DEMANDERS

DEMANDERS

Beggars can’t be choosers. Fascists, however, are neither. We are Demanders, and we can’t afford to be anything less.

BEGGARS

Politicians are prostitutes. They go on stages, on TV, shake your hand and kiss your baby, they say sweet nothings in your ear and essentially prostrate before you in the hope of getting your vote. They go around begging for as many votes as they can get. “I want to be your first” –Jeb! Bush. But once they get into office they are done with their voters, much like how a prostitute loses all feigned interest in the client once she pockets the money. They use you and discard you, because inevitably elections end and thus the need to grovel. That is how the political system operates for those involved in it. For those that are in fact kept at arm’s length away from it and attempt to go the “mass movement” approach the ride of begging and groveling never ends.

So you’ve decided you’re going to “rally the masses“, wake up the “silent majority” and get their support and thus change the political climate. What that translates to in practice is a nonstop process of begging people to join your cause. It doesn’t stop, because by virtue of this approach it cannot stop until you’ve actually won. And the truth is that you will be forever stuck in a vicious cycle: to win you need the support of the masses, the masses won’t join you until you can show them that you are in fact going to win, but you need the masses to win, but the masses need to see you as a winner to join you. Beggars are not winners.

Mind you, the masses are prostitutes same as the politicians. They whore themselves out to a candidate in hopes that he will give them something back in return, something in his policies or stage promises, and they only give their vote to the candidate that they believe can win and therefor actually pay them back for their prostration to him. The only people whom they think can win are those that are part of the political system and thus have the leverages of power in their hands to dispense the promised goods for their whored out votes. It’s an illusion, as we’ve already established, politicians stop giving any fucks once the election is over, regardless if they lost or won. But if they do win they don’t do shit of what they promised to their voters, and either pursue their own agenda, party politics or the desires of their financial backers.

The mass movement approach is bullshit because you can’t offer the people even an illusion of being able to give them something back. What do you have? You can’t enter the political system and those who still fancy the tactic of entryism can keep stepping on the same rake and look just as pathetic as Nick Griffin did on Question Time. Let the BNP stand as a shining example of why entryism will always fail.

And so will the mass movement approach. Amazingly, we’ve been provided all the answers on our Struggle long ago by its Champions from Hitler and Mein Kampf to James Mason and SIEGE. We should already know all this, and yet here we are again going over all this. It’s a more  or less accepted metaphor by now that the masses are like a woman, and you are going to win her over by begging? The mass approach calls of “[please] join our movement“, “show up for our rally“, “read our policies, you’ll like them” and “see, we’re presentable!” sound no different than “Oh please give me a chance, go out on a date with me, I promise you’ll like it, I’m such a good guy!

The saying “beggars can’t be choosers” really is the slogan of the mass movement, as the goal is to increase quantity, so what does it matter who joins? It’s still a +1, right? That wouldn’t be a problem for any other movement – but ours? In our Struggle? It is devastating as it goes entirely against our principles. The desire for quantity means casting a wide net, it means compromises, it means softening one’s principles and making exceptions, every possible step back until you are left with something bigger but less defined, an amorphous gray blob with no real power to it.

It is this mentality that leads to inconceivably retarded propositions such as the bronies being a source of supporters for the cause. Thus the mass movement approach becomes the preaching of an inclusive tent, to harbor quantity rather than quality, where principles are cast aside in favor of the misguided utilitarian belief in the “strength of the many“. This is fundamentaly based on begging: it is a position of weakness from the start, the position of someone who has no control, no power, no leverage and no strength. Thus, he seeks strength in numbers, and is willing to compromise, whore himself, lower his standards (if he had any to begin with), and essentially extend a hand with a cup out to the world and say out loud “please give me a chance“… And the world simply passes you by with a look of disdain, disgust, sympathy or pity, and the second two won’t grant you victory any more than the first.

