I never particularly got the whole “cuckservative” thing, I did get it’s value to shock conservatives with the realization that they are whiny, pathetic and repeatedly give up ground to the enemy. However at the end of the day that is what a conservative is by definition. As George Lincoln Rockwell had already said seemingly so long ago: “Conservatives are sissies“. That behavior is the very core of conservatism, but here we can look at the other implication of this new title – attempt at differentiation. Upset rank and file conservatives saying to their establishment representatives “you failed us, you’re no real conservative, you’re a CUCKservative, you betrayed what we stand for, you’re a sell-out“. And yet the people using that title are the same, they just realize how badly they are losing and they don’t see that their very position is premised on inevitable defeat, so they put the blame elsewhere to hang on to their delusions.

So I’d like to give you a run down of what conservatism actually is, then we can also look at the reactionary position and finally the Revolutionary position and dispel some illusions around those terms as well.

Conservatism comes from the word conserve. The entire point of conservatism is to conserve or preserve something – that’s it. As such this concept is entirely relative to whatever has been established prior, most likely by people of strong character and vision or principles, like conquerors and revolutionaries. Their descendants inherit these things but they never worked to get them in the first place, however the first few generations fight to build on and expand from there because they still have a direct connection to that original glory. Yet as time marches on descendants become more and more disconnected from that original glory and take their position for granted though they certainly still enjoy  that position, purely for the benefits they receive – they no longer understand the glory, they only understand the formal benefits and comforts. This is the downward slope of the inherently losing position that carries the name of conservatism. It’s an attempt to stop something that is destined to die from dying just for the sake of its formal benefits. The glory, the living spirit that established the structure that provides said benefits has long since left, it’s but an empty carcass that is falling apart, however this carcass is the most precious thing to those who never knew the glory in the first place.

To put it simply: someone builds an Empire, their immediate descendants build or expand its spirit and glory, inevitably the spirit and glory fade and what is left is but a formal structure inhabited by people who never knew the spirit and glory and only knew the benefits of the structure – the positions and titles, the basic political power and thus they don’t get the point of why the Empire was built in the first place. When the spirit and glory are gone the Imperium becomes merely an Empire. So they are focused solely on keeping the structure and they want to preserve it. This is the very premise of the ancient teachings on the cycles of rise and fall in societies, for instance the Greek Anacyclosis.

This is something that the German thinker Ernst Niekisch had spoken of after Germany’s defeat in the First World War, describing the conflict between the generations, namely the generation of old men who lost the Empire and the young generation who never got to know the Empire of their ancestors:  “These young hearts have never been impressed and inspired directly by the proud grandeur of their Fatherland. Political anger, social poverty, economic decline – that is what is self-evident to them, always in their face, their personal experience. Prewar Germany was nothing more than historical memory, akin to the memory of the Empire of Otto I, Frederick Barbarossa, with the memory of the great and incomparable state of Prussian King Friedrich. But if the old generation were to chide the youth for such “historical” viewpoint of Bismarck’s empire, it might have received a reply in the form of bold and impertinent questions: Wasn’t the fate of this empire in your hands? Were you not the ones who lost this empire in the first place? How do you have the audacity to still so arrogantly claim your own importance on the political scene?“

However, again, conservatism has no core of it’s own. It is always relative to what preceded it, thus conservatism isn’t inherently “right-wing“, if you still buy into that formal differentiation. Conservatism is always different from place to place. In the United States conservatism stands to conserve the Constitution, the ideas of the Founding Fathers and so on. Which all happen to be liberal in the classic sense of the word, of the government as being nothing more than a “guard dog” of society, with little to no involvement in the economy and social affairs, only enforcing the law and protecting it from enemies without. Is this not the american conservative/republican motto of small government? Compare that to conservatism in the British Empire that at one point defended absolute monarchy against constitutional monarchy, defending the big government, conserving its power. Hell, look at USSR, think there was no Soviet Conservatism? It stood against Gorbachev‘s reforms, attempting to conserve the old soviet system, which later became reactionary, but more on that specific example later.

Conservatism is always a defensive position of what had been established prior, thus it is always relative and has no core of its own and it differs from place to place and time to time. It defends the formal structure that has lost it’s real core, what gave it life in the first place. Conservatism defends the purely material, formal outer shell, it mistakes the outward form for the essence. Just as when the animating energies or the soul leaves the body, once the essence is gone, once the life force that created the form in the first place is gone, the form is already as good as dead and it’s decay and death are inevitable. But the conservative grasps hold of it in desperation, not wanting to lose what he has, but inevitably failing and coming to terms with their failure but he’ll just try again: “Well we lost some ground, but not a step back from here on in! Oh, we lost again. Well no mo-oh, it happened again. Well this will be the las-damn it!” Slowly but surely, they give ground and what they try to conserve is chipped away at, piece by piece. They can’t defend it, because they fight for something temporary and that is fated to pass away, mistaking it for the end all and be all.

Thus all conservatives, by definition, are cuckservatives and sissies. The name is a nice zinger, but it doesn’t do much in of itself other than feed the delusion of those who use it to signify that they are different, that they are the “real” conservatives who will uphold the “conservative values“. Mind you that with the United States we do have a special case, namely that it was built entirely on the ideas of the founding fathers, which from the get go do not reflect the values that we Fascists uphold. Defending them is no better than defending the Soviet values, which likewise came about from man-made ideas. It’s simply a choice between a liberal republic and a state socialist republic. And still both concepts decayed over time into merely formal structures, not even the original ideas remained.

Here we move on to Reactionaries. The difference between conservatives and reactionaries is purely in their stance, the former one being defensive (conserving and preserving), the latter is offensive (attempting to restore the old structure). At the end of the day, however, it is a thin line and one could say that reactionaries are at the very least admirable for being more pro-active, yet it is still a fight for an empty husk – not reanimating the corpse, just trying to rebuild it from  the rot it decayed into. To give an example of actual reactionaries you can once again look to USSR, reinforcing the point of how it is likewise a relative position with no core of its own. The old guard of the Soviet system formed the State Committee on the State of Emergency and attempted to stop Gorbachev’s reforms during the August Coup of 1991. Some people in Russia like to entertain the idea that the USSR could have lasted a while longer had the coup succeeded, but it’s decay and collapse were inevitable, because likewise the spirit and ideas that built it in the first place were no longer present in the political elite that was simply engaged in basic politics.

