Building off the recurring theme of propaganda I’ll be exploring some recurring memes and concepts being circulated within various WN spheres, with their real world, mass propaganda implications.

The White Suicide Meme aka “we’re doing it to ourselves”

The Milgram and Asch experiments show that behavior for the majority of people is derived from authority figures and peer group consensus. If we take the implications of these studies, behavior’s vertically determined (authority) and horizontally reinforced. If repeated long enough with corresponding reward/punishment, the underlying narrative becomes internalized as a norm, serving as a reference point for future behavior. Therefore, the majority of people cannot be considered autonomous agents acting with conscious intent in regard to their political views, related behavior, and the consequences thereof.

So, “White suicide” by definition cannot be true as suicide requires conscious, explicit intent of the subject, which would have to exist on a racial-level scale in every individual, implying a unified transcontinental racial consciousness that simply doesn’t exist. Blaming the masses for their own condition is erroneous and repellent as mass propaganda, as is extrapolating the self-interested treason of White elites into some race-wide D E A T H W I S H.

A common argument in favor of the suicide meme is the drop in White birthrates. Using this as proof that we’re just doing it to ourselves and solely responsible for our conditions is wrong. Claiming that the reduction of birth rates is somehow indicative of some “White suicide” ignores how norms and consequent behavior are established and transmitted. The decline in birthrates is attributable to Jewish-led and imposed feminism, consumerism, and all the other degenerate elements of liberalism, used as a justification in the political mainstream for increased immigration. Claiming that the increase in immigration is solely consequent of the fall in birth rates however :

1. ignores the underlying genocidal intent for Jewish-led and imposed mass immigration
2. implies this wouldn’t be happening if birthrates were higher, completely ignoring the power structure behind this, effectively exculpating Jews and their servile White elite traitors from blame.
3. Ignores other points in history where birthrates have tanked without a corresponding mudflood of divershitty detritus scraped from the bottom of the barrel of the third world. Such as the period between 1925-1945 in the US.
4. Ignores that the Hart-Celler act was passed on the deliberate lie that it wouldn’t significantly change the US’s racial composition Proving that the blame ultimately lies within the JewSA’s power structure that needs to be destroyed.

Building off the lie element in point 4), anti-racist political beliefs are predicated on outright lies. Jews in academia like ((((((Franz Boas)))))), and more currently ((((((Richard Lewontin)))))) And ((((((Stephen Jay Gould)))))), all radical left wing activists, are the ones pushing false theories peddling anti-racism that form the theoretical base/justification for the wider curriculum. Those are then simplified for mass consumption to assert that race is an untenable concept with the image of authority. All other dissenting views are ruthlessly repressed and censored, therefore peddling “White suicide” is blaming the masses for being lied to while letting the liar off the hook.

Another common argument in favor of the suicide meme is the deliberate lie that Scandinavia doesn’t have a politically significant Jewish population pushing for mass immigration. Which is hilarious, considering that Jew ((((((Barbara Spectre)))))) is pretty much the name and face associated with mass immigration activism over there, along with other prominent Jewish activists such as ((((((David Schwarz)))))), a writer for the Jewish-owned (((Bonnier))) Dagens Nyheter, the largest newspaper in Sweden, who was responsible for shaping much of the immigration debate in the 1960’s . This argument also willingly lies about the stranglehold Jews have over the media there, owning the largest newspaper networks and TV stations.

The suicide meme is favored by pompous prissy parlor poofs because it allows them to expend endless time and energy splitting hairs chasing after intangible abstractions, some vague transcendent inarticulable “deathwish” that we all supposedly have but somehow aren’t aware of, as they try to impress each other on who’s the most “erudite”. That’s the whole point – the “White suicide” meme isn’t meant to be solved by closing in some identifiable behavioral trait to be targeted for change on a mass scale. Further, even if that was the case, that flies in the face of basic behavioral mechanics as explained previously with norms and related behavior being vertically determined, making all efforts on that front counterproductive and worthless until after we’ve secured a position of authority.

And on a gut level, most people continue to exhibit racial instincts independent of their political beliefs and related behavior that they probably aren’t aware of. Miscegenation remains an exception rather than the norm, people still tend to naturally self-segregate in every context, and so on. I’ll also contend that targeting parts of our nature for change that are as much of benefit as they are liability isn’t the way to go. The problem isn’t these traits themselves, its their misdirection that’s consequent of the existing power structure.

The suicide meme exists ultimately as a result of cowardice and meretricious appeal, it allows its proponents to maintain a veneer of semitically correct respectability as they recoil in narcissistic fear of being associated with anything “vulgar” or “low brow” as determined established authority figures (i.e Jews), masking their cowardice as sophistication. Its a cheap plot device allowing the season of directionless parlor palaver to continue indefinitely as they chase the revenue streams and estates of rumpled old faileocon farts in their quest to unmask the identity of the “odorless, colorless gas,” the inarticulable D E A T H W I S H.

Ultimately it lets the Jews off the hook in favor of some heady ass new age bullshit. The frame it provides prescribes no clear course of action and does nothing to address the hostile power structure pitted against us, making it a propaganda liability as it will just confuse people, directing all their attention inward and away from taking action. Why, we just have to focus inward, popping in this meditative cassette tape from Arktos and changing our thoughts, maaaan. Somehow that magically creates some sort of cascade resonating throughout the masses magically bypassing all Jewish positions of power that will somehow then magically disappear! Ohm!

