell had proven that (at least in the US) being an open Fascist/NS does not lead to the kind of immediate retaliation against all the people involved with the label on the spot, leaving them free to operate in some capacity.

This effectively proved that our enemy, despite indeed having total control, is not so monolithic and unrestrained that it can act directly, openly and with impunity. In reality our enemy presents a vast multitude that simply shares a common opposition to our goals, meaning they have their own internal conflicts and rivalries. Moreover, they have to follow their own rules either because they believe in those rules or because they need the lemmings to keep believing and playing by those rules. Both of these revelations would be expounded upon by future Champions of our Struggle that would come after Rockwell, namely Dr William Luther Pierce and James Mason.

Even beyond the US, however, this holds true, as even in countries with the strictest of laws aimed to hinder and suppress Fascists and National Socialists our comrades manage to keep carrying out the Struggle while openly proclaiming who they are and what they stand for. This effectively puts to rest the “retribution from above” side to this argument. Some, however, will argue that the situation has changed since the 50s and that our enemies and the Jews have a much stronger death grip on the world today – while it is true that many things have gotten worse, this lesson from Rockwell still holds true and is self-evident in how many openly Fascist/NS groups get started and operate today.

That is not to say that we do not face retribution and suppression from our enemy, however it renders obsolete the idea that openly proclaiming oneself a Fascist/NS would have immediate consequences, meaning there is no particular unique danger or obstacle in doing so as opposed to trying to hide one’s true convictions, if anything there are more benefits to it, whereas hiding it puts one on the constant defensive against the enemy’s accusations. All the hurdles that exist beyond that point are essentially the same regardless of what one calls themselves – if you don’t keep up with the progressive agenda you’ll be branded a Nazi regardless, as we’ve explored earlier.

The only other dangers that exist beyond that point deal with how much success one achieves in the Struggle and how desperate our enemies are to stop us, in which case they will readily resolve to killing, regardless if one is an actual Fascist/NS or not. However, as we’ll explore further, only Fascism and National Socialism present any real danger to them, specifically because of our unyielding and absolute, fanatical nature and the success we have thanks to said nature, as opposed to our “allies”.

Decades have passed and the initial societal shock worldwide that Fascists and National Socialists do, in fact, still exist after World War 2 and openly, boldly proclaim their loyalty to the vision of Adolf Hitler and other Champions of our Worldview, had subsided. The existence of Fascism/NS in the post-war era became more accepted and lost some of its potency on its own.

Strong leaders would always breathe new life into the struggle and make themselves noted by the world, which would proceed with its usual indignation at this audacity. Recent history, however, has ushered in the next stage of societal collapse and involution. A new generation of easily offended progressives has revitalized that panic the mere idea of the existence of Fascism and NS in the post-war history would elicit immediately after the war. 50 years ago the reaction was most likely “how can there be Nazis, how can you call yourself a Nazi, we JUST defeated them!!!,” whereas now we hear “how can there STILL be Nazis, it’s the current year, I literally can’t even!!!”

The other side to this argument, the “lack of support from below” has been likewise discredited in part by Rockwell, but even more so by Dr William Luther Pierce and by James Mason and many other of our Champions all the way down to Hitler himself, if we consider the reasoning behind seeking “support from below”. The desire for that support comes as a package deal with our “allies criticism that we shouldn’t be driving people away, that we should follow a mass movement approach, that we can’t achieve anything without the masses. Fascists and National Socialists give a resounding refutation of these points and proclaim the primacy of quality over quantity, an eternal aspect of Truth that holds itself true even when dealing with movement politics!

This does not mean that the membership has to continue growing indefinitely, quite the contrary. Only a limited portion of mankind possesses the energetic and bold qualities a movement needs, so any organization that continues to increase its membership indefinitely would one day become weak and inert. Organizations that continue to grow their membership beyond a certain number gradually lose their fighting power. Then they are no longer able to take the offensive which means they cannot support their propaganda, and if they cannot support it, they cannot benefit from it.

The greater and more revolutionary an idea is, the more active the membership becomes. The revolutionary power of the doctrine spells danger for its ambassador. This danger keeps away the small, cowardly members of the middle or privileged-class. Privately they may consider themselves followers, but they fear to confess their beliefs to the public by openly becoming members. This is how the organization, promoting a truly revolutionary idea, takes in members—only the most active of the followers who have been won over by propaganda. This process of receiving only the most revolutionary membership into the movement, which is a result of natural selection among its followers, guarantees it will actively spread the message in the future and will fight successfully to make the idea a reality.

The greatest danger any movement faces is when the membership grows abnormally fast after a large success by the movement. All the cowards and petty selfish onlookers will shun a movement when it is engaged in a bitter struggle. However, once the movement has either gained a big success or such a success seems likely, these people will usually try to join at that time. The last-minute-joiner is the reason many movements, which are victorious in a battle before they achieve their final success, or rather before the final completion of the idea is achieved, suddenly retreat. They develop a vague, inner weakness, which forces them to suspend the fight and finally the movement dies. Their first victory drew so many bad, unworthy and particularly rotten elements into the organization, that these unworthy creatures eventually superseded the fighting strength of the movement in an effort to force the movement to serve their own interests. They reduce it to their own level of petty heroism and do nothing to achieve final victory for the original idea. The fanatical goal has been erased from their minds, the fighting strength becomes crippled, or as the privileged-class world would rightly say in such cases: “Water has been mixed with the wine”. When this happens, indeed, the trees can no longer grow up to heaven (meaning great things cannot be achieved any longer; the tree has grown as much as it can and decline will follow).

Therefore, it is essential that a movement interested in self-preservation cease adding members as soon as it has become successful. From that time on, it should exercise the greatest caution before allowing any membership changes and should examine the situation carefully before enlarging its organization. This is the only way it will be able to keep the nucleus of the movement pure, fresh, and sound. It must also be sure that this nucleus is the only group to lead the movement or decide on the propaganda, and as the center of power, this nucleus will perform all actions necessary to make its ideals a reality.


If we allowed people like these, who lack the spirit of revolution, to join our Party as members in the early days, then we would be nothing more than a pious brotherhood because we would no longer be a young movement filled with fighting spirit. The spirited and daring form that I gave our propaganda back then established and guaranteed the radical nature of our movement ever since. From that time onward, only radical people, with a few exceptions, were willing to become members. Nevertheless, our propaganda was so strong that, after a short time, hundreds of thousands not only agreed in their heart with us, but wished for our victory, even though they were personally too timid to make any sacrifices for it and some were too timid to even argue on behalf of it.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch11

This World-Concept does not build on the idea of majority, but rather on that of character.


If the National Socialist program sought to crowd out individuals and replace them with the masses, that would mean National Socialism itself was already eaten away by the poison of Marxism, just as the world of our privileged-class political parties are today.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch4

Most of all, it is our duty to restrict admittance to the party to those we are certain belong to that minority that by virtue of their value, always wrote history.

-Adolf Hitler

The subsequent Champions who came after Hitler only reinforced his warnings on the cowardly masses that would swarm and suffocate the movement from within, and expanded further on how their cowardly nature makes them absolutely useless to our Struggle, the most notable contribution being the Lemming Principle as defined and explained by Dr William Luther Pierce:

“Revolution is a spectators sport. The majority will sit in the stands and watch the factions fight. At the end they will choose side with the team that is winning.”

“So we are ideological and idealistic fanatics; just like the Communists by the way. In between the Communists and the Nazis is the great mass of non-fanatics: the TV watchers and the comic book readers.

-George Lincoln Rockwell

For more relevant GLR quotations from “White Power” see this image.

The masses, or the “mass” as a whole, can only be looked upon as a coward.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 2.20

Only after the System is BROKEN and DISCREDITED will there come a hope of mobilizing the masses of Whites to tackle the job of winning what will soon enough assume the characteristics of a civil war.

SIEGE, 2.24

The reasons why no mass movement has existed in this country on the part of Whites to defend themselves and what is theirs have been extensively dealt with by Movement scholars, probably more than any other single topic. There of course is the media brainwash which not only denies all Truth, but pumps the head full of lies and poison and robs the thinking and decision-making processes of any chance to function. There is the comfort corruption which softens and saps the spirit and will. Then there is also dysgenics which means, though a person is nominally “White,” he is so only in color, there is nothing underneath. This is the product of fratricidal wars and total lack of breeding: the creation of a race of boobs. These are some of the reasons… they may help us to understand but they excuse no one.

SIEGE, 4.10

A skillful hypocrite (i.e., “good citizen”) in a sick society, one that really knows how to assimilate or conform and generally doesn’t rock the boat, is a disgusting System Suck. I can have more respect – if that’s the right word – for the rabid liberal or Red than I can for the System Sucks and the Establishment Creeps. In any event, to go from one to the other is a national pastime and involves nothing more than a change of clothes, an expensive slick new hairstyle, and that certain mercenary acquisitive drive. But a good solid anti-social streak born right in the BLOOD cannot be changed by anything: physical suffering; brainwashing; disillusionment; discouragement; defeat… absolutely nothing. It’s been rightfully referred to as the common denominator of ALL “True Believers,” that is, of all fanatics.


We can’t quit. Nor can we be thinned-out or watered-down. Our very guts are on fire. We are the only real revolutionaries!

SIEGE, 7.1

As revolutionary National Socialists, we denounced and abandoned the so-called “mass idea” as worthless.

SIEGE, 9.16

They then built on the legacy of Adolf Hitler’s work, utilizing the negative stigma created by the Jews around Fascism and National Socialism to only further reaffirm its radical nature that would attract only the radical sort to our ranks:

By being a Nazi, with the Swastika, I would also gather the only kind of people I wanted around me: the tough, dedicated idealists ready to fight for those ideals and give their lives, if necessary. And even more important, I would automatically scare off the millions of blabber-mouths, cowards, fools and crackpots which infest the rest of the ‘movement’. The Swastika would probably not bring me many supporters, but those who came would be men.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, This Time the World, Ch12

Yet some of our critics insist that this way we can only attract the “wrong kind” of people, their definition of wrong, of course, depending on their own sensibilities, though in the case of our would-be “allies” they will accept most anyone in their ranks, except for us unless we toe their line and pipe down –“not punch right.” Some of them will lay down the claim that we’ll attract only social outcasts and unstable psychopaths. This criticism is likewise not new, and was, in fact, a point of contention between George Lincoln Rockwell and Dr William Luther Pierce, yet in the end Pierce had recognized the truth of what Rockwell had experienced for himself:

This touch of Hollywood in Rockwell’s approach to revolutionary politics always was a bone of contention between him and me. I argued that the uniforms, flags, and theatrical behavior — even the name “American Nazi Party” — made it difficult for serious people to take him seriously. His medium got in the way of his message. He replied that if he put away the flags and armbands, wore a business suit, and shunned theatrics, the news media would ignore him and no one would hear what he had to say.

His aim, he said, was to make people pay attention to his simple core message of the need for rebuilding a White, Jew-free America based on the principles laid down by Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf. When he had tried to present that message in a sober, serious way, no one had paid any attention to him. The newspapers and television stations wouldn’t send reporters to his press conferences, they ignored his press releases, and the public didn’t even know he existed. But as soon as he raised the Swastika banner, the news media went crazy and swarmed all over him. He was seen on all the TV channels and what he said was reported in the newspapers.

Yes, I answered, the theatrics get attention for you — but your message gets badly distorted. The media try to make you look like a madman and a clown, and to a large extent they succeed. The result is that most of the people attracted to you are losers, social outcasts, freaks. If you want to attract winners — serious, competent, idealistic people — you need a serious image.

Rockwell responded that it is the losers, the social outcasts, who make up the ranks of every revolutionary movement. They’re the ones who are available, the ones who don’t have anything to lose by becoming associated with a politically incorrect cause.

Individually they may not be very impressive but large numbers of them, organized and disciplined, would make a revolutionary army. He had tried appealing to what I called the winners: to the teachers and professors, to the doctors and lawyers and engineers, to the writers and artists, to the businessmen and the craftsmen, to his fellow military officers, to the careful, responsible men and women with steady employment and stable families. And he had found that while many of them agreed with him in principle, almost none had the moral courage to stand up and be counted among the righteous.

He had given speeches to groups of these people under the cover of several ostensibly conservative organizations. They would come up after his speeches, shake his hand, and tell him they admired him for saying what they also felt. But the merest suggestion from Rockwell to one of these people, that he ought to participate in an effort to take America back from the Jews and their collaborators would send the fellow scurrying away in fright. They were too comfortable, too corrupted by good living and materialism, too unaccustomed to taking risks and facing opposition. Only in the masses, Rockwell had finally concluded, were the recruits to be found that he needed to launch a political campaign to take America back — and the masses could be reached only through the mass media.

I still had serious doubts as to whether the type of people Rockwell was attracting with his flamboyant tactics could be disciplined and used to build an effective organization, and these doubts made me hold back from a whole-hearted support of his efforts. We collaborated on the publishing of National Socialist World and we continued to argue about other things. I gradually found out, however, that Rockwell was dead right about the moral cowardice and the servile conventionality of the great majority of Americans. Most of them would rather lose an arm and a leg than be suspected of thinking a politically incorrect thought, and as I worked and argued with Rockwell, my appreciation of his own courage and idealism grew.

-Dr William Luther Pierce

Thus, by taking a position and making statements which seemed extreme and even ridiculous to the “average citizen,” he could entice publicists to quote him widely, thinking thus to discredit both the man and the philosophy with these average citizens. What they failed to understand was that before the Movement could profit from any mass appeal, it had to appeal to a large number of very un-average citizens–fearless idealists who could form the National Socialist cadre.

And these men responded in a very different way to Rockwell’s message than did the liberal publicists or their average audience. They saw beyond the superficial “ridiculousness” of his message to the kernel of deep truth that it contained. While the average citizen, incapable of thinking beyond the immediate problems of the day, found Rockwell’s message “too extreme,” just as the publicists intended, those who could extrapolate in their minds the developments of the present to the consequences of tomorrow – and of a century hence – saw the compelling necessity of his demands. But such men are rather sparsely distributed throughout the population, and to reach them Rockwell needed to cast his net very wide; this the publicists helped him do while they thought to smear him. Rockwell also understood that the image of him being erected in the minds of the masses, while a liability now, had a value for the future, when conditions had ripened so that at least some of those masses were ready for an “extremist.”

-Dr. William Luther Pierce, “A National Socialist Life”

And to be sure, there are those among the social outcasts who can become fanatical and disciplined warriors for our cause. It becomes simply a matter of first attracting the outcasts and then filtering out the ones who are beyond redemption, that is to say, those who do not find salvation in the Worldview of Fascism and National Socialism. For not all social outcasts are such because they are degenerates, some are social outcasts because this society is degenerate. Those among them who will join our ranks will become disciplined warriors in time, for they will then serve something greater than themselves.

[…] we should be aware that in a sick or even mildly mediocre society such as exists today, it is a badge of honor to be possessed of an anti-social streak. It will keep you safe and high above the trash and poison of the milieu – right from birth – where no amount of “proper education,” “good background,” “upbringing,” etc., could.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.1

Discipline comes from within yourself. You accept it because you follow a higher will.

-Helmut Stellrecht, “Faith and Action”

The major problem of this world is the spiritual depravity that has left people atomized, bereft and alone, dispossessed – this can bring down and suffocate even the strongest of men, especially with the growing amount of material luxuries and self-indulgences to keep one distracted. Indeed, one can find drugs more readily available and socially acceptable to deal with their spiritual syphilis, than the real answer to their loathsome state of affairs, that answer being the Fascist/NS Worldview of Truth. Should one stumble upon it and truly grasp, understand and internalize its message, and if they possess the kind of character that is of absolute necessity to brave and champion our ideals in an open struggle, then they will no longer be outcasts of a dying and degenerate society, but fanatical fighters in the Struggle for their people.

These are the people that we are looking for among the outcasts, to whom we issue our provocative and radical message, those who belong in our ranks, even though they may not even realize it yet themselves.

Character is not acquired, it is given unto man at the whim of divine unjust fate, recognized by nationalists and denied by liberals.

Ernst Junger, “Character”

One does not become a National Socialist. One only discovers, sooner or later, that one has always been one — that, by nature, one could not possibly be anything else. For this is not a mere political label; not an “opinion” that one can accept or dismiss according to circumstances, but a faith, involving one’s whole being, physical and psychological, mental and spiritual: “not a new election cry, but a new conception of the world”— a way of life — as our Führer himself has said.

-Savitri Devi, Gold in the Furnace, Ch9

I can think of nothing more formidable than a band of malcontents who know exactly who they are, what they want and how to go about getting it!

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.1

And Rockwell had proven himself right, one only has to read the “Spiritual Syphilis” chapter of White Power to see the example of a discovered Aryan Viking warrior, once he was cleansed of the chapter’s namesake, that had turned him into a social outcast and burnout who was desperately searching for himself. And that cleansing process is exactly what we must adapt in order to discover these hidden warriors and keep out the undesirable degenerates who seek to join our ranks for whatever other reasons they may have.

The guy at the door of Nazi Headquarters was the living embodiment of the national suicide I have set forth in chapter 1. He seemed young. But you couldn’t be sure, because he was wearing a matted red beard.He wasn’t wearing clothes just a raggedy blanket and sandals. “Shades” (sun glasses) covered his eyes. Unkempt hair covered much of the rest of his face.


I have often found that I learn most, not from books and literature, but from people and events themselves. And this guy looked like a whole encyclopedia of everything degenerate.

I invited him in. We talked. He couldn’t stay still, but kept moving around the room, seeming to float a few inches above the floor. (I later learned that he was on pills and narcotics.) After an hour or so of talking, he began to change a bit. He appeared unsure of himself in the presence of something he’d never experienced before – men who were sure of themselves and had a purpose. A look of unbelieving wonder came over his blue eyes, even through the “shades” as I talked to him of what we really were and why we had given up everything of fun in life to fight for our nation and White Race. Little by little, I began to get the story out of him. He was only seventeen years old, and had lived an entire lifetime. He’d done everything, tried all kicks, and was already bored to death with an empty life. He’d made a mistress out of his art teacher, he’d run a den of degeneracy and debauchery called “Mule’s Pad” where the local beats and wild crowds did anything, including enjoy dope. He’d shot a man, gotten off, and lived as fast and hard as he could until finally, he contemplated suicide in utter despair of finding ANYTHING worth doing any more all this at seventeen! Before he committed suicide, he told me, he decided to come to see the Nazi “cats,” figuring it might be one last kick. What he found, unexpectedly, was what every human being needs to survive this life a PURPOSE – something which gives life more meaning than a constant search for more pleasure and kicks. He actually convinced me he wanted to try to be a Storm trooper!

As a matter of policy, whenever I hear that (as I do every day), I do all I can to discourage the applicant. We want no dabblers, but dedicated, fanatical fighters who will STICK through hell itself. With this crazy character, I went even further. I made fun of him. I told him he’d never make it, that we’d run him off the first day.

He rose to the challenge.

“You name it, and I’ll make it!” he said.

Strangely, I could sense a fiercely burning WILL behind the words. I told him he couldn’t come up to try life as a Nazi Storm-trooper until he was eighteen. He left, vowing to return in a few months. He did return – without the beatnik get-up. He turned out to be a blonde, young Viking, built for combat.

We poured it to him.

There was no place left inside for him to sleep. So he was assigned to a wrecked car out back. It was still winter and cold. But the kid moved into the wrecked car with a couple of blankets. We put him to work cleaning the toilets, and yard.

He worked.

Spring came, and then a broiling summer. He was still in the wrecked car, eaten alive by mosquitoes. I tried him on the printing press, and never saw such a bear for work. He was all dried out of booze, off the pills and dope, exercising plenty, and showing every sign of ‘making it.’

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch2

“Get the fuck off my porch, lemming!”

To summarize: we must avoid bloating our ranks for nearly the same reasons as we must avoid alliances, as their effects are the same, difference being only between Fascists and National Socialists being subdued into passivity from without by the coalition “allies”, and the Fascist and National Socialist spirit being extinguished from within the group they had built up to advance our common ideals by the dead weight that was allowed to join its ranks. Even when you look back all the way to Hitler, the necessity for the movement, group or party to consist exclusively of fanatics and be a vanguard, rather than a mass movement, has been made obvious, with clear warnings given against falling to the allure of quantity.

It is our duty, if we wish to achieve Victory, that we accept only fanatics within our ranks and keep the passive supporters outside the boundaries of whatever groups and movements we wish to establish, outside the nucleus of the Party. If, that is, passive supporters are allowed to join it’s rank and file, with nothing expected of them in return beyond their passive support.

The fastest way to grow in mass is to grow fat, but if you are fat you will not be winning any races or fights, let alone competing against a real runner or fighter, who trained to get only the kind of muscles he needed for the given task. And as everyone knows, fat and muscle of the same weight have a vast difference in their volume. Mass movement is the approach of growing fat, cowardly and lazy (as even the members of your mass movement might be literally fat, cowardly and lazy themselves), a fanatical group of idealists, on the other hand, is the approach of growing muscle, there will always be less, but it will be capable of packing a punch and getting the job done.

These Champions have shown us how we can successfully build our movements by simply being honest about who we are and about our intentions, all the while pushing unwanted elements, who weren’t scared off by our honesty, out and away from our ranks. We are not beggars to ask every passer by to join us, we are not choosers to pick out the least bad out of available options, we are Demanders who will not allow in anyone who is not up to snuff, who is not a fanatic, moreover a fanatical and true Fascist/NS.

We thus reject the very idea of mass movements and with it the idea of a need for popular support in order to engage in activism – we must instead drive away the vast majority of the people from joining us, and put those who do wish to join us to the test, so that only those who are true may stand with us. In the end, should we remain fanatical and pure in our vision of this Struggle, we will retain the potency and energy of our groups, which is the key to success and our inevitable victory, and that will be what will drive the masses to support us and rally around us.

When you rise and stand up and the masses see what a man of FORCE looks like, they will love you, as they now imagine they hate you.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, “In Hoc Signo Vinces”

Those who handicap their actions to first gaining mass appeal effectively shoot themselves in the foot before even making their first step on the treacherous path ahead, and immediately stumble and fall over in inactivity, as the bloated mass defuses the fighting spirit of the group. For truly, if the lemmings could actually be engaged in action against our enemies, wouldn’t they have done so themselves already? Would they have allowed the enemy enslave them in the first place?

This should be enough to successfully showcase the futility of the “lack of support from below” side to the “you can’t be an open Nazi!” argument. We must now conclude, that if the Altright is actually a “Nazis in hiding” entryism tactic, then this tactic has been proven to not only be based on false fears of immediate “total annihilation” retribution, but also futile in its attempts to  appeal to the masses, as they instead elicit negative emotions from the public. This is because they appear to be weak and cowardly.

Moreover, this approach is not new and has been proven to be an abysmal failure in practice numerous times.

Though what a dreary, tiresome task it would be, someone should try to catalog the number as well as the names of all the microscopic “groups” which make up the galaxy loosely referred to as “the Movement”. A study in futility and impotency. Every one of them “disguised” as something or another and with all their effort going toward the upkeep of the disguise rather than the expressed purpose. Commander Rockwell referred to these types as “Sneaky Nazis”. Mostly, they knew and understood what National Socialism was and is about but had no stomach or self-discipline to join the real fight in earnest.


Who are we trying to hide from? What are we trying to conceal? Who are we trying to kid? We, after all, are the ones representing Life, we have the answers, we have what it is everybody needs and wants. So why should we sneak? (If a person likes to dress up in a 1930’s German uniform, for example, I can understand the need to sneak and hide.) But we go forth among our fellows ready at any time to impart Truth to whomever seeks it or will hear it. Second, the “Sneaky Nazis” are several steps below “open” Nazis because they are aware of what they are doing and yet lack the courage and honesty to correct themselves.


Do not deny your prophets, your heroes and your saviors. As long as there is any breach of faith anywhere, nothing positive can ever proceed. It is something that the ignorant and the stubborn will have to live with.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 9.20 

See more relevant quotations from George Lincoln Rockwell’s  “White Power” in this image.

The only “positive” argument that is promoted in favor of the “sneaky nazi” approach (as opposed to the negative argumentation in its favor based on fear of immediate retribution from above and lack of support from below) that we’ve come to hear quite often is simply that “we’ll wrestle power back from the Jews the same way they took over, with a sneaky long march through the institutions.”

The hilarious absurdity of this argument is that showcases exactly the same kind of naivety that permitted the Jewish take over in the first place! The Jews managed to sneak their way in not only because they are natural-born sneaks, but because the decadent societies that allowed them in were gullible enough to trust them! Thus the premise of this argument is that the Jew will not only be just as gullible as the people whom he swindled, but that he’ll be an absolute idiot on top of that and fall for his own swindle! “Sneaky nazis” are in for a rude awakening when the Jew either calls their bluff or actually plays along with it long enough to cause untold amount of damage.

By all accounts, being honest and direct Fascists and National Socialists yields greater results than being sneaks.

You can’t out-sneak the System. But neither can any number of sneaks, or scum, or whatever withstand the onslaught of berserk, Viking warriors!

-James Mason, SIEGE, 6.4

This, of course, says nothing about open and honest Fascists and National Socialists engaging in possible sneaky tactics of our own, of which you can learn from such materials as SIEGE or Colin Jordan‘s “Uprising”, but we will never turn them into the definitive modus operandi and primary front for our entire Struggle.

Lastly, on top of the “sneaky nazi” approach being ineffective in its intentions, as its practitioners always find themselves on the defensive and make themselves appear weak, pathetic and cowardly, had this approach actually ever worked it would still be a most despicable and reprehensible act. Once the deception is discovered or made known to the public it would carry over an immediate backlash from both the masses and the immediate supporters of the actual group that utilized this method, assuring the group’s immediate downfall through disintegration, splintering and subterfuge carried out by the disenchanted and angry followers. The “sneaky nazis” would rightly become scorned as nothing more than backstabbing liars and terrible, untrustworthy leaders, as they promise their followers one thing and then deliver something else entirely. Public opinion will always yield to whatever is the dominant force, but the human disdain for weakness and cowardice is instinctual and unyielding through time. The very underhanded nature of this notion speaks of one’s ill, weak and tiny character that is by definition incompatible with the Fascist and National Socialist Worldview.

Of course, today, we face the destructive barking of our nation’s enemies at home. But we National-Socialists should never be swayed from our course of proclaiming what is absolutely necessary based on our inherent convictions. It is true that we must endure the flow of public opinion, which has been misled by the cunning Jewish exploitation of German thoughtlessness. It is true that sometimes the waves around us roar with evil fierceness, but those who swim with the current are more easily overlooked than the one who swims against the current. Today, we are just a rock sticking out of the flowing current. However, in only a few years Fate will elevate us to become a dam which will direct the flow of the current into a new riverbed.

Therefore, it is necessary for the National-Socialist movement to be recognized and established in the eyes of the rest of the world as the representative of a definite political idea. Whatever Heaven may have in store for us, let everyone know who we are by the caps we wear.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch14

However, we don’t actually believe the Altright to be “sneaky nazis” in the least, although we, again, can’t discount the high probability of those existing beneath the Altright’s colorful “big tent” circus top, albeit they are likely to be but a small fragment of their total mass.

Let us then move on to the other possibilities.

Altright – Hipster conservatism?

When the Altright first began to gain more traction it created a distinction between itself and the mainstream American “right wing” of the conservative Republican Party, hence the name “Alternative Right”, as in an alternative to Republican conservatism, which has been discredited for cucking on its principles and giving into liberal “left wing” demands and narratives, thus earning itself the denigrating title of cuckservatism”. This term was used to further draw the line of distinction between the Altright and the mainstream American “right wing”. There had later been talk of substituting mainstream conservatism and the Republican Party, with supporting memes of “Look at me – I’m the GOP now”.

If we take this alone into consideration then we do indeed get an image of the Altright as a kind of “hipster conservatism” or a “conservatism for millennials”, a new and hip brand that revitalized old conservative values for a younger generation, making it fun. In the overview of the last possibility of what the Altright might be (Racist liberals) we will look at what it actually is, as there is more to it than just this. However, when we take only the highlights above into consideration, as well as their implications, we still get a legitimate insight into certain events which we will address later.

The irony here is, of course, that the inception of the Altright apparently owes itself to what our “allies” criticize ourselves for repeatedly, namely “punching right” – the whole reason the Altright exists is because it punched the GOP for either cucking/betraying conservative values, or apparently for not being “right wing” “enough”. However, the bigger issue at hand is that American conservatism has never been “right wing” by European standards – again we must deal with the relative nature of this Right/Left dichotomy. Moreover, conservatism itself is a relative concept with no fundamental values to its name, something we explored in quite some detail in another previous article: Con/Cuckservative, Reactionary, RevolutionaryOne can certainly ascribe more definitive traits to a given form of conservatism by giving it a clarifying denomination, such as American Conservatism, as per our primary discussion venue, – and yet when you do that you are still left with something that takes its origin in what was called “left wing” in Europe, namely in the model of classical liberalism.

Thus American Conservatism is nothing more than the defense of classical liberalism on which the United States of America had been originally founded, with Enlightenment and Rationalism values at its core, including the germ of that poisonous idea of equality. Whatever hopes the United States had to escape those values in favor of an organic national identity, instead of a fake paper identity issued by the State and reinforced by one’s adherence to its liberal values, were repeatedly and thoroughly smashed by our enemies, including the Jews. This was elaborated on in some detail by Francis Parker Yockey.

America began its independent political existence as a creature of Rationalism. Its politicians agreed to the proposition— externally— that “all men are created equal,” and even said this was “self-vident.” To call it self-evident, and thus dispense with proof, was easier, and perhaps wiser, than to prove it. Proof would have spoiled what is actually a tenet of a Faith, and thus above Reason. The religion of Rationalism dominated America in a way that it was never able to dominate Europe. Europe always had resistance against Rationalism— based on tradition until the middle of the 19th century, and after that based on anticipation of the coming anti-rationalist spirit of the 20th century — as exemplified in Carlyle and Nietzsche. But America did not possess the first because it had no tradition, and had not the second, because Cultural impulses and Culture-forwarding phenomena come from the Mother-soil and are thence radiated outward, as the Rationalistic religion of America came from England, through France.

America, as the country most completely disintegrated by Rationalism, exhibited the least understanding of the nature of the Jew, while there were always some people in Europe— for instance, Carlyle— even during the 19th century who realized the total, and not merely political, alienness of the Jew. But in America, with its complete lack of tradition, there were no Carlyles, no de Lagardes. Thus America decided, in the middle of the 19th century, that a Chinaman born in the United States thereby acquired exactly the same American citizenship as the white native population of European derivation. Characteristically, the decision was not made in a responsible fashion, but as the result of a lawsuit. This was in pursuance of an American custom of deciding political questions in a pseudo-legal form. Obviously a regime which did not differentiate between Chinese and native American would oppose no political barrier to the Jew. And so, by 1928, the French writer on historical and world-political topics, Andre Siegfried, could say that New York City had a Semitic countenance. By the middle of the 20th century, this development had gone further, and New York City, the largest city in America, perhaps in the world, was almost half Jewish in population.”

-Francis Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM

As such, the entirety of the mainstream American “right-wing” is by definition no ally of ours, as it is rooted in everything that we vehemently oppose and see to be at fault in the world. In fact the entirety of the American State exists as a direct enemy to our values and goals. The only valid Fascist/NS action in America is that of the absolutely leveling of the existing State, state culture, it’s values – in short, the total destruction of “Americanism” as such. Only then can something organic (and thus Fascist/NS) be grown in its place.

Here the sickness has been coming along, unabated, for at least three generations, and probably more. It’s their own baby and they love it. They wouldn’t be parted from it. It’s part of “Americanism”. This sickness is home-grown and it is from the inside out.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 3.9

This concept has been promoted as “American Futurism”. The entirety of James Mason‘s SIEGE deals with the very goal of leveling the American System, to which he referred as the “Beast System, a thing more loathsome and evil than any which appears in the Bible”.