Reactionaries are but a braver kind of conservative, someone who is willing to take real action to retake the husk, but again, they place the value into something that itself only gained value from elsewhere, from the essence that had built it in the first place and without it, it is surely doomed. Reactionaries may even use violent means but their fight is nevertheless destined to fail, which was best explained by the Russian thinker Nikolay Vasilyevich Ustryalov, who likewise wrote on the difference of form and essence: “Violence cannot save a dying idea, but it can provide immeasurable help to the rising idea.“

And the rising idea always comes in the form of Revolution, regardless of the means for it’s rise, but again, violence can provide it immeasurable help. Whilst man-made ideas are by their nature lies, figments of the imagination, as opposed to the Natural Order and Truth that we as Fascists and National-Socialists uphold, they still have power to them and have a certain spirit which can sway masses of people and the course of history.

Thus Revolutions are inhabited by something living, they have some essence to them (the Truth or Idea), when talking about real revolutions that is, like the March on Rome which was a revolution through a show of force, or Hitler’s rise to power which was a revolution made through entry and reform. Even the Russian October Revolution, which was a violent, living revolution (as opposed to the February Revolution of decay or the events of Black October). We’re not talking here about “revolutions” that are orchestrated by (geo)political interests or which happen as a slow decay, like the Social Justice Warrior degeneracy we see today. Revolutions are always passionate, they breathe fire, fire that destroys and creates, regardless of what it is that it creates. SJW and modern liberal/democratic change is more akin to a parasite or growing rot than a fire-breathing dragon.

Revolutions are always aimed at the decaying husk, they burn away the husk and create space for something new, which can be either good or bad but it is nevertheless full of life rather than decay and death. You can’t compare modern commies and SJW’s to the original communist revolutionaries, the latter would probably kill the former had they ever met. But the original communist is long since dead, and he was a worthy foe, unlike the scum we face today which don’t deserve the title of enemy – you can respect an enemy for his dedication to his beliefs and readiness to die for them, even if he is dead wrong. SJW/PC/Feminist/etc scum are just parasites that can be easily crushed underfoot, they don’t wish to die because what they fight for is comfort and pleasure which cannot be enjoyed while dead – they’re merely pawns to our real enemies who profit from the decay they create.

What’s more important, however, is that real Revolutions are all about essence, they will destroy any form that stands in the way of the victory for their essence, whatever form doesn’t oppose them will be infused with the victorious essence, though essence of ideas will always be at odds with the essence of Truth. And here comes into play the difference between Ideas and Truth. Ideas are lies of the imagination, man-made concepts of how the world should be. The Truth is how the world actually is. Ideas can substitute one another, rather reflective of Marx’s view of how history is a continuous cycle of revolutions, which in turn takes cues from the concept of cycles of rise and fall in societies that we spoke of earlier. Thus the essence of an idea is temporary, though they may reoccur over time. The Truth, however, is eternal, it is always one and the same. Forms may come and go, regardless of the essence that lives and fades in them, but the Truth remains the same. Thus our struggle is an eternal one.

We don’t fight for forms, and that is our primary difference from the conservatives and reactionaries. We do not fight for mere ideas, even if they are revolutionary. We fight for the Truth. It is eternal but forms are not and so the Truth may fade from a given form and a revolution becomes necessary to bring back the essence of Truth. Which is what puts us at odds with conservatives and reactionaries – they protect a decaying husk, they protect something dead and lifeless. They defend the product of essence, whereas we fight for restoring essence itself even if its old form must be destroyed. What puts us at opposition with revolutions of Ideas is that they are lies. We have no allies in conservatives and reactionaries, or revolutionaries who do not share our loyalty to the Truth.

Let’s clear up something else, however, before we draw this to a close. Namely the confusion around the title of Conservative Revolutionaries, which is essentially just a clumsy way of explaining a Revolutionary struggle for essence, as it is again confused with the form. It was probably the first attempt made to articulate this direction in some categorical terms and thus a rather clumsy title was formed, driven by the desire so signify that this is a living, revolutionary force that wants to defend that, which made the old form great, back when it used to be infused with essence. At the end of the day, however, it is the same force as us Fascists and National-Socialists, though it was more concerned with self-analysis than action. I’m adding this part to make it perfectly clear to people who would use this title to differentiate themselves from “those bad fascists and nazis” that you won’t fool anyone but yourselves – we fascists know what it actually is and our enemy can smell that it is something related to us. It is not some other “third position“.

Using these terms to differentiate from Fascism and National-Socialism is futile, just as futile as it is to attempt to differentiate between “real” conservatives and “cuckservatives” – the former a delusion indulged in an attempt to protect oneself from the enemy’s criticism, the latter a delusion indulged in an attempt to protect oneself from admitting that he stands for something that is doomed to fail and fall. And this is why Fascism always was and forever will be a Revolutionary force – it fears not the destruction of forms, of what exists purely on paper fading away. So long as there is essence it can make manifest new forms, ones infused with living spirit, appropriate for a new time and a new place. That is our struggle, to carry on the Flame of Truth, from one torch to another, while the conservatives fawn over burnt wood that the Flame had already departed from.

There are no conservative or reactionary principles, they have none. We carry the principles, they obsess with the byproduct. The only driving “principle” behind these notions is that of the walking dead – to keep something lifeless from collapsing.

Few things disgust me more than defeatism. It is the combination of cowardice, laziness and egotism, where the impotent think that their worthless self deprecating thoughts have any value to them.

Throughout all recorded human history and applied universally without exception, defeatism during times of war was a crime punishable by incarceration at the very least. While those who claim to be vanguards for liberty and free speech may decry this, their outrage has no foundation. When the nation is under threat every muscle fiber is strained and reserve of energy expended to claim victory and avoid defeat.