We can endlessly split hairs over what some obscure monarch said in 17xx about some vague intangible D E G E N E R A C Y wafting through the air and how that theoretically led to blahblahblah, or we can focus on the fact the enemy‘s already inside the gates, in power, and focus on punching the fuck out of them, actively fighting for power so we can impose our vision.

It’s certainly one thing to tell people already within our ranks to harden up, be wary of their personal weaknesses, follow a consistent set of principles, being mindful of what they can do to help out and contribute more, and to hold themselves to higher standards. Its another to extrapolate the need for that within our existing ranks as some sort of race-wide “deathwish” providing a propaganda frame to a mass audience that lets the enemy off the hook and directs them away from action.

A functionally similar meme is pathological altruism which I’m largely not gonna go into as Zeiger’s already addressed it. The meme’s just so fucking stupid on its face, I question if Kevin MacDonald sincerely believes it or is being pressured to pursue it by others so he can keep a spot at their venues. Oh yeah, and with the rate the alt fright’s going, they’ll be declaring victory when jewfag Milo Yankalottadicks writes an article on pathological altruism to exculpate his tribe from blame. I’ll just say this – pathological altruism implies a racial-level unified consciousness of well, pathological altruism, which really could be more accurately described as a vain, status-signalling competition for Mother Theresa social media points in the context of a completely jewed culture.  I mean deep down inside, on a gut level, everyone knows Niggers suck.

But, I digress.  Let’s take Kevin MacDonald’s argument at its face.  At what point in history did the White race as a whole display:

1) “Pathological altruism”

2) A unified racial consciousness required for such

When the Cromwell starved the Irish? Andersonville Prison? When the Allies firebombed Dresden? When the Vikings sold the Slavs to the Arabs? Well shit, back to the drawing board on that one, KMac.

How come this “pathological altruism” didn’t seem to be a problem until after the kikes took over? It’s the Jews, stupid, not an “odorless, colorless gas” that mystically overcame us all. ITS THE GODDAMN JEWS. Whatever prior cultural factors paved the way for them to take their hold are inconsequential at this point in time, and are secondarily to the traitorous elite who allowed them in the door and who carry their water. The Jews are here now, they’re jewing the culture and killing us. Until we rise and kill them all in response, requiring the necessary propaganda framing beforehand, we have no way of getting our societies fixed in the direction they need to go.

The White Genocide Meme

The problem with the White genocide meme isn’t the meme itself, which is accurate, its the way that it’s framed and presented. Proponents like Bob Whitaker and David Duke always frame it in appeals to liberal concepts like human rights and accusing their opponents of being the real racists or whatever. Or in BUGS case, autistically deconstructing the term racist instead of saying “yeah so?” and getting back to the point.

The whole frame and subtext there is basically affirming enemy bogus concepts and asking their permission to exist within them, implicitly seeking their approval and granting them leverage. Its an inherently powerless, defensive position affirming every concept Jews use against us, passively begging them to stop calling us names when we try to reappropriate their bullshit and just end up confusing everyone. Above all, that approach radiates weakness which is picked up on by the audience.

Alex Linder provides a better frame that can be used for the White genocide meme: counter-exterminating Jews.  The important thing is that this frame accurately describes the situation we’re facing, names the enemy in no unmistakable terms, and outlines a clear course of action without room for confusion and misdirection.  And most importantly, it remains on the offensive, retaining leverage accordingly.

Always attack, never defend.

Holocaust Meme

Smashing the holocaust myth is the one way to bypass Jewish cultural and political programming that’s consequent of their institutional and political dominance without having those positions of power ourselves while exposing Jewish power in undeniable terms so it can be countered. We further undermine their authority while asserting ourselves in the minds of the public by destroying their credibility and related moral authority, making the Jews look like the utterly ridiculous and willfully malicious liars they are. Which is something clowns like Dick Spencer and Grindr Greggie (same kike, different loan) ignore: “countless innocent Jews surely died as well, and ultimately that’s all the Holocaust needs to survive. The gas chambers, the genocidal intent, and the rest of it could be dropped, but poor little ((((((Anne Frank)))))) and many others like her would still be dead.” – Grindr “If ((((((Anne Frank)))))) died then the holocaust happened” Greggie.

Wrong.

The components of the Holocaust™ are:

1. Detached, systematic industrial slaughter through gas chambers.
2. The 6 Million™ meme.

Without 1 and 2, the Holocaust™ by definition didn’t happen. The cause and reason for death is the key here and what ultimately provides meaning to the original meme and gives it power. Without that, it doesn’t carry nearly the same emotional weight, without that weight, the meme has no power and pales in comparison to what people were originally taught, public connects the dots with everything the holohoax was used to justify and the Jew loses all moral authority, facing a justified, furious backlash that we can fuel. ((((((Anne Frank))))))’s diary being a proven forgery is just the icing on the cake, as her worthless kike of a father slandered the German doctors trying to save her life.

…therefore the holocaust happened. According to Greggie. Lol. Greggie and Kevin MacDonald, like cowards, cede ground in this fight and hand the Jew a giant victory.