The enemy today is the U.S. Government itself and it is, by every standard of measure, the most evil thing that has ever existed on earth. This, once it has sunk home, should be a good enough indicator of the sort of struggle we have ahead of us.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 2.2

This should only further illustrate how little relative terms of “Right/Left wing” mean, and exactly why we will never accept calls of allegiance on that premise. We judge things based on the values they promote – if those values are not our own, then we are enemies.

Even if we were to be convinced that the United States were at one point founded on something real and worth preserving, we would still call for an all out attack on its institutions, for Victory of the Race will not be achieved in defense of some dying an decrepit structure, but only through life-affirming ATTACK and CONQUEST.

The very word and idea of “conservatism” guarantees that the victims of this delusion will merely try to “conserve” what is already GONE (such as the Constitution, etc.), thus condemning themselves to a pitiful, rear-guard DEFENSIVE action.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch12

Nazism replaces the collapsing “conservative” defense with vigorous ATTACK.

And when a people are as near to historical death as the whole White Race, attack is not only the best defense, it is the ONLY defense.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch5

The whole basis of the Right Wing was to try and “hold,” defend a shrinking perimeter, shouting “Never!”anti-this and anti-that. One can only be shoved over the brink so many times, or trampled and annihilated up to a certain point when one must admit that, if it was a defensive struggle that was being waged, it was lost a little while ago.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 2.1

The job is to build a world of our own, not to pull someone else’s chestnuts out of the fire. Not a defense but an attack! To borrow a revolutionary press statement by Ed Reynolds, “We don’t want to rock the boat, we want to SINK it!”

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.1

Fascism is not Tory Reaction in a black shirt or brown shirt, but the steel piston of realist revolution.

-William Brooke Joyce

Everywhere else, where there exists the natural, organic national and racial identity, nationalists, let alone Fascists and National Socialists, realize that the State is a separate thing  that exists as an expression of the nation, as part of its cultural expression, one that is organized towards manifesting the collective will of the nation in action for both internal and external matters.

The State is the form of a nation for action.

-Francis Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM 

However, through decay the State may cease to be an expression of the Nation, it may grow rigid and mechanical, very much in accordance with Oswald Spengler‘s concepts of Culture and Civilization. When this happens, nationalists have no qualms with laying to ruin the decadent and mechanical state along with all of the symbols which once expressed the pride and glory of the national culture. For when the state grows decadent and mechanic all symbols and institutions become worth no more or less than the physical materials through which they were expressed – institutions become just buildings, banners just colored rags. They may retain their cultural value in the memory of the nation, memory of the times when those institutions and symbols still retained their national essence, but they cannot become a value in of themselves, worthy of defense at the expense of the nation’s essence.

In short: organic identity has nothing to fear in the loss of what it had produced itself in the first place, the Nation takes primacy over the State and thus the Nation can always build a new State, but the State can never revitalize national health and restore the Nation’s spirit if the State itself had already ceased to be an expressive force of that Nation. If the spirit and will of that identity, the essence of the Nation and its character, still retains its vigor and vitality, then it will express itself anew.

Nationalists can destroy the State in the name of their Nation, so that a new, once again truly National State may be built on the ruins, and a new flag unfurled to signify its rebirth. New in form and appearance, yet in reality but a new manifestation of that Nation’s distinct character, the expression of the eternal Truth in its blood.

Our flag is neither red, nor black-red-gold, nor black-white-red; it is the flag of a new, vast reich that resides in our hearts, attaining in them its gestalt. The day will come when we will be able to unfurl it.

-Ernst Junger, Forward to  F.G. Junger’s book“March of Nationalism”

As sacred and dear as the old and beautiful colors must be, especially when they were fresh and youthful, to every decent German who has fought for them and has seen the sacrifices of so many under those colors, that flag is not the symbol for a battle of the future.

In contrast to the privileged-class politicians, I have always maintained the view in our movement that it is a real blessing for the German nation to have lost the old flag. What the new Republic does under its flag is unimportant to us. But we should thank Fate from the bottom of our hearts that it was merciful enough to protect the most glorious battle-flag of all times from being used as a cover for the most shameful prostitution. The present Reich, which sells-out itself and its citizens, must never fly the heroic black-white-red flag of honor.

As long as the November disgrace lasts, let it wear its own outer garment and not steal one from a more honest past. The conscience of our privileged-class politicians should tell them that anyone who desires the black-white-red flag for the current State is stealing from our past. The old flag really was beautiful, but only for the old Empire, just as the Republic has chosen a new one that is suited to itself.

This was the reason why we National-Socialists could not consider raising the old flag as a symbolic expression of what we were working for. After all, we did not want to awaken the old-dead Empire, which was destroyed by its own faults. We wanted to build a new State.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch7

However, USA is not an organic nation, as we’ve already stated, it was founded not as an expression of an organic nation’s character and will, but instead an idealistic experiment of Rationalist thought, rooted in Enlightenment values. Here, the State takes primacy over the vast array of people of different national and racial backgrounds, and imposes on them the values on which it was based, artificial values created from the imagination of men. The American State is a product of Intellect, not of Blood. There is no space for any organic nationalism here, only for the liberal civic nationalism of the nation-state with its paper identity of citizenship, permitting anyone to become an American. As a result the “American” identity is one that has been artificially grown in accordance to State interests; one that disregards the organic national and racial backgrounds of the people who came to settle and populate USA; one  that has been planned and directed in its growth by those in power, and if you take to heart what Francis Parker Yockey said in IMPERIUM, then this identity has also been the plaything of the Jews since the 1930s.

Thus Americans are by far and large no more than civic nationalists and patriots, and whoever tries to walk outside that mold is immediately chastised for being un-American. To be an American is to wave the State flag and to praise the piece of paper on which this artificial construct was founded (The Constitution) as well as the men who had concocted it (The Founding Fathers). The latter two elements hold no more intrinsic value than the Communist Manifesto and “The Founding Fathers” of Communism, Marx and Engels – USA might as well have been set up on those grounds and then it would have been un-American to not praise the Manifesto. There is no national character to fall back on because there is no one single nationality that can lay claim to the US for its conception, moreover there is nothing to fall back on period, because Americanism has for the most part effectively wiped out any and all national and racial identity and conscious heritage of its European settlers.

What sort of Movement would it take to represent the will of the American people today? With some variations, several are already on the scene and, I might add, none of them remotely resemble anything National Socialist. Then too, there is no “American People,” only Whites who, for the most part, have lost all racial pride and identity. But they are only reflections of what their rulers, the upper classes, have made themselves into. In a plutocracy, which this is, the wealthy decide and control the mould of the society, how the future generations will take shape. And, like any god, they can predictably be expected to fashion the people of the future in their own image. Meet the future today as it was envisioned forty and fifty years ago! And tomorrow?

-James Mason, SIEGE, 3.9

As a result Americans are heavily dependent on their State/paper identity, which goes a long way to ensure its survival, as the American “right-wing” by definition stands in defense of that, on which the State relies for its power and control of the populace. Whatever “alternatives” get formed continue to rely on that same premise and thus invariably handcuff themselves to the System, as they effectively do not wish to fight and destroy it, but rather come to control and change it. Hipster conservatism does the same thing, but makes it “fun”, leading the American youth to further comply with the fake paper identity of the State as they put on their MAGA hats, though from everything that has been said so far it should be clear why no Fascist or National Socialist will ever agree that America had ever been great. An American Fascist/NS, if he is truly NS, cannot agree either, to him American Futurism and SIEGE are the only ways to liberate the people from the clutches of the System, in order to foster something truly organic in its place. With the destruction of the System in America, the ensuing conflict and strife will by necessity give rise to something organic and full of vitality, capable of establishing its own State as the expression of that new organic identity, full of life and creative force behind it. What that new entity will be cannot be predicted any more than one could predict what the Germans, French or English would grow to become at the dawn of their inception, for that mystery of their blood, imparted on them by the Absolute/Truth/God etc, had not yet come to express itself.

To conclude: Fascists and National Socialists, including American ones, have no allies in the american “right-wing” scene as they are hopelessly enslaved to an entity that is fundamentally contrary to everything we stand and fight for, hence they are incapable of even mounting an effective attack against it, let alone of pursuing the same goals as us. This only compounds the criticism of the American “right-wing” that has already been presented via the Rockwell quotes earlier. Altright as hipster conservatism simply falls into the same category as old and tired mainstream conservatism, just younger and “hip with the times”. The only path American Fascists and National Socialists have before them is that of American Futurism.

Still, as we said at the start of this segment, we do not believe that this alone is the original Altright, however the Hipster Conservative Altright has come into existence once the term Altright had reached mainstream notoriety, of which we will speak more in the next segment dealing with the real nature of the Altright.

Altright – Racist liberals?

We come to the final possibility as to the nature of the Altright, and by all accounts we find this one to ring the most true. Taking into consideration the same initial premise as the one introduced in the previous possibility, namely of the Altright appearing as an “alternative” to the mainstream American conservatism, which it had accused of betraying American conservative values, the core from which the Altright label had sprung also contains elements of vague racialism, including some sort of awareness of the Jewish Question, and no less vague white nationalism.

In total we find only two definitive elements to the Altright: it’s adherence to Americanism and, ironically, its vagueness when it comes to the very issues on which we supposedly share some common ground with them, which prompts their calls for “alliances” and “not punching right”. The incredible vagueness that is the definitive trademark of the Altright is due to it’s “big tent” approach when it comes to both what people make up its followers and the people it finds itself in alliance with. For all intents and purposes the Altright is the quintessential example of everything that our Champions had warned us against. Just go back and read their criticism of alliances and mass movement approaches that we presented earlier in this article, you’ll find that the Altright has been consistent in ignoring all those warnings.

By trying to amass itself as many followers as possible the Altright has made itself too vague to identify, only things that it definitively advertised were that it is “Right wing”, a “new alternative” to mainstream American conservatism, and that it seeks to establish a “White Ethnostate” (yet more vagueness). However, in its pursuit of becoming something “hip”, as is even advertised by the use of the Alt prefix itself (Alt is the new New/Neo/Post/Meta), it had delved into contemporary youth and internet/meme culture, becoming that “edgy” Hipster Conservatism for millennials. This method in theory sounds oddly similar to the American 90s marketing craze for appealing to teenagers with “XTREME” themes.

“No, this isn’t your grandpa’s conservatism, this is the new RAD AND WIRED ALTRIGHT BRAND X-TREME CONSERVATISM!! WE HAVE FUN, MEMES AND MICROMACHINES!! R U XTREME ENOUGH TO HANDLE IT?!? GET YOURS TODAY!! PEEEHPAAAY!!! warning:micromachinesnotofficiallyaffiliatedwiththealtrightandaresoldseparately.”

Of course, despite the labels and the appeal to internet culture, Altright is still deeply rooted in Americanism and thus in liberal logic, but combined with vague racialism, in effect becoming nothing more than Racist Liberalism. The Altright simply feels that Americanism has been “ruined” (vehemently denying that it was never any good in the first place) by non-whites. Indeed the ranks of the Altright are full of former liberals and libertarians who had been shocked into their newfound racialism by the new progressive generation of SJWs. Now to protect their beloved Americanism they wish to arm themselves with that vague racialism and the goal of a “White Ethnostate”.

We’ve already covered the issue of Americanism extensively in the previous segment, so now let us discuss this vague racialism and what it effectively amounts to. The vagueness of the Altright racialism is present throughout its entire narrative and is defined by the end goal of establishing the “White Ethnostate”, which holds no more specific aspects to it other than that it would be a “homogeneous society” and that alone is the key to success. As a result the Altright requires only just enough racialism to prove how a homogeneous society is better than a multicultural one and… that’s it. Anything else becomes just icing on the cake after the fact, depending on what kind of racialists the Altright had managed to attract into its fold, thus the degrees of racialism varies. 

There was a reason the young movement settled on a definite program and avoided using the word “Racialist” in it. The concept of “racialism” is unclear and indefinite which makes it impossible as a basis for a movement. It also does not offer any standard to judge what the members actually stand for. The more vague this concept is and the more open to interpretation it becomes, the more it appeals to everyone. Anyone can see whatever they want in the movement.

Injecting an idea into a political struggle that is vague and capable of many interpretations will ultimately destroy the solidarity and lead to harsh fighting within the fellowship. A political movement cannot survive if the individual is allowed to decide on his own what he believes the movement stands for. It is outrageous that people are running around today with the “Racial” symbol on their hats and how many of them have created their own definition of what the idea means.


Everyone interprets the idea as he happens to understand it. Such a wide variety of opinions is unacceptable as a basis for a fighting political movement. I am not even referring to their separation from reality and particularly the ignorance these people display when it comes to the soul of the nation which is commonly seen in these racialist movements, these John the Baptists of the twentieth century. The value of these people is clearly illustrated in the way they are treated by the Left-Wing parties. They find them ridiculous so they let these people rant and rave and just laugh at them.

Anyone in this world who is not hated by his enemies is worthless as a friend to me. 

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V1, Ch12

There’s the crime statistics, the IQ charts, the comparison of cultural achievements, white flight, all sorts of arguments that to Fascists and National Socialists are entirely secondary. We’ll use them, but they are not our primary and definitive arguments, which further showcases how much our goals and those of our Altright “allies” differ. Their “White Ethnostate” goal amounts to little more than a white liberal gated community expanded to the size of a whole country, something we’ve already outlined in one of our previous articles. No wonder they are excited about Trump’s promise of a literal big wall – it is the ultimate, yuuuuge picket fence around their neighborhood, now they just need to get the whole of society to agree with them on keeping the Jews and darkies out of the neighborhood with their Overton Window petition.

What happens, is that the Altright finds itself between the average contemporary Americanism that doesn’t mind non-whites and “treats everyone as individuals” (the mainstream American “right wing” to which it poses itself as an alternative), and the progressive liberal SJW crowd that are taking Americanism to its logical self-destructive conclusions (the mainstream American “left wing”).

The altright wants exactly the same as the former group, minus the non-whites and the kind of whites that promote the latter. They fail to realize, that the latter are a direct product and result of the liberal mentality of the former, the SJW scene is the logical progression of the kind of Rationalist/Enlightenment principles on which the US was founded. The altright attacks the late-stage symptoms of natural death compounded by disease, not the reason for natural death, and is therefore ineffective against the opportunistic disease itself as well, as their solutions are always half-measures, an attempt to freeze the decay and disease at a certain stage of their development in perpetuity and proclaim that to be their ideal.

Their conflict with the American political mainstream, both “left” and “right” is premised on the same notion: “nonwhites get out, we don’t want to share the “fruits” of liberalism they’re all ours, OURS! REEEEEE DON’T TOUCH MY TOYS SHITSKIN!!!,” whereas the American “right” does want to share on “equal” and “fair” terms, and the American “left” is willing to sacrifice whites in order to give all of it up to the nonwhites. Sure, the nonwhites ruin the “fruits” of a liberal society and break all of the toys, however those things were no good to begin with. A further interesting point to highlight would be the prevalent opposition to socialism that exists within the Altright, including the Socialism of National Socialism, and not just Marxist Socialism or its successor, Cultural Marxist Socialism. OG Marxist Socialism, which aims towards Communism, pursues the goal of the formula “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”; Cultural Marxist Socialism develops that formula further into “from each white according to his ability, to each non-white according to his needs”.

However the Altright likewise opposes National Socialism, the entire foundation of which is, of course, duty and service, of which the liberal mindset wants neither, just as much as it opposes the idea of having to give up its cummies and general liberal frivolities for redistribution among other whites or giving them all up to nonwhites. “Comfortable and safe suburban bourgeois Life, Liberty from responsibilities and duties, and the pursuit of Happiness, i.e. hedonistic pleasures and cummies”that is the true slogan of Americanism, and thus the slogan of the Altright, which only attaches to that a sign reading “no niggers, Jews or other nonwhites allowed!” It comes then as no surprise why so many in the Altright worship the American 50s, when Americanism was strong and the nonwhites were fewer, but they ignore that the 60s had come about as a direct result of the previous decade(s).

If this society were not ripe for death, would it so willingly harken to the Jewish and liberal song of death? Would it cooperate so readily?

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.19

It is not physical lacks or hardship which bears down or our people and drives them unconsciously toward national and racial suicide.

It is a SPIRITUAL failing, a DISEASE of the spirit, which has our people down and beaten. 

Our people are rotting from the inside, no matter how the outside gives the appearance of prosperity and happiness.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch2

Fascists and NS, on the other hand, want to eradicate the very core underlying problem, hence there is no room for idolizing the 50s or Americanism in general – it’s all wrong. We cannot be allies with those who are employing half measures for, what is to us, half-goals. Therein is hidden the lie of us having the same goals based on the idea that both sides are rooted in racialism. Sure, we have some similar starting point if we bring everything down to a common denominator of actually recognizing that races exist and matter to social organization, yet our “racialism” is anything but vague, and when taken to its logical ends it will necessitate the destruction of liberalism, even if it calls itself Americanism.

The Altright wants to stop the train halfway to its final destination – by addressing some symptoms of the degeneracy, while leaving the core of modernity intact. We want to go all the way, so a conflict between us for the train controls is inevitable. To call us “fellow travelers” would be as delusional as it would be to say that a priest going to church is a fellow traveler with a sodomite who is going to a gay bathhouse located halfway down the same road.

As we deal with absolutes of Truth and Lies and not practicality for the sake of an “all-white-liberal-playground”, our own “racialism”, goes far beyond the limits of what the Altright requires for their goals. Moreover, Fascism and NS in reality hold a monopoly on racial values as it was only the Fascist and National Socialist Worldview that took the fundamentals of racial principles to their logical conclusions and stuck with them as the end goals, ready to not only promote but to fight and die for them. Only Fascists and National Socialists can declare themselves to be real proponents and defenders of racial values (moreover, to be their sole champions) as opposed to the big, vague tent that is the Altright and its intellectual “racialist sleepwalkers,” whose idea of “active struggle” is as laughable as it is sad evidence of the current state of affairs.

If National Socialism is to conquer, it must declare this set of ideas absolutely and exclusively as its own. Here too it has the duty and the right to stress that any attempt to maintain the race-based idea outside the confines of the National-Socialist German Workers’ Party is pointless and impossible, and in most cases, such claims are outright fraud.

If anyone today accuses the movement of acting as if it “owned” the race-based idea, there is just one single answer: We not only own it, but for all practical purposes, we created it.

Nothing that previously existed under the name racialist was fit to influence the destiny of our people in the slightest because these ideas all lacked clear, unified formulation. In most cases, these ideas were a collection of mere isolated, disconnected convictions, which varied in their soundness. They often contradicted one another and never had any cohesion among themselves. Even if this cohesion had existed, it was too weak to build a movement from. This is what the National-Socialist movement accomplished alone.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch5

Indeed, Fascism and National-Socialism are the only logical conclusions to any legitimate racial values and racial thinking, whereas Altright “racialism” has more in common with the kind of “redneck racism” imagined by mainstream liberals.

Redneck racism was based on hate, fear, ignorance and plain snobbery, etc. Hitler’s kind of racialism – and Manson’s – was, and is, based upon Natural Order.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 4.19

With the Altright the intellectual “racialist sleepwalking” is a product of their redneck racism. They simply hated other races for immediate emotion-driven reasons (“not that there’s anything wrong with that,” as this is an instinctual manifestation of a deeper Truth) rather than by virtue of having any fundamental reasons rooted in a definitive Worldview (of which there is only one, that of the Truth, of Fascism and NS).

Redneck racism is fine by us when it comes to the average folk, however if you wish to lead your people with racial values you are obliged to know the fundamental underlying reasons for this instinctual behavior and turn it into a social doctrine.

They utilized racialist thinking for pragmatic and utilitarian reasons alone, to justify their emotional drives after the fact, without ever taking that thinking to its logical conclusion (Fascism/NS). Again – they need it only in as much as it helps them create their all-white-liberal-playground ethnostate, where they don’t have to deal with nonwhites at all and can wallow in liberal degeneracy that fully comprehensive racial thinking would fundamentally oppose. Their racialism serves the goal of excluding nonwhites from white societies and that is it, merely a means to an end.

Fascism and National Socialism take racial thinking to its logical conclusions and uphold racial values AS VALUES  in of themselves within the model of the Organic State. Where a vague racialist can at most be simply proud of having been born a certain race, in the Fascist/NS Worldview being born into a certain race is but a premise, as that alone it is not enough. To be born Aryan is not enough to justify pride, it is a life-long obligation of duty and service to live up to the destiny of your Aryan blood. When racial origin is taken for granted with a sense of entitlement, it will inevitably lead to decay and racial ruin. Instead one must view it as a mighty responsibility before all those who came before, those alive, those who will come after, and to the Truth itself. There is no room here for egotistical pride and conceit. This is the meaning of the medieval chivalry motto “Noblesse oblige”“nobility obliges”, meaning that one’s noble ancestry constrains to honorable behavior, thus privilege entails to responsibility, NOT conceit and entitlement. This notion has existed in literature as early as Homer’s Iliad.

When we say “Romanian Nation” – we understand it as: all romanians, alive and dead, who lived on this land since the start of its history and those who will live on it in the future.

-Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, For My Legionaries

The nation is a being of a higher order, existing independently of those individuals of whom it is temporarily composed. It is not a physical being, with a head, arms, legs, eyes. It is a moral and historical entity, which lives and acts in human history, carrying its national symbols.

-Dimitrije Ljotic

I am not free to think as I wish. I can only live in relation to the dead of my race. They, and my country’s soil, tell me how I shall live.

-Auguste-Maurice Barrès

Once we let self-interest become the ruler of a people, the bonds of social order are broken. When man focuses on chasing his own happiness, he falls from Heaven straight to Hell.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V1, Ch11

Meanwhile the attitude of our would-be “allies” has been elaborated on in the same older article that we are now linking to for a third time. Yet let us go back to a claim we made just a bit earlier, namely of the methods employed by the Altright and how laughable and sad they are. The Altright’s insistence on it and its methods being “new” leads them down the path of the predictable claim that since they are new they are untried and “prove” themselves to be “successful” by claims the true consequences of which will be made apparent only sometime in the future, had we not already seen this “new” path been done to death before.

If one is to actually read the works of George Lincoln Rockwell, the parallels between what had been advertised by his “allies” at the time, and what the Altright advertises now are so great that we have released a bait and switch article a couple of months ago, publishing exempts from Rockwell’s books and substituting some names in there for those relevant to the contemporary situation. How is it that the entirety of Alrights schtick has been around since the 50s and yet they imagine themselves to be “new” and “innovative”?

Frankly, the only difference between then and now is the appearance of the internet, which, however, is but a new tool or medium for the same old methods, methods that we have already discredited earlier in this very article. Mass movement approach doesn’t work, mass conversion via propaganda doesn’t work, purely intellectual appeal doesn’t work, presentability and respectability of the suit and tie look don’t matter, and it doesn’t matter if you have a new tool to play with if the very premise of these methods is faulty. The new tool may be well and good but the way and the goal for which it is used renders that tool useless. Why hasn’t anyone learned their lessons and continued to repeat the same mistake for decades?

What repeating the same stupid mistakes for 50 years looks like. Keep watching the gif for the next 50 years for the full experience.

These know-it-alls cannot understand that being “dignified” or “refined” or “reasonable” has not helped any of the right-wing movements so far to SUCCESS.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, This Time the World, Ch20

The most likely primary reason why these mistakes had formed an inescapable loop, is that these very practices always lead a group to a quiet death in obscurity and irrelevance, thus nobody in the next generation of would-be political activists even realize that there used to be this one, two, ten, thirty groups over the decades that have attempted this song and dance already. Each new generation succumbs to these same rationalistic “reasonable” ideas as the default “logical” path to take and are not aware of the existence of the mass grave of forgotten groups and organizations that had died on this road, with the only warning being a sign with a Swastika, saying “turn back”yet none will listen. Nobody is willing to learn from the experience and vast knowledge of our Champions as they are dismissed out of hand for the same rationalistic “reasonable” mindset, that upon seeing the Swastika immediately jumps to the same tired assumptions that we had already criticized here earlier. “Dumb nazis, this isn’t how you win, I know best, so I’ll do this NEW and GENIUS in its SIMPLICITY approach” – yet they never seem to wonder why this self-evident and simple approach “hasn’t been done before”, for if they had, they would have discovered the mass grave right beneath their feet. Instead they go ahead and venture forth to assured failure.

To summarize: a group appears on the scene, does the “respectable, presentable entryist mass movement “we’re not nazis plz stop saying that!” mass appeal big tent” song and dance, dies in obscurity and departs from the fringes of public consciousness where it was trapped for the entirety of its existence. New group, ignorant of all this and naive, repeats the exact same steps and ends up the same way. Rinse, repeat, over and over for the last 50 years. An accursed loop perpetuating itself from sheer arrogant ignorance and naivety.

This is, of course, exactly why the Altright poses no threat to the System and the Jews – it’s already seen this before and knows how it will go. To paraphrase an earlier Hitler quote we’ve given: “The value of these people is clearly illustrated in the way they are treated by the System. It finds them ridiculous so it lets these people rant and rave and just laughs at them.” And let us be honest here, there is plenty to laugh at:

First thing we hear when watching the Spencer talk in Texas is “You went to a startrek convention” – shit, must have clicked something else by mista… no wait, this is the Spencer talk. Surprising at first, but with the benefit of afterthought it does seem fitting for just who Spencer is.

“You like to wear sweatpants, it’s all… … woo!” 


“These are elective identities” – being a “trekkie,” yes, perhaps, if you’re a complete loser. But wearing sweatpants is an elective identity? Who the hell wears sweatpants as a definitive part of who they are? It would appear that Spencer can only communicate with those like himself – utter losers and cringy imbeciles.

The way he talks, like he’s almost whispering in that faux soothing tone, just making him look like that much more of an emasculated creep, like he’s trying to emulate Mr Rogers, with a vest instead of a sweater.

“As a European” – you’re an ameriburger, lad – “I can tell the story of the Greeks and the Romans…”

He sure can tell some bullshit stories alright.

“… about the coming of Christianity” – but you’re only a self-professed “cultural Christian,” Spencie, you don’t know jack shit about actual Christianity. Maybe if you listened to some Mysterium Fasces you’d know a bit more.

He takes long pauses, allows the hecklers to shout some quip and replies to it in that same passive, soothing fashion “no, you’re wrong, sir” – you’re in enemy territory Dickie, nobody there is your friend no matter how much of a passive pussy you present yourself as, which isn’t hard, it’s in your nature. Dickless Dickie allows the people in the crowd to direct the talk by responding to every heckler he hears, like this wasn’t a planned talk but a heart to heart conversation between a councilor and some troubled youths (channeling Mr Rodgers hard), and perhaps that was exactly the angle Spency was going for – however that angle is weak, pathetic and completely ineffective. The Sesame street approach may seem appropriate in that modern college students are easily triggered little children with designated “safe spaces” decorated like baby rooms, however they are trained to be mindless and foaming at the mouth attack dogs whenever presented with anything that challenges their delusions. Either way the constant distractions to talk to hecklers renders this entire exercise in futility unworthy of even being called a talk or presentation.

It’s Spencer trying to be the “nice guy” with SJW’s. Why, however? For the fame and popularity? Is that all this is for Spencer?

“Oh, he’s a professor, so that means he must be correct” *chuckles* – further cringe. To which the audience, predictably, reacts, but what is truly interesting is how Spencer reacts to the crowd:

“Tee hee, don’t hit on me you silly boys!”

How does one manage to be a bigger presenting faggot than an outright faggot like Milo?

More talking to hecklers. Also note all the weird pauses. One lasts up to 9 or 10 seconds straight as he stands there awkwardly.

Joke about a fat clown that Dickie himself is just so fucking giddy over that he laughs, like a little boy who just said a naughty word, into the mic with a huge grin on his face.

All of these horrible hindrances dominate the presentation or whatever the hell this trainwreck is supposed to be. Some might argue that he made a few good points, but this is a backwards logic as you make up excuses for single, miniature instances, which are more or less  okay or moderately good, which are obscured by and large by the overall spirit of awkwardness and weakness. This is a downward spiral, for while NPI conferences were cucked and weak, here Spencer presents himself not only as that, but also as a joke.

>listens to heckler
>does weird hand gestures
>”alright, let’s cool down the autism a little bit”


>”Just joking!”

The mentality is amazing: “I did something naughty and it was so exciting but now I should cuck myself over it”. In the meantime his supporters in the back go bananas over hearing a meme *offline*. And it is an utter joke, cringy as all hell, but apparently this is what deserves praise.

This defines the entire next segment as well, as Spencer finally gets to deliver actual points, but at the end, in another pause, replies to a heckler “I’m not paranoid, they’re just out to get me” effectively undoing all of what he said prior. Instead of driving home those points on globalization and rootlessness by showing how the leftist/sjw narrative says some of the same things in different words, he effectively painted himself to be an awkward cook with that ‘joke’. Another pause.

He goes back into the actual meat of the presentation only to engage another heckler over some sign that he is shown and each time Spencer readily takes the bait and addresses it and makes a long spectacle of it which brings him back into that awkward cringe territory. In effect it is not Spencer running the crowd but the crowd controlling Spencer, which is easy because he is very responsive, too slow, makes long pauses, leaves all the possible ways in for hecklers and the crowd to exploit and it is truly pathetic how much of a hapless leaf in the wind he is during the entirety of this event. And his reaction to the hecklers is always the same thing: awkward pause analyzing what is happening – replying or explaining what is happening – then giving it a soft chuckle or making a “funny” “joke” or “maymay” and then giggling to himself like a schoolboy.


Finally the SJW part of the bored-to-death crowd decided to add some kind of excitement to the even and a lot of commotion happens with a crowd obscuring the view of the stage. “Let’s sit down and talk with each other!” – so talking to the hecklers was always part of the goal for this “event”. “I’m about to finish up and will give everyone a chance at Q&A”THAT’S IT? You did nothing BUT reply to them anyway, where is the actual talk? We’re 25 minutes in and half, if not most of it was lame memes, awkward pauses, answering hecklers and Spencer giggling at his own jokes and how clever he thinks he is. But that is most likely Spencer’s strong suit to talk with people rather than talk at people, he’s certainly a failure at the latter.

Spencer’s whole style at this event and the way he tries to calm down the crowd makes it look like he is going for an “SJW-whisperer” counterpart to Cesar Millan, however lacks any success, so he finally tries raising his voice momentarily, before once again returning to the real points and manages to keep going alright, until he is once again distracted by a heckler, to whom Spencer responds: “This world needs a better class of heckler” – proof to the contrary Spency, as you take the bait and allow him to control you. Every time Spencer does something that is moderately alright – his talking points being already passe within our own circles, their delivery being fairly flat, though steady – he immediately stumbles and ruins everything on demand of some random body in the audience, reacting in a way that makes him look like a fucking buffoon: “You know who I am!” – wtf was that? Was that another reference? In some half-assed delivery of a whisper-yell?

He wraps up and does a wide wave into the audience like a 5 year old. The Q&A goes along in the same pace, it feels more dynamic as it is conversations but ultimately it’s just more cringe.

>Hitler and nazi salute
>just memes and irony my nig-dawg!

>it’s all very exuberant

>it’s just exuberance and nothing more, I swear my african american brotha!

And then Spencer gets attacked on the premise of “are you an american? why do the nazi salute if you’re proud to be an american? should we have won ww2?” And the answers are just WEAK. And how truly pathetic is that, when you think back to how Rockwell handled all those exact same questions, essentially handed a blueprint for this type of engagement. But then again Dickless Dickie is just a schmuck-right pansy.

Spencer: I’ll actually agree here, find some common ground” – in other words “no seriously, let’s be friends dawg, I’ll even concede some things, I’ll cuck a bit for you to accept me, please! We’ll maybe knock some of that stuff off and…
Nig: MAYBE?  


Nig: Are you Christian?
Spencer: I’m a cultural christian, yes.
Nig: What the hell is that?

The nignog immediately zeroes in on any opening of weakness and since Spencer is nothing BUT weakness he can just take apart each of his points immediately on delivery (r u huwite nationalist? what’s identitarian?), this is literal interracial rape on live television! Change the title of the video to “Young white buck gets fucked by BBC”. Spencer just proceeds to babble incoherently at this point and has nowhere to go other than to say “this isn’t about me!” He does retaliate alright later on about historic Christians but ultimately this is a weaksauce punch because he didn’t deconstruct the predominant narrative that modern Christians are “the true Christians;” all the lemming Christians at home will agree with the nignog.