Some will feign moralism “oh it is moral because the war is wrong and it will save lives!” Preaching defeat saves nothing. The men will die all the same simply abandoned by their people, left alone in the fields of battle with their last thoughts of futility and betrayal.

The wounds will last long after the war. Unlike the temporary pain of a honorable defeat, the spiritual energy of the nation will be sapped greatly by such a moral collapse. Only with Faith in itself can a nation rebuild – never without it. The Triumph of the Will makes anything possible for a people with faith in itself and it’s leader!

The most despicable thing about such an attitude is that it comes exclusively from people with our views. They see the hell around them, acknowledge it is hell and then proceed to give up without a fight! They will decry the damage done as irreparable and irreversible. They will bemoan the crimes against us and then proceed to remain silent! “Oh Germany is doomed, Europe is doomed… It’s all over!” they’ll say in a youtube comment section.

They will cry that “no one is doing anything!” and then proceed to do nothing themselves. A useless, hypocritical nihilism more scornful than the traitors because at least the traitors “think” that they are correct and fight to that end.

We do not call for weak sympathizers, we call for fighters, those who die if final victory demands it! Those who will give their wealth, labor, food , clothes, blood and very lives to our brothers and sisters in need. Those willing to risk imprisonment and possible death in service of the cause.

The excuses will flow. “I have a job  I don’t want to lose , I have a family that relies on me, it’s just not convenient for me right now to express my views.” None of these are adequate because if you do not act in order to make your family’s life comfortable now you will doom your children and grandchildren to hell. Every day you hold back from the fight is one more day your descendants will have to fight 10 fold as hard for your cowardice.

If that is what you truly feel and you believe it’s the truth, if you love your people, then you will keep your nihilist mouth shut and not spread your fatal virus to anyone else! We must be willing to go to Hell to ensure our children live in Heaven!

It is said that if everyone with our sympathies rose up today it’d be enough to overthrow the rotten international clique that rules over us. This is true. But it is also no reason to despair that it hasn’t happened yet. The faithful of our cause will commit to action, not just words, in order to enlighten and uplift our people  and liberate them from their chains. For we have seen the light outside the modern day Plato’s cave – the cafe – and we will not return no matter the ridicule and violence.

No one man can do everything. But everyone can do something to help the cause, whether it’s speaking out, activism, charity or confrontation.

Mass movements with a cause never just spring up from under the ground, they are molded and directed by an elite or a singular being, who embody the spiritual consciousness of the masses and have the personal courage to give all of themselves to it’s victory. But none of those beings would have been able to accomplish anything if the masses did not volunteer their labor and will to the great causes of history.

Article by Aquila

Around every election season, a significant portion of American White Nationalists and their Alt-Fright faileocon interlopers seem to forget everything they have claimed to learn about presenting a clean ideological and strategic break from failed conservatism, and crawl slobbering back to their favorite Republican candidate of choice. By doing so, this self-declared vanguard displays its own ignorance as to what a functioning vanguard actually is and how they are oblivious to what this approach signals to the public they are trying to reach. More importantly, they show their own cowardice towards the necessary act of stepping outside their own nostalgic, sentimental comfort zone, ensuring this behavior and accompanying nonperformance is bound to continue.

The desperate embrace of Donald Trump possibly trumps the previous desperate embrace of the Tea Party by patriotard conservative WNs in terms of comedic value and cowardice. All the support for him’s just desperation for there to be an easy quick solution and to rationalize political non-involvement.

This speaks volumes to White Nationalism lacking any unified, coherent set of principles and accompanying ideological worldview, existing simply as a vague sentiment to be co-opted and misdirected. This season, we are honored with Donald Trump being the object of their unrequited affections, rank and file WNs being hilariously oblivious to the fact that Donnie would have absolutely no problem Ruby Ridging these people’s families on behalf of his Jewish friends.

Then again, what should we expect from people who cheer on Ann Coulter as she barely scratches the surface of the reality of the jewish problem by complete accident, and then immediately backpedals like crazy? What should we expect from people who fail to see the implications there? A turnstile of conservative cowardice and unrelenting fuckups, with cuckservative-in-denial, Dickie Spencer, leading the charge.

Donald Trump functions as a jewish measuring stick for emerging racial consciousness – the objective is for him to act as a relief valve and to keep all related discourse within a semitically-correct, patriotard frame, preventing it from reaching a point of explicit racial consciousness and organization. By getting the GOP nomination, he makes the system look more open than it really is, keeping an emerging, explicitly racial segment of the population on the GOP plantation, effectively assimilating them into that wide base where they can have no power and nullifying them as any oppositional entity. In the event he was ever to go third party, he ensures valuable resources, time, and money are misdirected from building any viable fascist vanguard. Semitically-correct frame applies across the board in both scenarios.

In the off chance that Trump wins the presidency and the wall gets built, that does absolutely jackshit to get rid of all the non-whites here, does nothing to lower their birthrates, does nothing to raise white birth rates, does nothing to repeal gunpoint-enforced integration, does nothing to stop niggers from raping and killing everything in sight, does nothing to eliminate the Jewish problem or change the accompanying power structure that’s pitted against us. It’s a symbolic victory that will simply render an increasingly disillusioned, angry segment of the population complacent all over again, knocking us all back to square one. It simply delays the point we reach minority status by a couple of years while reversing all of our efforts of radicalizing the public.

Meanwhile, The Donald will be in place to lecture the public on the virtues of hardworking legal nonwhite immigrants, why jews are the best thing ever, and the evils of racism, conditioning the public accordingly. Donald’s audience isn’t developing their views as a result of Trump, those views were already in place; they already had them, just as Donnie’s in place to keep them from going further and radicalizing. He feeds them, gives them validation at their current point, and makes them feel secure. Hell, a Trump victory could very well be the thing that kills us.

Given statements made by Trump and his son, he still wants mexcrement flowing into the JewSA, just as long as its through his claimed beaner wall he’s probably lying about and integrated into the tax system. This is also assuming the wall even gets built. It’s not like a billionaire mogul filled to the brim with jews has ever lied before, right?