With the gas chambers proven to be a hoax and the death toll reduced from 6 million to a couple hundred thousand as originally determined by the Red Cross , and those ~300,000 or so deaths proven to be the result of typhus outbreaks largely consequent of the Allies bombing supply chains, and justified executions of Jews for being violent communists organizing terrorist massacres, violent camp revolts, and so forth. People then can see the extent to which they’ve been lied to and extorted over this hoax that’s been used to guilt trip them into justifying countless wars, financial rape, and to protect kikery from facing any criticism or consequences for their own actions at the whole world’s expense.

If you need an example of the power of authority, look at all the dumb shit people actually believe on the sole virtue that some Jew said it. Like the eyewitness™ accounts found in Inside the Concentration Camps: Eyewitness Accounts of Life in Hitler’s Death Camps.

PEOPLE ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS SHIT. LITERALLY, A FUCKING HOLOCOASTER.

(((Alleged))) atrocities on the Eastern Front have become an increasing focal point to try to breathe life into the dying holohoax meme. Many of these have been pinned on the Germans by the Soviets, such as the Katyn massacre which is now widely-acknowledged to have been perpetrated by the Soviets. Other smaller (((alleged))) massacres, if proven to be done by the Germans, can be justified considering how communist partisans operate. Given the nature of partisan warfare, every person in a (((sympathetic))) village plays a role in an integrated firearms and explosives supply chain, and plays in a role in ambush attacks. Literally, kill or be killed. As Louis Ferdinand Celine explained to the Germans during their liberation of France, if they basically didn’t go door to door indiscriminately shooting every Jew dead on sight, they’d lose everything. As they had no intention of ever doing that, lose they did.

Countering the holohoax meme matters because it’s the only way we can bypass and reverse Jewish social conditioning without having their institutional power ourselves . Can’t reprogram culture and morality and related behavior without institutional and political power and control. Can’t get that without bulldozing the Kikes outta the way. Only possible way to bypass their programming is through attacking the holohoax to make such a power-grab possible.  The more people we get laughing at the holohoax, the closer we are to winning.

This article is essentially a reply to everyone who simply don’t get the point of propaganda, or at least don’t understand its point when hardline Fascists/NS use propaganda. It can likewise be viewed as a companion piece to Zeiger’s talk “This is the Plan“. The majority, being lemmings deep down, regardless of what they try to market themselves as, who eat up what they’ve been taught at libshit colleges, constantly assume that propaganda is some magic bullet to sway opinions and convert people, the key to “shifting the overton window” which likewise led to the delusional inflation of the importance of memes.

We’ll be foremost discussing the relationship between propaganda and lemmings, so we will forego discussing the use of internal propaganda, that is to say propaganda created for the consumption of your allies and movement/struggle comrades. For those who need a reminder as to what lemmings are, here is Dr. William Pierce’s explanation:

This lack of understanding on the subject of propaganda is indeed a product of liberal thinking. Libshit education centers constantly talk bout the evils of propaganda as something that brainwashes people into a certain way of thinking. Thus, it is dangerous.  This is a point that lends itself to justification of censorship and no-platforming policies of real Fascists and NS, or anyone branded as such, even if they are a jewish faggot.

The majority of lemmings believe this shit and buy into it 100%, however the reactions always differ – some believe this fairy tale and then do everything to avoid wrongthink materials out of fear, all the way up to making retarded arguments like “I don’t need to read Mein Kampf, I already know everything I need about Nazism from the HOLOCAUST!” Others buy into this myth and think that they can use this “magic wand” to forward their agenda. And as is always the case, when one doesn’t understand the purpose of the tool they can never wield it efficiently.

The notion that propaganda is a means of swaying people’s mindset doesn’t account for how propaganda has different uses in different circumstances. When you are a dominant force in society the lemmings follow your will because you represent the status quo, their modus operandi is to go along to get along, so they conform to the status quo put forward by the dominant force. Propaganda, in this case, is a way of solidifying and perpetuating the status quo, which already exists  regardless of propaganda, making it simply the icing on the cake, unless the purpose of the dominant force isn’t to simply maintain its own power.

If the goal of the dominant force is to completely and fundamentally change the outlook of people in society, then the importance of propaganda changes and becomes something more. Propaganda becomes more widespread, more persuasive, it becomes a part of daily life, because the message has to be hammered in day in and day out until you raise a generation of people who are capable of instilling this new type of thinking in their own children, becoming the perpetuators of the new outlook and societal norms. This use of propaganda is intrinsically tied with a Totalitarian phase that is required in altering a society to the core, hence the association of totalitarianism with mass use of propaganda, be it Fascist, National-Socialist or Soviet, hence the liberals drawing parallels between the use of propaganda in these societies. However, once this new generation becomes capable of self-perpetuating these ideals and norms the need for propaganda decreases, just as the totalitarian phase itself.

To sum up, the point in the use of propaganda by an established dominant force in society is to either perpetuate itself (in which case importance of propaganda is low) or change society at the core (importance is high) and then perpetuate that new society (importance is once again low). This is where the misconception on the use of propaganda comes from, as people take the use of propaganda by a dominant force in society as the only way propaganda works – to change one’s outlook, forgetting completely that it only works this way because the force that utilizes propaganda is already dominant and thus the lemmings of society conform to it regardless – they want to go along to get along, so they will take in propaganda messages readily and willingly. It is in this instance, when the masses are pliable and can be molded into something better than their base behavior, or worse, in the case of jewish propaganda in today’s world.