This is followed by a tiresome argument on slavery building america and Spencer still fucks it up completely. Then he gets raped some more on federal hiring. And throughout the whole fucking thing Spencer looks like he’s fucking lost and defenseless and he starts smiling to put up a front of “oh youuuu, you, youuuuu, haha, oh you“. And then he seriously, actually, literally says “give me a break”.

Nig: Who created affirmative action?
Spencer:  *lost daze* white people… probably?

Loses the entire argument on affirmative action. Pause the video at 17:17. That fucking profile, that mouth-breathing braindead expression – that says it all. Then it goes further downhill when he tries to make a valid point that Egyptians aren’t Africans (in the racial sense) BUT THEN ALLOWS THE NIGGER TO CONTROL THE NARRATIVE AND RESHAPE DEFINITIONS (he talks about Africans as people located on the African continent) TO STATE THE OPPOSITE. Then he actually allows the Nigger to get away with saying that while “black” egyptians built the pyramids, Europeans “were still in caves”. He just lets him get away with that blatant lie on top of reinforcing a different lie!

And then nignog tells Spencer he is afraid, putting the final nail in the coffin. He utterly raped him and then “psychoanalyzed” his stance (lack thereof) into a rationalization – you don’t have ideas, you’re just afraid of competition!

Nig: We’re not going anywhere and you’re gonna have to suck that bbc up.

Spencer walks away a complete fucking loser.



The fakers know why they are fakers. They have too much to hide, too much to protect, too much to lose. The attraction of any real talent or genius or personal drive is a direct threat to them as it threatens to “take away” not only their livelihood but also rob them of their “star” status.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 8.21

We can already hear the rushed objections of our Altright “allies” as they hurriedly try to present examples of their “success”. Namely, they legitimately seem to think that they “memed” Trump into the presidency of the United States. The absolute absurdity of this claim is indescribable. The Altright had not even registered in the widespread american public consciousness until Hillary Clinton had put it there with her Altright speech, which likewise ushered the birth of the Hipster Conservatist Altright without the racialism aspects, that we had explored earlier.

Time for an overdue reality check: the Altright did not make Trump possible, but the exact opposite, which is precisely why they have been riding his coattails online via memes, podcasts and some articles, which apparently in their mind amounts to “activism”.

In reality, as per the Lemming Principle, the masses, including mainstream conservatives, simply did not speak out in force against the progressive liberal SJW bullshit as it was the dominant narrative that was unopposed in the public discourse at the highest level, hence nobody felt safe criticizing it. Until Trump, who legitimized that criticism and thus carved out a “safe space” for lemmings to voice their discontent (which they would have never voiced otherwise, further showcasing their cowardice) – however the wide masses and overwhelming bulk of Trump support did not share in any sort of racialist thinking whatsoever, instead falling back on the mainstream conservative individualist fairness principles “of each man being able to make his own way regardless of skin color”.

It were these people, the average conservative lemming who isn’t racist in the slightest but does not support progressive liberalism and feels betrayed by the Republican party, that got Trump elected, not the Altright, which presents only a fringe element of Trump support. The actual figureheads of this core of Trump supporters who had contributed to his victory are actually figures like , outlets like Rebel Media and Info Wars (who had overtaken The Young Turks in their subscriber count), as well as various “rationalist” YouTubers like Sargon of Akkad. These are the real sample representatives of the core of Trump’s supporters who got him elected, not the Altright.

They often self-identify as the “new media” that is rooted in American conservatism, including Sargon of Akkad, even though he says he is a center-left liberal, since that translates from European to American “right/left” scale as something pretty close to American Conservatism. So if anyone got Trump into office then it was this “new media conservatives”. Hell, even Campus Reform had done more for Trump’s victory than the Altright with such real life actions as the one in the video below, though let us be fair and admit that lemmings stick to their bias regardless of what facts are presented to them (which holds true for both Trump and Hillary supporters), so you can safely bet that most of them voted for Hillary regardless of having been made to look like absolute idiots.

These people have been actively, visibly and publicly campaigning for Trump ever since he started, whereas the Altright, with its online “activism” was known to nobody outside the fringe political circles. It gained any level of public recognition only because Hillary Clinton had attempted to use the Altright as another way of attacking Trump to discredit him, just as it was done when he was pressed about his apparent KKK support-base (now imagine if the KKK claimed that it was them who got Trump elected – it is just as farcical and laughable as the Altright claim). In the long run one could say that the Altright actually owes far more to Hillary for their meager level of publicity than to Trump. Mark Dice (another representative of Trump’s real support base) Video below timestamped.

Search results for Altright starting from Trump’s announcement that he’ll be running for President and ending with his victory in November. The spike coincides with Hillary’s speech about the Altright. “Oh yeah we got Trump elected, fam!”

And what had effectively happened as a result of that speech? The Altright brand was somewhat fractured, as all the Trump supporters took on that mantle and started skewing it from its original sources and its racialist aspects to just refer to the Hipster Conservatism for millennials, so now you have pointless and moronic videos on the issue of the hijacked brand name, like the one where Red Ice Radio talk about Paul Joseph Watson of Info Wars misrepresenting the meaning of the Altright. Hipster Conservatives be like: “Look at me – I’m the Altright now.” Now the OG Altright is being pushed out even further into the category of an unfortunate and unwanted fringe, whose existence can be explained away in the same fashion one negro Trumpist explained away Trump’s KKK support-base:

Altright and people like that, they come out from under the rocks all the time around this time, that got nothing to do with Donald Trump, we’re all Americans.” This is the definitive attitude of the majority of Trump’s support, the actual support that did get him elected. They regard the Altright, to be but a fringe element that is irrelevant. And to add insult to injury, with the appropriation of the Altright label they can now relegate the OG racialist Altright as a fringe element of the “real” Hipster Conservativist Altright. Now go back and read once again Hitler’s warnings about mass movements and alliances and how they would defuse a group and render it immobile, not that the Altright had much going for it in the first place anyway.

And while the Altright is absolutely harmless to the System, for it practices the same, time and again failed approach, they do give it a fair share of coverage, however it is not done out of fear of the group itself (indeed they manage to successfully mock it nonstop), but for the exact same reason that Hillary brought it up in the first place: they are trying to use the Altright to smear Trump, which is of course completely futile, but it gives the Altright itself a false sense of its importance and achievements. They love telling the media that they got Trump elected, a delusion that the media is only too glad to capitalize on, regardless if they realize the truth of the matter, because that claim fits into their own narrative. The Jew-run media doesn’t actually attack them as a credible enemy, it only uses them to try and discredit Trump. What’s more, the Lugenpresse would have utilized the Altright for its narratives in either Trump or Hillary victory. With Trump’s victory they showcase how “evil racists had been emboldened by it” hence all the fake attack stories on Hillary supporters that have become so prevalent. With Hillary’s victory they would have instead talked about how “evil racists are lashing out against Trump’s defeat” (even the term “whitelash” would have still existed in case of Hillary’s victory), each time using the Altright as an avenue of attack on Trump.

The fantasy world in which the Altright lives is a fantasy world that the Jew media is only too happy to fuel, as they both pretend that the Altright is something more than what it actually is, which makes it all the better for the Jews when they easily beat it down with sheer mockery. The Altright huffs and huffs but cannot produce a single puff, but the Jew giddily pretends to be walking against a powerful gale, to look all the more heroic for it. Although, there is always another additional possibility as to why the Jew media pays so much attention to the Altright, which is likewise rooted in its harmlessness:

During all their direct attacks against the staunch patriot, the Jewish ‘lovers of sweet reason’ employ two equally dirty indirect plays: They build up sincere, but harmless anti-communist outfits, like the John Birch Society, by showering them with publicity to draw off the growing hordes of maddened Americans from any real and therefore dangerous activity and, secondly, they open up a heavy media bombardment of lies about Hitler and National Socialism, in order to destroy by discrediting ‘Nazis’ like ourselves, without giving us any publicity.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, This Time the World, Ch12

Yet the Altright insists on having “memed” Trump into office, using nothing but their online presence, of which the wider masses were not even aware of until that Hillary speech, and even thereafter the interest dropped again as real core of Trump’s support regard the (racialist) Altright as nothing more than another weak lying press attack on his persona. All this online “activity” and the power of the internet could not do jack shit to transform what the Altright was doing into anything tangible, and what they were doing was producing content for the immediate consumption of their own, already existing audience, and not the wider masses, despite their praise of the mass movement and “Overton window” approaches. The Altright racialist sleepwalkers had in effect done nothing other than partially substitute the intellectual methods of message delivery for the meme method.

This whole line of thinking stinks of the kind of weak character types that are afraid of any real action and seek the easy and comfortable way out, and what can be safer, easier and more comfortable than “memeing” your “victory”. These very same people, our would-be “allies” wanted us to in effect do nothing as well, for anything that we, Fascists and NS, promote and do, they decried as “larping” or as something that “pushes the masses away”. Or perhaps they do it because it effectively makes them look bad and forces them to face the reality of their own irrelevance and weakness. Yet they have the nerve to claim themselves to be the “brains” to our “muscle”, the presentable and respectable vanguard of the thug rank and file, all the while their sole “claim to fame” is the “silent work” of online “activism”.

Therefore the friendship of these people for our young movement was not only worthless but downright dangerous. In fact, that was the main reason we chose the name “Party” in the first place. We hoped that this would scare off a whole swarm of racialist sleepwalkers. This is why we also described ourselves as the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

The word Party scared off the fanatics who live in the past, as well as the big talkers who spout meaningless phrases about the “racial idea”. The other part, National Socialist German Workers, freed us from a whole parade of knights of the “intellectual” sword and all the ragged misfits that carry “intellectual weapons” as a shield to cover their cowardice.

Naturally the most violent “attacks” on our new movement came from these racialists. Of course the attacks were not physical, but only with their favorite weapon of pen and ink, just as you would expect from such racialist pen heads. To them, there was something revolting about our principle which stated, “If a man offers us violence, we will defend ourselves by violence”. They criticized us profusely claiming we possessed a rude type of worship for the rubber club and that our ranks lack any form of intellect. These quacks fail to realize that in a meeting of racialists, a Demosthenes can be silenced by just fifty idiots who rely on nothing but their lungs and their fists if those idiots do not want to let him speak. The inborn cowardice of the racialist always keeps him out of any such danger. He does not make noise when he works and he never steps out of the crowd – he is always careful to stay silent.

Even today I cannot warn our young movement strongly enough against falling into the trap of these “silent workers”. They are not only cowards, but they are all incompetents and do-nothings. When a man knows something is going to happen, and he realizes it is a real danger, and he sees, with his own eyes, the mere possibility of solution, he damned well has the duty and obligation to act. He must make a public stand against evil and openly work for its cure, not work “silently”. If he does not do so, he is a miserable weakling who has forgotten the meaning of duty and a failure either through cowardice or through laziness and inability. The great majority of the “silent workers” merely pretend to know what Heaven knows. None of them has any ability, but they all try to fool the whole world with their smoke-screen. They are lazy, but with their alleged “silent” work, they appear to be enormously active and productive. In a word, they are swindlers and political day-workers who find the honest work of others disgusting. When one of these racialist moths prefers the darkness in the valley of “silence”, you can bet a thousand to one that in the dark, he is not producing but stealing and stealing from the fruit of others’ work.

In addition, there is the arrogance and conceited disrespect that this lazy, night owl crowd dumps on the work of others. They constantly complain about the works of others in a condescending way, and in so doing they actually help the deadly enemies of our nationality.

Every last follower who has the courage to stand on a table in a tavern surrounded by his enemies and boldly and openly defend his views accomplishes more than a thousand of these lying, treacherous sneaks. He definitely will convert and win over one man or another to the movement. His achievement can be tested and proved by the success of his activity. However, the cowardly frauds who boast of their “silent” work and hide themselves in disgraceful anonymity are worthless and may be considered in the truest sense of the word useless when it comes to working for the revival of our people.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V1, Ch12

As far as this type of “racialist” fighter is concerned, I can only say to the National-Socialist movement and to the German people most sincerely, “Lord, guard us from such friends and then we can easily deal with our enemies”.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch10

As for the very few of their figureheads and groups that had managed to actually go out and attempt real life activism, we had already provided some criticism of their conduct earlier in this article, but there is still more to be said and more of their own points to be refuted.

The Criticism of Weapons

One of our primary arguments is that today we are left no other viable options to achieve our goals but Revolution and thus we promote education in revolutionary activity, foremost with James Mason‘s SIEGE. It is the timeless and inevitably repeating truth of the world that violence is the last resort. The only ones to believe differently are those who had never actually experienced a situation in which they have been deprived of any other way of achieving what they want, and if they had, such people are most likely to bend to the will of whomever holds power to deprive them of what they want. In our struggle, however, if you bend even a little then you might as well bend over and take it. 

If good men abandon and denigrate force, then bad men will take it up and beat us to death with it.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch13

Nevertheless, our would-be “allies” still delude themselves with notions of legal victory.

We’ve already criticized and thoroughly discredited entryism, mass movement approach, mass propaganda “Overton window” approach, and the “meme” “victory” of the Altright. The only straggling argument they may have left in their employ is that they are not attempting entryism, but are trying to be open in their own way. After all, we did concede that the Altright are not “sneaky nazis” and that they do in fact stand on some vague racialist notions, about which they are absolutely open.

Frankly, the only reason we’ve had as many encounters and arguments with the Altright  as we did was entirely their own doing. In their attempt to be as big of a “big tent” as possible, and through adoption of internet culture, they had taken on a presentation that is supposedly welcoming of Fascists and National Socialists, but, as we’ve outlined earlier, only if we toe the line and button up about our principles, as our principles are incompatible with the inherent liberal (Americanist) values of the Altright. In fact, the only aspect of Fascism and National Socialism they had truly welcomed was none of its core and fundamental elements, but a modernist byproduct of them – memes. Internet culture had a prevalent layer of ironic Nazism for quite a while now, used in the first place simply for trolling purposes, and this is the only sort of Nazism that the Altright actually welcomes – when its just a meme.

They’re actually utilizing this element of internet culture as a means of self-defense against the accusation of being actual Nazis. As opposed to the mainstream conservative self-defense of “NO YOU ARE THE NAZIS!” that we’ve discussed earlier, the Altright’s defense is not to throw the accusation back at the accuser, but to defuse it into a joke, an accusation that they feel they unfortunately have to deal with, but would ideally prefer not to. When accused of being racists they say “racism is not a real word, it is made up by leftists, its only used to shut down an intelligent conversation when we are winning” – we do not fear being called racist, we openly declare ourselves to be Racist.

In the same vein some of them literally and in all seriousness say that Nazi is the “white n-word”, which exposes their true attitude towards National Socialism. Still, they’re ultimately trying to cope with the accusation and use the benefits of internet culture to their advantage: “Yeah I guess I’m not totally on board with democracy, that is what Fascists are like right? Guess I am a little fashy, teehee!” This “dumb but cute” high-school girl routine is, of course, infuriating to any real Fascists and National Socialists, as well as the words “fash” and “fashy” which convey that same ironic, disingenuous attitude, coined by some degenerate bitch Rachel Haywire.

We have likewise tapped into internet culture to advance our ideals, however this resulted in the formation of our own post-ironic Nazi humor, when our apparently ironic presentation is nevertheless used to deliver the earnest message of our ideals. We do believe in what we promote, it is not a meme, it is not merely a means of defense, it is exactly who we are.

While I have always been an atheist, Hitler, to me, is larger than life – an immortal if there ever was one. To HELL with any who think differently! He is my life’s inspiration and shall always remain so.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 8.24

Thus our conflict with the Altright was all but inevitable as they insist on using ironic Nazism in a political environment only to then proceed and ignore anything that deals with true Fascism and National Socialism, all the while calling on us to join them as “allies” but only so long as we are not authentic in our beliefs. Hell, it would seem that some of them don’t even understand that we truly are “literal Nazis,” that we are not larping or memeing nazism or 1930s NSDAP, but that we are true believers and fanatics of the National Socialist Worldview, a Worldview that transcends time and national boundaries, to whom Adolf Hitler is not just some unfortunate burden of history not to be “counter-signaled against” for merely pragmatic purposes, but a Champion of what we believe in and whose name, among others, is a crucial element of what it is that we do and fight for. For example:

“People place you into the caricature of the emotional unstable ugly-neo-nazi, so you ought to just own up and become that caricature!”

What a ridiculous misrepresentation of our actual criticism towards “sneaky nazis” which is premised on the people being criticized actually being nazis (or at least insisting on being such) and trying to hide it. When dealing with the Altright, however, our criticism is rooted in the fact how they are the ones who insist on using Nazism as an ironic meme, and the point of our criticism to them is simple: if you are not actually Fascists and National Socialists then stop using Nazism as a meme in what you do, and if there are Fascists/NS among you or at least those who claim to be such, then stop pretending to be something else. And the “emotional unstable ugly” part is of course derivative of the notion that our approach can only attract this type of people, a criticism we had likewise addressed and refuted earlier, as was much of the rest of the article we link to above for reference. One is more than welcome, however, to see what was the general reaction from other people who openly and sincerely declare themselves to be Fascists and National Socialists.

In fact, the only way in which the Altright is seriously interested in something Fascist/NS is for liberal reasons, making the proposed calls of alliances even more laughable! The classic liberal model has always been that the state is supposed to be no more than a “guard dog” of society, maintaining internal lawful order and external military security, without interfering in societal and economic affairs with regulations and oversight. And what do our would-be “allies” want? “Fashy borders” – a strong state limited solely to its function of a strong picket fence around their liberal shithole society that keeps the nonwhites out and that’s it. What they want is a “fashy guard dog state” for their suburban bourgeois swamp of decadence and decay.

Libertarianism, i.e. rebranding of classical liberalism (and also very EXPLICITLY JEWISH, but nah it was “implicitly fash”), would work JUST GREAT if it was all white! FASH THE BORDERS! LIBERATE THE INTERIOR! NO NIGGERS ALLOWED IN OUR GAY BATHHOUSE!

So let’s recap real quick: the Altright is a Racist Liberal variety of Americanism that seeks to gain power by legal means, acquired through a mass movement approach and a big tent alliance of the “Right wing” (unless they are cuckservatives or purity spiralers) and a shift in public consciousness with mass propaganda as per the “Overton Window,” in order to create an all-White-liberal-playground, putting up a presentable and respectable image of an intellectual vanguard, all the while utilizing internet meme culture to appear hip with the times, and using ironic Nazism specifically to deflect the “You are Nazis!” accusation.

That is actually our objective and impartial assessment, as our more earnest description would relegate their legalism, respectability and presentability to cowardice, and their intellectualism to stupidity, or to be more exact “smart idiocy”. We’ll talk about those aspects more thoroughly further along, but right now we’d like to highlight how the Altright’s use of memes and internet culture stands in direct conflict with their attempts to look intellectual and presentable. One would imagine this contradiction to be blatantly self-evident, as internet trolling is by definition of its nature informal and is utilized to upset, including upsetting the status quo that the Altright at the same time tries to emulate for its look of presentability. One can think back to any number of great trolls that had been used to make fun of the System status quo, including Bane-posting and Ben-garrisoning the news.

This is what the Altright attempted to tap into for its “X-TREME” appeal, seemingly trying to form a kind of counter culture, yet at the very same time they are hard at work to be palatable to the masses with a professional suit and tie look. This mainstream notion of respectability and presentability is directly dictated by the System status quo, hence why the masses of lemmings uphold it, yet they wish to at the same time utilize something that is inherently used to disturb established conventions, as a result the Altright looks at best inconsistent and at worst like sad nerds trying to be cool.

Spencer is the biggest offender in this regard and one can go back to our mockery of him to see exactly what we mean. You cannot hold a serious, respectable, mainstream style press conference and at the same time talk about “PEEEHPAAAAY!” considering that the reaction you will get from the press is exactly the same confusion as the one in the video above. The guy who shouted “PEEEHPAAAAY!” at Hillary Clinton‘s speech (who most likely served as the inspiration for Spencer’s “PEEEHPAAAAY!” screeching) did so anonymously and from the ranks of the audience, which is why it worked, it was a random bomb that hit everyone present with confusion, to pick up the pieces of its implications only so much later, adding to the hilarity. That confusion is of course the exact thing trolling is built on, to drop it on, or to make the status quo repeat something like that without knowing the context or understanding its nature, thus mocking them. However when you are the one openly delivering that meme live and are the object of everyone’s attention in an audience of people who are just as clueless, all you do is make yourself look like a cringy idiot who is chuckling at his own jokes awkwardly – you are only making fun of yourself, not the status quo. You’d do better saying a holocaust joke and laughing at it out loud yourself to emphasize the deadpan silence of the shocked audience. The only people who get excited over real life memeing by Spencer are other idiots who get giddy over hearing a meme “offline”, looking like a bunch of underage boys laughing at a naughty word being spoken out loud in such context. Of course Spencer ends up being called a “Nazi Dork” – YES to the latter, HELL NO to the former.

So let us go back to the initial premise of this segment, namely of Revolution being the only path left open to us. We’ve already elaborated on much of the reasons why the legal way will never work by means of countering the mass movement approach and other points covered thus far.

It’s arguable that Rockwell was the last chance America had for any kind of legal revolution and yet he did this without banking on presentability and respectability as it were defined by the status quo that he was opposing. That is something that our “allies” can’t seem to quite grasp as they are banking on a suit and tie presentability in their presentation as it is defined by our enemies, the System/ZOG, as the sole approach available, which is likewise why they cannot afford to be associated with actual and earnest Fascists and National Socialists, not unless we pipe down or take the “sneaky nazi” approach for which their big tent acts as a vehicle – as if Fascism/NS needs to hide behind the skirt of the Altright.

Rockwell’s approach was always meant to be a multi-leveled one, so as to appeal to people of different kinds, but never once did that mean sacrificing being an open and honest National Socialist, nor did he allow himself to be trapped in complacency of safe routine to avoid further development and progress of his movement. Rockwell’s Three Phase plan coincided quite heavily with his great understanding of propaganda:

As mentioned before, the first two phases of Party activity overlapped to a large extent, and the transition between the two was marked primarily by a shift of emphasis. Phase one was the “Nazi” era of the Movement. Phase two is the beginning of the National Socialist era. In line with this re-emphasis, the American Nazi Party officially became the National Socialist White People’s Party on January 1, 1967, and that date can reasonably be considered to mark the transition. Six months earlier, the appearance of National Socialist World was a major step in this direction. And six months after that date – in June, 1967 – a historic reorganizational conference of the Party leadership was held in Arlington. There Rockwell set the Movement on its new course, explaining the need for a total professionalization of every activity, from fund raising to propaganda writing, in order to meet the severe demands to be expected during the long period of growth and struggle ahead.

-Dr. William Luther Pierce, “A National Socialist Life”

If each of the men in the fable about the blind men and the elephant were required to construct a model of an elephant, there would be three very different models. The blind man who felt only the tail would build a model as he described an elephant in the fable – as “a sort of rope.” The blind man who felt the leg and said an elephant was like a tree would produce a tree-like “elephant,” while the man who felt only the trunk would construct his “elephant” like a snake.

Most men I have met in politics consider themselves automatically experts in the field of propaganda. But almost all of them make the same type of basic error in their propaganda as did the blind men in describing and reconstructing an elephant; both suffer from insufficient experience with the subject.


In almost every case he produces propaganda which he likes, completely forgetting in his political excitement that the art of propaganda (and advertising) is not in producing that which one likes and admires one’s self, but that which will produce the effect desired – sales in the case of advertising and political conviction in the case of propaganda. Because he is able to think, he presumes that his audience is also able to think – a completely unwarranted assumption. Because he himself is repelled by crudeness and exaggeration, he makes his pitch factual, logical, and usually subtle. In addition to this foolishness, he also forgets that the average man in the street is emotionally assaulted during all his waking hours by advertising brilliantly designed by experts to capture attention through the most powerful kind of psychological impact. The average right wing piece, crowded onto a page, verbose, and dull, is not only not able to win the attention of the average man amid all this competition, but positively repels him.


Does this mean that the Birch Society’s high-level appeal is a total waste? Should all their propaganda be like that of the Klan? An elephant is neither all leg nor all tail nor all trunk. A complete, whole elephant needs all of these parts to live. The Jews, masters of the art of propaganda that they are (unlike the right wing), have understood this fundamental truth and have organized their “pitch” to appeal to all levels.


Hitler had Julius Streicher’s Der Stuermer, full of the wildest and wooliest sensationalism, designed to smash its way into the consciousness of the masses, as it did. He also had the regular party press, designed to reach and convince the great middle class. And, for the university community, he had the esoteric material of Alfred Rosenberg, Gottfried Feder, et al.


When I began, I purposely made my propaganda as brutal and shockingly rough as I could, simply to force attention. And I have kept everlastingly at the business of building a simple and direct image of all-out hostility to “Jews and niggers” in the minds of millions of Americans, regardless of the costs in other respects. (And when I have the rare opportunity to use some mass medium, as was recently the case when I gave a long interview to Playboy, I am forced to walk a careful line between what I should like to say and what the enemy would like to hear me say. Unless I deliberately sound at least halfway like a raving illiterate with three loose screws, such an interview would never be printed. This is another thing that most people fail to understand about my “Nazi” technique.) After I had become known to most Americans, I published the Rockwell Report at a somewhat higher level than my previous material to begin to recruit some of the brains and funds we needed to proceed. When this had begun to bear fruit, I used the talents obtained with the Rockwell Report to get back down to the people’s level and produce a publication designed for the masses, for the “average” man, the comic book reader, kids: the Stormtrooper. As planned, this is now our most popular and largest-circulation publication. And were it not for the Jewish ownership of the news distribution business, we could sell Stormtroopers literally by the millions.


With a base of operations established and with successful publications directed at both the lowest and the middle-class levels, the movement is finally in a position to afford the relative luxury of a publication directed exclusively at the academic intellectual-professional class. The National Socialist World, now in your hands, is designed not only to reach but to move people in that category. Perhaps our material is not what you, personally, enjoy most. But our aim, and the aim of the World Union of National Socialists, is not to produce material to please our friends – but to win over millions of those who are now our enemies or who are oblivious to both sides. The years of success with the Stormtrooper and the Rockwell Report give me confidence that the new National Socialist World will also do what it has been carefully designed to do – that National Socialist World will beat its way into the highest intellectual circles just as the Stormtrooper smashed its way into the minds of the juveniles and working folks.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, “From Ivory Tower To Privy Wall: On The Art Of Propaganda”

Rockwell‘s approach and methods followed a distinct path of elevating his organization to a more professional outfit on the back of what he could achieve through propaganda, doing this without ever letting go of all that is National Socialism, the swastika would remain, the criticism of Jews, niggers and traitors would remain but the form of criticism would depend on the propaganda outlet utilized towards a specific stratum of the populace: from crude to common sense to intelligent. Starting off with crude propaganda for mass spread by Jew media the Party would attract the fanatics and outcasts, of which only the tested and true would be allowed to join.

Once this was done and with the ANP becoming a group well-known to the public consciousness even without the Jew media coverage, the propaganda efforts were shifted towards a more “average” audience, and from there to the intelligent propaganda of “Ivory Towers” – all beneath the sign of the Swastika and the words “Nazi” or “National Socialist”.

It is self evident, that expanding into intelligent propaganda did not mean abandoning the crude approach, which likewise meant that the Party would not abandon the boots and uniform presentation, but if anything, have it stand with the suit and tie look. Rockwell’s strategy was thus entirely viable for taking power legally through elections, as the cowardly masses would at least have enough courage to cast a secret ballot for the Nazis, once they were swayed with its radical message, whichever approach of propaganda that was directed at them specifically, and the ANPs actual readiness to engage their enemies in direct physical confrontations.

That is also how Hitler has done it. And this is what our critics would often like to bring up to argue against our contemporary revolutionary strategy: “Hitler won through elections, Rockwell wanted to win through elections, so we can win through elections as well!” Two crucial facts are forgotten when this criticism is issued: in Hitler’s time society was in disarray, there was no strong System in charge of society, holding onto power with a death’s grip, if anything it was a mad political free for all frenzy where the Jews simply enjoyed and exploited the chaos without having to engage too much in the kind of  total control that they employ today.

Yes, they still infested, corrupted and manipulated society, but they did not guard the avenues of power directly, instead they merely bribed and manipulated the existing political forces vying for control. In short there was no System at all as we know it today. Under such conditions, with the wider masses themselves abandoned, and not just a few social outcasts, the NSDAP had much better conditions to take over. The Jews simply didn’t even understand WHAT they were dealing with. Since then, however, they know exactly who their true mortal enemy is, and have declared “Never again!”

“Never again!” was the name of the bullet that killed George Lincoln Rockwell – that was the Jewish System’s final answer to the danger that this man had posed to it.  As we have said, violence is always the last resort, and the Jews know this too. They dragged Rockwell through the streets, through the courts, through the jails and even a mental asylum AND HE HAD BEATEN THEM EVERY STEP OF THE WAY! Until they finally had found a useful pawn to pull the trigger for them to stop him.

There is no question that a man who has survived all these attacks will be killed, if possible, by the Jews or their agents. The Jews have no choice. They are too guilty to permit anybody to expose them and organize any effective resistance against them. Traitors cannot survive such an exposure. With such as the Jews, it is kill or be killed.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, This Time the World, Ch12

Adolf Hitler had shown the way to survival. It would be my task on this earth to, carry his ideas and his living example to total, world-wide victory. I knew I would not live to see the victory which I would make possible, but I would not die before I had made that victory certain.

-This Time the World, Ch25

The legal path is closed to us because today, having learned from the past and with USA having been under total Jewish control since as early as the 1930s, as per Francis Parker Yockey‘s assessment, they will simply not allow anyone to undermine them by legal means again as they are the ones who define what is legal and target all legal means against anyone who would upset or resist their plans even a little, let alone try to stop and expose them outright.

The game board is rigged against us and so we are constrained to kick over the gaming table itself.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 8.15

The only countries where some measure of legal approach may still be viable are the ones where the System’s power is not absolute, where the majority of people live dispossessed and are not provided for. This is exactly why the Golden Dawn is so successful in Greece, having gone through many of the same steps as Hitler and Rockwell, all the while staying true to the Worldview of Fascism and National Socialism:

We are the faithful soldiers of the National Socialist idea and nothing else.

-Nikolaos Michaloliakos, 1987


What would the future of Europe and the whole modern world be like if World War II hadn’t stopped the renewing route of National Socialism? Certainly, fundamental values which mainly derive from ancient Greek culture, would be dominant in every state and would define the fate of peoples. Romanticism as a spiritual movement and classicism would prevail against the decadent subculture that corroded the white man. Extreme materialism would have been discarded, giving its place to spiritual exaltation.

-Ilias Kasidiaris, 2012

The viability of the legalist approach does not hinge on how presentable one looks or how intellectual one sounds, as we have consistently proven in this article, but in how affluent and decadent a society is (which is the second crucial fact that is forgotten), and on how strong the Jewish System’s grip is on the institutes of power. If one is to look at the United States then one finds the homestead of the System, a monstrous behemoth just as James Mason described, one that will never allow anyone even remotely close to its assets. In reality the System was already too strong for the legal approach in the 50s, but society, the people themselves, had not yet been as sick as they are today.

Hell, things were so comparatively healthy in Weimar Germany, as opposed to what they are here, that Hitler was fully able to work within the framework of that system and WIN! No way in hell we can do that here today!!

-James Mason, SIEGE, 3.7

And yet our “allies” still want to pretend that the legal approach can work, all the while repeatedly shooting themselves in the foot every step of the way. One particular Altright flagship organization would do well to learn from Rockwell‘s lessons on propaganda as they have been repeatedly engaged in the kind of mistakes he highlighted in the article we’ve quoted some passages from. We’ve repeatedly criticized Identity Evropa for their vague as all hell Greek statue posters complete with obscure messages like “Become who we are”. These are the definitive example of what Rockwell calls “making propaganda that you yourself will like and enjoy” and you will be doing so alone. Moreover, it is the only sort of propaganda that they are making, like a the blind man describing an elephant from just holding his trunk.