CHOOSERS

The appropriate slogan for choosers would be “it’s better than nothing“. This is when you are presented two shit options and you concede that at least one is not as shitty as the other, so might as well grab it. This is begging when you pretend to care for quality. This is the sort of mentality that allows for exceptions to the rules to become the driving principle in gaining support. “Oh this guy is degenerate, but not as degenerate as the rest of them, so I’ll choose him, it’s better than nothing!” “Not all faggots are degenerate, there are homosexuals who are okay, so I’ll choose them, better than nothing!Such bullshit.

More often this is seen in the mentality of voters who can’t seem to find their dreamy candidate on a white horse, so they choose either the next best thing, “the lesser of two evils” or vote for some candidate purely out of protest for another – in Russian Federation State Duma (parliament) elections many people vote for the communist party purely out of protest against Putin regime’s “United Russia” party, because they know the commies won’t ever win majority of the seats or achieve anything of consequence, but so long as United Russia doesn’t get their vote they’re alright with that (despite the fact that the CPRF is controlled opposition so it doesn’t matter anyway). In the United States certain people fell, yet again, for this mentality with the way they now fawn over Trump.

Choosing is the path of least resistance, seeking easy options and a quick way out. If presented with the mere illusion of an opportunity for an easier win they’ll gladly take it to avoid having to do any real work to achieve their goals. Vote for a supposedly based candidate or armed struggle? “Well shucks I’m against democracy/know that it’s a sham but this sure would be an easier way to resolve the problem!” And when it doesn’t resolve one can always justify their bad decisions by saying that some minor progress was made that can be built off of, without realizing that you’ve essentially done nothing and achieved nothing instead of making your own progress to build off.

This is the path of the lazy, of those who lack true conviction and are thus ready to settle at a moment’s notice, whereas people of conviction don’t need a choice, the only choice that matters was already made: do you stand by these principles or not? Regardless of what options may be presented after that point, those who chose integrity will disregard all the illusionary options that would lead them astray and say loudly “it is all or nothing!“. “Better than nothing” is not good enough for our Struggle.

DEMANDERS

Beggars can’t be choosers because they will accept anyone and anything, such is the nature of begging. Choosers choose from whatever is available even if they are only given shit options. Neither is good enough for our struggle and that already speaks to who we Fascists and National-Socialists actually are – we are demanders. We demand quality. We demand integrity, we demand strength.

We don’t go out and beg people to join us, because we know that the majority of people are useless to our cause, they are lemmings and moreover they are weak, they will go along to get along. Most of them won’t provide us any help and will gladly stand to the side, pretending they don’t know us should we lose. We don’t care about public opinion because their opinion is shaped by the status quo, it is shaped by our enemy. Those who concern themselves with presentability and respectability in order to appeal to the masses in practice are trying to appeal to System standards, to the standards of the enemy, thus they have already lost. The only respectability the masses truly care about at the core is strength. The only presentability they care about is vision. When the masses see us as strong and possessing a sense of direction, a vision, they will admire and fear us.

Yet even then they won’t be of any use to us, because they are incapable of parting ways with the society as it stands today. That is because, again, they fear failure and will only gravitate to someone whom they think will win. They are opportunistic in this regard because their own safety and security on an individual level is paramount to them. They might support you from the sidelines but never enough to actually start marching with you, because they fear the System’s punishment. At the end of the day they will still go along to get along and thus they will join us only when our victory is all but assured.

Thus the masses are useless in achieving victory. It is always a small elite, a vanguard, a group of fanatics that do most of the fighting and spearhead the way. “In between the Nazis and the Communists is the great mass of non-fanatics, the TV watchers and the comic book readers” –George Lincoln Rockwell. That is why we don’t beg and we don’t chooseWE DEMAND. A fanatic adheres to a vision and does so without compromises, because he knows that compromise leads to the erosion of his vision. A fanatic doesn’t want just anyone to stand beside him because he knows quantity in itself mean nothing, he wants someone like himself beside him, someone who will fight tooth and nail and will not take a step back. The fanatic declares “you’re either with us or against us” because he has standards, his vision doesn’t allow him to accept anything less than the total and absolute.