A Trump victory will simply serve the purpose of making a jew-rigged system look open to a segment of the population reaching racial consciousness without ever implementing any of their goals. This will keep them loyal to the GOP under the impression they can take it over, it will keep them from radicalizing. If Trump loses, he will lose fairly and the system will still look open, despite some superficial, ineffective attempts to shut him out that were designed to make him look like legitimate opposition. His audience will then remain in place waiting for the next populist cohenservitve candidate to come along and blow smoke up their asses instead of going full vanguard.

Yet all these goddamn fucking tools are fawning over the guy “oh buh buh buh we can play off him” yeah no shit by FUCKING ATTACKING HIM AS A HOSTILE INTERLOPER and splitting off a 10–20 percent chunk of his audience, radicalizing them, not hopelessly fellating him over his every word, which drives away his audience from our ethnonationalist stances and reinforces their current misconceptions. Pulling discourse and action in our direction requires attacking everything and everyone that doesn’t pass a litmus test, actively asserting talking points around a consistent set of standards and drawing distinctions, acting as our own unit of authority; not ceding ground and pandering to and reinforcing current views and policies that are wrong. These retards, moved entirely by dopey conservative sentiment and nostalgia don’t stop for a second to think what they’re signaling and reinforcing to their audience by voicing support for Trump. At the end of the day, they wish to cling to their sentimental attachments and personalities rather than actually owning the vanguard stance they superficially purport to.

Even funnier are the alt-right gaywads claiming he’s somehow secretly on our side. If he was on our side, he’d be naming the jew and concerned with radicalizing his supporters in an explicitly racial direction, not with adopting enemy talking points (and reinforcing those talking points to the public) for the purpose of winning a single, largely symbolic, presidential office which would do nothing to improve our ethno-racial situation and would make an emerging racially conscious segment of the population complacent all over again, keeping them on the JewOP plantation where they can have no power. If you think billionaire Donnie isn’t some sort of JewOP insider, you’re a cuckservative.

His alt-fright fanbase uses his statements to the republican jewish coalition and his statements made in his interview with jewtool Alex Jones that he’s somehow secretly on our side. The statements made to the coalition are just him blowing smoke, the claimed anti-jewish nature of his statements is by implication, likely the result of reading too deep into them spurred on by wishful thinking. Yeah never mind he has jews active in all levels of his campaign going up to the very top, has more jewish connections than any other candidate, holds their line on Iran and other foreign policy areas, and has been taking their money for decades. If the jews thought Trump was any threat, they would have deep sixed his business empire long ago. Jews play all sides, Trump inclusive, ensuring that no matter the outcome and related cosmetic differences, their objectives are fulfilled. His statements made to Alex Jones regarding an unnamed country funding ISIS were of a similar nature – he never actually named the jew or the country. He’s just tossing a bone to the conspiracy crowd to obtain their support without actually committing to anything controversial or semitically incorrect. And as usual, his alt-right fanbase reads too deeply into his statements as “proof” he’s somehow on their side so they don’t have to do anything or assume any personal risk beyond pulling a level at the voting booth and jerking off to anime. Voting for Trump is their way of rationalizing the fact they do absolutely nothing, their way of justifying staying with their zero risk personal comfort zone.

Both the main parties are closed out too, so vanguard party approach is required. You can’t somehow sneak someone non-kosher into the very top of the System. The idea that he’s somehow *not* a JewOP insider is laughable, people are taking the whole scripted entertainment too seriously at face value. Trump’s a relief valve, nothing more. Thinking we’re running an angle on the jews with him is just the jews running an angle on us.

As the twitter account Young White Family put it, WNs are desperate for SOMEONE ELSE to wipe their ass and do all their work for them, and they can’t see why whites trusting the government again as a result of a Trump victory is a bad thing. That “WNs who know better will still push Trump “to gain ground” b/c they want to pretend it’s not a script to get Whites to be pro-gov’t again.” This is like the same shit WNs were doing when they were clamoring for Romney to win because “ANYONE BUT OBAMA I DON’T WANT DAT GOT DAMMNED BLACK BLOODED TOWEL NIGGER IN DUH WHAYT HOUSE RUININ’ MUH MURIKA”.

That nigger in the white house was the single best recruiting tool we’ve ever had and these fags were all whining about it like it’s the worst thing to ever happen.

If you support Donald Trump, you’re a cuckservative. This struggle requires and will be won by fanatics, not by reactionary, nostalgic cowards pining for the reform of a hostile system. This struggle is entirely winnable, but requires a much higher level of dedication and personal risk than simply laying in bed and dreaming of Trump, which is the equivalent of retards claiming that Putin “is the savior of the white race”. Draw very clear distinctions between us Fascists and failed conservatism of all variants, Trump and Coulter inclusive. Attack relentlessly around those, start radicalizing their supporters by doing so.

In response to fallout over the latest Spencerfest, I can’t say I’m surprised regarding the “content” of the National Policy Institute conference; this is Dickie Spencer after all. I guess he got bored of arrogantly parachuting in to lecture the Hungarians on how to be Hungarian and is back to his usual routine of buzzword-laden, content-devoid TED Talk nationalism and promoting repellent weirdos.

Spencer, as per his ingrained faileoconservative sentimentality, is a weak, pandering, fence-sitting coward who tries to play all sides of key issues while maintaining plausible deniability when held to any stance or standard, kinda like Grindr Greggie and the Alt-Gay Mafia in that regard, but wider in the scope of his offenses and more stupid. Spencer brings absolutely nothing to the table beyond repackaging the same old conservative/mainstreaming approach that’s been argued, tried, and refuted a million times already, pretending he’s doing something “new” and “different”, while busing in homosexual freaks and jew-appeasing cowards. Dickie blacklisting Matthew Heimbach for rightfully opposing homosexuality and allegedly supporting violence – like Dopey McGodboy is any threat to anything or anyone as he’s laying 6 million wreaths of white Christian guilt on the graves of dead niggers – was also particularly funny.