The other repeating issue for this group is their logo, and for all appearances it would seem that they have been bullied into changing it from an incomprehensible set of squiggles… to a generic triangle logo that is overused as a mobile app icon, gaming logo or hipster tattoo – that is to say, the thing is so generic that it means absolutely nothing to a passerby without context. However, considering the nature of the group, even in context the logo wouldn’t mean jack shit to a passerby.

Of course when it comes to symbolism we get shots taken at us as well for the use of the Swastika. We’ve already covered some of the major aspects as to why the Swastika is effective via a number of previously provided Rockwell quotations, but we will provide a couple of additional points on the matter. For one thing, the Swastika is brilliant in its simplicity and the hypnotic power with which it conveys strength, even without its Fascist/NS context, which is of course of great necessity in a symbol, which is only emphasized ever more the weaker and more degenerate a society grows:

The liberal pacifists and humanitarians, with their momentary power of the press and dollar, HATE all symbols of strength and masculinity and they therefore seize upon all the strongest, most outstanding of these very things and hold them up to ridicule.

-James Mason, SIEGE 3.1

Symbolism, the more basic the better, is the only thing that can penetrate the mass mind in this mass-opinion society.

-SIEGE, 6.14

The other point is that the Swastika, just as Adolf Hitler’s name and visage, elicit an immediate array of emotions and ideas, most of which have been instilled in the masses by the Jews, true, however we have covered earlier how this only plays further to our advantage over them.

It was once said of Hitler and the Swastika that they represented the “threshold of anger.” At the very mention most will curse you, a few will join you, none will remain neutral.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.3

Moreover, association with these things as well as the clear profession of one’s NS and Fascist views immediately does most of our marketing the job for us and we only need to educate further those who come to us and are accepted into our ranks, while the masses will come to know who and what we truly are through our actions.

Meanwhile our would-be “allies” are constantly engaged in a brand war with literally everyone, hence the appearance of the various peripheral names around Altright such as Altlight or Altkike and so on – they have to fight to put a specific image of themselves in the minds of the masses all the while fending off the “You’re a Nazi!” accusation. And that, while fighting to preserve what they want their brand to mean as it either gets hijacked by the Hipster Conservatives or gets divided up from within. All of this is due to their vague big tent approach. No wonder the Altright has NO strong symbols to its name.

There is also a conjoined argument we often hear, that the Swastika is a “German NS” symbol and that overall one should never associate with “German NS” unless they are German themselves. This argument can only come from people who either don’t yet grasp the full scope and nature of the Fascist/NS Worldview… or from cowards. We come back to the starting segment of our article, “Where we Stand,” to reinvigorate this point and once again shed light on the monumental difference between us and our would be “allies.” Again, the difference between us and them is greater than the difference between them and what they insist is our common enemy. That is to say our “allies” have more in common with our enemies than with us, as they are rooted in the same Liberal and Rationalist thinking.

They share the same ultimate goals, namely those of human safety, comfort and affluence and thus invariably and inevitably hedonism, all these things powered by egoism.

All the arguments of social and economic organization are predicated on the goal of serving these selfish and merely human wants and desires. Our “allies” are simply concerned with the spread of these things to a lesser scope than our humanist multiculturalists enemies, focusing on a specific group. Which is to say, the group that they happen to belong to, because their own individual prospects of achieving these goals rely on their group’s success. In all likelihood, had multiculturalism not interfered with liberalism they wouldn’t have any motivation to adopt whatever vague racialist thinking in the first place.

All society, all “civilization” that proceeds from the same aspiration to human well-being above all, to well-being or human “happiness” at any price, is marked by the seal of the Powers of Decadence, enemies of the cosmic order of the play of forces without end.

-Savitri Devi, “Religion of the Strong”

And what are our goals? To ensure the global dominance of Truth on Earth, worldwide, without exceptions, manifested in the form of Organic States that are rooted in selfless service and duty – it is rooted in a loyalty to something more than human and thus eternal and unchanging. Fascist/NS economic and social concepts are thus not derived out of utilitarian concerns for material goals and the human imagination trying to produce the best working system, but only from the eternal laws of Truth, which dictates only one possible solution in all matters, and Fascism/NS is the sole force on earth to be motivated by these eternal laws.

Anyone who today assumes that a race-based National-Socialist state is only differentiated from other states by emotionless qualities, such as better construction of its economic system, does not have the faintest idea what a World-Concept really is. If they think it is created through a better balance of wealth and poverty, or a greater voice in the economic process for the broad masses, or by more equal pay through the elimination of excessive wage differences, they have been blinded by the superficial aspects. Everything I have just described offers no security and does not guarantee our permanent survival. It offers even less of a claim to greatness. A people who become bogged down in these outward reforms would not have the slightest chance of victory in the struggle for the nation’s existence. Any movement that believes balancing the social classes and promoting equal economics, though noble, are the sole core of its mission, will not produce any great results or any true reform of existing conditions. All of its activity eventually becomes wrapped in showiness and totally preoccupied with appearances, without giving the people the inner preparation that they need to finally overcome this I say with certainty, those weaknesses we suffer from today.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch4

Indeed, the true and full scope of the Fascist/NS Worldview would become apparent only close to or after the end of WW2, namely that Italian Fascism and German National Socialism were not just new man-made ideologies seeking mere material goals, but a singular force for the restoration of Truth in human affairs, as perceived by Italians and Germans respectively.

This world-wide appeal of Adolf Hitler shows sufficiently that, although in its modern form it originated in Germany — and could not possibly have originated anywhere else — the National Socialist doctrine transcends Germany. As I have said, it is the everlasting truth about the laws of life and the evolution of human races, apprehended from the angle of the Nordic race.

-Savitri Devi, “The Philosophy of the Swastika”

We’ve elaborated on this in the Year One Anniversary Issue of NOOSE, in the exclusive “History of IronMarch” article and will repeat here:

Fascism and National-Socialism appear as the latest militant vanguard of Truth in a world of Lies, carrying the torch passed on to us by countless other men who fought this same Struggle long before us, beneath different banners, carrying other names, and which will be fought long after we are gone, by new men beneath different banners still. Yet now, right now, is our time. Italian Fascism, German NS, Spanish Falangism, Romanian Iron Guard and all the rest – these appeared as individual rays of sunlight, piercing through the pale of Modern Ignorance, induced by the Age of “Enlightenment,” and as they dispelled that dark shroud it became clear that they all come from the same source – the brightly shining golden Sun of Truth. All these groups appeared different on the surface in as much as their respective nations and cultures differ from one another, and yet in all of them exists the all-pervasive spark of Truth, bonding them together as the same force in a common struggle. This is all the more proven by the legacy left behind for us by the Champions of our Worldview, as in their works we see a common thread, we see, written in their own hand, how they all fought for the same thing.

There is indeed clear evidence that German National Socialism specifically had realized the full nature of its mission within the scope of our Worldview during the war, shifting from being simply something in the service of Germany to the surface of a higher ideal.

In a speech delivered at Poznan on 4 October 1943 Himmler spoke about the SS as of an armed Order that in the future, after the elimination of the Soviet Union, would have to stand guard for Europe against the ‘Asiatic hordes’ on the Urals. What is important here is that a certain change of perspectives had taken place at this juncture. The Aryan was no longer identified with the German. The plan was to fight, not for an expansionist National Socialism based on a unilateral racism and for ‘Pan-Germanism,’ but for a higher idea, for Europe and a European ‘New Order.’

-Julius Evola, Notes on the Third Reich

To summarize: the variety of Nationalist/Fascist movements that existed across Europe after WW1 and until the end of WW2, were the manifestations of the same exact Worldview, one that believes in the existence of an Absolute objective Truth in accordance to which all must live, however these movements only partially expressed different aspects of this Worldview, aspects that most spoke to their respective national character, which created the different forms of expressions of this same Worldview in these different movements, much like how the same ray of light creates a variety of colors once it passes through a prism.

However the followers of these ideals would only fully comprehend the full scope and nature of their common Worldview during or most notably after the war, which served as a cleansing fire that removed their particular national and historically-conditioned expressions, leaving behind knowledge of the eternal core from which these aspects originate, and how they all relate to one another in a single Truth. Italian Fascism, German NS, Spanish Falangism, Clerical Fascism of the Romanian Iron Guard and etc – all form coherent individual pictures, all the while acting like pieces of a single puzzle, one only has to be capable of realizing that they fit together and comprehending the larger image.

Fascism is preoccupied by the clothing (namely the forms of state organization), National-Socialism by the body (namely the racial eugenics), whereas Legionarism is preoccupied by something much deeper: by the soul (namely by its strengthening through the cultivation of Christian virtues and its preparation with final salvation in mind, salvation dealt with by the Christian Church in the most perfect fashion).

-Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, “The Nest Leader’s Manual”

That image being the Worldview of Truth, otherwise called Worldview of Tradition, one that we name after the Champions who had pioneered the fight for that Worldview in the Modern World we know today, hence when we say Fascism and National Socialism we do not mean specifically Italian Fascism and German National Socialism, but the much grander image to which they belong and to which they lend their names in this day and age – that Worldview of Truth.

So while there is a German National Socialism and an Italian Fascism, different inasmuch as Germans and Italians are different by national character, there are likewise the Eternal Fascism and National Socialism, which are one and the same and transcend all limitations of time and space. This Fascism and National Socialism had existed since before time itself, and in reality what they are has no permanent name and no word of any language will ever be truly apt to describe it, though we have listed all the other names for it at the start of this article. However, here and now it bears the names of the only force  loyal to it to have come about in this day and age. 

And just as this force had elevated these names, so it too had elevated the symbol of the Swastika to be the universal symbol of our struggle, the symbol of that eternal Truth. And one can very well suspect providence having been at work behind the choice of this symbol over all others by Adolf Hitler, as its deeper original meanings that predate the appearance of German National Socialism and their use of it, in fact, convey that very eternal idea for which we struggle. A solar symbol, a symbol of pole, a symbol of the immovable mover, a symbol of eternity and all its laws.

This is why we do not shun away from the Swastika despite all criticism, for it represents the very essence of our struggle and our goals, moreover it is a symbol that is widespread among those of Aryan heritage (throughout all of Europe and among Slavs) and in areas of original Aryan expansion and conquest (certain areas of the Middle East, India, China, etc). If one shies away from the swastika then it is most likely that he is a coward or not an actual Fascist/NS.

Mind you, we do not believe that every Fascist/NS movement worldwide should use the Swastika as their symbol; each movement needs its own logo and brand to stand out and be recognized for itself. However, we are talking about two different types of symbols: symbol of the movement or group and symbol of the struggle. There are plenty of groups that do not utilize the Swastika and yet they do not shy away from it in fear. Such was the case with the now banned National Action, whom we have always extended our full support to. The same can be said of Golden Dawn and the Nordic Resistance Movement.

We often hear the criticism that since Hitler lost the War and Rockwell was killed then clearly Fascism/NS had failed, but the war was instead a cathartic experience which served to reveal the full scope and nature of their mission. Fascism and National Socialism have not failed, for our ideals and mission are eternal and thus the Struggle itself is eternal, and their triumph is not dictated by any given defeat.

Every negative event in the world can be turned into a positive one. Every defeat may father a later victory. Every lost war may be the cause of a later resurgence. Every distress may inspire a new surge in man’s willpower. A new spiritual rebirth may spring from every oppression, but this can occur only as long as the racial blood is kept pure. The loss of blood purity by itself will forever destroy inner happiness and forever lowers man. The result of impurity can never be eliminated from man’s body and spirit.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V1, Ch11

In the eyes of others we were losers. Vagabonds without a homeland. The minority against the majority. However such perception was not in line with my own. I did not see myself a loser, more importantly, I wasn’t one. I was on the side of the defeated. Those who fought, and not those who gave up without fighting.

Pier Luigi Concutelli

So what if these warriors did not get to experience external success? Heroic values are not the values of merchants, they value principles, not success.

-Ernst Junger, “Mechanized Warfare”

Hitler’s and Germany’s ‘crucifixion’ was all according to the inevitable workings of this unknowable Scenarist. Even the eleven hanged disciples in Nurnburg were not without significance! The most hated and dreaded idea two thousand years ago was Christianity, and the most hated and cursed man on earth was Jesus Christ. His followers were bitterly persecuted and murdered by the ‘good’, ‘sensible’ people who could see that anybody in his right mind recognized Rome and the Empire as the solid, substantial reality. I realized that today’s Marxist-Democratic world is another sprawling ‘Roman Empire’, and today’s Nazis the early ‘Christians’. What is going on is far more than a battle for political supremacy in the present social and political situation. it is the utter smashing and destruction of a society which has become so rotten that it will tolerate and even love its own Marxist destroyers, just as it hates, despises and fears the slowly-growing Nazi society which will replace it. Such mighty, awesome thoughts come to a man but once in a lifetime, if ever, and when they do, that man changes for all time.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, This Time the World, Ch7

But this ritual [consecration of new Swastika Banners with the “Blutfahne”], to which many others can be added, would never have sufficed to give Hitlerism the character of a religion, if it had not already been a more-than-political doctrine: a Weltanschauung. And above all, it would have been unable to make it a true religion, if, at the base of this Weltanschauung, there had not been eternal truths and a whole attitude which was not (and does not remain), in last analysis, anything other than the quest for the eternal even in what changes — the traditional attitude par excellence.

These words may seem strange in 1969, more than twenty-four years after the defeat of Hitler’s Germany on the battlefield and the collapse of its political structure. They can seem strange, now that one would seek in vain, in the whole geographical region covered by the Third Reich, a visible sign of the resurgence of National Socialism such as the Führer intended it, and that the majority of the organizations which, beyond the old frontiers of the Reich, claim they would rescue the condemned Movement, are just pale imitations without heart, or just lamentable caricatures, sometimes in the service of other goals. But the value of a doctrine — its truth — has nothing to do with the success or the failure of its members on the material plane. This success or failure depends on the accord or discord of the doctrines with the aspirations of people at a given moment of history, and also on the fact that its adherents are or are not, from the military point of view, the diplomatic point of view, from the point of view of the art of propaganda, able to impose themselves — and consequently do impose themselves — on their adversaries. The fact that the doctrine is or is not an expression of cosmic truth is of no account here. But it submits in the long run, right or wrong, to these doctrines, in the sense that a society that refuses to accept a teaching in harmony with eternal laws and prefers untruths works for its own disintegration, in other words, damns itself.

-Savitri Devi, “Religion of the Strong”

We have been defeated before, yes, but we have not lost, and in many ways that defeat had only served to reveal to us our true path and make us all the stronger for it when the final confrontation arrives. As our goals are in loyalty to that which is eternal we can never be dealt a final blow so long as those of pure blood and strong character still exist, unlike the meager, temporal and merely human goals of our enemies and “allies” alike, which will always condemn themselves to defeat and damnation as their goals invariably oppose what is eternal and serve only one’s own weakness.

This is exactly where we see our would-be “allies” – in a place of service to their own weakness, which leads to cowardice, and “smart idiocy,” far away from our eternal goals. The idiocy is well on display as they attempt legalism, which will not work for them either, because the Jews decide what is legal and they have the entire System at their disposal to keep you out. Moreover their legal tactics are subpar and in error compared to the ones utilized by Rockwell. In fact, he criticized exactly these tactics 50 years ago and nobody learned a damned thing since!

The cowardice is manifest in their refusal to move on to the only recourse left, namely Revolution, which of course betrays the fact that they have no common ground with us, for cowards are such out of fear for their own hide and well being, whereas heroes are those who will sacrifice themselves in the name of the eternal. Behold our would-be “allies” that dare chastise us: cowardly idiots and racist liberals!

We shouldn’t limit ourselves to exclusively “legal means” either, which are not of the least importance. Only mediocrity and weaklings cling to them, meaning their defeat is assured.

-Ernst Junger, “Unite! Final Word”

Men will talk about almost anything. Men will fight for very few things. 

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White power, Ch14

If a man isn’t willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he’s no good.

-Ezra Pound

Stupid people are more dangerous than any time bomb.


Regardless whether they are with you or against you, stupid people are equally disastrous to have around.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 2.36

More often, these days, it is intrigue and guile which decide the course of the future. To be undone by a bastard who has not declared himself your foe, or who has actually painted himself as a “friend,” is one of the worst fates imaginable. If just that much can be avoided in a person’s life, or in the life of the Movement, then we will be halfway home to victory.

-SIEGE, 4.18

… I was frequently attacked by people whose total nationalist convictions consisted of a mixture of stupidity and showy displays intended to enhance their self image. These were the people who shouted with others because it gave them a thrill to suddenly act like a “nationalist” without putting themselves at risk. I considered this “united front” as the most miserable and most ridiculous demonstration possible and history has proven me right.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch15

Who dares chide us because our eyes are open?

-Helmut Stellrecht, “Faith and Action”

Considering that the real motivation of our “allies” is the pursuit and defense of materialist, liberal comforts then it stands to reason that their ranks are made up of people who already have something that they want to keep and are afraid of giving up (afraid of the niggers coming over and taking away their toys from them), hence their sudden racialism. Once again we reiterate that our supposed “allies” seem to be little more than racist liberals who are afraid of losing the benefits of liberalism that they are presently enjoying or wish to enjoy in the future, and idolize the 50s suburban liberal “utopia” but refuse to recognize how it was exactly that mentality that allowed multiculturalism, Jews and niggers to advance as far as they did. These are what Hitler had called privileged-class idiots and patriots.

[The National-Socialist movement] must never let itself be influenced by the privileged-class idiots who think they know something about everything but have tossed away a great State along with their own existence and the dominating control of their own social class. They are enormously smart, can do anything, and understand everything. There is only one thing they could not do. They could not prevent the German people from falling into the arms of Marxism. Here they were a wretched and pitiful failure. Their present conceit is caused by their cockiness, which is well known to be the companion of stupidity. Ignorance is the mother of audacity.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V2, Ch6

We National-Socialists must be especially careful not to be taken in by our Jew-led privileged-class patriots who prefer to battle with words. Our movement will be in trouble if it indulges in protest speeches, like they do, instead of preparing to fight!

-Mein Kampf V2, Ch13

However their inherent motivation prevents them from conducting any true action that involves risk to themselves or can result in them losing their toys as a result of System punishment. Hence they will never conduct any true attacks on our enemy and will rationalize away any calls for such action as being wrong on some fake premise or because “it makes them/the movement (which movement? Altright? NS? Speak only for yourselves!) look bad”.

Some have said and still say that these are “pre-revolutionary times”. That’s a pretty good intellectual cop-out for a professional faker.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 4.12

No wonder the System does not fear these clowns and only utilizes them as ammo in some petty internal power struggle of its own, the ultimate outcome of which brings us no closer to our own goals. The Jews know the Altright will never step out of line and if push comes to shove they will run away.

Big Brother loves talk, loves debate, adores paper pushers but is frightened to death by ACTION! Even more than that Big Brother is terrified by the kind of action that the White masses might identify with!!

-James Mason, SIEGE, 6.11

This weakness is apparent even in the propaganda employed by other groups. The entire narrative of “white geNOcide” is weak and pathetic! Arguments like “Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for everyone” and “We have a Right to Exist” is akin to walking up to the Jews that run the world and pleading with them, “please massah, it’s not fair, can’t I have the same rights as the nonwhites? Please massah!” Crying about injustices to your enemy who wants to destroy you is the height of cowardly non-action! Are we not AT WAR with the Jews and their System? And it doesn’t matter if you are aiming that propaganda at the powers that be, or at the masses, or are trying to convey the hypocrisy of the powers that be to the masses because THAT is the mental image being produced in their minds, of pleading and rationalizing what you want and trying to gain it by pure rhetoric rather than declaring your intention of simply taking it.

It is not the half-hearted and neutral who go down in history, but those who take on the fight.

-Adolf Hitler 

Do not make fools of the rest of us by complaining to, pleading with, or barking at the System.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 4.11

How can there be any talk of “injustice” when our sworn Enemy holds all the power? What can you expect from a mortal enemy other than to try and wipe you out, any way and all? There is no middle ground, no one to go crying to. There is only ourselves and our Enemy…


Let there be no more talk about injustice. Let there only be talk of WAR!

-SIEGE, 7.8


SIEGE, 7.3

And of course, being cowards but not wanting to admit to that, one is inevitably going to hear all sorts of disingenuous “arguments” against Revolution from our would-be “allies”, which are purposely designed to make that prospect sound either absolutely hopeless or ridiculous. They will come up with the stupidest example of revolutionary activity done wrong in every way possible. Of course, if these “arguments” are sincere and genuine, then all it does is prove further that we are dealing with utter imbeciles who are a liability to be around. If there is any benefit in these “arguments”, then it must be that it at least tells us exactly what sort of mistakes and dumb things to avoid.

There are no such things as desperate situations. Only desperate men.

-Adolf Hitler

STOP rationalizing a situation you know to be deadly serious. STOP temporizing with halfway measures in a situation that screams for decisive action. STOP using business, social etiquette, family and security as an excuse for downright cowardly behavior. If you hesitate very much longer, the fight will be over-and the White Man will have lost!


-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch16

Blueprints for successful revolutionary movements have been set down for us from Hitler to Rockwell to Tommasi and any number of other great revolutionaries not of the National Socialist spirit. Why then has the Movement continued to attach itself to the decrepit and utterly ridiculous Right Wing and chosen a course that has perennially doomed itself to failure?

-James Mason, SIEGE, 4.7

Some might even try to dissuade us from Revolutionary activity by “scaring us” as to how “hard” it will be.

You neither do, nor refrain from doing, anything because it’s “easy” or “hard” or because everybody else is or isn’t doing it. You instead follow your instinct. As revolutionaries, we have it easier than most in determining our own actions.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.7

Our struggle is hard, because we are fighting for something great, and great things are not lightly or easily gained.

-Sir Oswald Mosley

And of course, the last bastion of excuses against Revolution is always how powerful our enemy is, that there is simply no way to topple it by force, because its own force is greater, it has all these technological advancements on its side and the conditions will never be good enough for revolution – all excuses made by those who wish to stay inactive, for the old saying is true: where there is a will there is a way!

As far as creating the appropriate conditions, as well as almost all extensive and sober points on NS revolutionary activity are concerned, one would have to read the entirety of SIEGE and not just some of the meager scraps we had provided in this article. Technological advancements of any given age have always been to the benefit and bane of both revolutionaries and the state they had to topple, so in that sense we are no worse off than any other successful revolutionaries of the past, however the hardest truth that cuts through all other whining and pleading for avoiding commitment to Revolutionary action is the fact that Race War is simply inevitable. And the most recent events, namely the kidnapping and torture of a White kid by a gang of niggers, stands as further evidence of that.

Ahead lies all-out world race-war…

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch14

Regardless if one wants a Revolution or not, the choice will inevitably be out of their hands, for the NS Revolution and Race War are events joined at the hip, only question is which one will come first and usher in the other: will the NS Revolution happen first and begin the Race War or will the niggers in USA and Muslims in Europe start the Race War and force the NS Revolution?

The former scenario is only possible if it is actively worked towards by dedicated and fanatical National Socialists who prepare themselves and act accordingly to their own strength, slowly building themselves up and undermining the System in as much as their means and preparation permits. And if the Race War happens first and not as a result of their own revolutionary action then they will be at least already somehow prepared for it and ready to take the fight to the Jews and their pawns!

The latter scenario, however, if one has not engaged themselves in revolutionary activity at all and persisted in their suit and tie approach, then they will be caught with their pants down and unable to put up any resistance, but then again such cowards would run for their lives, as their entire political engagement was only ever about their own benefit. Those who wear suits can’t fight – they might ruin the suit and it was expensive! Moreover, even if the Revolution and Race War won’t happen in our lifetimes we must do everything in our power to hasten the process regardless and make sure that we have left plenty to work with for the next generation of Fascists and National Socialists who will finish the job – to do otherwise is clean cut betrayal.

Only our descendants can finish what we didn’t have the time to.

-Ernst Junger, “Differentiation and Connection”

“Tell me your relation to pain, and I will tell you. who you are!” -Ernst Junger, “On Pain”. Those who wish to avoid pain are cowardly hedonists. Those who wish to overcome pain in the pursuit of higher ideals are heroes.

Whom would you believe were ready to fight in the streets against niggers and muslim rapefugees once the Race War hits? The presentable gentlemen on the left? Or the “delinquents” and “social outcasts” on the right? When Race War kicks off and the System will topple, White people won’t be running to the protection of some vague, presentable suit and tie group that they barely remember or understand, no, they will remember “those evil Nazis” who have been engaged in real action and looked violent and tough, and so the normal average folk will see the Swastika Banners as their only salvation and the former “Nazi thugs” will become their most venerated protectors.

Those out front, putting themselves on the line and taking the action, as Tommasi wrote, are in fact the real LEADERS and are at the top level of the struggle. All else pales to insignificance…

-James Mason, SIEGE, 9.5 

Let us make a quick detour on the issue of suits and ties and talk about aesthetics. Our suit and tie “allies” seem to fully believe in the notion of “normalizing” “our” views, however in the case of their vague racialist Americanism there isn’t that much to be normalized to begin with anyway as it coincides so much with the System status quo. We’ve already essentially criticized this kind of thinking at the very start of this article when we made our more “mathematical arguments” – you are not normalizing 2+2=4 by taking a step towards the 2+2=6 crowd and saying 2+2=5, you are just compromising and thus surrendering to their demands and their lies. In a world where everyone buys into the lie that 2+2=6 and THAT is the “normal”, to tell the Truth is a revolutionary and despised act.

However the actual ideals that we fight for are not as simple as basic math, you can make all sorts of elaborate, intellectual arguments and the lemmings will still refuse to go along with you or else they’ll just nod their heads and agree for the moment but revert back to their conditioning the very next hour. To “normalize” yourself with this gray mass is to blend in and be forgotten as part of the status quo. This of course manifests itself in the aesthetics one employs.

Throughout history aesthetics have been a powerful tool that exerts influences on the masses and in order to shape and organize society, in particular to separate the normal from the special. Aesthetics are used to designate the boundaries between what is casual and everyday, from what is formal and celebratory. Religion utilizes aesthetics to separate the profane from the sacred. To submit to the demands of the existing status quo is to say that there is nothing special about you, which seemingly contradicts the intentions of our “allies,” or rather betrays further still how much they have in common with our enemies.

Our struggle carries a transcendental character, we fight for a higher ideal, the ultimate ideal of Truth in a world of Lies. Here lies and falsehoods are the norm, thus complying to what is considered “normal” in a world of lies is as good as in all seriousness claiming that 2+2 is 5 or 6. Aesthetics have always been self-evidently important to Fascists and National Socialists. Some might argue that the foremost pioneer and facilitator of Fascist aesthetics had been the Italian poet Gabriel D’Annunzio, who in his city state of Fiume had created a whole new world of his own that heavily utilized impressive theatrics that stood out as absurd to most. Overall the Italians had a brilliant knack for opposing the tired social norms of their time in favor of something new, radiant and odd, such was the work of the Italian Futurist movement for example. Soon enough all Nationalist/Fascist movements of Europe, including the NSDAP, utilized aesthetics in brilliant ways, to demonstrate that they represent something else, something different to anything else that contemporary society had to offer.

Their particular aesthetics were genuine, honest, which is why they worked. Some people mistakenly take to outright copying these Champions of our past and for the most part look ridiculous for it. Rockwell had made his uniforms work because he didn’t copy them completely, and because he too was authentic and genuine, unlike the LARP uniform cosplaying of NSM who never could look the part of true and dedicated Fascists/NS as the fatness of their uniformed members betrayed lack of any discipline or willpower that are a cornerstone of our Struggle.

There are those who deck themselves out – not in serious, dignified National Socialist attire – but in authentic World War Two German costumes complete with decorations, awards and insignia rank of that period. I don’t know which is worse, rendering themselves utterly ridiculous or insulting the memory of genuine heroes.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 4.5

The contemporary Fascist/NS groups likewise have to utilize aesthetics to demonstrate fully how they stand APART from the Modern World of lies, not try to integrate into it. One of the most successful examples of doing that in recent history has been, again, National Action, who have pioneered a new trend of aesthetics which are now being successfully used by our Lithuanian comrades in SKYDAS. Their use of the skull mask had made it a more widespread piece of unofficial Fascist/NS attire that serves our purposes and our Struggle perfectly. Overall, to be APART from this contemptuous society of lies, skull masks, boots, swastikas and military casual style of clothing is infinitely superior to suits and ties. We are revolutionaries not only because we promote a revolution to topple the System but because we promote a spiritual revolution, and thus nothing about us should feed into the Jewish status quo.

Perhaps once we have won there will be a place for suits and ties, just as there was a place for them after Fascists came to power in Italy and National Socialists came to power in Germany, however before those suits there were blackshirts (in both Italy and Great Britain), brownshirts, greenshirts (Iron Guard) and others. All of them had been social outcasts and rogues of some description or another, however once they came to power they dictated what was normal and what was to be cast out, for real respectability is earned through power, not image alone.

Let us return then, to the subject of Revolution. Here we must bring up one point that should be clear to anyone with half a brain and goes without saying: Revolutions are always bloody, and we expect that. The bloodletting will be necessary, however, not only the blood of our enemies, but of our own people.

The most fundamental rule of such a cataclysmic social upheaval as a revolution is: “The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church!” Perhaps it sounds cruel and brutal, but it is nevertheless true, that the greater the proportion of human upheaval aimed at, the greater quantity of blood and torrents of tears which must be poured out in vast quantities to gain the goal. The kind of unprecedented, colossal movement which can alone reverse the suicidal trend of the Western world, and usher in even another thousand years of survival for the White man, can never be launched – let alone won – in any safe, painless, or easy way. Even ordinary sufferings and martyrdom are too minuscule for the kind of movement we must set aflame to survive. Everything about the current deadly battle for world mastery is and must be Olympian, and we cannot shrink from Olympian AGONIES if we are to hope to win.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, “In Hoc Signo Vinces”

But there is no way we can destroy the System without hurting many thousands of innocent people – no way. It is a cancer too deeply rooted in our flesh. And if we don’t destroy the System before it destroys us – if we don’t cut this cancer out of our living flesh-our whole race will die.

Dr. William Luther Pierce, The Turner Diaries

Our disingenuous “allies” will hold this against us, trying to assess that we are not truly fighting for the well being of our people if we are willing to to subject them to the horrors of Revolution and accept the inevitable casualties as exactly that, inevitable. Frankly they will criticize us in the same vain for our insistence on the validity of the Lemming Principle alone, as they think it to be false in some description or deprecating of White people.

Of course, this criticism is likewise fueled by the inescapable fact that our “allies” are very much the same as our enemies. They refuse to recognize that the liberal, rationalist, Americanist goals that they fight for are a sickness, a disease that must be destroyed. They relegate everything to simply the presence of nonwhites who ruin these “great” things by afflicting the stability of a homogeneous society. Their attitude is that “the problem with liberalism/libertarianism/Americanism is all these niggers and Jews everywhere! Without them this would work perfectly!” as opposed to our attitude that “the problem with liberalism/etc is LIBERALISM.

It is the initial decay introduced by conceit and weakness of well-to-do bourgeois Whites that allows for the Jew to weasel his way in and fester until he has the power to open the borders all the while getting the decadent whites to agree and enable him every step of the way. Had the Jew not appeared this society, it would still be developing all manner of degeneracy and depravity and just dying a slow and quiet death. What is essentially the contention of our “allies” is that the Niggers and Muslims are ruining their idyllic and hazy slow death with the prospect of a more violent one. As if these people are not dead inside already.

A country has the Jews it deserves. Just as mosquitoes can thrive and settle only in swamps, likewise the former can only thrive in the swamps of our sins.

-Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, For My Legionaries

The more materialistic the Culture became, the more it approached the Jew, and the greater was his advantage.