However, fools mistake this particular use of propaganda under certain circumstances as the universal use of propaganda, including as a means of becoming that dominant force. In reality, the dynamics, point and efficiency of propaganda changes when it’s used as a means of achieving dominance. At the very least, it changes when it comes to our struggle, because it is more than just some political shift between already existing and widely accepted social narratives – in contrast to the situation with existing democratic elections.

Modern “democratic states” use propaganda in this fashion of “swaying people” efficiently only because they deal in widely accepted social narratives, the only ones that lemmings are allowed to choose from, like the Republicans vs Democrats in the United States. To us these choices are mute, they are pointless, they are part of the same whole – they cannot bring about effective, qualitative change that we desire, while the ruling System is purposely keeping options that can issue such change out of the equation. All choices it offers are false, all choices given are the status quo with irrelevant meager differences, the kind of differences that lemmings are allowed to “make up their minds about“, under the constant onslaught of propaganda that tries to pull people to either side. Propaganda is here used to maintain the status quo. It does nothing to initiate qualitative change. Lemmings are deluded into thinking they have a choice and are active participants in the political process. Republicans or Democrats – you’re still ruled over by the System, Coke or Pepsi – you’re still drinking soda. All election campaigns and soda advertisements are exactly the same.

Yet some morons think they can use this same method to sway people to thoughts and concepts that exist outside of the status quo, and expect people to be just as easily swayed as between voting for Republicans or Democrats. People accept the false choice because it is still a form of conformity as each choice is backed by a large percentage of the populace and is sanctioned by the System. If you promote ideas that counter the System – you are an outsider and a minority, a fringe force to be excluded from the equation and kept away as far as possible, you are the threat to the status quo and thus a threat to the lemming principle of go along to get along.

Lemmings will never follow you no matter what propaganda you use on them, be it logical with data backing it up or emotional and empathetic – the lemming may agree for the duration of your conversation with them, but the next day they will revert to a conformist position, because they are pressured by everything in their surroundings to do so, including other lemmings, least they be expelled from the System. Such a fate would be as frightful as a death sentence to a mere lemming.

From this we can conclude that propaganda cannot be used as a means of swaying the masses in order to become a dominant force in society. The leverage over the masses is firmly in the hands of the System and cannot be undercut by anything other than the System’s demise. This is obviously a painful conclusion for idiots with high hopes for the mass movement, however that is the the one thing that undermines their entire plan: in order to have mass control over the people you must be the dominant force, but they want to have mass control over people in order to become a dominant force – they can keep trying that till the cows come home or till they bash their skulls open against the pavement in desperation from begging lemmings to join their side.

So how DOES something become a dominant force in society? Those who believe that entryism and mass movement approaches may work are delusional, whereas those who may seem to be successful are only as successful as the System allows them to be, in other words only in so far as what these idiots try to offer society is still part of the System’s plans. It’s all part of the plan, goyim. Notable exception from this would be, once again, Golden Dawn in Greece but as we’ve explained on NOOSE before, their presence in the System’s workshop is foremost to destabilize it and mock it from within – their true power exists entirely outside the official political channels and in part is owed to just how incompetent and self-destructive the System’s lackeys are in Greece, bowing to their masters and their demands elsewhere.

When talking about real, qualitative change, the kind that only hardline Fascists/NS offer, propaganda plays a different role, one that actually stems from understanding of how this tool is utilized. We know we can’t sway the mass opinion in our favor and we know that lemmings are ultimately useless in this struggle until push comes to shove (Race War). In such circumstances, they are simply forced by necessity and desire for self-preservation to hide behind our backs, whereupon we can enforce our will upon them, becoming the only authority they recognize (which is when the lemming principle will finally act in our favor). Thus we don’t even bother with lemmings as such. What we want are other fanatics like ourselves, those who can break from the System’s hold and become truly proactive in the struggle. All these people truly need is that last push.

That is the real point of propaganda if one seeks to become a dominant force in society and exact real, qualitative change. It’s purpose is not to sway people to a different way of thinking, it’s real goal is to give people who already share our outlook that last push they need to finally cross the line and join our ranks. Many people feel something is wrong and can’t quite put their finger on it, and these are the only people on whom propaganda actually works, those who are already seeking answers and solutions, rather than those who are comfortably set in their ways as conformist lemmings. Propaganda isn’t a magic wand, it can’t just immediately turn someone’s outlook upside down, it is simply a call out to people who are already on their way to accepting this view anyway. It gives them the final push over the line, from conformity to the System to the outcast fanatics who can sink the System.

Once these fanatics commit to direct action against the System, by virtue of their success they will be placed in the public spotlight and made aware of to everyone in society, and the more their victories grow from direct action, the more these fanatics become a legitimate force in the eyes of the masses – not by virtue of propaganda calls, but by seeing with their own eyes that these dedicated activists mean business and can deliver. That is the foremost reason to the rise of Golden Dawn, who could deliver help where the government institutions could not, and for the frivolities that had been afforded to Ukrainian nationalists, who took it upon themselves to crash Lenin statues, destroy Russian Federation bank offices and hunt down drug dealers to be publicly humiliated. The fact that these groups could do so with impunity made them a more legitimate force in the eyes of the masses, when compared to the state and their competitors (commies, liberals, what have you).