When not cucking for Trump, vouching for disgusting fags and attempting to silence all criticism on that matter, Dickie will go out of his way to exculpate jews from blame and argue for their inclusion, while throwing the occasional, vaguest insinuation in the other direction to retain the loyalty and cashflows of some of his other supporters. Weak, pretentious, and stupid. It seems that Dickie “please don’t quote paranoia” lil Dick Spencer was finally able to the muster the minimal amount of courage required at this latest conference to state that jews “aren’t us”, barely addressing the scope of the jewish problem and why it matters. Dickie, with all his prissy concern over the media calling him names, doesn’t need the media to look bad. He makes himself look worse than they ever could with his cowardly backtracking right in front of them like the stupid, simpering idiot he is. Whatever one may think of them, the cartoon klansmen that NPI’s branded as no matter what they do at least have the balls to stand by their convictions. Look, mom! I’m a thought criminal!

Spencer’s previous inclusion of alibi jews to avoid being called mean names by their media and continued hesitance when forced to discuss the subject bring his most recent declaration into question. With no public disavowal of his past stances and actions, and with the inclusion of Jew appeasers like Guillaume Faye, his audience is sent an unclear, confusing message to internalize regarding the role of Jews. This sets them up to be co-opted by Jewry and ultimately is the result of Dickie’s cowardice and continued prissiness when it comes to “difficult” subject matter. At the end of the day, Dickie’s more concerned about maintaining his appearance and not being even vaguely affiliated with anything remotely “fascist” than he is with the truth and leading people in the direction they need to go. For that reason alone, he’s a despicable coward and a weakling. One is left wondering where his continual, subservient fawning over jew, Paul Gottfreid, and pathetic adoration of various other jews like (((Rothbard))) and Mises fits in here, and what conclusions his audience draws from that.

It’s hilarious how alt-right postures as some radical alternative while pussing out on things like naming the Jew, attacking the holohoax, making a clean and explicit break from conservatism, and adopting anything even vaguely resembling a vanguard strategy. They just sit around and play girly little parlor word games – buzzword-laden and pretentious enough to retain their audience’s attention and $$$ but vague enough to avoid committing to anything tangible – so they can all congratulate each other on being oh-so-clever and “above” those vulgar philistines who consistently out-compete and out-achieve them in pretty much everything. They want the image without actually owning it. Repackaged faileocons. It’s a big fashion statement for them as they all play another round of pin the evasive buzzword to the champagne glass with Sam Dickson whining about equal rights for Whites.

It’s all vague, evasive bullshit defining itself on what it’s not – yeah we’re not fascists, but we’re not conservative either – and by its own big tent design, is incapable of developing any internal consensus and corresponding goals. Self-indulgent, directionless, overanalytical bullshit put out by smart people with no balls with a serving of hobby horse bullshit needlessly thrown in. It’s a big tent structure paradoxically pitched to a very narrow niche audience – a handful of nerds whining over inconsequential bullshit and arbitrarily redefining themselves to avoid being called mean names by their enemies. As a result, they can’t agree on any concrete set of standards, making them unable to mobilize any consistent platform, and unable to defend themselves from hostiles and homosexual Fifth Columnists intent on co-opting them. Hell, they can’t even agree on who their enemies are. A prime example of this in action is the vapid jewish skank Rachel Haywire, who’s allowed to fester (and generate $$$) as a result of the alt/new right’s explicit rejection of fascist politics and insistence on liberal principles like free speech – except when they’re being attacked over Haywire. Funnier yet is how the big tent idea is used to justify the inclusion of jews, jew-appeasers, faggots, and all range of unrelated tangential subcultures while radical, fascist elements are denounced as icky extremists and “disinvited.” All while they co-opt the imagery behind fascism for the purpose of vibing out to an aesthetic and maintaining a false image of radicalism while shitting all over the ideology and related goals behind it.

In the end, it ends up functioning as the same failed, capitulating conservatism it nominally opposes, minus the real world presence and institutional power. Forever on the defense; forever trying to justify itself in accord to liberal/jewish precedents; forever prefacing itself with faggy disclaimers; forever pandering to people’s existing viewpoints and getting co-opted; forever ceding ground; forever splitting hairs over irrelevant minutiae and boring everyone to fucking tears with needlessly esoteric wordplay in an attempt to make itself look profound and relevant when it has no reason to be.

The usage of the term “identitarian” as a self-descriptor is another perfect example of this chickenshit mentality in action. The term is vague and flexible enough to mean anything, to offer plausible deniability whenever called a mean name. I D E N T I D Y. Yeah well wtf’s that? Who’s identity? Who’s excluded? What clear reference points and course of action is the term establishing beside directionless, self-serving obfuscation. The original Generation Identity primer by Markus Willinger was already cringeworthy enough, going out of its way to explicitly condemn and downplay the nationalist focus on race and ethnicity in favor of I D E N T I D Y, going out of its way to condemn Germany’s National Socialists and Fascism as whole as “extremism.” These happen to be the only forces who were historically capable of resisting the Jewish-led onslaught of liberalism whom the alt-right routinely caterwauls about while marinating in a level of angst reminiscent of some fat emo bitch’s livejournal. It’s only fitting these cowards would want to emulate Generation Identity. The concept of the “Overton window” is a frequent defense used by the alt right to justify their approach.

However as correctly pointed out by Alex Linder “The alt-right shit has absolutely nothing to do with our cause, it merely sucks potential supporters away from it. Overton window is wrong. It’s a zero-sum game.”