-Francis Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM

The most deadly enemy of the Jew is order and national health. […] Jews can’t prosper in a healthy, well organized, ordered society.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch6

A healthy state will expel – or kill – the Jew; a decadent one will take him to its bosom.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 2.14

The situation in many countries is desperately bad, far worse than what was going on in Weimar Germany, because back then the decay and degeneracy was complimentary with a weak System and decrepit social and economic order. However, today degeneracy is propped up as a wonderful benefit of affluence, it is polished and sold as a commodity that most people do, in fact, buy. The fact is that the USA in particular is a hotbed of degeneracy among White people, and all these degenerates hardly deserve any consideration beyond what they represent in the crudest sense possible: genetic material.

Any time that a man of good race, cheerfully integrated into “consumer society,” disappoints you, tell yourself that he does not count as a conscious individual; only his blood counts. See in him only what the breeder of horses or dogs considers in his subjects: his pedigree. Let us be frank: what he says, believes, and thinks is of no importance.

-Savitri Devi, “The Religion of the Strong”

Take a look at the armies of mouth-breathing knuckle-draggers on these streets and realize that they are what pass as “White”!

-James Mason, SIEGE, 2.21

To us they are merely the unconscious, unwitting, and unwilling carriers of the genes that can, under the proper care and leadership, re-achieve greatness and pull this planet out of its quicksand.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 2.15

When an opponent declares, “I will not come over to your side,” I calmly say, “Your child belongs to us already… What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.”

-Adolf Hitler

It is no use crying and protesting that this is somehow harsh and cruel. What is truly cruel is the completely irresponsible behavior of those who had put the survival of their Nation and Race at risk for their own short-sighted self-interest. Some will cry out “how can you claim to love your nation if you promote such contempt?” which is a desperate attempt at muddying the waters and substituting the facts.

The contempt is promoted towards the subhuman scum who have ignored the responsibilities of the blood they were given and put the continuation of their Nation and Race at risk, for let us remind you once more: the Nation/Race is not only those living, but all the dead and those yet to be born. It is in defense of those honorable dead and the innocent unborn that we must practice contempt for those living, who spit on the former and threaten the purity and existence of the latter!

We’ve mentioned how it is not enough to be simply born Aryan, to be born White. That is not the start and end of the matter, you don’t get to smugly sit your ass and bask in self-importance, entitlement and conceit – it is but only the beginning, as it imparts a mighty responsibility on the one who carries that blood, that he may prove himself to be worthy of it, for what good is pure, noble blood if it is carried by subhuman filth. Conceit on the grounds of having been born into superior blood is just as bad as conceit on the grounds of having been born into nobility, wealth, status, etc, for it leads one not to appreciate those things, what they entail, nor the duties that they impart.

Nations who become mongrels or allow their people to be bastardized, have sinned against the will of Eternal Providence. Their collapse at the hands of a stronger force is not an injustice done to them, instead it is the restoration of justice. If a people no longer respect the qualities given to it by Nature, qualities which are deeply rooted in its blood, it surrenders its right to complain when its earthly existence is at an end.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, V1, Ch11

Subhumans exist in all peoples as a leavening agent.

-Paul Joseph Goebbels

The unity of the noble soul and a noble body is the goal to which we strive. But we despise those whose noble body carries an ignoble soul.


Inherited honor does not last forever, but always demands work and struggle. Honor is like a crown. He who ceases to live and act like a king loses it – and has lost it, even if he still wears it on his head.

-Helmut Stellrecht, “Faith and Action”

But despise the mass man with his empty heart and shallow mind; the mass egoist, mean and pretentious, who lives only for his own well-being and for what money can buy.

-Savitri Devi, “The Religion of the Strong”

Which could be lowest, the Jewish Systematarian or White capitalist traitor, or the hordes of don’t-give-a-damn “White” fun-seekers and escapists? Somehow, I can’t find it in my heart to hate anyone with a direct purpose – however vile – nearly so much as an irresponsible shirker.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.1

Which is all precisely why we do not share the same goals as our “allies,” for what they seem to prize most is exactly what allows for the Jewish takeover. That is to say, the individualistic, materialistic and hedonistic “culture” of modernity. They prize the very sickness of decay that invites rampant degeneracy and the rendering of blood a mere biological fact, inherited by white subhumans. They quite literally think that the SWAMP OF THEIR SINS would be the most amazing thing ever IF ONLY IT WERE NOT FOR ALL THE MOSQUITOES!

And this decay has always been initiated by conceit and it is the eternal truth that all such decay starts from the top, going back all the way to the Antique Greek concept of Anacyclosis and well before then, and it is that very same truth that demands a REVOLUTION to fix things!

Our “allies,” Weak Men, idolize the Good Times which THEY have ruined and think it will take more of their WEAKNESS to fix it. Reality is that these Hard Times can only be fixed by STRONG MEN – only Fascists, only National Socialists.

The curse of “liberal,” “humanitarian” mankind is egocentrism, conceit.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch3

What we are fighting has always been, and will always be, a sickness from within.


The White upper classes – which, make no mistake, rule this land – have long since been alienated from their own people, their own past; the great struggles and causes of White history are forgotten; today these people are merely managers and custodians, albeit damned well-paid ones at that…


A ruling body with its own, peculiar world view in which they believe, for they are quite sincere. The Whites of this country and indeed most of the West have been betrayed by their own rotten leaders. yes, their natural leaders, the nation’s elite! That is why no renaissance can be possible here. Only revolution.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 3.9

Again, let us state this to be clear: our contempt is for the degenerate subhuman filth who desecrate their blood purity. Wherever those who have not succumbed to the degeneracy of the Modern World will be found they will be treated as true members of their Nation and Race, and thus as true individuals rather than merely genetic material. However the likelihood of finding such survivors in this world are directly inverse to the level of affluence and decadence that is enjoyed by a given region or country. Perhaps some of the criticism towards us on this point originates with exactly this sort of degenerate filth that had attached itself to the wider group interests for the sake of their own security, for example the faggots (for example Grindr Greggy), as we’ve discussed earlier in this article.

This is the true extent of the awesome responsibility that all Fascists and National Socialists face. The only means left to us may be crude but they serve a higher purpose, whereas our “allies” boast about their impotent methods that just sound swell on paper in how easy and nonviolent they are (how bourgeois they are), yet are completely ineffective and are meant to serve petty and contemptuous goals.

[Violence is] the quickest and most definitive way of reaching the revolutionary goal. […] No bourgeois hypocrisy, no sentimentalism; action, direct and sharp, carried out to the end, at whatever cost.

-Italo Balbo

Before we move on to the final segment of our article let us address the ever prevalent suspicion and accusation towards various Altright circles and individuals as to their implicit or explicit friendliness or non-hostility towards faggotry. Now that we have established that the only goal of the Altright is restoring an affluent bourgeois-liberal society of decadence and degeneracy with no nonwhites, how is it a surprise that such suspicions can exist?

Nothing in this goal is mutually exclusive with allowing rampant faggotry. Moreover, faggotry is the very pinnacle and natural product of such aspirations. The only point where conflict should arise is the vague racialism of the Altright, however we’ve already showcased how this racialism only exists in as much as it serves their liberal agenda and thus has nothing to do with survival of one’s Race and Nation.

And while some figures and circles in the Altright are very explicit in their approval of faggotry, others get upset and offended at the accusation, yet repeatedly refuse to make definitive statements of opposition to faggotry, disavow known Altright faggots, think to exploit faggots in their favor (as some believed Milo, the black cock gobbling Jew would serve as some kind of introduction to the Altright sphere – AND WHAT AN INTRODUCTION IT IS!), or try to play down the nature of the issue if not outright attempt to attack their accusers. However, there is no smoke where there is no fire, those who make their contempt for the degeneracy of faggotry clear do not have to deal with that suspicion hanging over their heads.

Consider some of the popular ways in which people from the Altright try to ignore or downplay the fag question: “Why do you obsess with faggots so much? There’s not that many of them anyway, statistically they’re not even a problem and not all fags are degenerate, in fact I know some and they’re great! Some can even be of help to our movement. Frankly, your obsession with fags means there’s something wrong with you!”

Now read this: “Why do you obsess with Jews so much? There’s not that many of them anyway, statistically they’re not even a problem and not all Jews are subversive, in fact I know some and they’re great! Some can even be of help to our movement. Frankly, your obsession with Jews means there’s something wrong with you!”

The final level of irony being, of course, that both of these statements above are what we have come to normally expect to hear from the progressive liberal crowd in response to us on the dangers of Jews and Fags.

How much more evidence does one need to see that our Altright “allies” are simply a different variation of the same liberal disease that had ruined Western civilization? And recall our point from the start of this article: faggots will pay lip service to Western civilization and the White Race only because they happen to belong to them and wish to save themselves from the violent fate that awaits them, should the West be finally overrun by muslims. AND HOW IS THAT SO MUCH DIFFERENT FROM THE ALTRIGHT who only pay lip service to Western civilization and the White Race, only because they happen to belong to them and wish to save themselves and their cummies from the violent fate that awaits them, should the US be finally overrun by niggers, mexicans, muslims, etc?

Their supposed ties to the West and the White Race, however, are likewise a mere formality as they have lost all connection with that civilization and race and only identify with the liberal bourgeois denigration of it, which looks back to the height of Western civilization as nothing more than decor, something nice to look at, and evaluates it only in utilitarian terms, foremost as a life-preserver to try and maintain society, as they themselves cannot continue it.

In truth, the West today has no culture. These consumers hang onto the language and customs of a bygone age because they can’t come up with anything so organized and intricate on their own.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.17

Of course Modern Men (and the Altright which they have created) wish to go back to the 50’s and are constantly playing a defensive game, as they completely lack the spirit in which their civilization and culture were created in the first place, though in the case of USA the conditions are even worse, as it is an entirely artificial construct, as we’ve discussed earlier. They cannot build anything worthy of their ancestors, they cannot make anything new to continue the culture further, the creative spark of their Race is not within them and thus all they can do is try and preserve the merely material legacy, even if that same spark, that spirit, no longer dwells inside the material vessel.

Timestamped. Relevant message ends at 55:15

They are but dead automatons, custodians and tourists to a museum of dead things. Such is the fundamental condition of all Modern Men. They regard their own Civilization and Race as mere commodities, like antiques collectors, who simply wish to own the material object and have it be a piece of decor or a conversation piece, to be shown off. Ask them to try and make something that would be worthy of the same craftsmanship and they will either stand there in total confusion or go back to enjoying modernity in all its glorious rot. They are but parasites inasmuch as the Jews or niggers.

For all intents and purposes, the Altright can be symbolized by a pretentious and snobbish homosexual art-collector who holds a private decadent party (no nonwhites allowed), where he shows off his collection of antique European art before asking for everyone’s attention, toasting the accomplishments of Western Civilization and the White Race that provided him with his collection as well as the security that he enjoys, and then telling his guests that the orgy will be held in the 16th century European classicism gallery wing.

Fine, not all of them are faggots, it’s not always a literal gay orgy, not all of them approve or support of faggotry or gay orgies – but they downplay it well enough and support the conditions for it well enough to warrant all the scrutiny they get, so indignant whining in outrage over that scrutiny is mute and pointless, and the scrutiny will remain valid so long as they refuse to acknowledge that there can be no compromise on the fag question and refuse to openly condemn and attack all faggots, regardless of who they are, who they claim to be and what they do – this attitude must be adopted to all fag apologists and fag enablers.

True nationalists, and especially Fascists and National Socialists, are the only ones who still have the living essence of their Nations and Race, which is why their are motivated by a sense of higher duty and not pragmatism or utilitarianism in the service of one’s own interests and pleasures. To us this struggle isn’t about just saving some material objects in a museum or to ensure the safety or comfort of degenerates (“FASH THE BORDERS, LIBERATE THE INTERIOR!”), let alone join them in their degeneracy. To Fascists/NS the accomplishments and glories of the past are a benchmark, they are a visual and material representation of the spirit that resides in the blood, they are, in the words of Bob Mathews, a call to ACTION and a DEMAND for adherence to DUTY! 

Total Aryan Victory

We’ve thoroughly criticized our would-be “allies” and have shown how little they have in common with us and how much they have in common with our enemies. The distance it takes them to travel to their end destination is so short from where they started, that they might as well have not left at all. However they are unable to realize that, to them it might seem like a big journey, and they would only realize how inconsequential their “strides” are if they knew how far us Fascists and National Socialists intend to travel. We talk about something eternal and Absolute.

To someone who has no comprehension of the truly Absolute, being simply stubborn in defense of something, anything, for purely personal gain may indeed seem like having an absolute position.

One can only truly see the full scope of things once they achieved knowledge of the existence of the Absolute and of its fundamental nature. When that is accomplished they begin an eternal struggle towards the full understanding of the Absolute and find themselves at odds with those who still cannot see the forest for the trees, who still gaze at the shadows in the Cave and refuse to hear talk of the Sun outside.

If they do realize how far we wish to go, then they must likewise realize how little we have in common and, moreover, as we’ve mentioned earlier, they’d be frightened by the prospects of our victory if our assessment of them is correct (which indeed it is, the only question that remains is how many of them are redeemable). For that which we strive for does not serve man and thus does not operate in a utilitarian fashion to provide one with safety, wealth and pleasure.  Instead it is expected that the whole of society, down to the last man, serve something greater than themselves, with true joy as the reward for that service. Yet to those who seek pleasures service will only ever feel like slavery, and thus they would oppose us in our pursuits, for we don’t just seek to “fash the border,” but the interior as well. Indeed, we will not stop at any borders, for we want to spread Fascism worldwide.

To the end goal of our “allies” – the all-white-liberal-playground; whites-only-gay-bathhouse; “White ethnostate” that simply wants to “fash the borders and liberate the interior” and have a nationwide white liberal bourgeois suburbia gated community, that is to say, an isolationist state that just wants to be left alone to die a slow and hedonistic death – we oppose the goal of nothing less than Total Aryan Victory. What we mean by that is exactly what it sounds: we are not content with just a state or even all of Europe, our goals demand global totality. Total Aryan Victory means the absolute global dominance of the Fascist/NS Worldview across the entire world which is guided by the descendants of the original Aryan race who had once again lived up to the glory of their ancestors and answered the eternal call of their blood! TOTAL ARYAN VICTORY MEANS A PAX ARYANA!

Make no mistake about it, I am advocating total and complete WHITE POWER in this world!

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch16

For the ultimate political goal of the Movement was the establishment of an Aryan world order, a pax Aryana, as a prerequisite for the attainment of the long-term racial goals of the Movement.

-Dr. William Luther Pierce, “A National Socialist Life”

To make the whole world once again follow the eternal laws of that which we call different names: Universal Truth, Cosmic Order, God(s), The Absolute, The One, Providence – that which bestowed all with their rightful place in this world as per their unique nature in a grand Hierarchy of Hierarchies which accounts for all things that make up life as we know it, as they all are manifestations of that same force. There is a hierarchy of men in a given nation, a hierarchy of nations in a given race, and hierarchy of races in the human species. Each man, each nation, each race has their appointed place in this Hierarchy of Hierarchies. We are all some kind of reflection of the eternal Truth and to follow one’s nature is to live in accordance with that Truth and thus to be at harmony with life. The only social organization that can successfully bring about this harmony on a grand scale is the Organic State, where all exist as parts of a greater whole.

The purpose of the Organic State is to create a society in accord with the Cosmic Order, to be its functional manifestation on earth, in human affairs, so that each individual may live in accord and harmony with himself and the world around him.

The Ultimate Truth defines us all, you are a product of its manifestation in variety of lesser Truths that had come together to form your own, personal Truth.

The Organic State is meant to put each man in the place he was meant for, according to his personal Truth, so that he may serve it and that which is greater than himself. Your personal Truth is not the same as a selfish interest, for your personal Truth is an expectation that you have to live up to, to that inherent potential hidden within that is called Destiny (utilizing Francis Parker Yockey’s definition).

A personal Truth is a great many truths that come together and define you, but these many truths pertain to things greater than oneself, from his family, ethnicity, race, sex, all the way up to that Ultimate Truth, God(s), etc. If you are born a man then you have expectations and obligations that come with being a man, and the same is true for women. Same kind of expectations and obligations exist  depending on your ethnicity and race. In realizing these obligations you are striving towards the ideal of each: the ideal of man/woman, the ideal of your ethnicity/race, and in striving towards these ideals you strive towards the ideal of perfection, towards the Absolute.

The entirety of the Modern World and all its ills come from a rebellion against these obligations, which started with denying the Absolute itself and then with all the particular manifestations of Truth, and so you have today the progressive liberals and their chanting of “Fuck you God, State, Mom, Dad, heteronormative cisgender binary norms! Race is a social construct!” – a literal rebellion against each level of the Hierarchy or Hierarchies.

In the Organic State each person is nurtured, guided and evaluated according to his nature, to help him discover where he belongs, whom he was meant to become, so that he may be placed in a position to realize his potential and find true joy in that, all the while contributing to his community, for that is why it is called and Organic State.

The crucial salient characteristic of the National-Socialist idea is precisely that it induces the unfolding of the configuring forces and creative values of personality within the community, and exerts them on behalf of the community.

-Dr. Otto Dietrich, The Philosophical Foundations of National-Socialism

It is truly an organism where all cells have their role to play and in doing what they were meant for help organs fulfill their roles which allows the overall organism to be healthy and fulfill its role. It is thus by necessity a community based on service and duty. You have a duty to all things that make up your personal Truth and in fulfilling that duty you realize your Truth and gain true Joy of Life. You serve your Nation. You serve your Race. You strive for the ideal of Man or Woman and towards overcoming all that which is merely human. In doing so you have likewise fulfilled a duty to yourself and your own, personal Truth. This, is how one attains what men call honor, measured by his service and loyalty to others of his community and to that which is greater than himself. Being loyal to Truth and vanquishing falsehoods – that is Justice. And who are our enemies if not those who have rebelled against any kind of loyalty and truth?

The purpose of life is not that of being more or less happy, but to make oneself and others better, and to combat injustice and error is not a right, but a duty.

-Italo Balbo

What exists exists because of loyalty. If that which exists ceases to be loyal, it returns to nothingness. That tears the bonds that hold everything together, it shatters camaraderie; it shatters leadership; it shatters honor; it shatters confidence in the law; it shatters the army; it shatters the state; it shatters everything that exists.

-Helmut Stellrecht, “Faith and Action”

It is when man tries to immediately serve himself, his petty immediate interests and welfare, that he begins to act as a rogue against the natural order around him, upsetting it and only growing ever more frustrated that he cannot find happiness in his ceaseless rebellion against the “oppressive” forces that make up his nature, thus man only rebels against himself and can only ever experience misery for it, becoming a slave to mere material wants and desires. Such is the eternal irony, that the “freedom” he sought truly was but slavery, in ways that Orwell, of course, could never imagine. And that is the eternal choice all men face as it is the foundation of the dual nature in the human condition: to willingly choose to serve the path that was prepared for them and find joy as their reward, becoming more than merely human… or to rebel against it and succumb to base wants and desires, rendering one less than human or animal, making one subhuman.

Fulfilling one’s duty to the utmost is required of each of us. Who will wait until the demand comes, until it is required? He who does his duty of his own free will, he is a free man and not a slave.


Slaves believe that they only need food and drink to live. The free man knows that he needs honor first of all.


Freedom is choosing to follow the path that duty requires. The others are slaves of themselves.


He who thinks of himself is a slave and bound; he who thinks of others is master and free.

-Helmut Stellrecht, “Faith and Action”

The individualistic concept of freedom however wants to liberate the individual from this duty toward the community.


… natural freedom is the freedom of personality, which means the freedom of the man who creates for his community. This uniquely true concept of freedom was taught as far back as Aristotle, who attributed freedom only to the creative man. One can only be creative, however, for a community.


Only he who is conscious of his duties toward the community and acts accordingly can be creative. And therefore the concept of freedom presupposes connection to the community. Whoever possesses this sense of community and acknowledges its moral obligations is free and feels that he is free, since his free activity can never be directed against the rules of the community, but instead runs in harmony with it.


… whoever does not possess this sense of responsibility toward the community and does not acknowledge his moral obligations places himself outside the community. What he calls individual freedom is not freedom but rather unbridledness.

-Dr. Otto Dietrich, The Philosophical Foundations of National-Socialism

One achieves true human dignity only when one serves. Only he is great who subjects himself to taking part in the achievement of a great task.

-Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera

When men concentrate only on themselves and their own animal lusts, they begin to despise themselves, they become despicable and hated by other men, and they become unhappy and hateful, in turn.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch2

Any form of liberal society is thus fundamentally incompatible with our goals, any society that is rooted in pursuit of self-interest and hedonism that passes for “happiness” today and is concerned with standards of living as the alpha and omega of all things is what we seek to root out in its entirety, for this society will only produce the kind of loathsome subhuman parasites that will inevitably subvert any and all Truth in the pursuit of their insatiable and bestial desires, from which blood purity cannot protect alone.

We shall create a spiritual atmosphere, a moral atmosphere, in which the heroic man may be born and on which he can thrive. This hero will lead our people on the road of its greatness.

-Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, For My Legionaries

So can it be any surprise that those who believe in the Absolute, in the Truth and are loyal to it, feel compelled to do that which is necessary, to fight and if need be die for that which is greater than themselves and in doing so actually realize who they truly are? Such men cannot fear death, and their actions are what defined courage for all times.

He who loses his life shall find it. When you are ready to die for something, then you’re alive.

-George Lincoln Rockwell

Courage means, in the last moment of life, to still show allegiance to the thought for which one stood and fell. To the devil with the times that want to take from us courage and men.

-Ernst Junger

True bravery is a constant. It is a singleness of purpose. A complete devotion to a Cause higher than one’s self.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 9.23

That is the kind of world we wish to build and those are the kind of men we want to populate it. So that every community is organized in an Organic State. Only such an organization can sustain the sort of structure for racial unity that is required, when all Europeans come together to form their Imperium (Europe a Nation, Europe of Fatherlands) – a civilization-scale organism based on common racial ties that exists as a singular entity towards the rest of the world, but is made up of these individual organs, these ethic, cultural communities of France, Germany, Italy, etc., that are in turn made up of self-actualized persons, each in their proper place, like healthy cells. Other such organizations may very well form alongside it to unify the other races and their own communities, so long as they realize their own proper place in that Hierarchy of Hierarchies, where the restored Aryan Race stands at the helm and guides the rest of the world in this new Golden Age of living in accord with life itself, with the eternal laws of God/Absolute/Truth etc. This is Pax Aryana.

The White Man once ruled the world with an iron, relatively just and humane hand. There were abuses, but nothing like what happens when rule is turned over to the colored races the White Man has dominated and civilized.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch11

This vision is the true legacy of all Fascists and National Socialists of the past, as they together had contributed to its revelation. Even Italian Fascism, that gets wrongly declared to only care about the State, in its focus on the purpose of the State had contributed very important lessons. Mussolini‘s famous quote “all within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state” only serves to protect the Race and Nation when they are organized within the Organic State as the “form of a nation for action”. For this organism can only be ruined by rogue cells, by individuals who begin to think only of their own interests.

And the only “organization” towards which all rogue cells in an otherwise healthy organism can commit is that of cancerous tumors that are at war with the healthy organs and the entire organism. There can be no other force within the state that competes with its power, that is against it, and worse still if it exists at the behest of some outside force. All of that is, in fact, the very premise of Capitalism, Liberalism, Democracy, Marxism and etc., as they throw an organism in disarray and pit all of its cells and organs against one another and at odds with the overall organism itself, as each of its individual cells or organs attempts to compete with and usurp the power of the whole, to elevate themselves over it. All of those things are none other than diseases.

The Jew elevates the part over the whole.

-Miguel Serrano, The Golden Cord

So long as we are talking about a healthy organism (and not a mechanical monstrosity or a living and disease-ridden corpse, as all states are today), the Organic State as the form of a nation for action, that is to say the manifestation of the nation’s will, then there can be no question that we should not tolerate anything that opposes it from within or without, for it is an attack on the nation itselfFrancis Parker Yockey described these same themes in more familiar terms of power dynamics when he addressed the Laws of Totality and Sovereignty and the Law of Constancy of Intra-Organismic Power. An even simpler explanation is that the Organic State, if it is healthy, cannot exist divided within itself by individuals or groups, which must exist, but all living in harmony with one another – it exists not as a society, but as a community.

… no joy can exist wherever exclusivity and division of the whole dominate in place of the integrity of being, as there is no point of contact or unity with the living, breathing cosmos.

-Miguel Serrano, The Golden Cord

Universalistic thought, community-conscious thought, must take the place of individualistic thought; and the universalistic – or if one wishes, the organic – picture of the world must take the place of the mechanical picture of the world.

-Dr. Otto Dietrich, The Philosophical Foundations of National-Socialism

Which inevitably brings us to the issue of the apparent opposition between the modern state, product of enlightenment and rationalism, and anything spiritual that it had purposely separated from via the principle of secularism. This is an artificial splitting of what used to and always meant to be a singular whole and one that must be done away with. The Organic State by definition cannot be secular as that creates one of those power conflicts that upsets the internal harmony of the organism, thus it must exist as the domain of both Spiritual and Temporal authority, either by principle of reunification of these powers, or through the Byzantine principle of Symphonia, where State and Church support one another, the former of the two options being the most ideal.

The issue of how exactly will this manifest is not well suited for this article least we wish to expand it to twice its current size to take into account all the nuances and caveats, so we will limit ourselves to only a couple of non-negotiable fundamental points:

  • That the spiritual formation (religion, faith, esoteric teaching) is legitimate, which can be verified through what Julius Evola called the Traditional method and is otherwise referred to as Perennial Philosophy. This legitimizes, for example, Orthodox and Catholic Christianity, but disqualifies all the bastard children of Catholicism as heresies and likewise disqualifies various crackpot cults and new age nonsense;
  • That a people adopt only the spiritual formation that is “native” to them, that is to say a people cannot be forced upon a foreign spiritual milieu that is a product of a different nation’s interpretation of the same Truth in accord to their own unique character.  This matter is still under dispute for many of our comrade when it comes to the legitimacy of Christianity in Europe, and that is something that we hope to see addressed in full in the Mysterium Fasces podcasts and a series of articles dedicated to this and other intimately related questions. However one thing is certain, that Europeans must never accept the wholesale adoption of clear cut foreign spiritual teachings such as Islam (the very legitimacy of which we question as per point one, with some due consideration given to Sufism, which, however does not exclude it from what has been said so far in this point) or Buddhism (which is legitimate, but nevertheless foreign).

When we’ll have achieved Total Aryan Victory and thus Pax Aryana it will inevitably come to pass that new sacred monarchies shall arise from the ranks of the new Fascist and National Socialist elite, which in turn shall be formed by the struggle against this sick world we live in today and its custodians: the Jews, their System and their house goyim race traitors.

And if a nation has no real elite – a first one to designate the second? I answer by a single phrase which contains an indisputable truth: in that case, the real elite is born out of a war with the degenerate elite, the false one. And that, also on the principle of selection.

-Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, For My Legionaries

So again we must ask: who will fight this war? The intellectual suit and tie sort? Their entire narrative is premised on avoiding and denigrating the very idea of open conflict! Their method is appeasement, appeasement of the masses at the cost of the Truth to gain their passive support of inaction and appeasement of the System to avoid direct confrontation. They are cut from the same cloth as that which we must fight, which is exactly why they cannot commit to its total destruction, and yet they claim to be “allies” to our cause, which is nothing less than revolutionary, one that promotes the only true revolution that is possible, as opposed to the fake revolutions of one way to secure one’s pleasure and safety over another: the revolution against one’s self-interested concerns of pleasure and safety!

Intellectuals turn out to be womanly and hysterical as often as the masses.

-Pierre Drieu la Rochelle, “Fascist Socialism”

… we don’t need any more informed people WHO WON’T STAND UP AND FIGHT TO OPPOSE TYRANNY!

-George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power, Ch12

Nobody ever heard tell of a “noble intellect”. Intellect doesn’t MOVE people, if anything it serves to hold them back from bold and daring action.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.16

Forget about middle America or any one of those slobs arising out of the middle class or the “Silent Majority”. Expect them to remain silent throughout.

-SIEGE, 8.5

The gallows long cry for the pseudo-revolutionaries! The mudflow has passed, the time has come for the real revolution!

-Ernst Junger, “Revolution and the Frontline Soldiers”

And as we have stated earlier: this conflict is now inevitable, the only question is who makes the first move, them or us, and when it does hit the question will be the same as the bloody struggle will determine who will decide the future of the world: THEM or US. The time for empty talk is fast approaching its end, and the coming Race War will make it impossible for the rats to pretend as to their real motivations, and the bloody nature of the struggle ahead is a terrifying prospect for them, as all conflict purifies of weakness. The cowardly talkers and frauds, the underhanded rats and degenerate subhumans who sought safety behind happenstance of belonging to the White Race will be driven out and exposed, leaving behind only those worthy and capable of fighting for Total Aryan Victory and establishing Pax Aryana.

Just as the hardest tests cull out weak individuals, it also cuts out weakness in the strong individuals and this is what accounts for the phenomenon of the strong getting even stronger under fire.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 7.18

REALITY has arrived and business for fakers is bad.

-SIEGE, 9.16

That is the harsh reality of the times ahead. Which is why we can do no less than offer the harshest of criticisms to those who refuse to accept this reality, for either they are frauds, rats and degenerates as we have said, or they are deluded and misguided, if well meaning, idiots. If the latter is true then they should recognize this article for what it is: a call for them to WAKE UP and start preparing, so that they are not caught off guard when the time finally comes. If there are those among our would be “allies” who truly search for the way out of the Cave, then they shall find it sooner or later, however we’d prefer that it’d be sooner, as soon as possible in fact, so they don’t waste their own time. And if to do that we must bruise some egos and step on some toes THEN SO BE IT.

… those who start with the Truth, though they may do so separately, ultimately end up together with the Truth, regardless whether they be hailed or cursed by the masses.

-James Mason, SIEGE, 9.17

… if you cannot make a revolution in your own mind, in your daily life and habits, then you certainly cannot do it in any other way.

-SIEGE, 9.35

When chaos prevails, as it does now in the right-wing, it is inevitable that people get hurt when you apply that force to establish order, but the hurt to one or two people who claim to believe in Our Holy Cause will mean nothing later, when we have demonstrated, as we are doing, our ability to help even those we might now ‘hurt’ to win, beside which even a severe ‘hurt’ is nothing.

If we cannot win the most desperate battle for survival in the history of humanity, it will not make me proud to have been a ‘good guy’ and to have failed to bring order and victory to the pitiful right-wing. Even those who may be personally angered at the exposures here will know that they are true, and those with which they are not familiar are equally true.

-George Lincoln Rockwell, This Time the World, Ch14

Our vision is clear, the path stretches out before us, and so we must commit to it. Let those who are afraid of what dangers lie in wait for us, and of that which awaits us at the path’s end speak no more of being our “allies.” Let their futile reproaches and criticisms fall on deaf ears for we will hear no more – let those who are true join us, and those who are false hide on the sidelines and stay out of our way, that is all that we have left to offer. It doesn’t matter if someone swings to the left or swings to the right, come Day of the Rope anyone who does not share our vision and stands in its way will swing by the neck.

Ahead is only Total Aryan Victory or Total Aryan Defeat, but in either case the world will tremble by how loudly each of us had proclaimed our oath to this Struggle: I FIGHT!

We do not argue with those who disagree with us, we destroy them.

-Benito Mussolini

… it is our duty to ignore all reproaches and begin the offensive.

-Ernst Junger, “The Frontline Soldier and Wilhelm’s Era”

No, we won’t be judged by our success – they will only ask how loud was our “Yes,” how brightly the flame of will burned in us.

-Ernst Junger, “Blood”

Defeat never. Victory forever!

-Bob Mathews

Hitler or hell.

-Savitri Devi, “Gold in the Furnace”

… I want to ask the young to look up to their predecessors in the Movement as examples so that they will realize that there is nothing superficial in being a National Socialist. It is not a matter of clothes, meetings and stars… but it is the heart that matters! …For them it is not enough to simply confess “I believe” but to take the oath: “I Fight”.