While morons try to get mass attention to themselves via propaganda to create a mass movement, we use propaganda as a wide net – we try to maximize its spread not in order to get everyone who hears it on our side, but so as to call out to those few, who are already receptive to our message and just need that last incentive to take the plunge. It is a beacon with which we attract those with potential, and thereafter we vet them for those who are real hopefuls, weeding out losers, fakers and larpers.

We cast a wide net, we call out to the few and then distill those numbers even further, until we get only people who can change the world. The fanatics, the uncompromising believers in our cause, in our struggle. We use propaganda to attract quality, not quantity, because an active, dedicated minority has always been the real source of any revolution and societal change, for better or worse. Meanwhile those who misunderstand propaganda think that it will change the way people think to the core and give them a mass movement with which they could then force the System to negotiate terms and only then consider a confrontation against it. Wishful thinking of the worst kind, one that will leave its practitioners holding the bag alone, with not one lemming ready to stand by their side when push comes to shove for their failed movement.

Only thing left to say on the matter is how mass movement morons are in fact undermining our efforts, or rather, delaying them. By offering hopeful activists a fake way out with less effort they give them false hope as to a non-radical solution, allowing them to set again in the comfortable lemming existence. This was touched upon by our regular contributor Max Macro in his article “Trump Cucks“.

This gives people false hope in methods for change that require less effort but are doomed to fail. This is because they are based on a misunderstanding of the mechanics utilized and engaged in. This diverts the few hopefuls from taking that final step over the line, delaying their progress needlessly, if for no other reason than to indulge oneself in rationalizing “I’ll give this a try and if that doesn’t work out I’m going all in“. These people will join us regardless, once they realize that the hope they were promised was a delusion of morons whom they believed, or if they grow discontent with just how little mass movement people actually do and how they accomplish even less. At best this acts as another step to a vetting process for finding the best of the best who’d become active, radical fanatics in the struggle. At worst this is a delay that needlessly prevents these people from going all in.

Mass Movement morons using propaganda – you’re doing it wrong.

For Fascists/NS propaganda is a push over the line of System conformity to an all out confrontation.

We recently published an article advocating the final solution to our little hebrew problem. Reading the words of Max Macro made me reflect on this issue, and I’d like to share some of the insights I’ve had.

The struggle is eternal

There’s a certain satisfaction to be had in contemplating the absolute destruction of those who are sucking us dry and plotting our destruction. It’s a natural and healthy reflex. The only danger in it is the notion that by destroying our current enemies and competitors, we would be creating a new, eternal age of prosperity and freedom for our people.

Struggle and hardship is something we must always contend with. In all our endeavors, we have to seek to be stronger than the obstacles in front of us, not to make those obstacles disappear. Our current predicament isn’t that we have horrible conditions. Yes, we’re being invaded by third worlders. Yes, we’re being fleeced by jews and traitors. Yes, our economies are being dismantled and shipped to third-world shit-holes. But those problems pale in comparison to the kind of hellish problems our ancestors had to deal with.

The fact is that our woes are rather insignificant, in the grand scheme of things. The invasion could be stopped overnight with some suitably muscular law enforcement. The brown hordes could be deported in a year or two with our current organisational prowess and transport technology. The jews were kicked out countless times in the past, and nothing concrete is preventing us from doing so again. The problem isn’t our situation. We have more resources, technology and manpower than ever before in the past. We just need to harden ourselves to DO IT.

The jew fills an ecological niche

Our civilization is based on trust and hard work. This combination of trust and wealth, however, creates a ecological niche for parasites who can survive by leeching our resources away from us by exploiting our trusting nature.

Jews, as a race, basically became hyper-specialized to inhabit this ecological niche. Their instincts and biological traits got refined over thousands of years to better exploit our society. But hypothetically getting rid of the jews wouldn’t make that ecological niche disappear. It would leave a vacuum just waiting to be filled.

If jews were to somehow disappear, the most likely scenario would be for the worst elements of our own race to fill the niche now vacant. The cycle would then start again, but this time far more difficult to escape, since the enemy would wear the mask of our own people. If we’re close to disaster now, imagine what our descendants will have to deal with when they won’t be able to distinguish between the subversive leeches and their own people.

A long term strategy

Rather than worrying about “exterminating” our enemies down to the last (not that there’s anything morally wrong with that), we should be worrying about removing this ecological niche that springs up as a result of our nature.

The very existence of the jew is helpful in a certain sense. The knowledge of jewish duplicity makes us more vigilant and skeptical. Experience with these hebrews hardens our heart in a way that’s very desirable, if we’re to survive. Their disappearance would ensure that our vigilance would drop and make us vulnerable again to just such corruption in the future.

Perhaps a more fruitful approach would be to shape our culture around the notion of an eternal struggle between the forces of corruption and decay (embodied by the jew) and the aryan spirit of truth and heroism (which the nation does it’s best to inherit). This obviously would not involve having jews within our society. But if they were to exist in some reserve somewhere, under close watch, it would help avoid complacency.

Conclusion

There’s often a conflict between what is expedient and feels right on one hand, and what is ultimately wise on the other hand. It’s very hard for us mortal men to think of the consequences of our actions on future generations, in times when we personally will be long gone. But thinking only of what is immediately convenient is the mentality that’s given us the modern liberal mindset and our present problems.