Acting in terms of the Overton window is just ceding immense ground while pretending you’re moving things in the direction you want. At the end of the day, it’s a theoretical model that nerds use to sound superficially smart while rationalizing their inability to hold a concrete, clear, consistent stance of anything. It’s a model, not an immutable law of nature. The idea that we need to gradually convince people to the point of radicalization overplays the degree to which people actually think, and ignores the fact that there’s no such thing as “gradual radicalization”. They side with whatever puts food on the table and with what they think the neighbors are doing. What people “think” they want at this immediate current point in time doesn’t really matter. People don’t think, they respond to authority, which requires acting as our own unit of authority. Stemming from that, to a large degree all politics is local. Which requires building up local, PHYSICAL on the ground units to serve a variety of community interests as well as actively challenging for power. See Golden Dawn. How did they do it? Providing community services tailored to their specific localities. Providing recreational meetups. Providing security escorts in dangerous neighborhoods. Providing food drives, medical supplies and other charity services. Staging public demos, leafeletting, and all the usual IRL promo activities. Maintaining an unwavering, unphased image of confidence and consistency while beating the living shit out of immigrant invaders and anything standing in their way. Basically acting as a state within a state and doing the exact opposite of everything the alt right claims is necessary. All while fielding candidates, who started out getting fractions of %’s of votes. But, that signaled a serious intent to actually challenge for power. They’re now the third biggest party, and because their support’s coming largely from the police and military going up to the highest levels, they can’t be shut down because they can leverage a credible threat of violence against the state if it breaks its own rules. They’re basically running the whole show now to where both the left and the right are trying to co-opt their support, and failing. What they didn’t do – publicly support figures that were hostile to their interests or sell out out of some mistaken notion of expediency. They lumped EVERYTHING that wasn’t them in with the System, populist conservatives included, and attacked it as a whole, capitalizing off the growing disenfranchisement of their voter base. A large segment of the population’s already disillusioned, voter non-participation’s on its way up. There’s an opening, if it’s acted on and taken advantage of by an unapologetically fascist vanguard. Let’s look at some numbers – when William Johnson half-assedly ran for congress in MI on nothing more than lazy robocolls, he got 0.9% of the vote in his district. Think that’s like 3,000 or so people already willing to ditch the two party system under an openly racial line. That’s a small segment of the larger population in that frame of mind. Now if ~10% of those local 3,000 were actively coordinated into an ideologically and politically relevant unit , you know where that could snowball? Going from that, what would those numbers look like decade or two down the line as conditions get worse?

The A3P wasn’t that unit, as it never sought to fully differentiate itself from failed conservatism, and increasingly tried to copy it. No one wants a shitty knockoff version of an already failing product. Its membership numbers tanked accordingly. The same applies to the alt right as it’s just another incoherent rehash of conservatism for repulsive degenerates who want to play Nietzschean crossword.

The success of Greece’s Golden Dawn, Hungary’s Jobbik, the prior organizational success of the US’s National Alliance is a direct refutation to everything these people claim, and puts them to shame. They are pandering cowards trying to rationalize their cowardice, they want the radical image without actually owning it in any capacity. All these design flaws are why all this shit will never make it past the blogosphere and occasional self-important dinner parties into any concrete organization/movement. Oh, but here’s an inspirational game of thrones reference. Dude, I’m like fuckn Voltaire or somethin.

As for Guillaume Faye’s claims on holocaust revisionism being ineffective and unnecessary, that’s demonstrably false, as several prominent figures came into racial politics via learning the truth about the holohoax and the jewish problem – which remain our primary institutional obstacles. The holohoax, in particular, is the enemy’s primary propaganda point to keep the public away from any Ethno Nationalist stance; we have the tools to counter and disprove it, exposing the enemy for what they are and further harming public sympathy for their antics, which is already tanking. The holohoax happens to be both the enemy’s strongest point of psychologically disarming whites, and their weakest point of defense. Disproving it and pointing out how the jewish control of the media allows such a lie to be institutionalized quickly opens the door for people to understand the rest of the jewish problem. When they see the extent they’ve been LIED to and EXTORTED, any sympathy towards the jews goes right out the window, being replaced by righteous contempt and distrust, opening the door for public examination of other areas of the Jewish problem. Revisionism is our greatest tool for tackling the jewish problem; sacrificing truth out of some misplaced notion of expediency is a hallmark of corruption and cowardice, only making our work harder.

Avoiding crucial material out of fear of negative framing, that will happen regardless, and has already happened simply giving the enemy power, resulting in ceded ground. If we lure people in under false pretenses and insinuations couched in plausible deniability in hopes of later radicalizing them, that just creates a risk for a hostile takeover the second the envelope is pushed too far; it creates an ideological prison, pandering to and reinforcing their current misconceptions, drives them away from the direction they need to go, and prevents them from perceiving and defending against external threats. No way out but through the jew and it’s depraved existential playground, America. The basic mechanics of media control and the holohoax can be easily understood in an hour by pretty much anyone, and is absolutely necessary introductory material. This isn’t graduate level course work, so it isn’t complexity that holds the audience back from these points, as various alt right figures sometimes claim in regard to revisionism. It’s fear of punishment from authority figures that holds them back. This requires us to champion these points and act as our own unit of authority instead of beating around the bush – which frames the subject as dirty and shameful – undermining morale and reinforcing cowardice in our audience, further making the audience even more reluctant to approach it, as well as appearing fundamentally dishonest, like we’re trying to slip poison into the food. Avoiding this subject out of fear it will alienate the audience, pandering to their misconceptions and giving that power. This isn’t a complicated subject. Snapping that the audience already knows about the jewish problem, as Dickie did when Mike Enoch briefly mentioned the subject, is a cowardly lie, especially when the alt right goes to great lengths to redirect from all aspects of the jewish problem whenever it is brought up, all out of concern of how it’ll make them look to a hostile media that hates them anyway and brands them as klansmen and dressup Nazis regardless of what they do. The inclusion of Kevin MacDonald on the panel at the recent NPI event was an attempt to retain credibility in the eyes of more radical elements and related revenue streams, an attempt to maintain plausible deniability when accused of going soft on the jewish problem. KMac’s content was devoted entirely to a fantastical “pathological altruism” with not a single word mentioned in regard to his previous primary area of focus.