-Adolf Hitler



The Review

The past week I’ve been reading Serrano’s Golden Cord and have to say, it’s quite a ride. If this book was Serrano himself talking to you, you’d hold up your hands defensively and cower away slowly while saying: “Why dontcha backoff Serrano! Don’t steamroll over me with this plox, how about yah take it easy for a second?”

Firstly: I absolutely and categorically ward off anyone reading this unless they have read all of the following Evola books first, in the order that I give them here:

  1. Mystery of the Grail
  2. Hermetic Tradition
  3. Doctrine of Awakening
  4. Yoga of Power

It’ll be beneficial as well if you’ve read Guenon and Schuon most likely as well (I haven’t read anything at all by Schuon yet, but I can say that having as much perennial/esoteric reading under your belt as possible will be of absolute necessity). Furthermore, you need Florian-tier (our comrade and host of the Mysterium Fasces podcast) knowledge of Christianity and various christian heresies. Without these you will be all but lost reading this book, I myself had been lucky enough to have finished reading the Yoga of Power not too long before I decided to tackle the Golden Cord.

Reason for this warning is that Serrano’s style, as far as this book is concerned at least, is hard to deal with – it is very heavy with various references and names and concepts without providing in-depth understanding of them, so it’s heavy in content but at the same time light in explanations. Basically, unless you’ve read the books above this will be a wasted read as you won’t understand any of the words, concepts and names utilized, which he borrows from all those subjects and beyond. He often strews together several concepts that are symbolically describing one and the same thing, and later in the book mixes them up to create a narrative built out of several languages. Hence, it does describe one process but using different narratives, like speaking one sentence but with words from different languages.

The Golden Cord has a peculiar structure of several major portions divided into multitudes of very short segments. Most of these segment don’t last longer than a page and a half. The forward alone, as one portion, contains 21 segments. The other portions are named after the Cathars, Druids, Templars and the Rosenkreuz. The titles of the portions, and in some cases of the segments, are misleading, as he does not go into the in-depth background of each group. Sometimes, he barely mentions them at all in certain segments, while mentioning the other groups, and groups that don’t get their own titles (Minnesangers and Fedele d’Amore for example).

Word of warning (of sorts): pretty much everything up until you start reading the second half of the Templar portion will appear to be extremely wAcky. Conspiracy-theory-tinfoil-hat meets ancient-aliens+DaVinci-Code-History-Channel-documentary-series-marathon-special wacky. Most of the Hollow Earth and UFO stuff will be in the Forward segment, complete with questionable science claims, followed by the History Channel special in the rest of it.

It’ll be kind of like this:

oh the Druids? Yeah mages of hyperborea, and the Cathars were their descendants, kind of? Templars followed in their footsteps and so did the SS, btw jews aren’t jews and the 10 commandments that we know of were a second set of commandments that are false, the original ones are the for real ones and who was Moses anyway, oh an Egyptian priest-mage actually, vikings and Templars had been to South America btw, in fact one Aztek “White God” is actually a depiction of a Templar.

It might be hard for some people to take him seriously, absolutely impossible even, unless they read the ‘must read books’ listed at the start of this review. Problem is that one may easily get lost figuring out how much of this Serrano presents literally as supposed historical facts and real science, and how much of it he presents symbolically and allegorically. With the more historic stuff it becomes a question of the legitimacy of the narrative that he builds depending on what can be believed to be historically true, that might in fact be completely erroneous (as he constantly references other people for the basis of some of his points).

However the historic validity may be completely unimportant as the symbolism takes primacy for Serrano, thus legend becomes more important and more real than factual history – his take on Druids and Catharism for example. Still, Serrano presents this information for those who would like to test the historic accuracy of these things, but their symbolic value as myths/legends would nevertheless prevail – he leaves it up to you to make the call if you want to believe these things as just symbols or as symbols rooted in reality. The myth/legend narrative that Serrano weaves, however, does seem to be legitimate and in line with everything we know from traditional teachings.

As an example:

>otherworldly beings from other planets
Okay, well is that symbolic of transcendental beings, or is this tied to a literal aliens/UFO interpretation?

-Is it aliens or not, Serrano? What are you saying?
-I’m not saying it’s not aliens, but it is totally angels. They could be aliens tho.
-Oh… o-okay?

Serrano also comes from the anti-christian perspective – which is a lot more muddied, however, with these concepts of Jesus having a twin brother. Or, of there being another prophet, which brought more Buddhist/tantric concepts to Christianity, whereas the first one was merely a Jewish nationalist concerned with politics.

Serrano also goes into a concept of how Christianity “inverted” positive symbols into negative ones and vice versa per its lunar antiaryan roots, ergo Lucifer at the center of the earth is not HELL, it’s actually Paradise of Hollow Earth. Overall Lucifer is used as a positive figure in this book, equaled to Apollo and others, referred to as the “God of the Defeated who would come back Victorious” ergo he’s also the god of Esoteric Hitlerism in this narrative.

Apparently this is something that Alfred Rosenberg goes into in his Myth of the XXth Century, a book I, personally, am yet to read. But I did play around with this kind of narrative myself in my kike-on-a-stick phase. Regardless, if you can get past the antichristian/heretical implications you can still see the basic point and narrative being delivered, which isn’t wrong, but the delivery method may be off-putting to our Christian comrades. Of course, I’m saying this from the newfound viewpoint of Christianity being fully in line with traditional, solar/hyperborean esoterical teachings, a stance some of our comrades may not share, and thus be partial to this Rosenberg interpretation.

As far as the Hollow Earth / UFO science is concerned, I did have my theory prior to actually reading the Golden Cord, that in a world fully explored by science, the only way to give life to certain symbols again is to circumvent modern science by introducing some pseudo-scientific claims, and I was curious to see if that is what Serrano was going for. There is one portion of the text preceding all the Hollow Earth science that partially validates this suspicion. The portion in question is, in fact, something one should keep in mind while reading the entire book (italic highlights – Serrano’s, bold highlights – mine):

Before I begin laying out the arguments and theories of those who believe in the existence of hollow Earth, it is important to point out that in all of them I see but a repetition or resurgence of an ancient idea, manifested in many myths and legends which have a significant meaning to humanity, as I will discover and showcase in the course of this work.

Scientific explanations provided below are of no significance in themselves, and it is only interesting to show them here as oddities and extravagances. I see the truth in all of this only in the manifestation of the archetype in a more Platonic sense of the word than a Jungian one.

Myth and legend are indivisible, just as the prototype, archetype. They do not take hold of one specific place on the planet, but rather engulf it whole, instantly, so as to cover it with their influence from both within and without, in a unified world  (Unus Mundus). Only in certain historic times do they firmly plant themselves in some center of the Earth’s living body and act from there, manifesting themselves in a human being, in order to declare their message within the scope of the occurring fatal development…

In short, Serrano’s position is this: it doesn’t have to be literally real because it is still a valid archetype/symbol/Truth, but one can speculate that these things are also quite literally real.

So there’s all sorts of issues with reading this book that may drive people away or give them a false understanding of some things, it’s all up to your level of erudition in this field of knowledge, hence why its important to read all the Evola books that were listed at the start of this review as a bare minimum before getting into the Golden Cord.

However: all is not so bad, and from the second half of the Templar portion until the very end the book becomes a lot more comprehensible with some good stuff in it. Moreover, for me at least, it kind of helped distill and organize everything that was in the book up to that point into a coherent base narrative.

Serrano later talks about the “Three fundamental positions of Esoteric Hitlerism,” which can be summed up thusly:

  1. The position that all of these concepts and narratives are purely symbolic for the inner processes of the soul towards liberation/transcendence
  2. The position that these things are the “as above” equivalents for the real world “so below” concepts that do/did really exist, like Hyperborea and Atlantis, and this position drives people to establish a Golden Age on Earth (he associates Evola’s direction with this via Evola’s promotion of an esoteric order/aristocracy establishing an organic state and etc)
  3. Lastly: “besides these two directions which seem to be different, there is also a third one, that contains the previous ones and reconciles them”

Serrano does not explicitly say which “position” he subscribes to, but it would seem all but certain to be the third one. This doesn’t do much to say how much of the stuff he talks about he himself takes as purely symbolic and how much as being symbolic with a physical/samsaric world counterpart. He is only delivering the “as above” symbol, and leaves the possibility of its “so below” manifestation an open subject of discussion, while providing you will all the relevant information.

Ultimately how much of this he himself believes to be factual history and literally real is unimportant, hence why he doesn’t go into much detail, leaving that much open for debate and open for you to decide (depending on which of these 3 positions you subscribe to yourself) – he just provides all the relevant materials via which you may conduct your own research.

Personally, I have a point of disagreement with this division: there is nothing to reconcile between positions 1 and 2 as they do not oppose one another to any degree (Serrano certainly doesn’t provide any examples of how they would be contradictory enough to be different), thus position 3 is the only, sole position that exists. One can argue that somebody might subscribed to a 100% symbolic interpretation as per the first position, however I doubt such a stance would be possible to maintain once somebody starts reading into these materials. So in reality there are not 3 positions, there’s only the one  the first 2 positions are rather practices, first one for personal transcendence and the second one for establishing the rule of Truth on earth, ushering in the next Golden Age.

An interesting aside is how he introduces the idea of two Grails, one being the initiatory process of the Templars and the other one being the path to immortality, except that they are technically one and the same thing – the ritual of initiation into the order follows the motif of the process towards transcendence. He also thus makes one of the Grails the Templars pursue to be the establishing of Truth on Earth, so the difference of the two Grails is that of the internal struggle for liberation and the outer struggle for establishing Order in human affairs. It is kind of like splitting hairs and at the same time provides just slightly more clarity and a whole new narrative one can take with the same symbol, which can be useful in presentation.

To conclude: this book is a wild ride, and not for beginners. The sheer amount of stuff Serrano hits you over the head with can be overwhelming and disorientating, I myself forgot his earlier warning in the book, the quote provided above, and thus was rather blindsided. I only got the narrative towards the end, which is indeed the same narrative we all follow regardless, but with a whole new style of presentation which is kind of frankensteinian in the way it merges concepts from different symbolic languages as well as ancient and more immediate history together to strew one story. Ultimately you won’t lose much by not reading this book, but it can provide some insight to those who can stomach it.

Its biggest goal, I’d say, is to showcase how Nazi Germany was following an archetypal path, that Hitler, NSDAP and the SS were avatars/reemergence of forces that had manifested themselves prior in history, however out of all his proposed parallels only the Templar one warrants the comparison I think, since the other ones are very dubious in their historic validity. However, since the goal was to have a symbolic connection and to create a new Myth, that can be excused. Being yet another manifestation in a long line of such manifestation is what makes Hitler and Nazi Germany another link in the titular Golden Cord of these manifestations of the solar/hyperborean tradition.

Something that Evola covered in Mystery of the Grail much more succinctly to be honest:

When considered from the above-mentioned perspective, Arthur’s saga appears to be one of the many forms of the general myth of the Emperor or invisible Universal Ruler and of his manifestations. It is a theme that dates back to the most ancient times and that bears a certain relation to the doctrine of the “cyclical manifestations” or avatars, namely, the manifestation, occurring at special times and in various forms, of a single principle, which during intermediate periods exists in an unmanifested state. Thus every time a king displayed the traits of an incarnation of such a principle, the idea arose in the legend that he has not died but has withdrawn to an inaccessible seat whence one day he will manifest himself, or that he is asleep and will awaken one day. And just as the suprahistorical element in these cases overlaps the historical element, by turning a real figure into a symbolic one, likewise the opposite occurs; that is, the names of these real figures sometimes survive, yet designate something that transcends them.

But Serrano seems to have tried to establish a narrative that leads all the way from the mythical Hyperborean prehistory to Nazi Germany via myths and (questionable) historic events in a kind of line of succession, with some other elements involved, hence the idea of Golden Cord, which is a metaphor for Tradition. In a lot of ways the same thing we’ve all been subscribing to for a while now anyway, hence why you won’t lose much by not reading it. However it can be useful for those who want to come up with an esoteric Hitlerist myth themselves.

The final and best suggestion for reading this book is something that our comrade Greve Hans keeps saying “don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story”, which can be altered to be more appropriate for the book so: “don’t let the questionable claims get in the way of their symbolic meaning”.

In other words, don’t fret about the historic and scientific accuracy of anything offered in this book, you can look into them if you so like, but that will not take away from the Truth hidden in their role as symbolic links in The Golden Cord.

Hitler, The Sleeping King at the Center of Hollow Earth

The archetypal narrative that Serrano associates with the idea of Hitler escaping to Antarctica and from there to Hollow Earth, waiting for the day of his return with a large force behind him in the last war to usher in the next Golden Age, is that of the King sleeping in the Mountain. The major themes of this narrative contain a wounded, poisoned, sleeping Hero/King who exists in a state of sleep/paralysis/unconsciousness in some locations that impart the meaning of centrality, like inside a Mountain or on an Island. He awaits the predestined hero who searches for the Grail and passes on the mantle of the King to this hero, becoming the new avatar of this function.

Hollow Earth = Center of the Earth = theme of centrality.

Hitler losing the war = theme of the Wounded King.

Some of the relevant passages from Evola‘s “Mystery of the Grail“, with particular elements highlighted by myself.

First on how Hollow Earth is another symbol of the inaccessible hidden place where the wounded/sleeping King has been taken to.

This is how the traditional notion of an invisible “King of Kings;’ or “Universal Ruler;’ or “King of the World;’ came to be associated with specific symbols, some of which derive directly from analogies, while others are mythologized memories of the land or lands where the primordial Olympian cycle unfolded. 

These are first and foremost symbols of centrality: the center, the pole, the region in the middle of the earth, the central stone or the foundation, the magnet. Then, symbols of stability: the island surrounded by the waters, the rock, the unshakable stone. Finally, symbols of inviolability and inaccessibility; the invisible or not-to-be-found castle or land, a wild mountain peak, a subterranean region. Moreover, the “Land of Light,” the “Land of the Living,” the “Holy Land.” Yet again, all the variations of the golden symbolism, which, on the one hand, includes all the notions of solarity, light, regality, immortality, and incorruptibility while, on the other hand, it has always had some relationship with the primordial tradition and with the age characterized by gold. Other symbols point to “life” in the higher sense of the word (e.g., the “perennial food;’ the “Tree of Life”), to a transcendent knowledge, to an invincible power; everything appears variously mixed in the fantastic, symbolic, or poetic representations that in the various traditions have foreshadowed this constant theme of the invisible regnum and of the Supreme Center of the world, in itself or in its emanations and reproductions.


The Leabhar gabhala (Book of invasions) mentions the advent in Ireland of a new race, that of the “sons of Mileadh;’ whose physiognomy is not clear. In this race the warrior element predominates – it seems that Mileadh has the same root as miles (soldier) – yet it is not distinct from residues of the highest tradition proper to the previous cycle of the Tuatha. Thus even in the civilization of Mileadh we find the symbolism of the “central seat.” The constitution of this people is feudal, with a supreme regality established in Tara, in the “Land of the Middle” (Meadhon), which already had been a sacred center of the Tuatha. Their king used to be consecrated by the “stone of destiny” (lia-fail), more on which later. This too belonged to the tradition of the Tuatha. As for the Tuatha themselves, according to some texts they allegedly left the country, assuming an invisible form as the inhabitants of marvelous “subterranean” palaces or of mountainous caves inaccessible to mortal men, among whom they appear only in exceptional cases. According to other texts, they returned to their original home in Avalon.


… while Arthur is attempting to realize his legendary world empire and to conquer even Rome in order to be crowned emperor therein, his nephew Modred, who remained at home, usurps the throne and takes possession of Arthur’s woman, Guinevere. In the war that ensues the traitor is killed, but the best knights of the Round Table also die. Arthur himself is mortally wounded; he is taken to Avalon, that the health-restoring techniques of the women inhabiting that land (especially Morgande’s) may heal him and allow him to resume his function. But Arthur’s wounds (especially the one produced by a poisoned spear, according to some writers) open up again every year while his faithful subjects at home vainly await his return. There is a tradition, however, according to which one day Arthur will return from Avalon to resume his reign: this is why the Britons, since then, never wanted to appoint another king. In other forms of the legend-for instance, in the Otia imperialia by Gervasius of Tilbury-Arthur is portrayed lying in bed in a wonderful palace located on top of a mountain.


In the Hindu tradition we encounter the theme of Mahakasyapa, who sleeps in a mountain but will awaken at the sound of shells at the time of the new manifestation of the principle that previously manifested itself in the form of Buddha. Such a period is also that of the coming of a Universal Ruler (cakravartin) by the name of Sarpkha. Since sarpkha means “shell;’ this verbal assimilation expresses the idea of the awakening from sleep of the new manifestation of the King of the World and of the same primordial tradition that the above-mentioned legend conceives to be enclosed (during the intermediate periods of crisis) in a shell. An analogous Iranian tradition refers to the hero Kereshaspa, who, having been wounded by an arrow while he was immersed in a state of slumber (here we find again the same symbolism), survives in a lethargic state through the centuries, being nurtured by the fravashi (like the wounded Arthur, who is tended by women expert in healing techniques); he will come back to life at the time of Saoshyant’s advent and will fight on his side. Saoshyant is the lord of a future, triumphal kingdom of the God of Light and the slayer of the Arhimanic dark forces…


ParaSu-Rama never died, but withdrew to a mountain named Mahendra to live as an ascetic. When the right time comes, in conformity with the cyclical laws, a new manifestation from above will occur (Kalki-avatara) in the form of a sacred king who will triumph over the Dark Age. Kalki is symbolically thought to be born in Sambhala, one of the names that in the Hindu and Tibetan traditions designated the sacred Hyperborean center. His spiritual teacher is Parasu-Rama, and after being initiated into the sacred sciences he receives the regal investiture. From Siva he receives a white winged horse (which in the legend is so important that it came to be identified with Kalki himself), an omniscient parrot, and a bright sword. Recall that Arthur is believed to return one day on a white horse and that this symbol also plays a famous part in the Revelation of Saint John the Divine; recall also Excalibur, the lost sword that Arthur will one day yield again and that from time to time emerges from the bottom of a lake.


The “knight of the swan;’ named Elias or Lohengrin, comes from a place that is portrayed as the earthly paradise where the Grail is located (annales quosdam veteres volunt prodidisse, Heliam istum e paradysi terrestris loco quodam fortunatissimo, cui Graele nomen esset, navigatio tali venisse), as Arthur’s seat, and as a mountain.


The images of the seat of the Rosicrucians and of their emperor correspond to those of the center: this seat is the “solar citadel;’ the “mountain in the middle of the earth;’ simultaneously “close and far away;’ the “Palace of the Spirit at the further end of the earth, on top of a mountain, surrounded by clouds;’ almost a facsimile of Montsalvatsche.

Next, on the theme of the King.

The awaited, hidden emperor, who never died and who withdrew to an invisible or inaccessible center, is here transformed into one of the major representatives of the Holy Roman Empire: Charlemagne, Frederick I, or Frederick II. The complementary theme of a devastated or sterile kingdom awaiting renewal finds its equivalent in the theme of the Dry Tree. The Dry Tree, associated with the seat of the Universal Ruler, will blossom again at the time of a new imperial manifestation and of the victory against the forces of the Dark Age that are represented, in conformity to the new biblical and Christian religion, by the people of Gog and Magog, who will launch their attack at the time of the advent of the Antichrist.


In this case we have also the interference of a further motive, namely, that of the kings who, as they await a predestined avenger or restorer, are artificially kept alive by the Grail.


Wolfram has portrayed in Amfortas the type of the wounded king who awaits the hero who will heal him and to whom he will transmit the mandate of the Grail’s kingship.

Thus we come to the Esoteric Hitlerist Myth/Legend of the Fuhrer taken to Hollow Earth, where he awaits the Hero to whom he will give his title and command of the Last Battalion that will usher in the Golden Age in the final war against their enemies.

This theme mimics perfectly the Hindu narrative followed and presented by Savitri Devi (following quotes taken from “Lightning and the Sun“), in which Hitler represents one of the divine Avatars or incarnations of the Gods, one that precedes the final incarnation, the Hero to whom Hitler passes his title, the Hero being the equivalent of Kalki the Avenger:

They live and wait. Knowingly or unknowingly, they are waiting for Kalki; Kalki the last Man Against Time; the Avenger who will give them– or their children– the world.


That last, great individual – an absolute harmonious blending of the sharpest of all opposites; equally sun and lightning– is the one whom the faithful of all religions and the bearers of practically all cultures await; the one of whom Adolf Hitler (knowingly or unknowingly) said in 1928: “I am not he; but while nobody comes forward to prepare the way for him, I do so.




One of our favorite fascist quotes is that of Corneliu Zelea Codreanu: “A country has the Jews it deserves. Just as mosquitoes can thrive and settle only in swamps, likewise the former can only thrive in the swamps of our sins.”

The basic message of the quote is that much like how a decaying and disease-ridden body attracts flies and parasites, only a weak and decaying society can allow the jews to latch onto it and accelerate the decomposition of the festering gaping wounds, leading to its ultimate demise. Healthy societies have expelled the jews time and time again throughout history, whereas sick societies had fallen victim to them and faced ultimate destruction, least they managed to once again find their inner strength.

Thus arises the obvious question: where does the initial decay come from, where does the first sore appear, inviting in the jews and leading us on the path to the degeneracy we see today? Those of us who understand history to be cyclical, know that the engine of history is that of conflict and complacency. Conflict breeds strength, aspirations and leads to prosperity. Prosperity, however, becomes the inheritance of people who never knew conflict and that begets complacency – people who were handed that, which was fought for with blood, treat it as a given, leading to decay. This is something we have briefly touched upon in relation to conservatism in one of our earlier articles, and is likewise the premise of the antique Greek concept of Anacyclosis, one that we bring up regularly.


This constitutes the short and fundamental answer to the question of “where does initial decay come from?” and this is the answer that will remain relevant throughout all of time for it strikes at the fundamental premise of the problem. What follows below, however, is a look at our own immediate history, to discover how this process played itself out in our times, which can serve as an example for future generations of what to watch out for. Moreover, this analysis will help us better identify who is responsible for the current state of affairs we face today, so that we may hold them accountable and not allow them to escape retribution.

In our immediate history the face of decay first began to take shape with the Bourgeoisie, who rose up against the traditional societal order and spearheaded ideas that would culminate in the French Revolution. Much of this is already widely known in our circles and doesn’t really need further prodding or elaborating, except for one particular element, which is the core of what one may call the “Bourgeoisie mentality”, for though the word is largely discarded nowadays, the mentality lives on and has been at the forefront of the social decay that allowed for jews and degeneracy to creep in and bloom. This mentality lives on in the liberal middle class.

This mentality is the natural consequence of living in prosperity without having ever known its price first hand: conquest, war, blood, strength of character. These are the things that are also closely linked to supremacy, hence prosperity is their reward. The following generations, however, inherit this prosperity, and a warped understanding arises, one that associates prosperity with not having to do anything at all, thus breeding decadence and a false sense of arrogant “supremacy“.

Prosperity is the consequence of true Supremacy – yet here the situation is reversed, and prosperity is deemed to be the evidence of supremacy. This is the trademark of the Bourgeoisie moralistic outlook, where wealth serves as proof of one’s supremacy, even if one merely inherited it and has not proven himself to be capable of living up to the legacy of those who procured that wealth in the first place. Sure, the Bourgeoisie do enjoy wealth they themselves accumulate through economic means, however they wouldn’t be able to do so in the first place, had conquerors not carved out a safe space for them beforehand (note, when we talk of the Bourgeoisie we don’t criticize them on an economic basis, but on the basis of moral outlook definitive of the Bourgeoisie, the very mentality we are addressing in this article). One can likewise easily see how this mentality is at the basis of the Calvinist heresy and its notion of material wealth being a sign of God’s favor.

Which leads us to the other important aspect of this mentality that has to do with inherited security that comes with prosperity. One who has not experienced any sort of hardships and proven himself to be truly Superior by overcoming said hardships is incredibly likely to be a weakling that would prefer to avoid any hardships at all – and thankfully he doesn’t have to in his inherited prosperity. Presence of prosperity without actions necessary to acquire it leads to a moralistic interpretation of supremacy, that simply dictates one being superior “just because he is good“, or rather “just because“, since “goodness” is often defined by such people as “not having done anything bad/wrong“.

This false sense of “supremacy” (in reality nothing more than pretentious smugness) breeds a particular kind of moralistic narcissism and moralistic hedonism, of being “morally superior” by virtue of not doing anything wrong. They get a literal psychological high off of the image of themselves that they construct in their minds: “I am such a good and virtuous person“. However, should this self-image come to be challenged (should someone “harsh their buzz” with some inconvenient truths) or start to wane, such people will quickly jump into “action” so as to sustain said image, for no other reason than to keep their self-appraising delusion going. This “action” is well known and defined now as virtue signalling. You are all well familiar with this kind of behavior and the many ways that it has been depicted and made fun of (prepare for a lot of South Park clips).

We can now summarize the mentality in question thusly:  I have all this wealth and prosperity, and I have not hurt anyone in achieving it, hence I am a good, righteous, morally superior person! I love myself so much for this!

Funny and relevant South Park clips aside, though, one might ask how exactly could this mentality have undermined, let alone led to the downfall of our Race and Civilization. Well simply look at the historical example of Gandhi, who had exploited this very mentality against the British Empire in order to provoke a virtue-signalling reaction from them that was favorable to his goals. You can pick up Robert Greene‘s 33 Strategies of War[pdf] for more details on how this unfolded. Below is the audiobook reading of Chapter 32, “Passive Aggression“, which deals with Gandhi’s tactic of exploiting the British Bourgeoisie mentality and need to virtue signal in the face of a threat to their self-image.

Mind you all, that Gandhi was by no means a true pacifist, he would have used violent means if it were plausible, but India was hopelessly inferior to the British Empire where conventional warfare was concerned, yet had he the means, by his own admission, he would have used them:

Had we adopted non-violence as the weapon of the strong, because we realised that it was more effective than any other weapon, in fact the mightiest force in the world, we would have made use of its full potency and not have discarded it as soon as the fight against the British was over or we were in a position to wield conventional weapons. But as I have already said, we adopted it out of our helplessness. If we had the atom bomb, we would have used it against the British.

-Speech (16 June 1947) as the official date for Indian independence approached (15 August 1947),
as quoted in Mahatma Gandhi: The Last Phase (1958) by Pyarelal Nayyar, p. 326.

But India had no atom bombs, and thus Robert Greene’s analysis comes to the forefront, solidifying what we have established thus far (highlights mine):

Gandhi was a deceptively clever strategist whose frail, even saintly appearance constantly misled his adversaries into underestimating him. The key to any successful strategy is to know both one’s enemy and oneself, and Gandhi, educated in London, understood the English well. He judged them to be essentially liberal people who saw themselves as upholding traditions of political freedom and civilized behavior. This self-image – though riddled with contradictions, as indicated by their sometimes brutal behavior in their colonies – was deeply important to the English. The Indians, on the other hand, had been humiliated by many years of subservience to their English overlords. They were largely unarmed and in no position to engage in an insurrection or guerrilla war. If they rebelled violently, as other colonies had done, the English would crush them and claim to be acting out of self-defense; their civilized self-image would suffer no damage. The use of nonviolence, on the other hand – an ideal and philosophy that Gandhi deeply valued and one that had a rich tradition in India – would exploit to perfection the English reluctance to respond with force unless absolutely necessary. To attack people who were protesting peacefully would not jibe with the Englishman’s sense of his own moral purity. Made to feel confused and guilty, the English would be paralyzed with ambivalence and would relinquish the strategic initiative.


Many people today are as ambivalent as the English were about having power and authority. They need power to survive, yet at the same time they have an equally great need to believe in their own goodness. In this context to fight people with any kind of violence makes you look aggressive and ugly. And if they are stronger than you are, in effect you are playing into their hands, justifying a heavy-handed response from them. Instead it is the height of strategic wisdom to prey upon people’s latent guilt and liberal ambivalence by making yourself look benign, gentle, even passive. That will disarm them and get past their defenses. If you take action to challenge and resist them, you must do it morally, righteously, peacefully. If they cannot help themselves and respond with force, they will look and feel bad; if they hesitate, you have the upper hand and an opening to determine the whole dynamic of the war. It is almost impossible to fight people who throw up their hands and do not resist in the usual aggressive way. It is completely confusing and disabling.

This analysis is correct when dealing with the modern mindset, the Bourgeoisie and liberal mindset, however it would be entirely incorrect if one were dealing with true conquerors who establish empires like the British one in the first place. Such people know the price of their own prosperity and security, including hardships that must be overcome and blood that must be spilled, your own and that of those who refuse to submit. Furthermore, we would do well to recall the words of Clausewitz, who stated that conquerors prefer submission and peace – it is the victim who makes the war, by refusing to submit. The nature of the refusal, peaceful or otherwise, is irrelevant. Gandhi had set out to wage war against the British Empire with the only means he had, but with full knowledge of their impact. Had Gandhi faced an opponent who was not muddled with petty narcissistic ideas like “self-image” he would have been utterly powerless and faced assured defeat.

That is how the inheritors of Empires, built up with blood and sacrifice, come to lose those Empires, as they grow complacent and overly concerned with their own self-image, motivated by their inherited prosperity and security. This is the starting point for ruin.

Yet this is but one example, however one can easily trace a parallel between the old Bourgeoisie mindset that lost Gandhi and the mindset of the modern liberal that is allowing degeneracy and muslim immigrants to overrun the West today. The quintessential face of this new Bourgeoisie is the American Dream family of the 1950s.

There are two fundamental issues with this visage that is being upheld by American conservatives (who are factually classical liberals as opposed to the American democratic neoliberals).

The first one being its standardized nature. The “American Dream” is a one size fits all model of having a suburban home with a white picket fence, a family of 4, at least one car and, optionally at no extra cost, a dog. The ideal American life is a husband doing his job, wife supporting the home, obedient kids, barbeques on the 4th of July and weekend wine mixers alternating with book club for the wives from the neighborhood. This is not an ideal to aspire to, this is standard to fall in line with. It seemingly maintains all the hallmarks of a traditional family, but in reality acts as a subversion of it in order to produce identical atomized individuals who fully comply with the expectations of the Jew-ridden System.

In the 2nd part (“The Engineering of Consent“) of the Adam Curtis documentary series “Century of the Self” it is well documented how in the 50s Americans were conditioned even psychologically to fit a certain standard model of behavior that was meant to be one of perpetual mindless happiness and conformity to the American “standard”. Below you will find the entire series comprised of 4 parts in one video.

The amount of various comical PSA (Public Service Announcement) films on topics including the “Do’s and Don’ts of Dating, “Family Dinner Etiquette“, “Are you Popular?and even “How to Undress” are further testament to how the entire population was being pigeonholed to fit a unified, standardized model most suited for the atomized individualist structure (it is also highly amusing to consider how American conservatives who love these PSA’s complain about State intrusion in private life). Lastly, we can turn to Francis Parker Yockey‘s IMPERIUM for further insight on the creation of the American standard (highlights mine):

A contest was recently held in America to find “Mr. Average Man.” General statistics were employed to find the center of population, marital distribution of the population, family-numbers, rural and urban distribution, and so forth. Finally a man and wife with two children in a medium-sized town were chosen as the “Average Family.” They were then given a trip to New York, were interviewed by the press, feted, solicited to endorse commercial products, and held up for the admiration of all those who fell short in any way of the desirable quality of averageness. Their habits at home, their life-adjustments generally were the subject of investigation, and then of generalizing. Having found the average man from the top down, his ideas and feelings were then generalized as the imperative-average thoughts and feelings.

To drive home the point of difference between an ideal that is to be aspired to and the standard to fall in line with, one must realize that the absolute ideal is different for each individual based on their particular nature, whereas a standard is based on a common denominator – one is fundamentally rooted in quality, the other in its universality and thus lack of quality. The American Dream is but the common denominator, a single digit in an atomized structure. This in of itself is bad enough from an authentic Fascist perspective.