It’s not within our power at this moment to enact any significant policy, one way or the other. As such discussions about these distant decisions are mainly thought experiments at this point. And of course, in the realm of propaganda there’s not space for subtle distinctions or moderation. But NOOSE isn’t a propaganda outlet destined for the masses, and we can afford to ponder on these far reaching questions as an exercise for future leaders of the various movements engaged in our struggle. One day some of us (or our sons) may have to make these decision. Let us hope we have the wisdom then to make the right one, and avoid letting history repeat itself too soon.

 

In the past I’ve written about how truth is not limited to the intellect. There are certain things which you can’t really explain, but only experience. The most obvious being art. With this fact we must expand on this train of thought, and this leads us to a clash with intellectuals.

First and foremost, an intellectual does not have to be intelligent. There are plenty of smart-looking idiots in the world. Being intellectual is more of a personality trait and anyone can have it. The most glaring examples of smart-looking idiots can be found in modern academia. Talking about how whiteness is a problem, and how we need to raise our children as genderqueer androgynous blobs of fat is very intellectual. But it’s stupid. They can talk for hours about why their special-snowflake opinion is the best opinion but they don’t say anything of worth. This is because they are borderline autistic and thus blind to anything beyond what they can just intellectually understand. They are soul-less, cold golems. It could also be because whether they realize it or not, they don’t actually care about what is true or false, but only about what would – in their view – advance their position in the world. Thus truth doesn’t really have any value for them. Most of the time, it seems to be a mix of both.

As Evola said: ‘‘Representatives of this sort of ”intellectualism” value the brilliant phrase and effective wielding of polemics and dialects far more than the truth. They use ideas as an excuse; it’s important for them to shine, to give the impression of a particularity smart person […] Without a doubt there is a measure of truth in whomever said that amongst all the varieties of idiocy the most disgusting idiocy is that of the intellectuals”, and he wasn’t wrong.

We can see these people clearly in many ”rightist” circles. They can talk for hours and hours about the metaphysical meaning of metapolitical kulturkampf within the samsatic confines of the kali yuga without really realizing what they are on about. As soon as you try to intellectualize something, you kill it. Oswald Spengler wrote that as high culture progresses towards it’s end, it eventually becomes more and more intellectualized, categorized and generally rootless. The racial feeling, the blood, dies out. Just like how de Maistre meant that a good set of laws are short laws and few since you can’t make a law for every single detail and simply need common sense instead. There is also a Chinese proverb, which claims that a virtuous society needs but a few laws, because people of virtue simply don’t have to be told right from wrong. This common sense can’t be explained in intellectual terms. Evola too wrote that intellectual knowledge is only a way to reach understanding by using it as a sort of stepping stone. Esotericism would not be simply digging into obscure books, it would be having  experiences with a higher world.

There is nothing wrong, in and of itself, with using the intellect. What is wrong is to give it an undeserved importance and status as the only way to find truth. The intellect is but a tool, nothing else. It doesn’t matter if you have an IQ of 160 if you still watch anime all day or don’t have an ability to see the actual points of the books you read. This likewise can be seen in ”rightist” circles, where many read Evola but don’t really have an understanding of his work, so they intellectually masturbate about him and warp his quest for the truth as a way to validate their quest for cummies in the brain. Another, perhaps more common example, are modern Priests remaking Jesus into a hippie communist instead of the conqueror that he was.

One of the worst things that intellectualism can do though, is to encourage people to be passive and ”engage in discourse” instead of acting. There are many people out there who when confronted by this fact will spit up an old cliché like ”Oh but National Action are LARPers”, or ”But those people are Feds!”, only to later proceed to post bad memes and circlejerk themselves about how enlightened they are and how they must lead the ”stupid skinheads” when the shit hits the fan. Intellectualism enables these people to sit at home and do nothing as Rome burns. It gives them a fake sense of superiority due to their pathetic egos demanding a boost. Most of the time, they are not more intelligent than the ”stupid skinheads”, but only more intellectual (which is a personality trait, as we established).

Intellectualist argumentation and dialectic is a bad joke. They don’t see their goal as to be humble to the truth and do their best to understand it and manifest it in the world, they care only about making sure the other guy agrees with their intellectual construct, and naturally the other guy wants the same from them. So they continue for hours, repeating the same things over and over again in overly pretentious voices and using ten times the words they need to describe their point, all to appear smarter than they actually are. In some cases they even agree with each other but don’t realize it, because they use a slightly different wording, or go at it from slightly different angles. Again – useless.

Most “paradoxes” showcase this kind of intellectualist mindset. In fact, Greek philosopher Zeno came up with a number of Paradoxes to explicitly mock his peers and their intelligence, providing intellectualist thinking that is self-evidently wrong, and we know it is wrong from experience. One could argue that this article is a Paradox as well since I use intellectual means (the written word) to combat intellectualism. But the difference here is that this article isn’t made for it’s own sake, but for the point behind it.