As fascists, we’re responsible for setting parameters of ethnonationalism manifestations to come. This requires delineating “us” and “not us.” A jew of any kind will never be us, and will always be an alien entity both in terms of biological composition and cultural function/identity. “European Jews” may physically look closer to us due to admixture, and can outwardly mimic our cultural expressions/forms, but, internally, will still be hyper-aware of their jewish status with accompanying motives, cloaked actions, internal ruminations/content, etc. They will always act in accord with their ingroup interests at our expense. Codewords do not cover that, and leave too many loopholes, and for that reason, the jew needs to be named, excluded, and attacked as a whole. Anything that does not address this crucial aspect of ethnonationalism in full will be co-opted by jews and taken out. Initial task for Ethno Nationalists: branding the “we”, from which jews must be identified as a cohesive biological entity and unilaterally excluded. Part of the exclusion requires instilling a very clear sense in members who the “we” is, otherwise, you end up with jews getting caught in the mix and causing their usual problems, thus necessitating regular attacks on the jew. Anything that fails this will be infiltrated and co-opted by them, secessionist breakaways included. The same applies to fags, and the alt right is living proof as to why they must be treated exactly the same as jews, as their function is identical. Just like jews, fags infiltrate rising movements, form their own internal power blocs and start jockeying for positions of power and influence to ensure their interests are carried out within a new context.

The problems with Faye and Donovan should be obvious, and it speaks to White Nationalism’s lack of principles and coherent direction that aside from being rightfully attacked by Carolyn Yeager, this garbage is going on relatively unopposed, with no organized response. Spencer should be attacked until he picks a side, his conferences boycotted until he stops bringing in homos and outright enemies as shining examples for us to follow. Meanwhile, the resulting Zionist and faggot influx from the alt right needs to be spat on and shown the door in no uncertain terms. Their attempt to run with and dredge ethnonationalism with their reactionary, cowardly conservative bullshit cannot go ignored. All such efforts, when spotted, will be immediately and publicly kicked to the curb by us.

New terminologies have started to arise within the “right wing“, and by that, I am referring to terms like “alt-rightism” and “New right“. What needs to be understood about this, is that the realms of “new right“, is rather metapolitical, but with a severe lack of substance.

Now, I am not gonna denounce the “alt-right” and the “New Rightists” as being completely useless, but they are not as useful as they themselves would like to believe. To elaborate upon this sentiment, one must look into what the New Right as a whole do: Deconstruction.

Deconstructing the egalitarian world-dogma is naturally a good strategy, if one is trying to re-construct something, however, this is where the problem comes: the abstraction found within the alt-right. They lack what can only be described as “Mesapolitics“. In other words, they lack coherence, and a clear line of direction, for what they want to obtain. What needs to be included here, to give a minimal amount of credit, is the way that the alternative right can recruit new members, informing them of our people’s miserable situation, to later be spiritually strengthened to finally grab the steel, and get active on the spiritual battle-field.

When the aspect of mesapolitical understanding is brought up, one must ask, to the deepest, and most fundamental parts of ones essence: Do I wish to defend the very soil, that my forefathers for thousands of years have plowed, and cultivated? Do I wish to adhere to the deepest parts of masculine spirit, adhere to the ancient European barbarism, that still burns like glowing iron within our blood, from which comes our resilient will to resist and crush the enemies of our peoples. What I am implying with this, is the needed will for action, rather than academic verbal masturbation.

Moving on to why the alt-right is useless to build anything of great significance. Alone, the alt-right is not capable of making anything stable, due to the simple fact, that the alt-right is abstract. It doesn’t have a consistent way of defining, what it as a whole desires. It is a mix of MRA egalitarians, people further right from the republican party, ethno-monarchists, white nationalist tribal-haters, fascio-capitalists, “race realists” and “racist” liberatarians. With such a mixture of individuals, with mixed notions, without any sort of strength, consistency and dedication, it is next to impossible to create any sort of political platform, to manifest resistance to the current cowardly and disgusting system.

Now with that out of the way, the alt-right boils into a diarrhea-like substance, without consistency, or direction. If an attempt was tried, to create a final product from the metapolitical diarrhea of the alt-right, the end product would end up as an “appeasement” product, that would lose any vague sense of direction they had to begin with, in its strive towards popularity, in other words, it would end up as one of Nick Griffin’s fuck-waste projects.

For the alt-right to serve its purpose, it must give room for the more ideologically radical notions, within the realms of what is reality: National-Socialism.

With my reference for the desire of popularity comes naturally the talk of inclusiveness that is found within the alt-right today. They allow the worst of filth to have a platform, and thereby allowing the filth to misdirect youngsters with an interest in an alternative to liberal, socialist, neo-conservative and capitalist ideas. They allow dysfunctionals to step onto the high-alter of rhetorics, people like Jack Donovan, James O’meara and Buttercup “My Nationalist pony” Dew, TRDante and Millennium Woes on their platform.

Imagine White Pride rhetorics with HIV, this is what the alt-right has degenerated into. So, to get to the core, the alt-right needs to deal with its spiritual disease, and realise its purpose: It is a gateway ideology into something stronger.

#EnoughWithTheSilence. The “correct” Muslims are launching a campaign under this name with a simple message of “Islam =/= Terrorism” or even “Terrorism has no religion“. Which is of course nothing new as that message gets hammered in by mainstream media almost immediately after any Muslim terrorist attack in order to protect the System’s assets, that is to say it’s lemmings. This argument is brought up every single time, but it’s a lemming appeal to other lemmings. As Commander Rockwell once said, between the Nazis and the Communists, the fanatics, there is a sea of non-fanatics, the TV-watchers and the comic book readers – the lemmings. The same thing applies to other fields.

Most modern Christians are foremost lemmings of the System and subscribe to its “values” that are entirely centered on the provision of security and pleasure so long as you play by the System’s rules. Thus your average Christian, who is not really all that versed in his own religion, and even those who know the religious texts very rarely understand their actual message, begin to bend the rules of their faith until it fits the narrative of the lemming. “God loves everyone so you can love faggots“. This is essentially proof that the majority of modern “christians” are not truly Christian, they are foremost loyal to their desires of security and pleasure and thus are willing to compromise on their faith that becomes more so a tool to reaffirm that their lemming life is the correct way, the good and moral way – go along to get along. In reality they are Christians in name alone by the simple force of inertia – they were born into it, much like one is born into a certain culture, and we clearly see today how little value lemmings place in culture and thus regard it as a mere background to their life. Christianity has suffered the same fate and is now upheld in any meaningful sense only by radicals who are shunned by the System and its drones for it.. A lemming is only loyal to his materialistic desires and needs and thus will be loyal to the System that provides those things for him.

However the same applies to Muslims, they have lemmings all the same who will be ready to rationalize Islam to a point that would be reconcilable with life in a Western liberal society. These people likewise seek merely security and comfort, the only real difference is that coming predominantly from the Third World they have a very basic manifestation of those needs, they want that which in the West today is taken largely for granted as the Western lemming is no longer satisfied with material safety and seeks emotional safety as well as the next logical step – “your rights end where my feelings begin” (enter “first world problems“). Likewise arises a need for more “extravagant” forms of pleasure which manifests in degeneracy.

So the Western lemming is one that is born into a secure society that promises him pleasure and he builds up a sense of entitlement to more than what he already has, whereas the Third World lemming wants the very basic version of security and comfort. Thus it is no wonder that the Third World lemming is attempting to get into First World countries where such things are already assured and, moreover, where the liberal values and System interests openly invite refugees and in fact offers them more benefits than it would offer its own people. What lemming would say no to that?

Yes, yes, there are in fact calm and nonviolent Muslims, the kind that liberals advertise as the ONLY kind of real Muslims in existence, the happy, calm Muslim “poster family” that will compromise Islam in the face of the liberal narrative in order to reap the benefits of society they live in and they will indeed go along to get along, they will teach their children to be grateful for what they have in a First World country and not to rock the boat in the least. But there are other types of Muslims. It is unavoidable that second generation Muslims born in Western societies will be socialized within the liberal narrative, the one that breeds entitlement and talks about oppression, and these Muslims will be taken in by that kind of education and they will take to heart what they are taught, especially about Islam, how it is good and can do no wrong, how it is constantly oppressed and marginalized and stereotyped and they will learn to be good, angry, entitled identity politics Muslims. They will become a kind of Muslim “radical” but only in the same sense of the word as there are feminist “radicals”.

There will always be, however, the real radicals, the true fanatics that exist outside the sea of lemmings, who will adhere to their faith as the central most important axis of their lives and they will promote its enforcement and be openly, truly radical about it in Western societies. They seek to change the West from within, as opposed to the ISIS kind of radicals that seek to change it by forceful means. Only the very last get branded as the “incorrect” Muslims, but this judgement is being passed down by lemmings. Imagine hearing some snotty white lemming kid tell a Nazi “you’re not a real white man, a real white man is kind and accepting and would never resolve to violence“. Of course you’ll never hear it since the dominant narrative is how the privileged cishet white male is the source of all evil in the world since the beginning of time, but if you were to hear such an argument you wouldn’t be able to restrain yourself from laughing. This is the exact same kind of judgement being passed on the “incorrect” Muslims, who actually place their faith above all else, by the lemming Muslims who readily compromise their faith for security and comfort. Thus, barring discussions in differences of the many denominations of Islam, a question arises: who’s the real Muslim here?

Adam Curtis, a British documentary filmmaker, created several very interesting documentaries and one of them deals in part with the history of the modern Islamist movement: The Power of Nightmares (2004). In this documentary we are taken back to the origins of modern Islamist movement’s narrative of opposition to the Western society (American in particular) as a society of vices and corruption that may poison the minds of the good Muslim people. In essence it is the same degeneracy that we, Nazis and Fascists, oppose as well, and seek to eradicate as cancer from the body of the Nation, whilst in the Islamist narrative they wish to destroy the source of possible corruption of their own people and Faith by whatever means. We wish to rescue our nations from the cancer, they wish to destroy our nations to prevent the cancer from spreading over to them. They call this cancer “Jahiliyyah” – “a state of barbarous ignorance” or “ignorance of divine guidance“. According to the Islamist narrative people affected by the Jahiliyyah can be justifiably killed even if they were Muslims, because they themselves are not aware of their own corruption. This was at first only directed at political leaders in their native countries, but later it was broadened to all people of Muslim faith. This is their comprehension of dealing with their own lemmings.

Naturally lemmings, whatever their supposed religious persuasion, are afraid and opposed to anything that will take away their material security and pleasure, so to them indeed “Terrorism has no religion” and they see no distinction between Nazis and Islamist terrorists, and whilst I did provide a parallel in our respective narratives, the core of the issue is still in our racial and civilizational difference – Islamists think this degeneracy is by default inherent to Western societies and they will attempt to destroy us by whatever means. We want to save our civilization from degeneracy and outright destruction so we absolutely must oppose Islam’s presence in Europe. The only case being made here, is that it is the Terrorists who are the “real” Muslims, and not these lemmings concerned with their security and comfort, which is indeed put under threat by the Terrorists, because they fear the negative reaction of the society on which they are now reliant for said security and comfort. In the black rights narrative this would be called “uncle tom” behavior.

If that is not so, and they do value their Faith foremost but also wish to run away from the violence to somewhere peaceful and prosperous, then it is baffling why these refugees don’t try fleeing to Saudi Arabia or other such rich Muslim countries, where Islam is upheld and you are also provided with security and comfort. There are conflicting reports on how many refugees have actually been let into these states, but then again, Adam Curtis points out in his other documentary “Bitter Lake” (2015) that Saudi Arabia purposely directs the ire of its religious leaders and radicals outwards into the world at large in order to maintain its own internal stability, so it would make little sense for it to accept many refugees that would put a strain on its stability, and less sense to accept the radical elements that it actively attempts to send outwards. But this is a separate topic, though this small bit of information once again points to why the West ends up with all the refugees and migrants who come along with them.

Just as there is a sea of comic book readers between Nazis and Communists there is a sea of lemmings between Nazis and Islamists. We are the real radicals and fanatics, fighting for our causes, whilst the lemmings are not “real” anything other than slaves to the System. Yes there are parallels because we are fanatics, but that is where the parallels end. The conflict between us, despite the subject matter explored here in relation to lemmings, is foremost a racial one. Race War is inevitable, and in time Western lemmings will have no other choice but that of being killed or hiding behind the backs of the “big bad” Nazis.

As for the Muslim lemmings – #EnoughWithTheSilence? #DontMakeMeLaugh