However there is something else fundamentally wrong with this image, and that is how this American standard of American Life and Family are likewise rooted in a complete lack of awareness of the price of security and prosperity that they enjoy. And this was the model upheld and promoted for all Americans as the standard to comply with, compounding the problem of self-image faced by the old Bourgeoisie with a whole new layer of what constitutes one’s morality and “goodness“. This would later evolve into the turmoil of the 60s, when, much like Gandhi, the African-American Civil Rights Movement would stage numerous peaceful (and not so peaceful) protests that would provoke White Americans, who care about their self-image, into helping the jew and negro ruin their country even further. And they would do it for the sole reason of virtue signalling foremost to themselves that they truly are “good people”. Some may protest and say that the 60s were a clear break from the standard of the 50s, hence the rise of Hippies, and yet hippies are a direct tie-in to the same Bourgeoisie/Liberal mindset of virtue signalling one’s own goodness to themselves. They did, partially, breakaway from the american standard, but only so as to virtue signal to the niggers that they are no longer part of the “system” (what these opponents of surface-level politics call the “system”, and not the far more sinister enemy that we call by the same name with a capitol S). You can check the 3rd part (“There is a Policeman Inside All Our Heads; He Must Be Destroyed”) of the Century of the Self documentary on how a new psychological conditioning was employed that helped the 60s unfold as they did, this time feeding directly into the narcissistic aspect of the mentality we are discussing and the beloved “freedom” narrative, which would form the more familiar to us today strands of deviant and degenerate behavior.

In reality, however, the entire struggle of the time was done with American values in toe, and just as how Gandhi used Britain’s self-image, so did the jews, blacks and faggots use the American values and Constitution and the self-image cultivated and derived from them in order to undermine power in their favor (and said values were easy to exploit from the start anyway as said values had always been the values of materialists, rationalists, atheists and others, who are the jew’s prime customers).

The 50s are directly responsible for the 60s and thus for all other subsequent degeneracy (in as much as the 50s were a result of other events going back further than the French Revolution – the point being that the 50s were in no way some ideal of traditional values). This holy cow of american conservatism had always been a lie. The transition from the 50s to 60s seems to be a radical one only to people who have a limited scope and conform to an outlook that is incompatible with the Fascist/NS one, to us however, the change is insignificant qualitatively, from one lie to another, but all lies share a common aversion to Truth and thus fundamentally share certain points of negation of the Truth. Moreover, the supposed change did not stick, and everything was reversed back to the 50s model by the 90s, but with a contemporary face. Former hippies were now back in the mold of the American standard, further proving lack of any true qualitative difference.

This model persists today, but the standard has been generalized further for export worldwide, thus this form of decay finds itself nowadays in countries which did not experience the kind of prerequisite decay through prosperity that was necessary for countries which are now exporting degeneracy worldwide.

However, we are not done, for there had been developments in this mentality which has led it towards subversion of our movement, and that is the primary reason why we must come to understand the difference and uniqueness of the Fascist mindset, derived from our Worldview, as opposed to the Bourgeosie/Liberal mindset, derived from narcissism and hedonism – seemingly something obvious, and yet during this US presidential election we’ve clearly come to see a danger that must be addressed.

As an introduction to this point, we’ll once again address the topic of “White Pathology” or “pathological white altruism“. This concept could only have come from the mindset that we are discussing and criticizing here – the idea that the downfall of the White Race is the result of Whites being pathologically altruistic is nothing else but a form of virtue signalling – it is tantamount to asking a political candidate “what do you think is your greatest weakness?” and them responding with “I work too hard“.

The way this argument was born can be traced back to the American Dream, a whole society consisting of the same standard copied over millions of times. However not all can fit the mold, and those who do fit the mold would rather not have to see these “malformed” people, even if they are homeless whites.


While it is clearly the pretension of this mindset to think of yourself as a good and moral person by some liberal standard, in practice these people are extremely offended by the presence of anything they don’t like – they like helping the homeless and the starving in theory, as a nominal act that is mostly done to satisfy their own ego with some insignificant token action, which is worth a lot more to them as an act of virtue signaling. However, they do not like the homeless and the starving in their own immediate vicinity. They are dirty, smell bad, look ugly, it ruins the carefully constructed standardized image to have something that disrupts the illusion. In an all white or majority white country it is easy to maintain that illusion and throw caution to the wind when it comes to token gestures, until the jew slips in a gesture that has far reaching consequences, but is sold to the dumb goyim as a way to satisfy their own ego, feeds their narcissism and makes them feel good about themselves in their subtle, psychological hedonism.

Let’s help the starving niglets in Africa, why not? We’ll never see one in person, but we’ll feel so very good about ourselves for sending some nominal help that doesn’t inconvenient us in the slightest but gives us such a rush of feeling good about ourselves.

“Oh those poor refugees on boats, we can’t deny them access to our country, I’m sure I’ll never have to actually live next to one of them, but I’ll feel so good about myself!”

Oh, a Black President! Politics never affected me in any tangible way so I doubt this will have directly tangible and readily apparent negative consequences, but what a rush, I’ll be able to brag about how progressive I am and feel good about myself!

That 50s American family standard thought in exactly the same patterns, hence why we have further decay today as this same thought pattern continues to destroy our Race and Civilization. Some of these people do manage to live with the consequences of their actions and continue on their merry ride on the “progressive” train to further ruin. Others, however, don’t, and have to resolve to means of removing themselves from the vicinity of the problem, rather than trying to remove the problem itself. Too many non-whites and homeless? We’ll set up a gated community – problem solved! For the moment. In reality the problem grows exponentially until such a point in time where you can no longer keep the undesirables out – “there’s niggers in tennis and golf clubs now as full fledged members for God’s sake! I can’t not invite them to the next cocktail mixer, WHAT WILL THE NEIGHBORS THINK? THAT I’M A BAD PERSON, A BIGOT, A RACIST!

The panic and realization of the newfound reality sets in for such people and they finally start wondering “how did it come to this?“, and the only “logical” conclusion such ilk can come to is “pathological altruism“, which is, in fact, yet another act of virtue signalling – “it’s because I am fundamentally too kind, I am such a good person that I’m too good! Who says there’s no such thing as too much of a good thing?” – “I’m too good“, “I work too hard“. What is pathological isn’t the altruism – because there is no authentic altruism here to begin with – but the blind and delusional narcissism. And how can they change this unfortunate state of affairs?

They can accept it and keep giving in to the demands of the increasingly entitled, arrogant and aggressive subraces and degenerates, until it reaches the sadomasochistic daze of an overdosed drug user that would, had Christianity not become a target of disdain for such people, compare themselves to Jesus in how much suffering they are willing to submit themselves to, as part of their orgiastic virtue-signaling delirium (so they result to comparing themselves to… Gandhi, obviously).


Or, the ones among them who are not yet high enough off their own farts to completely throw caution to the wind and forget about their own basic survival, they can drop some of their pretentious bullshit to try and salvage the rest of it. It is these “disillusioned” liberals, who suddenly begin preaching against multiculturalism and for the “white ethnostate“. They are only disillusioned in the liberal narrative as much as one of these gated community liberals would be upset about a homeless person walking down their street, hence the vagueness of their end goal of “white ethnostate“, which simply translates to a nation-wide gated community where they would carry on with the rest of their liberal bullshit, but without the undesirables to ruin the view. In throwing out the multicultural and multiracial narrative they are left no other option but to side with white nationalism, not because they feel any real racial kinship or understand higher values, but simply as a matter of securing their own, personal interests – “I happen to be white, so I have to throw in with the white nationalists”. They simply seek strength in numbers, they project their individual interest via a common denominator to a larger group.

It is thus, that these liberal minded vermin worked their way into the movement and began injecting it with false narratives like “white pathology“, likewise done by means of the same projection: “I’m white, and I’m such a good person, the very best, and these other white guys say whites are superior, and I know that I’m the best so it must be true, and you know why this is happening? It’s because I’m too good of a person, that’s what went wrong, in fact that’s the problem with our whole race really – we are just pathologically altruistic as a race, that’s what the problem is.

No. Whites are not “pathologically altruistic” – you are just pathologically narcissistic and you are the cause of this: decadent, hedonistic, virtue signaling scum that never had any intentions of living up to the deeds of your ancestors and the call of your blood, you are the face of our decay, a spiritual and physical weakling, result of the prosperity and security attained by men infinitely greater than yourself and you simply took all they built for granted and let it burn with a braindead smile on your face saying “This is fine” as the fire consumed the world around you. But so long as you felt good about yourself it didn’t matter, and only now, after having thrown everything to shit, you suddenly decide to “join the struggle” that you share no fundamental values with, and in reality stand for everything that we despise which had led to this state of affairs in the first place? No.

You will be held accountable as much as the jew, if not more so, because the jew simply acts according to his nature and we cannot expect different from him. The traitor always gets the bullet before the enemy.

And if we now discuss most recent history, we have to look to the appearance of the “Altright“, which we likewise have criticized time and again, and one of the articles by Max Macro had likewise drawn that distinct parallel between its advocates and those of the liberal mindset, using the “elegant dinner party” simile.

The Altright represents a new wave of “former” liberals who discovered undesirables in their gated community and who want to change the state of affairs, however they have presented themselves in such vague terms while using our themes, symbols and parts of our narratives  to such a degree that it became unclear at first glance as to whether they are our allies or not. However the real nature of Altright revealed itself quick enough during the course of this US presidential election, namely that of being the same liberals who are just more internet savvy and who, for some reason, were utilizing our materials, but ultimately not to uphold our values but to secure their own petty, personal interests.

The actions of the Altright do seem to have a parallel with another action of gated community liberals, namely of white flight and gentrification: “Well we ruined this place with our liberal bullshit and can’t keep these undesirables out, time to uproot move to a new place with low property value and gentrify it, make a new gated community out of it. Oh look at that spot, it’s kind of backwards and quaint isn’t it? Let’s spruce it up a bit, what a project! Are you excited? I know I am!

The Altright is the first ever attempt at “movement gentrification“, of attempting to subvert the tools and message of an existing movement in order to plant and secure their own petty agenda within it: “Well we ruined conservatism with our bullshit and can’t keep these niggers out, time to uproot and move to a new place, something with next to no respectability and gentrify it, make it more presentable. Oh look at that, Fascists! That’s kind of backwards and quaint isn’t it? Le’ts spruce it up a bit, what a project! I guess I don’t like democracy too much either, I’m so fashy tee-hee!

Thus the Altright attempt to use our tools and message but then proceed to harp on issues of “presentability” and “respectability“, try to declaw and defang our methods. To an extent this is a calculated method of self-preservation against the inevitable accusations of being Nazi if you don’t keep up fast enough with the progressive parade, hence the existence of the gay term “fashy“, as a kind of cute and quaint way of belittling the idea as being no more than a joke or a meme in order to deflect the accusation. This, obviously, never works, and these people get branded as “evil nazi white supremacists” regardless, but they do serve to confuse and steer people with potential away from becoming true and full fledged Fascists and National-Socialists, offering them that last easy way out of breaking with the System and the decaying society that holds them hostage.

Below is an accurate video presentation of Altright movement gentrification, complete with parody of Dickie Spencer’s Phalanx:

We’ve even had one crystal clear example of this, when one startup movement had stolen the design of another movement’s poster and after changing the name, logos and links, “gentrified” it by removing the swastika and the word “jews” from the poster – “NOW it’s presentable!” Look up any pictures of Dickie Spencer and his attempt at a 1950s Average Man braindead smile, or the Identity Evropa rally where they all look like they are protesting shortage of caviar at their golf/tennis club, listen to the pretentious intellectual voice of Jar Jar Taylor with his retarded little bow-tie.

Other obvious tell tale signs include the attempts to pander to the mainstream media, the exultation of intellectualism over character, defense or apologetics of faggotry, which is not surprising in the least – faggots are the ultimate bourgeoisie and thus the envy of straight bourgeoisie, who would love nothing more than to get the fag couple on the block to come over to their next wine mixer and hear their comments on the newly refurbished living room, and all the wives in the gated community have been just dying for a gay best friend to be a faghag to.

So long as the fags are white they are ALT-RIGHT with me, haha, yes, such witty banter!

Thankfully, one doesn’t have to worry about the Altright too much as its demise is inevitable, and just as the hippie protesters of the 60s seamlessly converted back to the American standard and the jewish narrative, so too will the Altright convert back to mainstream politics by means of its representatives actively seeking that and them being overrun with mainstream Trump supporters who are claiming the title for themselves. However one must avoid the danger of these liberals gentrifying potential Fascist/NS movements, while potential individual Fascists must hear loud and clear that Fascism and the Altright are in no way the same and cannot be allies by definition – a true Fascist/NS is not simply a racist liberal with bourgeoisie mindset, morality and sentimentalities and we shall not stand for people muddying our message and standing in its way as a detour that obscures the one and only path to the Truth:


And there are those that are by no means that way, and whose authors, far from being true followers of the doctrines, of which they display the visible symbols, represent in reality only themselves and use the prestige of the doctrine and the authority that it confers on them to promote their own interests, to satisfy personal grudges, or simply to give free reign to their passions.

-Savitri Devi, “The Religion of the Strong”

And for those that accuse us of “purity spiraling“, know this – we do as one of the great champions of our Worldview had instructed us to, thus proving once and for all, who we are, and who you are:

The greatness of any powerful organization, which embodies an idea in this world, depends on the absolutely religious fanaticism with which it establishes itself when compared to others. It must be fanatically convinced that it is right and just, and it must be absolutely intolerant of any idea or organization that is counter to its own teaching. If an idea is right and it takes up the sword of battle with this mind-set, it is invincible and any persecution only strengthens it.

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf V1, Ch12

We are the movement for the Worldview of Truth and Cosmic Order, the rest are nothing.



Now that we’ve established that intellectuals are Kikes, it’s time to figure out what makes the Kikes what they are – Kikes.

First and foremost, we’d have to understand the concept of the body of Christ, which is the Church. The Church was supposed to contain everything. From the Emperor to the poor Macedonian peasant. They all had their specific place and function within the body of Christ. It is, in fact, more or less the same thing as the Cosmic Order. Logos manifesting into the creation. The Church itself is the whole, and its leader is God himself. With this in mind, the thought of a symphony between emperor and patriarch makes perfect sense. They are of the same will, to be true to their calling and trough that become a part of the body of Christ.

There is also in Christian theology the concept of God’s energies. As humans, we cannot really comprehend God in his fullest. This reminds one of how St. Paul did not see the face of God when he had his famous vision, renouncing Talmudism. You can visualize it as someone holding a prism in front of a light source. The light source, logos, is filtered trough the lens. Yet we’re not the full Logos, that would be impossible. We’re only a part of the whole.

The meaning of existence is to be united with God. Yet, we have free will. We can choose not to. We can choose to rebel. We can choose to ignore our calling, our ray from the prism, our lot of talents. We can choose, instead, to be of the world, devoted to base desires. Smiling as we continue to look at the shadows on the cave wall, snacking on popcorn and asking our fellow fool if we’d rather switch to another shade.

Yet, when any normal person does this, this person feels bad. If you masturbate, you feel bad afterwards. And you should. This is to abuse what you have. Your penis isn’t supposed to be jerked off by your hand and the seed flushed down. You’re supposed to make a new life with it. Because, with your own free will, you pervert that which has been given to you, you’re stepping away from God. You’re abandoning Logos in favor of cum. This is slavery to your own desires. It’s pathetic. And you are only as much of a slave to it as you choose yourself to be.

St. Ignatius of Loyala wrote of this in his Meditations, the one who does bad will eventually feel good by doing bad and very bad by doing – or seeing – good. Like an exorcism. That is why these people hate beauty. They can not stand it. Likewise the one who does good will eventually feel very bad for doing bad things – such as sodomy. The repentant homo Michael Voris is a good example of someone realizing what he was doing was horrible.

Masturbation is sodomy as well – for good reason. Raging sodomites who do not feel bad for what they are doing have with their own free will abandoned God. ”God is dead and we have killed him”. Because they have abandoned God, they have also abandoned the Holy spirit, which would function in us as the inner voice, telling us what is right and what is wrong – dragging us up to God. Since at this point you would be totally Godless you could no longer feel any love. This is because Love is recognizing the beauty in something, the spark of Logos in it, and trough that loving it. Philia, not Eros. A painting is a symbol for something deeper that hides behind it, but through the painting we can see a glimpse of that which hides behind it. The spark of Logos.

This is also why blasphemy against the Holy Spirit was seen as the one unforgivable sin, because by doing that you rebel against God and close your heart to him. Thus you are not yourself open for it. You’re abandoned to your own hell-fire. ”Dude, cum!”.

To the people who reject God – Logos – there is only power. They see no meaning in following any laws, because they have no laws. They have no laws because they have rejected God. They have rejected the Holy Spirit. They have rejected the Cosmic Order. Rejected ideals and standards. Thus for them everything is a competition for power. Power for power’s sake. This is a desire. Not a will. A desire. They desire to be powerful. They are drowning in their lust for domination. The only thing they are expanding into is an infinite void without an end.

Lucifer rebelled against God and took a third of the Angels down with him in the fall. Deprived of all power, he saw only one way to achieve what he desired, and that was to corrupt God’s creation. He saw how man had free will and successfully made Adam and Eve commit sin trough their own free will.

Here comes the difference between the city of God and the city of the Devil. The city of God is where man follows his inner calling and is content with his place. Like pillars leaning upon each other, everything is in harmony with God. The Cosmic Order.

The City of the Devil is the City whose Prince is Satan. It is true he is bound and shackled, but the Bible tells us that during the era of the thousand year reign (that is, period between Christ’s first and second coming – that is right now) Satan would still be able to influence the creation trough us willfully walking to him. He would no longer be able to oppress us trough original sin, but he would be able to drag us away from our salvation and make us linger here. And he does this trough the thirst for power. The desire to dominate.

It is trough this light we got to see the Masonic legend of the temple of Solomon, the temple which Solomon built (supposedly) trough demons. Solomon, wise as he was, was eventually seduced by the world and started to worship the Gods of his wives – all demonic entities.

The Temple of Solomon in the Masonic sense is not the same thing as the Cosmic Order – nor the temple where God dwelt. It is in fact the same thing as the Synagogue of Satan. It is dissolving everything sacred and using these very atoms as a clay to shape something else. It’s stealing the living stones we’re supposed to be in God’s temple and placing them instead in the Synagogue of Satan. They know they cannot create something by themselves, so they have to work with that which is already created and corrupt it.

This is what the kikes did. They rejected the truth by nailing Christ on the cross and choosing the Talmud over their Messiah. They chose Satan. In their Pride, they could not stand that Christ was supposed to be the savior of all, and not just their savior. Just as how Lucifer, in Catholic thought, could not stand Mary becoming the Queen of heaven. So they rebelled and built their own temple. Kikes wanted a worldly king to make them powerful for power’s sake, which we can see in Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Christ for a few sheckles for being disappointed.

This reshaping of the creation may sound very outlandish, but when you think of it we see it every day. GMO food, trannies, faggots, ”Cum-dump Paganism”, race-mixing, banking (interest rate demanding expansion at the cost of something else – that is will to power crushing the organic) and so on. Everything the Jew does is to break down the natural order created by God, imposing their own instead. They want to be God. They want power, not truth. So they level the temple and from the clay the Rabbinic sorcerer creates a Golem. With carriers and nukes.

When you think about it, this makes sense. The Jews still pray before the wailing wall, said to be a wall of Solomon’s temple. God only knows what demons would escape from it should we actually demolish it, but with this in the back of our heads Judaism makes perfect sense. Not to mention the fact that the Jews murdered Jesus – logos incarnated. By doing this the Jews have placed upon themselves a curse. They have trough this act rejected all truth. All order. God himself. And every day they repeat this act by drowning us all with their filth in an attempt to dissolve us – and God’s creation – into nothingness.

By race-mixing we distort our natures to the degree that we do not know what we are. We become a coffee-colored brown sludge, a clay Rabbi Wisenthal can forge a new man from. A Golem drone content with living in a rat-cage apartment, paying his 14% interest on his 300K$ loan with his minuscule wage from working 12 hours a day in the Goy factory. The only communion this drone will take will be the colourful pills he’ll take every morning to prevent killing himself – making him duller and duller for every day. America has become the Rabbi’s Golem fighting against God’s cosmic order. Jews see the Goyim as animals, ”not of Adam” – that is animals. The Jews alone would be the ”true humans”. To them we’re like smarter animals one can abuse to their whim. And the perfect Goy for the Kike is the urban Golem.

Reliable sources have told me that they have heard time and time again with their own ears that the military in America – at least its air force – hungers for another war so they can bomb the living crap out of people. A satanic desire to destroy, to dominate, to feel powerful. With white people there would be no collateral damage – if anything they would be praised for killing off ”evil Nazis”. Like the forest-watcher in Ernst Jünger’s ”The Marble Cliffs”. Laughing as he sends his bloodhounds on the population simply defending their way of life.

These people are beyond reason, they are beyond morals, they are beyond logos. They have shunned the holy spirit, the glue of creation itself as theologians describe it, the shining glory of God, and instead choose to become slaves to their passion to destroy and rule. They can only rule over the ashes of creation, so they must through this shun God.

The antidote to this is not a dreamy ideal of a rural nation with peasants peacefully tilling the earth. We are not safe. Unlike our forefathers we now have the machine. A terrible creation which consumes natural resources and gives titanic power. The Jews have, in their satanic thirst for power, enslaved this weapon to their usury system. Thus, it not only consumes the natural world, but it is also forced to expand it’s operations exponentially.

Now, we’re at the point where the whole of society is a machine. Computerized bureaucratic demagoguery where bureaucrats are placed upon the thrones of the Dukes, Barons and Lords of old with blinders around their face, obsessed whether giving food for the Svensson family goes against §B1.03 or has support under §A7.34. The Jew has full control of this machine, and with it the Jews seek to crush the whole of creation.

So, should we just dream away – cuddle up to a relatively healthy woman and create a family in an isolated homestead? No. The total mobilization against the Jews and the forces of Satan is being sounded. Can’t you feel it? The forest-watcher’s bloodhounds are approaching. Can’t you hear them? The matrix’s shadow is looming over your kid picking flowers outside. Can’t you see it, with it’s thousands of tendrils and it’s titanic stature, blotting out the sky itself? If we isolate ourselves now and ignore the call for total mobilization, there’s none to fight them anymore. And ZOG’s dogs can go house to house and kill, rape and abuse every single one of you. Just like they have already done. You either stand under Christ’s banner at Jerusalem or under Lucifer’s at Babylon.

So the only thing we can do is to build our own machine and crush the Jew World Order and their satanic drive for “power for power’s sake,” without us ourselves being seduced by the temptations of this power. The plough must become a gun – or more like the 5 TB of anime must be replaced with social competence, physical fitness and a preparation to head into the woods once the European governments are starting to collapse – which they will very soon (to do peaceful, democratic and purely recreational activities of course).

We are heading into another great war. Not between two empires, but between two machines. The machine trying to demolish the Synagogue of Satan and the machine which the masons carefully built up with square and compass.

The Peace of the Jew is the death of civilized humanity. The Peace of the rural pacifist is the inevitable rape and murder (not necessarily in that order) of his whole family in front of his very eyes before he is killed as a result of him abandoning the bastion.

Only with the death of ZOG and killing our internal Jew will we be able to go back to another rural age. The Machine is dependent on natural resources, and they are shrinking and getting more scarce for every day as the demand for them is becoming higher and higher. If we are to survive we must fight for our survival. We must grab all the resources we need, to drain it all, only when these have been exhausted or when we have won with our spirit intact we can return to the farm. But only then.

The New Solomon of the Kikes is taking another step towards the throne of his temple for every year. And his number is six hundred sixty-six. Can’t you see the Rabbi rocking back and forth, praying to the wall where Lucifer himself is shackled?



“God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him.” — so declared Nietzsche to the world in his “Science of Joy,” a statement to be later popularized via “Thus Spoke Zarathustra”. Yet most people misunderstand the message Nietzsche conveyed and thus atheists and nihilists use that declaration as a message of triumph, when in reality it was a statement of despair.

Before we continue with this article, we’d like for the reader to understand what we will be talking about when referring to God in this article. In the previous articles published on NOOSE we have occasionally talked about the Ultimate Truth and the Cosmic Order – the central core of the Fascist Worldview. These same things can be understood and expressed in a number of ways, depending on the conceptual and symbolic language/narrative employed, thus they have also been referred to, for example, as the Absolute, or, more commonly, as God. What all these words have in common at their core, regardless of the narrative employed behind them (be it an abstract spiritual force, a host of pagan Gods, or the Christian God), is an understanding of a spiritual force that pervades and rules supreme over all. It governs all of life and gives it structure and order, from the physical laws of the universe to the intricate nature of the Human condition. Ultimate Truth / Cosmic Order / The Absolute / God(s) are expressions of that spiritual force by different means, which are not the subject of this article. Thus we aim to simplify the narrative presented in this article by referring to them all simply as God, not necessarily specifically the Christian or any other God, but nevertheless not excluding them either.

The deeper nature of these narratives and their correlation is something that will be explored in depth in a series of articles that will be published by IronMarch at a future date. This article, however, will be focusing on the issue of mankind losing its connection with that spiritual force, the consequences of that, and what it has to do with the Fascist Struggle. Thus, let us continue with the article proper.

God is dead” is a statement of fact, the fact being how mankind has lost its connection to the spiritual world (for if we can no longer perceive God, he might as well be dead to us), which ultimately leaves us stranded in the desacralized, material world without a guiding light towards which we could orient ourselves – with no objective, absolute law ordained from a higher source. Nietzsche did not, in fact, celebrate this state of affairs, but was horrified of it and thus sought a solution – Nietzsche was not a nihilist, but to the contrary, an anti-nihilist, seeking a solution to nihilism as a problem that mankind faced in the absence of God.

As much as he may have had his qualms with Christianity, it nevertheless presented such a guiding light to men, without which we are but rudderless ships lost in a storm. Where else could man turn to, in such a state of affairs, other than himself and his own strength? When men lose their connection with God they can do nothing else but rely on themselves – thus the man-centric conception of the world is born, which is exactly what Nietzsche had contributed to, by promoting Will to Power and the Übermensch, fine additions to what Oswald Spengler defined as Faustian culture, all things associated with the nature of Titans.

In many ways Nietzsche comes to mankind as an earthly counterpart of the Norse God Heimdallr, who blows the Gjallarhorn to signify the beginning of Ragnarök and the coming of a host of Chthonic/Elemental forces (e.g. Fenrir, Jörmungandr, the Jötunn giants, etc) that would wage war against the Gods. Whereas Heimdallr warns the Gods of the start of Ragnarök, Nietzsche comes to mankind with a message that the Twilight of the Gods has already arrived – we are living it. The world of man has been submerged into the “waters“. However, at the exact same time it is Nietzsche that promotes the coming of the Elemental Giants (Titans) via his concept of the Übermensch – man as a law onto himself.

The Bronze Age is also marked by the unleashing of the principle proper to the warriors’ caste, namely, pride, violence, war. The corresponding myth is the Titanic or Luciferian revolt, or the Promethean attempt to steal the Olympian fire. The age of “giants,” or of the Wolf, or of the “elemental beings;’ is an equivalent figuration found in various traditions and in their fragments preserved in legends and epics of various peoples.

-Julius Evola, Mystery of the Grail

Twilight of the Gods” and “God is Dead” are one and the same notion. They are different narratives for the same event of mankind losing its connection with the spiritual world, ushering in materialism, nihilism, rationalism, atheism and other concepts that lie at the heart of modern degeneracy and decay, associated with Faustian, Titanic, Promethean and Luciferian themes, unified in a simple formula: Man must become his own God and take control of God’s creation. Such a man is an Übermensch  a Titan. 

The true message of the Norse myth, along with many other similar traditional narratives, warns mankind of its inevitable downfall into ignorance of the Higher Order of life as ordained by God. This ignorance would force man to find a new absolute law to orient himself towards, and he would inevitably place it in himself. Man becomes the end in of himself, thus his own desires are of the utmost importance, his own mind and ego are the ultimate judges of his own conduct.

Let us map out the timeline of the Death of God:

  • Mankind loses sight of God and is left bereft of a guiding light.
  • Mankind begins to look inwards and cultivates the man-centric worldview. This stage is best embodied by the Enlightenment Era. This is the Luciferian/Promethean aspect, where man begins to place value in himself above all else, including God. These processes are tantamount to Lucifer’s revolt against the Christian God and to Prometheus stealing the Fire of the Gods from Mount Olympus, bringing it down to man.
  • Once this self-obsession is cultivated, it is directed outwards against nature/God’s creation as man attempts to subjugate everything to himself. This stage is best embodied by the Industrialization Era.  This is the Faustian aspect, where man uses his own reason, will power, science and technology to manipulate the world around him. Here we witness the birth of Titans, the Nietzschean Übermensch, driven by his Will to Power.

At this stage man essentially becomes the “perfect animal“, the “king of earthly beasts” so to speak. Yet this state of affairs cannot last for two major reasons. First of all, when man places value and ultimate authority within himself he can negotiate with himself and thus compromise on anything. Man cannot negotiate with a Higher Order, but he can always negotiate with himself, which is what we can witness today as people rationalize their shortcomings and degeneracy. Secondly, man becomes a slave to his own mechanical creations by means of which he exerted his dominance against nature, which helps further degenerate mankind. Man grows lazy, complacent, compliant, and his Will to Power withers away, leaving something even less than animal, something subhumanThis is the era we find ourselves in now. The Fall of Titans.

However, just as Mankind was warned of its downfall, so it was likewise foretold of its restoration by means of coming to know the Higher Order of life once again. All traditional narratives talk of how in the last and darkest age after the Death of God there would come Heroes who would dispel the darkness and restore God’s Law on Earth.

The last age is the Iron Age, or, according to the corresponding Hindu term, the Dark Age (Kali Yuga). This age includes every de consecrated civilization, every civilization that knows and extols only what is human and earthly. Against these forms of decadence there emerged the idea of a possible cycle of restoration, which Hesiod called the heroic cycle or age of heroes. Here we must employ the term heroic in a special, technical sense distinct from the usual meaning. According to Hesiod, the “generation of heroes” was created by Zeus, that is to say, by the Olympian principle, with the possibility of reattaining the primordial state and thus to give life to a new “golden” cycle.

-Julius Evola, Mystery of the Grail

Through the reconciliation of the Titan and Hero archetypes, who are cut from the same cloth, the titanic Will to Power would be directed towards the restoration of the Cosmic Order and thus it would be converted into a Will to Truth.

Heracles earns Olympian immortality after allying himself to Zeus, who is the Olympian principle, against the “giants”; according to one of the myths of this cycle, it is through Heracles that the “titanic” element (symbolized by Prometheus) is freed and reconciled with the Olympian element.


The titanic type – or, in another respect, the warrior type – is, after all, the prime matter of which heroes are made.

-Julius Evola, Mystery of the Grail

It is the overcoming of the Nietzschean Übermensch, granting Nietzsche’s legacy a positive connotation.

Freeing the doctrine of Nietzsche from its naturalistic aspects, one sees that the “superman” and the “will-to-power” are not real except as supra-biological, and, we should say, supra-natural qualities. Then this doctrine, for many, can be a path by which the great ocean can be reached – the world of the solar universality of great Nordic-Aryan traditions – from whose summit the meaning of all the misery, irrelevance and insignificance of this world of prisoners and lunatics can at last be grasped.

-Julius Evola, Heathen Imperialism

It is the appearance of what Savitri Devi called Men Against Time, those who fight for the Eternal in the world of change, counting Adolf Hitler as one in their number.

The saviours in the worldly sense of the word — those who set out to perfect not merely men’s souls but men’s collective life and government, and international relations — are what we call men “against Time.” And they are necessarily violent, although not always physically so. They may be, — in fact, they should be, — personally free from the bondage of Time, if they are to act with the maximum of foresight and efficiency. But they have to take into consideration the conditions of action “within Time” to live “in” Time, also, in a way.