To beg people to join and cast a wide net means to obscure and water down that vision and poison the quality and strength of the few with the weakness of the bloated many, thus quantity doesn’t play to strength but to weakness.

To choose between shit options with a conceded “better than nothing” leads to exactly the same thing whilst pretending that it could be worse.

Fanatics demand that one meets the standards of his vision, to maintain its strength and purity. The beggar’s mass movement attempting to appeal to everyone or many different groups has no vision at all by virtue of it becoming obscured by the interests of all other participants. The chooser’s mass movement picking the least unfavorable option available is one that compromises on its vision, which ultimately means that it likewise has no vision.

Compromise is where the Truth goes to Die. One doesn’t argue that 2+2=4 with someone who thinks that it’s 7 and then compromises with them that 2+2=5. Thus alliances likewise don’t work, as they are built on the same method of compromising on your ideals, on your principles, on that vision in favor of quantity.

Mein Kampf, Volume II, Chapter 8: The Strong Man is Mightiest When Alone:

Above all, the new race-based state will never be created by the compromising indecisiveness of a racialist worker-coalition, but only by the iron will of a single movement that has fought its way through all that opposed it.

Hence why we don’t seek quantity. The real fighting is up to the few fanatics, some of the masses may cheer them on but they’ll calmly dispense and say “well it was a good show while it lasted” should the fanatics fail. Sure we make our intentions clear and our message loud, because we want the whole world to hear us. As a result people who have even a tiny bit of initiative in them will seek us out. We don’t wander the streets with an outstretched hand begging. We let everyone know we are here and then wait for those interested to come to us, but we don’t choose from what’s available when they do come – we demand. Prove that you are up to the challenge, prove that you are loyal to our vision and have what it  takes.

This isn’t an inclusive tent. This is an exclusive club. You think you’re getting in this house? You’re never getting in this house. You’re too fucking old, fatty, and you… you’re too fucking… BLOND! GET OFF MY PORCH!

White Power, Chapter 2: Spiritual Syphilis:

“He actually convinced me he wanted to try to be a Storm trooper!

As a matter of policy, whenever I hear that (as I do every day), I do all I can to discourage the applicant. We want no dabblers, but dedicated, fanatical fighters who will STICK through hell itself. With this crazy character, I went even further. I made fun of him. I told him he’d never make it, that we’d run him off the first day.

He rose to the challenge.

“You name it, and I’ll make it!” he said.

Strangely, I could sense a fiercely burning WILL behind the words. I told him he couldn’t come up to try life as a Nazi Storm-trooper until he was eighteen. He left, vowing to return in a few months. He did return – without the beatnik get-up. He turned out to be a blonde, young Viking, built for combat.

We poured it to him.

There was no place left inside for him to sleep. So he was assigned to a wrecked car out back. It was still winter and cold. But the kid moved into the wrecked car with a couple of blankets. We put him to work cleaning the toilets, and yard.

He worked.

Spring came, and then a broiling summer. He was still in the wrecked car, eaten alive by mosquitoes. I tried him on the printing press, and never saw such a bear for work. He was all dried out of booze, off the pills and dope, exercising plenty, and showing every sign of ‘making it.’ “

Our policy must be always that of exclusion, hence, let me say this again, why we are not beggars or choosers, we are DEMANDERS. We must spread our word far and wide so that people come to us and when they do we must make sure they are up to the task. By forcing them to come to us rather than trying to include everyone we make sure that only the truly interested come, thus excluding the go along to get along crowd of lemmings.  What must happen next is further weeding out of undesirable elements, the degenerates, the cowards, the LARPers and the mentally handicapped. The true fanatic of our struggle will face hardship sooner or later – he may face imprisonment, bodily harm, his family disowning him, exclusion from the System (losing their job or getting booted from their place of education) and finally death. These are the very real possible consequences of being a man of conviction and these are exactly the things that all undesirable elements are afraid of unless they are delusional.