There is nothing wrong with spreading your ideas, if your ideas are actually true. To know what is true and what is false is not the mission of the pure intellect. It’s simply a tool, a ladder, to reach this understanding, this view. In my experience, semi-serious arguments can be good at this if you actually are motivated by finding out if something makes sense or not, but this is not what argumentation is used for anymore. It has only became a tool for intellectual masturbating and has no substance in it. You can not intellectually understand certain things – as I’ve said before – because certain things are superior to the intellect. You can’t see what’s behind a wall if you just stare at the wall, no matter how sharp your eyes are. This is where faith comes in, and how faith is regarded in Christianity. You can’t intellectually know if there is a god or not, but you can see and understand that there is one, and to do that requires this faith, this fire in your heart that tells you what’s true and what’s false, what is right and what is wrong. ”And he said, Come. And when Peter was come down out of the ship, he walked on the water, to go to Jesus” Matthew 14:29.

The funny thing is that modern intellectuals, the rapefugee huggers and the genderbender professors see themselves as wise and enlightened, as gods handing out gifts to their subjects, the sandpeople from the east. They don’t realize that these sandpeople are not harmless (in fact, we respect them more since we realize they are a threat) and this will, if they are successful, go right back at them. Could you imagine a Salafi Jihadist respecting some androgynous blob of fat’s pronouns? No, he’ll slaughter that cow. Intellectuals seem to have a tendency to simply be purged when they have served their role as useful idiots. The furries would be tossed to the furies.

With this in perspective, we simply can’t afford to hang ourselves up on details, details which really are a consequence of too much intellectualism and the inherent insecurity of people who simply want a label to show off. It doesn’t matter if you call yourself a Fascist, National Socialist, alt-righter, Traditionalist, Reactionary or TradCat. We all have the same goal, the same spirit, and the same inextinguishable fire that just demands to throw all these empty, soulless societies into fire and brimstone and create something new, something pure and beautiful. In a few years Germans will be a minority in their own country among the youth, and I would not be surprised if Swedes already are in the youngest age group.

This is not the time to sperg about semantics, this is the time to act. And that is what we should be best at doing. Intellectualism usually creates rifts that are not really there to start with among people who want to save the White Race. There is a reason why ISIS has disallowed major religious discussion among their followers, because they know that will open up a Pandora’s box of division. The intellectual constructs are irrelevant, what matters is the spirit in them.

Our society has been poisoned with this very intellectualism. It slithers in like a snake and injects it’s poison in everything sacred. Our military is cucked. Our church (in Sweden) is transexual priest tier cucked. Our art is cucked. It’s rotting away. You can be a Professor in European Art without even looking at a single Rembrandt. But as the saying goes ”A picture is worth a thousand words”.

The sick fascination some people have with the intellect is literally autism and quite frankly very semitic.

 

At this point we here, on NOOSE, have already criticized White Pathology and White Nationalism. Let’s go a step further and strike at the linchpin of these topics, with a criticism of the so-called “White Identity“. It’s a concept which, naturally, could arise only in the United States, and which actively poisons pretty much everything it touches. And this is regardless of if it’s used by the “Left” or the “Right” – although it has been more beneficial to our enemies.

The only reason why the notion of “White Race” – and thus “White Identity” – exists, is because of the unique racial situation in the United States. There, you have a great collection and mixing of ethnicities and races on the same soil under the paper-citizenship identity of “American“. In some ways it could be argued that the concepts of “American” and “White” are at odds with each other. The former represents the victory of the classic liberal nation-state concept, where any citizen of the state is part of the nation, and culture is defined by the state and the man-made ideas it was built on. The latter represents an attempt to make a distinction within that body that excludes the racial and ethnic groups commonly referred to as the minorities, or the non-whites. The only way to create such a, more or less, unified, cohesive body, was to go back to a common denominator, and under such circumstances that denominator actually went back further than a biological racial conception to a supra-racial one – that’s the origins of the “White Race“. Thus you have the division between the “Whites” and “minorities” in USA.

The core problem with this, is the need for a common denominator which demands broader generalization, which is rather the goal of our enemies that repeat bullshit like “only one race – the human race“. The broader you go the more unique traits you have to deny in order to include all the groups you want, washing away any particular distinctions. Thus “White” becomes a negation of everything else. Therein lies the origin of these bullshit stereotypes that exist in the USA about how “bland” and “boring” “white people” are – because the term reduces everyone in it to a commonality devoid of any real cultural traits. This is because “white” Americans don’t have a real connection to the culture of their ancestors, and otherwise fall back on the dominant state-culture.

Another issue is how proponents of “White Identity” try to make it stretch out beyond the borders of USA to Europe as well. Had this been an attempt to create something new and organic in USA then it could be something promising. Americans need an anti-state-culture identity with “blood and soil” potential – one that will go against the entire premise of what the US stands for at the core, and will compromise on nothing less than its total destruction. However the very name does not lend itself to just being an American thing.

American SJW crowd fully exploit the concept of “Whiteness” and “White Identity” in their own narratives, from Noel Ignatiev’s infamous “we have to do away with whiteness“, to Portland Community College’s “Whiteness History Month” from April 6th, 2016, having a discussion on how kids in school are told to bring “artifacts of their culture to share with the class” and the white kids coming up to the teacher, saying “I don’t have a  culture“. Of course the jewy looking old hag that brought up this point, colored it in a narrative of how “not having a culture” gives one power as it means being “normal“. That bullshit aside, it does bring up a point of how Americans don’t have a culture in the same sense the minorities have cultures, but only because the minorities stay true to their actual ethnic cultural background (niggers are a separate issue however), while the generalized “white” Americans have only state-culture to fall back on. Nobody in their right mind would say that Germans or Anglo-Saxons don’t have a culture – yet those are two predominant groups of “whites” in the US. They are stuck between having to adhere to some imaginary “American” state-culture, or the alternative concept of “white identity” that tries to bring the two groups together under one term. But this negates their respective ethno-cultural differences entirely in favor of broader commonalities, leaving only something bland and undefined in their place, something that truly doesn’t have a culture.

The SJW criticism likewise shows how purely rooted in  the US reality all of this is: in Germany it’s perfectly imaginable for kids to be told to do a report on the culture of their own people, and German culture is the “normal” in Germany – that doesn’t mean that they don’t have a culture. This kind of confusion exists only in USA and the notion of “White Identity” is not helping matters. Worse still is how certain imbeciles now attempt to export this American notion to Europe with statements like “One of the most important trends in world history is the development of a Homogenous European Man. We need something like a European Union, or, in the east, a Russian Empire. Ethno-Nationalism is backwards-looking idea.” Take note European nationalists, you apparently have to discard ethnic nationalism entirely and strive for a European Mystery Meat “homogenous man“, following the example of the American White Mystery Meat. Naturally someone with no comprehension of blood and soil nationalism and organic culture would deem those things completely unimportant, unification on generalization towards a broader common denominator will save Europe, you fools!

As we’ve covered earlier, generalization is the path of our enemies. The “White Identity” concept is but a step away from going full-on cosmopolitan: “only one race – the human race“. We follow the reverse path of particularization, going from the broader to the more specific. Yes, we’re all humans, but we’re more than that. Yes, we belong to the same race, but we’re more than that. Yes we belong  to the same ethnicity, but there’s more than that – and so it goes until we build up truly unique individuals with a specific place in this world as per their innate nature. Whomever claims that ethnic nationalism is a “backwards-looking idea” literally misses the entire point of the struggle and uses the same line of thinking as our enemies.

This is brought on by a desire to see European unity but at the expense of what actually defines Europe in favor of some generalized “Homogenous European Man“. Obviously there is nothing to fear as this idea will die back where it first appeared, in the USA. No European Nationalist will stand for rejection of their respective ethnic culture or deny blood and soil nationalism. Some scars from fraternal wars in Europe must be addressed in order to achieve unity – one can’t just pretend that they didn’t happen at all.

What Europe needs for unity has already been outlined by several European NS/Fascist figures – Europe a Nation or Europe of Fatherlands. The premise behind this unity is the sharing of a common Civilization, which is to culture what Race is to ethnicity (to an extent, there is a distinct civilizational rift between Europe and Russia, despite common racial origins). One does not come at the expense of the other, because we are not moving away from the particular to the general, but from the general to the particular. Europe is most certainly a distinct entity as a Civilization of its own, but it is made up of various cultures that have a common root.

What Europe needs is to enshrine its nature as a Civilization into the form of state, an Imperium, presenting a unified front to anything outside itself whilst maintaining internal ethno-cultural borders and a certain level of autonomy within said borders on internal matters – Europe of Fatherlands. Any European must feel that he simultaneously belongs to a certain Civilization and Race, as well as to a particular Culture and Ethnicity, and not simply feel that he’s a “European” from “Europe” in the same way that “Americans” are from “America“. Frankly, Americans should leave European nationalists to their own devices as to the future of Europe and stop trying to project their own lack of culture as some kind of virtue for unity.

The other issue to take with the notion of “White Identity” is the second word in it – identity. While the concept of “White” appealed to generalization, which is what our enemies aim for, the word identity is literally a buzzword that our enemies use on a daily basis. Identity does not represent anything concrete or rooted in reality, like blood and soil, it is an abstraction. One can thus change their identity on a whim, by choosing to identify with something, even if its fictitious. Bad enough that men identify as women and vice versa, or how some “whites” try to identify as black, some choose to identify as animals, fictional creatures like unicorns, dragons, vampires, ghosts, demons or whatever (including chimeras of different animals), or even as TV and cartoon characters (“fictionkin”).

Thus “White Identity” becomes willful identification with something fictional, making it no different from the examples given prior – the entire thing is inherently incompatible with our worldview. Probably the sole useful thing to come out of the introduction of the word “White” was its simplicity in use for discourse and debate, as opposed to the technically correct alternative that does not stray from reality: Races of Aryan descent. There can be a lot of nitpicking on the subject and this can easily become a debate over semantics. However the primary criticism on its actual use stands: as a fictional identity that leads to generalization by means of rejecting ethnic differences, which could only come from USA, where people of Aryan descent have forgotten their ethnic cultures and comes as an alternative to the soulless state-culture of the American Dream, the Constitution, the Founding Fathers, of man-made ideas, written laws and their authors.

An alternative is indeed crucial for Americans, but it must foremost seek to establish something organic as opposed to the artificial Leviathan that is the United States, thus its total destruction becomes paramount. What can come out of the ashes is anyone’s guess and there have been many ideas thrown around, from an Anglo-Saxon state being formed, to the balkanization of the country. Regardless, the only road to something real, organic, natural forming on the territory of modern-day US must come from its demise, a notion that has been outlined in some details under the name of American Futurism.

The bottom line is this: if Americans want to figure out who they actually are they must stop relying on fictional and paper identities. Just being “White” is not good enough.