-Savitri Devi, Lightning and the Sun

It is the coming of the Wildes Heer – the Wild Hunt, heroes sacrificing themselves in battle to aid Odin in Ragnarök

First of all, as is well-known, Valhalla is the centre of celestial immortality, reserved mainly for heroes fallen on the battlefield. The lord of this place, Odin-Wotan, is presented to us in the Ynglingasaga as having shown to the heroes the path which leads to the place of the gods, where immortal life flourishes. According to this tradition no sacrifice or cult is more appreciated by the supreme god, and none produces richer fruits, than that sacrifice which one offers as one falls fighting on the battlefield. In addition to this, behind the confused popular representation of the Wildes Heer this meaning is hidden: through the warriors, who, falling, offer a sacrifice to Odin the power is increased which this god needs for the ultimate battle against the Ragna-rökkr, that is, the “darkening of the divine”, which has threatened the world since ancient times. This illustrates clearly the Aryan motif of the metaphysical struggle.

-Julius Evola, The Metaphysics of War

It is, indeed, the coming of Fascists and National-Socialists – the last Heroes of the cycle, the last Titans who turned their Will to Power into a Will to Truth. We practice what is described in Buddhism as, negation of negation: in our opposition to the forces that denied God’s Law we reaffirm it once again, restoring the Cosmic Order in human affairs. It is the path of restoration on a civilizational and racial scale, rather than the path of individual salvation, yet the latter will follow suit with the former.

Such is the true essence of the Fascist struggle – to deny the forces of decay, involution and degeneracy and in that denial restore all the positive aspects of the human condition. It is nothing short of a Holy War, a spiritual and physical Crusade against the forces of materialism, secularism, atheism, rationalism, humanism, egalitarianism, hedonism, relativism, utilitarianism, nihilism, i.e. the powers of ruin that only seek “nothingness, nothingness without end“.

Thus, to Nietzsche’s desperate cry of “God is Dead!” we will give our roaring and triumphant battle cry: “God is Dead – LONG LIVE GOD!”



We’ve already had a couple of articles by Greve Hans that dealt with anti-intellectualism, but we’ll have one more crack at this subject. This time, however, we will present what it is that Fascism/NS prizes over intelligence and why exactly it is incompatible with intellectualism.

The prevalent default dichotomy that people just go with is that of smart vs dumb people, the former being “good” or at the very least “better” than the latter. The emphasis on this dichotomy took hold with the rise of Rationalism and the Enlightenment, when it was cemented that the “rational”, “smart” and “intelligent” people should form the social elites as the “most” capable.

Such origins alone should signal to proper Fascists that there is something suspect going on here, and for good reason. For all intents and purposes Intellectualism is fetishization of intellect, whereupon intelligence becomes a measure of social worth and thus social status. What follows, is that if one wants to rise in his social standing, he must prove himself to be intelligent, and thus achieve the title of higher social standing “intellectual”.

However, what this does, is create a proverbial rat race to prove one’s intellect even when one does not possess said intellect, for blind ambition is most often found with fools, as the Dunning–Kruger effect will attest. In fact the less a man understands a given subject, the more likely he is not to realize all the mistakes he is making, whereas someone actually knowledgeable in the subject can correctly evaluate their own shortcomings (consider all the singing competitions in the world and how many delusional people are convinced their shitty singing is amazing). Same effects apply to intellectualism – people aspire to be regarded as “intellectuals“, as smart, however they may only be smart enough to read truly intelligent or complicated texts, but not understand them – and therein lies the origin of most intellectuals. This is a problem that Adolf Hitler highlighted in Mein Kampf, when he talked of how most people don’t know how to read:

In either case, what is read shouldn’t simply be stored in the memory like a list of facts and figures. The facts, like bits of a mosaic tile, should come together as a general image of the world, helping to shape this world image in the reader’s head. Otherwise, there will be a confusion of information learned, and the worthless mix of facts gives the unhappy possessor an undeserved high opinion of himself. He seriously believes he is “cultured and learned” while thinking he has some understanding of life and is knowledgeable simply because he has a stack of books by his bed. Actually, every piece of new information takes him further away from the real world, until often he ends up either in a psychiatric hospital or as a “politician” in government.

-MK, V1, Ch2

These people, fueled foremost by the desire to achieve a certain social standing, put on a pageantry of supposed intelligence by trying to dazzle everyone with fancy and complex words or concepts that they picked up from smart books. Sometimes, not even that – as intellectuals feeds off each other, thus they will gladly regurgitate each other’s nonsense. One of the favorite maneuvers of intellectuals is to take something simple and dress it up with needlessly complex phrasing to, once again, give off the appearance of being intelligent.

The more honest term for these people is “smart idiots” as Julius Evola described them in Chapter 14 of The Bow and Club.


In short, Intellectualism is the fetishization of intellect, where intelligence becomes a goal in and of itself. It creates the desire in people of weak character to propel themselves socially by giving off the illusion of being intelligent (though often even some truly intelligent people are of weak character). In the process of striving for that social status they actually manage to fool even themselves into thinking they possesses high intellect.

Coupled with the idea of egalitarianism, this created the conditions for the “rat race of smarts“, where anyone is supposedly capable of achieving high intellect, and thus enjoy the social position from whence to sneer down on those who had not achieved the same. This being motivated, in the first place, by envy of those held in high esteem for intellect above oneself (regardless if their esteem is well earned or not).

The whole of modern society is actually built on perpetuating this misguided ambition with motivations of mass higher/academic education. An education which is, in fact, used to socialize and thus integrate people into the System, our mortal foe. Yet it is done under the guise of creating “intelligent” people, where one’s intellect and rightful social standing is proven by nothing more than a piece of paper. In USA this is also coupled with a larger usury scheme of student loans. One has to wonder how smart a person truly is, if he is willing to be duped out of his money in a simple swindle, for the promise of becoming an “intellectual“.

In psychology, the mass idea has triumphed, so that “genius” is equated with high intelligence, and the latter with “college education.” Again — no qualitative differences among persons. The commercial maxim is “You can buy brains.”

-IMPERIUM, by Francis Parker Yockey

However, one not being deluded by the System’s institutions of learning does not mean one has escaped its larger influence of placing value in intellect as a goal in of itself, hence all the “fringe” intellectuals, the self-taught and self-read wannabes who merely covet the same aspirations as the lemmings in the halls of modern academia – they simply do so “from the outside”. This, in fact, likewise gives them a sense of intellectual superiority as they believe themselves too smart to fall for the System’s influence, despite the fact that they follow the same aspirations everyone else has been told to uphold.

If a lemming intellectual is hard to get through to, because he believes himself intelligent by virtue of his diploma, then the fringe intellectual is hard to get through to, because he believes himself intelligent by virtue of “not having been fooled” by the System. In either case they will tell you of how much smarter they are than you because of a piece of paper or because of how they “know” what’s “really going on“.

The worst offenders of the latter type are the people who claim to be on the same side as ourselves, but immediately try to assume a position of superiority based on their delusion of personal intellectual grandeur, and regard the rest as their personal army of foot soldiers, whom they can “direct” with their “high intelligence“. This “intellectual vanguard” (sometimes self-described as “the brains”), that sneers down on the people who would actually get things done (“the muscle”), forgets that after any revolution the first group to be purged from society is, in fact, the intellectuals. Moreover, most ills of modern day can be traced back to ill-conceived ideas of the intellectual strata.

All of this, however, is not to say that education is wrong, but rather, to point out how its purpose has been completely perverted and transformed from cultivating useful knowledge for practical purposes, to cultivating a sense of self-worth, measured by one’s “intelligence“. Neither are we harping on intellect or intelligence itself (and thus, by extension, on the truly intelligent people), rather we oppose the transformation of those things into social credentials.

In the end, one can hardly be surprised by the Fascist/NS opposition to intellectualism and all self-professed intellectuals. The former necessitates a kind of social structure that is incompatible with our ultimate goals and allows for the rise in society of people who are unworthy of the posts they might assume. The latter presents a person of low quality trying to pass themselves off as someone worthy of your admiration, respect, and even obedience, based on their own self-evaluated “higher” intellect.

Fascism/NS outright reject the inflated importance of the smart/idiot dichotomy and opposes intellectualism with Character. Where Modern World Rationalists place Intellect, Fascism and National-Socialism places Character. This is because unlike intelligence, one cannot pretend to cultivate it artificially or pretend to have any other kind of Character than the one they truly have.

I would strongly compel everyone to read Ernst Junger’s interwar article on Character for the best insight to its nature and importance, but we will nevertheless provide some quotations from it and other Fascist/NS sources.

Unlike the Age of Enlightenment we believe character to be the highest value – that is the most important sign of our inner transformation.

-Ernst Junger

One’s Character is their true inner nature. Fascism prizes the great, strong, firm character over the weak and soft, for that is the character that can uphold our values and honor Truth. One’s intelligence comes second, for a person of great character may not be the smartest, but he will stand taller than the person of weak character, who is more intelligent. In fact, the latter is the perfect description of the intellectual, of the modern man in general.

The person of weak character desperately needs some modicum of intelligence to have the skills for rationalizing why his lack of will power (a trait of a strong character) doesn’t matter or should not be taken into account. It is these people who will try to intellectually justify degeneracy – foremost their own, and then that of others, to secure their own standing. “Faggotry is not a problem” is something only a faggot or a smart idiot will say, ignoring that faggotry is often the consequence of a small and weak character, as is the case for all degeneracy.

A simple and humble man may be far more virtuous than the intellectual, and thus we do not prize intellect itself and would not offend said man for not being the smartest. “Smart” and “dumb” do not figure in our worldview as substitutes for “good” and “bad“, nor do they rank as the all-defining human traits – only Character can fulfill that task. Thus we also do not recognize the “smart” jobs as the superior ones, instead we recognize the effort of the man fulfilling the task he was meant for, as per his Character:

“Each has his task in the community, given to him according to his gifts. Never do all have the same task, but rather each his own. His task gives him a place in the community, if he fulfills it completely, he wins the esteem of the others. He is happy, even if his task is not large in the overall scheme of things.”

“A worker on the street can stand higher in the ranks than a government minister if he has better done his duty.”

-Faith and Action, by Helmut Stellrecht

In reality, intelligence is a tool, and like any tool it can be wielded for good or ill, and what determine’s ones use of that tool is, again, Character. The small man will use intellect to justify his shortcomings and to secure his petty interests, to protect his own hide and swindle others. Thus intellect serves to create ideas like equality and communism. A great man will use intellect in service to a higher task that he seeks to realize, in service to a greater principle that dictates a necessity, rather than a personal whim. Thus intellect serves to create the Organic State.

As our spiritual experience shows, above the outer logic of reason, conditioned by the senses, rises an internal logic of fate. And we perceive it not by the brain, but by blood which uses the brain for its own goals or in spite of it. The arguments of blood are not convincing, they are compulsory. Its goals are not logical constructs but are the consequence of necessity. It’s main organ is the heart. And that which in relation to the brain we call reason, in relation to the heart we call character.

-Ernst Junger

It thus follows that we also do not recognize the notion of an “Intellectual Elite” as the leaders of State and Nation, seeing how the qualifications for such an elite would once again put men of weak and small character above men of great character (hence our laughter when self-proclaimed intellectuals deem themselves to be the “brain” to our “muscle”). The only elite possible in Fascism/NS is the natural-born leaders, men of great character, what Francis Parker Yockey called the “culture-bearing stratum“, the natural spiritual minority within any given culture who represent its absolute best:

Races and nations express themselves at their highest potential in strong individuals, who embody the prime national characteristics, and acquire immense historical symbolic significance.

Not intelligent or smart individuals, but strong individuals, men of great character, that is the primary prerequisite, what follows is their natural talents and aptitudes, including intelligence, which they can apply for the best effect:

The notion of prominence is related to the idea of the Culture-bearing stratum in this way: every man who is prominent in any field, and who also has inner gifts, of vision, appreciation, or creativeness, naturally belongs to this stratum.

Hence why it has always been Fascism/NS that attracted exactly this type of people:

Only Authority represents a step forward, and thus the strongest, most vital, creative elements in the Culture-bearing stratum are found in the service of the resurgence of Authority.

Which likewise accounts for why Fascism/NS had attracted into its ranks people from all walks of life, from all social fields and classes – something that has been a mystery to our enemies for the longest time. Our worldview did not attract people on the basis of interests or existing social standing or common secondary attributes, such as intelligence – it attracted that very culture-bearing stratum who felt the “compulsory argument of blood” to do “that which is necessary” and whose representatives are hidden throughout society:

“The Culture-bearing stratum is not recognized by its contemporaries in any way as a unity, nor does it recognize itself as one. As a stratum it is invisible, like the Culture it carries. Because it is a purely psychic stratum, it can be given no material description to satisfy the intellectuals.”

“The Culture-bearing stratum, articulated into creators and appreciators, is invisible as such. It corresponds to no economic class, no social class, no nobility, no aristocracy, no occupation. Its members are not all public figures by any means. But by its existence, this stratum actualizes a High Culture on this earth.”

One other Fascist figure who wrote on this same culture-bearing stratum, from which the elite could be formed, was Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, in his autobiography “For My Legionaries”:

A people is not capable of governing itself. It ought to be governed by its elite. Namely, through that category of men born within its bosom who possess certain aptitudes and specialties.

Furthermore, when he qualified the necessary characteristics of an elite, he does not once mention intellect, instead listing qualities that are also properties of Character:

On what must an elite be founded?
a) Purity of soul.
b) Capacity of work and creativity.
c) Bravery.
d) Tough living and permanent warring against difficulties facing the nation,
e) Poverty, namely voluntary renunciation of amassing a fortune.
f) Faith in God.
g) Love.

Finally, Codreanu talks about how a new elite may be born only in a direct confrontation:

And if a nation has no real elite – a first one to designate the second? I answer by a single phrase which contains an indisputable truth: in that case, the real elite is born out of a war with the degenerate elite, the false one. And that, also on the principle of selection.

Anyone familiar with the history of Fascist/NS movements can clearly see how all of these things have been proven in practice, that it were men of great character and natural gifts, which were used in service to that character and the higher goal, that made up the ranks of our movements, and in their struggle against the enemy in power a new elite was formed, forged by fire and in various trials and tribulations. The kind of trials and tribulations that would leave weak men of intellect crushed underfoot and tossed to the curb.

When George Lincoln Rockwell put a new recruit to the test, it wasn’t a test of intelligence, but a test of Character, as the second chapter of White Power will attest:

He actually convinced me he wanted to try to be a Storm trooper!

As a matter of policy, whenever I hear that (as I do every day), I do all I can to discourage the applicant. We want no dabblers, but dedicated, fanatical fighters who will STICK through hell itself. With this crazy character, I went even further. I made fun of him. I told him he’d never make it, that we’d run him off the first day.

He rose to the challenge.

“You name it, and I’ll make it!” he said.

Strangely, I could sense a fiercely burning WILL behind the words. I told him he couldn’t come up to try life as a Nazi Storm-trooper until he was eighteen. He left, vowing to return in a few months. He did return – without the beatnik get-up. He turned out to be a blonde, young Viking, built for combat.

We poured it to him.

There was no place left inside for him to sleep. So he was assigned to a wrecked car out back. It was still winter and cold. But the kid moved into the wrecked car with a couple of blankets. We put him to work cleaning the toilets, and yard.

He worked.

Spring came, and then a broiling summer. He was still in the wrecked car, eaten alive by mosquitoes. I tried him on the printing press, and never saw such a bear for work. He was all dried out of booze, off the pills and dope, exercising plenty, and showing every sign of “making it.”

A weak intellectual would never submit himself to such treatment, for his character wouldn’t be able to take it, and he would rationalize that this was all either beneath him or did not test his “true” value to the cause, that of his “high-brow” “intelligence“. The intellectual would rather prove himself with a smartly written program, but as we know from, again, Codreanu: “This country is dying of lack of men, not of lack of programs…”

What we lack is men of great, strong character, whom the weak-willed intellectuals will disregard as “dumb” “muscle” that requires their “guidance“.  For our enemy doesn’t fear the intellectual, someone who deals with rationalizing all their life is easy pray for coopting and molding into something that can be worked with or even outright ignore, whereas a man of character will stand on principle no matter what and will not accept anything less than the complete satisfaction of the compulsory demand in his blood:

They fear an impotent, weak-willed genius less than they fear a forceful nature with only modest intellect.

-MK, V1, Ch2

No matter whom you look at in the Pantheon of Fascist champions, you cannot in all honesty declare any of them “intellectuals“, rather you see men of great Character who also possessed great intellect, and not necessarily academic smarts, but worldly knowledge of how the world around them operates. That intellect was subservient to their goals and their character, establishing them foremost as Men of Action, rather than men of pen and paper. Even well educated people like William Luther Pierce spoke without pretense of intellectual superiority, and the content of their speeches was always that of Action, as opposed to the kind of speaking one might hear during various “think tank” get-togethers.

These people spoke plainly but they spoke of things of great magnitude, something that is impossible for an intellectual, for his instinct drives him towards either analyzing and dismantling and picking away at things until there is nothing left; or towards making mountains out of molehills as they proceed to over-intellectualize the most basic of things. Intellect left to its own devices is a tool for tearing at the very fabric of reality or satisfying one’s own ego, whereas the intellect subservient to great character is a creative force that helps us return closer to the Truth.

These types think themselves to be the next social elite, whereupon they can occupy stuffy cabinets with leather chairs and sip wine whilst stroking each other’s egos over meaningless yammering coated in complex wording. Well let them dream. Reality of the matter is, however, that history shall repeat itself once again, as these intellectuals will find themselves trampled underneath the jackboots of “low brow” “thugs” (the favored insult towards fascists in the past, all of them, from Hitler and Mussolini to Sir Oswald Mosley and Rockwell, to Codreanu, Italo Balbo, Joseph Tommasi and etc) – the very ones they thought would be doing their bidding.

And from the ranks of those “thugs” the new elite will come forth.



Before I’ve written about how slave morality really is slavery to desires. This isn’t a new thought and it has been known for a very long time. This article will attempt to expand on the concept that’s been forming in the past articles about how the intellect is limited and how freedom is to be true to one’s nature.

We have already established that will to power is to reach one’s goal. To realize one’s inherent nature. To find one’s place in the cosmic order, or whatever you want to call it. If someone is enslaved to his desires he is not free and therefore not powerful. Even if he is commanding armies he is not free unless this is his rightful place in life. He would just be a rebel against truth.

There is also more than what we can intellectually understand. We are not bodies with souls, we’re souls with bodies. If we do not stay true to our ideal which comes from our soul, we degenerate. Just look at the blobs of fat on tumblr who think they are liberating themselves from the patriarchy when in reality they are just liberating themselves from their health. They are too weak to reach any ideals trough their own free will, so they don’t.

An ideal is extreme by definition since only one thing can be that ideal and everything else is not. This non-ideal is infinite in it’s nature while the ideal is not. The ideal comes from one’s nature which comes from one’s soul which is created in God’s image.

The ideal is directly from God. Everything else is void. Everything else destroys God’s creation. Everything else is per definition Satanic. The Jews are a prime example since all they do is to erode the discipline of the dumb Goyim and dragging them down to their materialistic, Satanic level.

Since God is truth, and truth is one’s nature, one’s ideal you have to reach is literally becoming one with God. In Byzantine times this was expressed with the term theosis, which essentially is the same thing as what Julius Evola calls transcendence. This is what is really meant with ”becoming God”. You’re not supposed to rebel, you’re supposed to free yourself by being true to the ideal you have. To become the very best you are. Otherwise you would just dig down your talent.

We are made in God’s image, and God is not bound by his own creation. In the Byzantine Church, the nature was supposed to be to man as the whole of creation is to god. You’re not supposed to be enslaved to it, that would be repeating the fall, you’re supposed to overcome it. You’re made in God’s image, so act like it.

Matthew 25:18-20

But the servant who had received one talent went off, dug a hole in the ground, and hid his master’s money. After a long time, the master of those servants returned to settle accounts with them.

The reason we have free will is so that we can use that free will to achieve this goal and no longer be slaves to the world. Nothing else. Just like how Jesus freed the world from Satan’s domination trough the cross in Christianity. National Socialism is an intellectual construct that reflects this law. Nature’s laws reflects God’s laws and by looking how nature operates you can get a good idea of how the absolute laws are.

Everything strives to be true to it’s nature. From how Big Bang formed a universe so orderly as ours to how a seed turns into a flower. They don’t strive for ”power”, they strive for the truth. It is in fact the same thing since you can not have power without being free and you’re only free when you’re true to your higher nature.

With this perspective, natural selection for example would only be half-true. Animals and humans have not become how we are just because we managed to survive trough adapting to chaotic changes. We are those who we are because the essence which makes us who we are demand that we manifest it into the physical world. It was destiny that the Neanderthals would lead to us. It’s destiny that the different races are where they are. It’s destiny that the homosexual alt-righters disappear since they are not true to the nature they are supposed to be since homos engage in their sick lusts instead of creating a family. Aka chaotic desires before truth.

Race mixing is a great example of how the Jews are yet again rebelling against nature and trough nature against God/Logos/<Insert snowflake name here>. A multi-culti nation will not feel any connection to any ideal. It is as chaotic as it’s DNA is mixed. It will fall down the pit of materialism and intellectualism and that will be the end of it. The fight against these kikes is eternal since the only thing that motivates them is rebellion and destroying order. They are enslaving entire continents to their desires and trough these desires to the Jew and trough the Jew to Satan.

All sins are that which takes you away from the ideal. All good is that which makes you embody it. You can eat moderately and be fit or be a glutton and become fat. You can be humble to the truth or be high on hubris. Etc. Not Moralism but morals.

An example of this will to truth can be seen in Spengler’s philosophy (tl;dr of Spengler). Every high culture had a specific ideal which they were destined to embody trough their free will. The will is free since you are – again – not a body with a  soul but a soul with a body and since this ideal comes from the soul you are free when you achieve the ideal since the ideal is what you really want.

Eventually the culture would burn out. Most of their creations had already been created according to Spengler. You then reach a degeneration of the whole civilization. Ideals became that which is convenient (aka no ideals and slavery to desires).

As the civilization finally crash trough war and chaos, it returns to a ”fellah population”. A people without the great soul they had before. Modern examples would be Arabs, Chinese and Indians. They have traces of their once great culture, but it’s a pale frigid reflection of what they once were.

Spengler predicted that machines would eventually take over much of the jobs people had and a great immigration wave from somewhere in order to feed the great machine which the system itself has become. Man creates a false god and the false god creates man in it’s own satanic image. If I’m not mistaken, Spengler’s greatest fear was that the French would import Negros from their colonies, arm them, and send them into Germany. Not even he could have predicted the proportions of this. The best words to describe what Spengler saw coming would be a system only comparable to the system of the biblical Anti-Christ. All while we hand the machine to the Coloured races only to find that they use it as a pointed stick against us as their population boom and ours drop.

Eventually people would rebel against the system where the shekel is placed higher than the people. ”Caesarism”. This would in turn be relative to the nation’s individual ideals within the high culture. Anglos would have businessmen rebel, ”Prussians” would have generals. The wars that would result from this would be multiplied due to globalization and diminishing resources. Spengler predicted a sort of global race war between civilizations.

And he might actually be right

Some traditional Catholics talk about a great triumph of the church over the forces of Satan before the reign of the real Anti-Christ. This seems to overlap from a quick comparison.

Meanwhile, Russia would rise and start to realize their own ideal since they are a separate civilization. Dostoyevski was according to Spengler a great source of the Russian mentality that is about to rise. Raskolnikov’s confused hate in Crime and Punishment, the Brothers Karamazovs’ discussions. He was not an author but a sort of modern apostle, seeing the ideal but not quite able to define it. According to Spengler, Russia’s great goal is to establish the thousand year reign. A goal they have been prevented to do due to a sort of ”cultural imperialism” that warped Russia from the time of Peter the Great and that was cleansed in a catharsis with the fires of Bolshevism. He saw the Russians as the only truly religious people on the planet at this point. Likewise, there’s talk of Russia being consecrated among traditional Catholics which yet again seem to be hinting at the same thing.

Meanwhile in Sweden

Considering how the west is doing compared to Russia, Spengler seems to be right.

Everything is will to truth. Art is will to truth. War is will to truth. Existence is will to truth. Evolution is will to truth. Religion is will to truth. Industry is will to truth. Music is will to truth. The human body is will to truth. A farm is will to truth. Everything.

“The will-to-power of the beasts of prey is limited and practical; it is fierce but unspiritual. Man carries within him this same will-to-power, but his soul infuses into it a purely spiritual intensity that raises its demands and its performances incomparably above the level of the beast.”

-Francis Yockey Parker

Actual tolerance is not tolerance of degeneration but the realization that your personal ideal is not the same ideal as everyone else. No one is the full embodiment of logos/god/whatever. You are only a part. Dust. Ashes. The Byzantines thought that the full God/Logos/whatever is unreachable. You can only experience God though his manifestations, his energies, which create everything. Peace is when everything is a perfect manifestation of the ideal. War is when it is not. Thus life is struggle.

Evola’s ”Golden Age” would be achieving theosis/transcendence as a civilization. Reaching the ideal. Restoring the truth.

The meaning of life is to embody this ideal which you are unable to explain in intellectual terms. Intellectuals are the worst guides of a civilization ever since they reject the truth which their books are (at best) an incomplete manifestation of. They rebel. Truth is they are little better than homos.

On the other hand, the two tend to overlap. Especially within the alt-right.

You’ll learn more from a mass than from a dozen university lectures.

2+2 is always 4 no matter what color you use writing it.



An unfortunate meme, predictably circulating within the alt right, is that of “good jews”.   Some alt right dullards like to even go as far as romanticizing jews for being “excellent” and “hardworking”, worshiping traits like IQ, socioeconomic status, and work ethic as universal standards for respect, inclusion, and reverence without regard for what they’re used for. And predictably, this all completely misses the points:

  1. There are nogood jews”.
  2. Jews cannot lose their status and be assimilated in accord with our standards.
  3. Jews cannot be trusted and we owe them absolutely nothing.

Jewry, at its core, is biological.  They are an identifiable race retaining a common,  identifiable genetic lineage, clustering closer to each other than the various host populations they’ve mixed with.

Jews play all sides while acting as a cohesive group

Jewry has its own internal disagreements and rivalries.  However, all these different factions and viewpoints are ultimately working for the same goal – to perpetuate jewish ethnic interests at our expense by dominating and controlling their respective niches. This essentially allows jews to play all sides, all ideologies,  to fulfill their goals in every possible context and scenario while maintaining plausible deniability when called on it.  As to how much of this is an overt, consciously coordinated conspiracy vs instinctual, biologically ingrained behavior to co-opt anything they come into contact with as a vehicle for their interests, is beside the point.

Providing any other frame than addressing jews as what they area biological race playing multiple, conflicting fronts to advance its interests in every possible context and outcome, provides the frame that they can be redeemed by their host society’s standards.  They’ll outwardly adopt its norms while maintaining their tribal networks and related behavior. An example of this would be framing the jewish problem as a religious issue as opposed to a biological problem, allowing jews to lose their jewish status and gain trust upon conversion, giving them access to positions of power while providing them cover to continue their objectives.   As a direct consequence of this frame, the Catholic Church allowed itself to become infiltrated  and subverted by jewish converts to Catholicism.

Other examples include basically every instance throughout history where jews nominally integrated into their host societies and gained their trust.  They’d change their names,  behaving better for a generation or so before invariably resuming the same behavior. These frames, born of either ignorance, cowardice, or squeamishness on the jewish problem simply play into the the hand of jewish crypsis.

Its not just the Zionists

A particularly idiotic frame is the tendency for most WN to simply attack jews as “zionists” while holding up anti-zionist jews – usually ones advancing their own anti-racist bullshit narratives, as tokens in hopes of deflecting accusations of antisemitism.  Anti-zionist jews are just as bad as zionist jews and share the same underlying motivation.  They systemically work to attack and undermine the cohesion of their host societies while existing as a tightly networked, cohesive tribe dominating their share of institutions. Their tribal existence and survival  just isn’t necessarily connected to Israel, and is usually more implicit while still  retaining some level of outward, explicit expression of jewish identity.  The common theme of “chosenness” with different forms of expression and framing runs throughout both zionist and anti-zionist camps, showing that this behavior is a biological expression rather than the result of religious and/or political indoctrination.  Look at basically every radical left movement and every jew-domnated jewnivershitty field for confirmation.

There is no separating the jewish elite from “everyday jews”

The jewish elites and community leaders play a symbiotic role with the rank and file “everyday jews“.  Unlike the case for whites, where white elites are actively working against their race’s interest in collusion with the jews, in the jewish group organism, the head is connected to the body.  This means that while on an individual level, some jews may outwardly come across as relatively normal people, claiming to not even be consciously aware of what their race is doing in full, they’re still playing an integrated role in a group organism that’s committing genocide against our race.

After all, it was street level activists and agitators that helped build Bnai Brith into what it is today , starting with only 12 fresh off the boat jewish immigrants in a cafe. It’s street level activists and volunteers that help push (((AIPAC))) proganda and recruit on college campuses. It’s everyday jews networking at the JCC, benefiting from and solidifying jewish nepotism as they become increasingly upwardly mobile. It’s everyday jews providing donations and membership dues for jewish groups that aggressively work to shut down all criticism of their actions and to actively undermine all ethnonationalist efforts at organization on our part.  Groups such as the ADL go to lengths as providing training for police forces to identify and shut down  groups in conflict with their interests.  If charges are laid, juries can be manipulated into delivering a “guilty” verdict even if no crime was committed, allowing jewish activist  groups to abuse the legal system for their own ends.

If each individual jew is consciously working to exterminate our race is beside the point – they all play an active role in a group organism that’s hellbent on killing us. Further, given the existence of established global jewish networks, wealth solidified through jewish banking, media, and corporate dynasties, and the significantly high average IQ found within jews, it’s very easy for “everyday jews” to be upwardly mobile and become elites. If those networks are destroyed, they’d be very easy to rebuild them especially if the jewish problem is framed in a manner that allows a portion of jewry to go crypto, infiltrate existing institutions, and form their own networks within there for eventual takeover. Given the existence of global jewish networks and money, it’d be very easy for them to maintain backchannel funds and connections to assist in that process.

The case for extermination

The case for exterminating jews has already been made by their behavior and past failed attempts to counter it over the course of thousands of years.  Every past attempt to deal with them has failed, and most framed the issue in an unclear light providing portions of jews cover to resume their work  The idea that jewish nationalists can be worked with is refuted by the fact Germany tried that very thing and got stabbed in the back by the World Zionist Congress. When we show jews any clemency, they reward us by sinking the USS Liberty.  They reward it by stealing our military secrets.  They reward it by blackmailing the entire world into doing their bidding through the threat of nuclear annihilation.   They reward it by lobbying for ethnonationalist movements to be crushed, a noteworthy example being Antonis Samaras meeting with members from the American Jewish Committee to proceed issuing orders to arrest and disband Greece’s Golden Dawn.

On account of their established behavior pattern, even nationalist jews cannot be trusted.  Jews claiming to be ethnonationalists who want total separation and independence from the gentile world only circulate that claim within WN and alt right spheres as a rhetorical redirection ploy to stop people form criticizing jews as a cohesive entity and attacking them as an enemy. This is further evident by the fact that Israel is dependent on a wider global network to maintain its existence and receive the weaponry to do so, the idea is a false premise from the get-go with Israel basically existing as an outgrowth of the JewSA military-industrial complex. Said redirection ploy is then used as a justification for including jews within the alt right so they can continue co-opting it.  Plus, what do these alt right retards expect? Jews are just gonna voluntarily surrender everything they’ve worked for and quietly go along with a repatriation plan without any retaliation?  Do we really want to do business with people who have a proven track record of betrayal?

The only viable, long term solution to the jewish problem is mercilessly killing them down to the very last one, exactly as they’re trying to do to us.   After all, they staked that ground in the first place. Why should we reward them on any level for their efforts to destroy us? Who retains leverage there? We don’t owe them shit, other than delivering a swift death. With Israel’s efforts at developing bioweapons designed to kill based on genetic sequences it’d be particularly hilarious and well-deserved if that technology was somehow used against them.

Instead of pretending to be working for our race’s survival, the alt right should proceed in accord with its internal destiny and make the case for allowing jews to live while protecting them from the consequences of their own actions.  It’d be a rare act of honesty from them so they can get back to stuffing their faces with Heideggerian hors d’oeuvres and spamming retarded helicopter memes.