Take the mentioned above method of testing applicants, consider the various traditions of hazing, or look to the informal approach of National Action, which drives away the hardcore LARPers who think they’re about to join something like the American NSM, thinking they’ll get to march in fancy uniforms and roleplay hard before going back home and resuming their lemming life. This is how you forge a movement of real fanatics that will actually go out and take ACTION against the enemy. “[Action] has the effect of leaving the fakers and the parasites standing alone and exposed as in the middle of a forty-acre field. It is electrifying. It is unifying. It builds the confidence to on towards even greater things” –James Mason.

Want to see what happens when your movement is made up of unknown variables that you let through the open door? Look at what happened to the antifa in Dover. Once the police line was broken only the fanatics remained who were at the very front of the crowd – the rest ran, because the rest were hobbyists and LARPers, who had only come out because they thought it was going to be a fun event where they can strut around and feel important, nice and safe behind the police line, and later they’d all hit the pub and have fun. The antifa that stayed around for the real confrontation experienced this for themselves:

“Unfortunately, despite some on twitter claiming “victory” because a handful of fascist got bloodied by rocks and stones, the fact is this wasn’t a victory at all. Part of the reason for this is because so many of the antifascists present were not street fighters and were not up for engaging the fascists in hand-to-hand fighting. Playing the big boy behind the police, when the fascists broke through many of them turned tail and fled leaving the few such as myself willing to stand toe-to-toe with them to get outnumbered and take a beating.”

wpTQUJm

Funny as it is to witness happen to the antifa, those who kid themselves with notions of inclusive tents, alliances and mass movement appeal will inevitably end up in the exact same predicament. The hobbyists, the LARPers, the degenerates will run, they will always run. Only the fanatics will stay. Unfortunately for our enemies they are entirely rooted in notions of inclusiveness. We, however, are not.

If you still need more convincing then I suggest you read the first IronMarch Revolutionary Fascist Manual – Mental Liberation, as well as James Mason’s SIEGE, or fuck it, any real hardline Fascist/NS materialsthey all point to the same answers.

But try to take away at least this much: beggars project great weakness, choosers project lack of integrity. No one is coming to help us, we are all there is and it is time to rise up to that challenge instead of seeking strength in numbers. Stop being self-conscious about how you are seen when the enemy dictates what looks presentable and respectable, that game is rigged against you. The only things that have universal and deep rooted presentability and respectability are Strength and Vision – the hallmarks of a fanatic, the hallmarks of someone who doesn’t accept what he sees around him, of someone who doesn’t accept anything less than total commitment to a singular vision, of someone who doesn’t conform or compromise. We are demanders. We demand from ourselves, we demand from others, we demand from life itself.

You are either with us or against us.

7 thoughts on “DEMANDERS”

  1. Very Explanatory and Concise, all that needs to be said and nothing more.
    Stand by you’re principles at any cost, because any deviation/compromise is the death of the cause.

  2. It is already War. It didn’t end in 1945. Becourse in Holland they restarted it from 1995. By Hunting on children of right winged families. When they get the chanche, they take away your children. It happend to me and i do not care what other arguments they tell.

    1. Do you mean they took you away from your parents or your children from you? Either way you could submit that story to us so that everyone knows how the grave the situation can get.

      1. They took away my Son. It took 5 years. They manupilate the reports. The judges have already take their judgement before you can defend yourself or your child. In my case.., when the Judge found out, he had nothing to stand on, he just shut my mouth. Their tactics went slow. First they create a lot of stress by wich you change. You live day in day out in fear to loose your child. But the worst thing is; you dont realise they break you ot that you are already been broken. Becourse on that moment you have no ideer whats going on. You have no rest and make mistakes. Slowly you get social isolated. Going to drink and use maruhana. Whatever their manipulated reports say about me, whatever the surrounding area saw about me, they seen just frictions of what was happening. They judge, but they can’t. I am alone and stay alone, but i know, i am not lonely.

  3. This is inspiring but its important to be WORTHY of demanding isnt it? Lurking on the IM forum and even in this article there is the stink of resentment for our people for not being all they should be. This is not unjustified, but too often it leads to a ‘fuckem’ attitude that only harms us and twists us into rabid dogs if we let it. I do agree with what you wrote though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *